State money for Santa Fe firetruck sparks debate on lobbying outside of city council
Capital outlay the New Mexico Legislature set aside earlier this year for two new Santa Fe firetrucks sparked a recent debate at City Hall over whether councilors should individually lobby state lawmakers.
Councilor Signe Lindell raised concerns during a Finance Committee meeting last week after questioning where the $2.4 million budgeted for the trucks had come from.
Fire Chief Brian Moya said the firefighters union had lobbied lawmakers directly for the funds after the new trucks didn't make it on the city's legislative wishlist.
Councilor Pilar Faulkner, a professional lobbyist, interjected, saying she had worked with the union to help secure state capital outlay for the firetrucks and that Moya was not involved. She had "no regrets," she added.
Lindell, appearing perturbed, indicated the move to secure the state funds was out of bounds. "It just seems like we're not playing as a team," she said, "and somebody's got to address that."
She pointed out the vehicles had not been listed among the city's legislative funding requests and had not been presented to councilors as a priority last year when they were considering a spate of one-time allocations using surplus gross receipts tax revenue. She also complained repeatedly during the meeting her District 1 didn't receive any infrastructure funding from the state for the next fiscal year.
Councilor Carol Romero-Wirth also objected, describing Faulkner and the union's lobbying as an "end run" around the City Council.
"We really need to not do that in the future," she said, adding the council has to make hard choices every year about what to prioritize.
But Faulkner, the city's contracted lobbyist and at least one local state lawmaker all noted the Legislature's capital outlay process gives legislators and the governor — not the city — discretion over how to divvy the infrastructure funds in their control.
Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, for instance, allocated $5 million last year for upgrades to Fort Marcy park. The request had not been on the city's wish list and appeared to be part of the governor's desire to help beautify the state's capital city.
This year, the governor allocated $10 million for an abortion clinic to be established somewhere in Northern New Mexico — a move that raised the ire of Republicans.
"The capital outlay process is completely discretionary, and lawmakers alone decide where they want to put their resources for that year," city lobbyist J.D. Bullington said Wednesday, adding lawmakers for major municipalities such as Santa Fe often coordinate on how to allocate their shares.
'I have no regrets'
The city received a combined $525,000 from Rep. Reena Szczepanski and Sen. Linda Trujillo, both Santa Fe Democrats, for a new fire engine for Station 3. It also received $1.5 million from Lujan Grisham and another $400,000 from the Legislature for a new ladder truck for Station 7.
Lindell said the total $2.4 million in the city's proposed budget for fiscal year 2026 took her by surprise.
Ahead of the legislative session each year, the City Council approves a resolution outlining its legislative priorities, which includes a laundry list of funds for capital projects — some for the city overall and some for each council district. The requests are based on the city's Infrastructure Capital Improvement Plan, which ranks funding needs. The city received about $6 million for its projects, and a total of more than $18 million for projects it will oversee as the fiscal sponsor.
While the firetrucks were a top priority for the fire department, they didn't make the city's shortlist.
Moya took the blame for catching the council off guard.
The fire department union had successfully lobbied the Legislature in the past for money for self-contained breathing apparatuses, he said, and decided to try its hand again.
'I did not communicate clearly with the mayor the union was going to request for these firetrucks to be purchased," Moya said.
Faulkner said she helped the union with the effort, something she felt was necessary this year because of the long lead time to get the trucks built and delivered to Santa Fe — at least two to three years. She pointed out some of the city's older vehicles will be aging out in the coming years.
"If we kept postponing building the trucks, we were going to have trucks that don't work with no trucks coming in," she said. "That is all on me, and I take 100% responsibility for it, and I'm glad that I did it, and I have no regrets."
'The pie is only so big'
While Lindell had argued her district was left out of legislative allocations, one District 1 project did get partially funded. The city requested $1 million for the replacement of a pedestrian bridge at Shelby Street and received $250,000 from Democratic Senate Majority Leader Peter Wirth's share of capital outlay.
Lindell conceded in a Wednesday interview she had been mistaken.
"I was uninformed, and I misspoke on that," she said, adding she is "very grateful" for the bridge funding.
Still, she stood by her disapproval of "outside lobbying."
"I think it's inappropriate," she said Wednesday.
It's unfair to the rest of the city, Lindell argued, because it takes away money that could be going toward projects councilors have identified as top priorities.
"The pie is only so big, and if you add stuff in, you take away from what we had agreed on as a council are our priorities," she said.
Faulkner said she understands the reasoning behind the council's resolution laying out its priorities — but she doesn't feel beholden to it.
"The reality is, we have every right as councilors to lobby for things we think would be best for our district, whether it's in the ICIP list or not," she said.
She also pushed back on Lindell's assertion money for new firetrucks took something away from the city: "That's a benefit for the whole city," she said.
Faulkner in recent months has been the most vocal supporter on the City Council for the police and fire departments and has been actively lobbying for more stringent public safety ordinances.
She co-sponsored a resolution with Mayor Alan Webber last year to restrict sitting or standing in narrow city medians and is working with Councilors Lee Garcia and Amanda Chavez on a package of public safety bills focused on curbing reckless driving and other crimes.
'Line in the sand'
Faulkner said it is an "open secret" some Santa Fe-area lawmakers are frustrated with how slowly the city moves forward with construction projects funded with state capital outlay, leaving funds unspent for long periods of time. She also noted one lawmaker did not allocate any money to a city project this year.
Unspent capital outlay has been an ongoing frustration among lawmakers across New Mexico, with backlogs growing to nearly $6 billion.
Rep. Linda Serrato, D-Santa Fe, said Wednesday she did not give any money to the city except the $300,000 she allocated for Phase 3 of Tierra Contenta, a south-side development led by Homewise Inc. that will include a large share of affordable housing. She cited her frustrations with the city over its failure to spend previous legislative allocations for a sewer line connection on Jemez Road, a neighborhood that long has been waiting for service.
"It is incomprehensible to me why they cannot get a sewer line," Serrato said, especially as the city spends millions of dollars in reserve funding and unanticipated gross receives tax revenue.
She described the sewer line project as her "line in the sand" and said she has made clear to city officials she will not give money to more of its projects until the sewer line is complete.
'I cannot in good conscience give New Mexican dollars when it is not being spent on essential services for my community," she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
34 minutes ago
Election conspiracy theorist sticks by false 2020 claims in defamation trial
DENVER -- One of the nation's most prominent election conspiracy theorists, MyPillow founder Mike Lindell, stuck by his false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen while testifying Monday during a defamation trial over statements he made about a former official for a leading voting equipment company. Taking the stand for the first time during the trial, Lindell denied making any statements he knew to be false about Eric Coomer, the former product strategy and security director for Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems. Among other things, Lindell accused Coomer of being 'a part of the biggest crime this world has ever seen." Lindell also distanced himself from a story told by a conservative podcaster who accused Coomer of helping to rig the 2020 election. It was discussed during a 2021 symposium Lindell hosted to discuss election fraud. Lindell said he did not know about the story before it was discussed onstage at the event and only learned about it during the trial. Coomer said his career and life have been destroyed by statements Lindell made about him and allowed to be promoted through his online media platform, Frankspeech. During sometimes rambling testimony in federal court in Denver, Lindell painted himself as the victim of 'lawfare' — when people are sued to scare them into silence. Several conservative news organizations, including Fox News, Newsmax and One America News, have settled defamation lawsuits from voting machine companies over allegations that they promoted falsehoods about the 2020 presidential election. In 2021, Newsmax also apologized to Coomer for airing false allegations against him. Nevertheless, Lindell said he hoped his trial would lead people to look at what happened in the election and get rid of electronic voting machines, which have been targeted in a web of conspiracy theories. Reviews, recounts and audits in the battleground states where Trump contested his 2020 loss all affirmed Democrat Joe Biden's victory. Trump's own attorney general at the time said there was no evidence of widespread fraud, and Trump and his allies lost dozens of court cases seeking to overturn the result. Lindell said he never accused Coomer of rigging the election, but he testified that Coomer's claims led Newsmax to block him from being able to go on air to talk about voting machines. 'You're part of the biggest coverup of the biggest crime the world has ever seen,' he said to the Coomer lawyer questioning him, Charles Cain. Lindell said he used to be worth about $60 million before he started speaking out about the 2020 election, and now he has nothing and is $10 million in debt. 'I believe what you did to me and MyPillow was criminal,' he said to Cain during questioning. Both Cain and U.S. District Judge Nina Wang had to remind Lindell several times to listen to the questions and only provide the answers to them, rather than head off on tangents. During the trial, Coomer's attorneys have tried to show how their client's life was devastated by the series of conspiracy theories about him. Lindell was comparatively late to seize on Coomer, not mentioning him until February 2021, well after his name had been circulated by other Trump partisans. Coomer said the conspiracy theories cost him his job, his mental health and the life he'd built and said Lindell's statements were the most distressing of all. He specifically pointed to a statement on May 9, 2021, when Lindell described what he believed Coomer had done as 'treason.' Asked by his attorney what he wants out of the trial, Coomer said he would like an apology, compensation and 'a chance of rehabilitating my public image.' Lindell's attorneys argued that Coomer's reputation was already in tatters by the time Lindell mentioned him — partly because of Coomer's own Facebook posts disparaging Trump, which the former Dominion employee acknowledged were 'hyperbolic' and had been a mistake. 'Your reputation was shattered long before Mr. Lindell said a word about you,' Chris Katchouroff said to Coomer. Katchouroff noted that Lindell also is known for making hyperbolic statements and that what he said about Coomer was simply the result of his sincere concern over vote-rigging in the 2020 presidential election — a claim for which there is no evidence.
an hour ago
Minnesota budget deal cuts health care for adults who entered the US illegally
ST. PAUL, Minn. -- Adults living in the U.S. illegally will be excluded from a state-run health care program under an overall budget deal that the closely divided Minnesota Legislature convened to pass in a special session Monday. Repealing a 2023 state law that made those immigrants eligible for the MinnesotaCare program for the working poor was a priority for Republicans in the negotiations that produced the budget agreement. The Legislature is split 101-100, with the House tied and Democrats holding just a one-seat majority in the Senate, and the health care compromise was a bitter pill for Democrats to accept. The change is expected to affect about 17,000 residents. After an emotional near four-hour debate, the House aroved the bill 68-65. Under the agreement, the top House Democratic leader, Melissa Hortman, of Brooklyn Park, was the only member of her caucus to vote yes. The bill then went to the Senate, where it passed 37-30. Democratic Majority Leader Erin Murphy, of St. Paul, called it 'a wound on the soul of Minnesota,' but kept her promise to vote yes as part of the deal, calling it "among the most painful votes I've ever taken." Democratic Gov. Tim Walz, who insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, has promised to sign the legislation, and all 13 other bills scheduled for action in the special session, to complete a $66 billion, two-year budget that will take effect July 1. 'This is 100% about the GOP campaign against immigrants,' said House Democratic Floor Leader Jamie Long, of Minneapolis, who voted no. 'From Trump's renewed travel ban announced this week, to his effort to expel those with protected status, to harassing students here to study, to disproportionate military and law enforcement responses that we've seen from Minneapolis to L.A., this all comes back to attacking immigrants and the name of dividing us.' But GOP Rep. Jeff Backer, of Browns Valley, the lead author of the bill, said taxpayers shouldn't have to subsidize health care for people who aren't in the country legally. Backer said California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has proposed freezing enrollment for immigrants without legal status in a similar state-funded program and that Illinois' Democratic governor, JB Pritzker, has proposed cutting a similar program. He said residents can still buy health insurance on the private market regardless of their immigration status. 'This is about being fiscally responsible,' Backer said. Enrollment by people who entered the country illegally in MinnesotaCare has run triple the initial projections, which Republicans said could have pushed the costs over $600 million over the next four years. Critics said the change won't save any money because those affected will forego preventive care and need much more expensive care later. 'People don't suddenly stop getting sick when they don't have insurance, but they do put off seeking care until a condition gets bad enough to require a visit to the emergency room, increasing overall health care costs for everyone,' Bernie Burnham, president of the Minnesota AFL-CIO, told reporters at a news conference organized by the critics. Walz and legislative leaders agreed on the broad framework for the budget over four weeks ago, contrasting the bipartisan cooperation that produced it with the deep divisions at the federal level in Washington. But with the tie in the House and the razor-thin Senate Democratic majority, few major policy initiatives got off the ground before the regular session ended May 19. Leaders announced Friday that the details were settled and that they had enough votes to pass everything in the budget package.
an hour ago
New York lawmakers approve bill that would allow medically assisted suicide for the terminally ill
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Terminally ill New Yorkers would have the legal ability to end their own lives with pharmaceutical drugs under a bill passed Monday in the state Legislature. The proposal, which now moves to the governor's office, would allow a person with an incurable illness to be prescribed life-ending drugs if he or she requests the medication and gets approval from two physicians. A spokesperson for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said she would review the legislation. The New York Senate gave final approval to the bill Monday night after hours of debate during which supporters said it would let terminally ill people die on their own terms. 'It's not about hastening death, but ending suffering,' said state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a Democrat who sponsored the proposal. Opponents have argued the state should instead improve end-of-life medical care or have objected on religious grounds. 'We should not be in the business of state-authorized suicide,' said state Sen. George Borrello, a Republican. The state Assembly passed the measure in late April. The proposal requires that a terminally ill person who is expected to die within six month make a written request for the drugs. Two witnesses would have sign the request to ensure that the patient is not being coerced. The request would then have to be approved by the person's attending physician as well as a consulting physician. The legislation was first introduced in 2016, Hoylman-Sigal said, though it has stalled year after year in the New York statehouse. Dennis Poust, executive director of the New York State Catholic Conference, which has opposed the measure, said 'This is a dark day for New York State." Eleven other states and Washington, D.C., have laws allowing medically assisted suicide, according to Compassion & Choices, an advocacy organization that backs the policy. Corinne Carey, the group's local campaign director, said lawmakers had 'recognized how important it is to give terminally ill New Yorkers the autonomy they deserve over their own end-of-life experiences.' 'The option of medical aid in dying provides comfort, allowing those who are dying to live their time more fully and peacefully until the end,' said Carey.
