2024 Mercedes-AMG GT63 S E Performance Is an 831-HP 4-Door Hot Rod
Up front, you'll find the same 630-hp turbocharged V-8 that sent the 2019 GT63 S to 60 mph in 2.8 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 11.0 seconds at 125 mph. But at the rear, a 201-hp electric motor joins the party, powered by a 5-kWh battery and mated to its own two-speed transmission. The hybrid GT63 weighs in at 5252 pounds, a 570-pound gain over its predecessor. AMG minimized the PHEV poundage by making the tactical decision to disregard EV range and optimize the battery for performance. Thus the lithium-ion high-voltage battery weighs just 196 pounds, and the E Performance has an EPA-rated range of one mile. As comically bad as that sounds, the E Performance must be exceptionally inept at the EPA's test regimen, because even that small of a battery should be good for more than a mile of range—we saw an onboard range prediction of eight miles with a full charge.
Those extra 570 pounds have a negligible impact on the E Performance's handling and braking, perhaps because the rearward position of the hybrid hardware imparts a slightly rear-biased weight distribution, with 49.3 percent of the car's mass sitting over the front axle versus 53.9 percent for the nonhybrid GT63 S. (The rear-cargo-area floor is bumped up to accommodate the hybrid components, dropping cargo volume from 16 to 12 cubic feet.) The 2019 GT63 S generated 1.03 g's on the skidpad and stopped from 70 mph in 155 feet, while the E Performance clings to the skidpad with 1.02 g's of grip and hauls down from 70 mph in 158 feet; both wore similar 21-inch Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tires. These numbers fall squarely into the category of "different, but probably not so you'd notice."
What you do notice is the difference in acceleration. The GT63 S E Performance torches 60 mph in 2.4 seconds and trips the quarter-mile lights in 10.5 seconds at 131 mph. The nine-speed automatic uses a wet clutch rather than a torque converter, so launch control involves a real-deal clutch drop that torments all four tires as the contact patches struggle with a combined 831 horsepower and 1032 pound-feet of torque. The bonkers acceleration flattens out a bit as the electric motor nears its 13,500-rpm max and the rear transmission grabs second gear, which felt like it was around 60 mph even though Mercedes says the shift should happen around 87 mph (we noticed the upshift in the S63 E Performance as well). When the electric motor grabs its taller gear, the spike in acceleration feels like a turbo overboost function or a wee shot o' nitrous. Good fun, in other words.
Mercedes says that it developed the E Performance's battery in collaboration with High Performance Powertrains, the British Formula 1 engine manufacturer, so it's unsurprising that the battery's output characteristics are tailored for racetracks rather than long commutes. For example, the battery can sate the 201-hp appetite of the motor for only 10 seconds, at which point output drops to a continuous 94 horsepower. (If that sounds like a problem, we'd encourage you to report back after you find a place where you can go wide open in a GT63 S for more than 10 seconds.) The battery enjoys an elaborate cooling system, with roughly four gallons of coolant routed to individually cool all 1200 cells and maintain a temperature of 113 degrees Fahrenheit. Rapid discharging and recharging is the name of the game—in Sport, Sport+, or Race mode, the V-8 will charge the battery as you drive, and regenerative braking can send more than 100 kilowatts to the battery. The slowest way to charge the battery? By plugging it in. But if you find an EV-only garage spot and want to take advantage, the GT63's onboard charger is good for 3.7 kilowatts.
Given the complication of the powertrain—two sources of propulsion, two transmissions—it's amazing how harmoniously everything cooperates. There is no slack, no lurching confusion anywhere in the system. Check the E Performance's ridiculous top-gear 30-to-50-mph passing time: 1.9 seconds, which might be less time than it takes to say, "Uusikaupunki," the town in Finland where the GT63 is built. That sprint knocks 0.9 second off the nonhybrid GT63 S's time and matches the time posted by the Ferrari 296GTB. But conversely, in Comfort mode, the E Performance can settle down, mute its active exhaust, and slur its shifts like a decent member of society, if you're in the mood for that sort of thing.
If you do find yourself on a track, the GT63 offers endless ways to tailor the car to your liking. Care to destroy some tires? There's a Drift mode that disconnects the front axle, and yes, you can combine it with launch control if you're looking to lay stripes into the next county. The AMG Dynamics settings influence the stability-control system, the all-wheel-drive system, and the electronically controlled limited-slip rear differential, and it's telling that the Pro setting isn't even the most aggressive. Beyond it is Master, which is paired with the Race drive mode and sets the rear-axle steering for maximum response on turn-in and delivers slightly oversteer-biased handling. To activate Master mode, you need to turn off stability control using the button on the center console, sort of like the two-key system for arming a nuke. If you do this on a road course, you can also enable the Track Pace function to log lap times and keep yourself informed on how a given lap is going—if your time's in red, you're off your target pace, and if it's in green you're ahead. But hey, no pressure.
Besides adhering to the original AMG tuner performance credo, the GT63 S E Performance evokes the Hammer's sleeper aesthetic too—it's understated, especially for a car capable of hitting 100 mph in 5.9 seconds. But part of that understatement stems from the fact that this generation of four-door Mercedes-AMG GT is now six years old and a semi-familiar sight in the enclaves where such cars are found. In addition, the AMG GT four-door lineup spans a wide breadth of financial territory, and the E Performance hero model looks a lot like a GT43 that has 362 horsepower and costs about half as much. Our test car wore a base price of $196,050, and a pile of options brought that total to $216,410. The mechanically similar example we used for photography cost even more, thanks in part to its $6500 Manufaktur Signature Sunburst Yellow paint. Yet that flamboyant hue goes a long way toward advertising the GT63's exotic performance capabilities. Of course, you could just get it in black, avoid the $2850 AMG Aerodynamics package with its bold fixed rear wing, and let the neighbors think you've just got a nice luxury hybrid.
Which this is. But it's also a poster car for the hybrid hot rod, with the electrified GT63 S crushing its nonhybrid counterpart's drag-strip performance without compromising its handling dynamics. Fuel economy even improves, albeit slightly, from an EPA-rated 17 mpg combined to 18 mpg. And if official EV range is only a mile, well, that's a mile more than it used to have.
You Might Also Like
Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades
How to Buy or Lease a New Car
Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
Richmond toll roads are going cashless
The Richmond metro's three major toll roads are going cashless, starting with Powhite Parkway later this year. Why it matters: Once the switch to All-Electronic Tolling is complete, drivers who don't have an E-ZPass will have to pay more to use Powhite, the Boulevard Bridge and the Downtown Expressway. State of play: The Richmond Metropolitan Transportation Authority is transitioning because All-Electronic Tolling makes for a better highway driving experience, according to RMTA's website. Phase one is scheduled to begin this winter at the 20-lane Powhite Parkway Toll Plaza. Once complete, RMTA will make the switch for the Downtown Expressway in winter 2027, followed by the Boulevard Bridge. Zoom in: Under the system, cash and coins won't be accepted. Drivers who don't have an E-ZPass will be charged via pay-by-plate, which will cost more, Tia Freeman with RMTA tells Axios. RMTA's higher rate hasn't been set yet. That extra charge can be pricey, per Axios' review of Virginia toll roads that use it. It's $1.60 more than the E-ZPass rate on the Dulles Toll Road, plus an extra $12.50 service fee if paid more than six days late. Pay it more than 45 days later, and that fee grows to $25. Yes, but: E-ZPass isn't free. While the transponder costs nothing, users typically must have a bank or credit card tied to the account with a minimum of $10 available. E-ZPass offers a manual Reload Card, but adding to it costs an extra $1.50 per transaction, which (ironically) is more than it would cost to pay the toll to get back and forth across the Downtown Expressway or Nickel Bridge. By the numbers: Around 15% of drivers used cash or coin to pay RMTA tolls in fiscal year 2023, per the latest RMTA data. Downtown Expressway users had the smallest cash/coin use (9.5%). Powhite's cash use was 15.5%. Drivers on the Boulevard Bridge had by far the highest coin use rate at 26.6% — which anyone who uses the Nickel Bridge, as locals call it, can attest.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Snap earnings: Stalled growth isn't just from an 'ad glitch'
Snap Inc. (SNAP) stock is down double digits after reporting earnings, with the company saying an "ad glitch" weighed on sales. EMarketer vice president and principal analyst Jasmine Enberg says that while the glitch may have dragged down sales, Snap faces challenging fundamentals. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts. Snap shares plunging Wednesday after reposting its slowest quarterly growth in more than a year. The photo sharing app blamed a downturn partially on a glitch with its ad buying tools, as well as competition from bigger rivals. Joining me now is Jasmine Enberg, E-marketer, vice president and principal analyst. Jasmine, thanks for being here. Thanks so much for having me. So Snap talked a lot about this ad glitch, which basically allowed its advertisers to be charged less than they should have been. Um, and that that was part of the issue. But but talk to me about how you're thinking about Snap and how much of the issue that was. Yeah, so even before earnings I said that it wasn't looking good for Snap and it was less to do with economic uncertainty and the tariffs which of course Snap had warned about at the end of Q1 and more to do with sort of fundamental, uh, structural challenges within its business model and its ability to monetize in part due to some of the large competition that we're seeing in the market. And I certainly could not have predicted that there was going to be an ad glitch in Q2, but I think that again points to some of these challenges that it has in its business that are much longer term. As you know, Snap has been working to revamp its advertising platform for many quarters now. A lot of that work has been focused on its direct response advertising platform and I do think that perhaps in a different context investors might have been just a little bit more forgiving, although maybe not quite so much because they're rarely forgiving with Snap. But this work has taken much longer than many of them have anticipated. I think investors are getting impatient because the results have been inconsistent. So there's very little room for mistakes. And then if you bring in the broader context of Meta's and Reddit's blowout earnings for Q2, it really shows that it's hard for Snap to shift any or a lot of the blame to macroeconomic headwinds. It pointed to Ramadan and the removal of the de minimis tax exemption as other reasons for the deceleration and growth, um, when you have these two platforms that are very different sizes, very, um, different in terms of their importance to advertisers really performing well in Q2. And Jasmine, daily active users overall were up 9%, but there were some weakness in North America. Why is that happening? Yeah, well, that is extremely troubling to me because North America is Snap's core market. Um, it is where it has made most of its money. It's much harder for it to monetize in international markets. Now, on the call, uh, CEO Evan Spiegel talked about how daily active users is usually a measure of communication on the platform versus entertainment. Snap, as you know, of course is primarily a messaging app, but it also has a short form video feed. It's also focused heavily on creators. And so it seems that there's some weakness potentially there. Now Snap also spent a lot of time talking about sponsored snaps, really hyping them up. It's a new ad placement that they have, um, that will appear within the the chat tab, which is the core part of the Snapchat app. And they're hoping that they can kind of help to turn around, um, some of the the weakness in its ad business and they're already saying that that's, you know, given some incremental reach to advertisers as well as conversions. So they're really betting on the this communication, um, aspect of of the app. But again, the weakness in in North America is extremely troubling because it means that Snap is going to be more reliant on international markets going forward to drive growth if it can't bring that back up to growth. And Jasmine, if it is having these issues and it's fundamental business are glasses the answer, right? This, you know, like smart glasses? Is that something that's going to juice growth? Well, you know, AR overall has been such a core part of Snap's vision and its ambitions, and this isn't the first time it's introduced glasses or spectacles. Snap got a few questions on the call yesterday from investors, really asking whether they have the resources or the capital to even bring these devices to market next year as promised without a partner. You know, executives kind of sidestepped those questions. And you know, based historically, they haven't done very well, but there is a lot more momentum right now for smart glasses. I mean, we saw demand for meta ray bands, for example, um, grow last quarter and that could either help or or hurt Snap in this environment, really depending on what these glasses are when they when they come to market to consumers. Yes, we'll see how that all works out. Jasmine, thank you so much for your perspective. Appreciate it. Thanks so much for having me. Related Videos Novo Nordisk warns copycat drugs continue weighing on sales AMD is Nvidia Blackwell's 'closest' competition, strategist says Top 3 takeaways from Uber's Q2 results JPM's Crawford Still Sees Value in Owning Bonds in US Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mercedes happy to secure Russell's future after Verstappen talks
Toto Wolff said he needed to talk to Max Verstappen about a possible move to Mercedes but was now happy to secure George Russell's future with the team. Verstappen confirmed for the first time that he would stay with Red Bull ahead of last weekend's Hungarian Grand Prix, putting to an end speculation that he could make a sensational move to rivals Mercedes ahead of the 2026 season. Mercedes and Wolff have made little secret of their desire to sign the four-time world champion, which heightened talk that Russell – who is out of contract at the end of this season – could lose his seat. Team principal Wolff admitted that the possible availability of Verstappen, 27, had to be explored. 'I've always said I'm happy with my team, with Russell and Kimi Antonelli, but suddenly Max's future became uncertain, so we talked to him too,' Wolff told Gazzetta dello Sport. 'But I've always been very clear with George: 90 per cent of the time he would stay with us, but I needed to talk to Verstappen too. Now the situation is clear, and everything can go back to normal.' Verstappen had a break clause from his Red Bull deal which can no longer be activated. Confirmation that he would stay with the team came 23 days after Christian Horner discovered he had been ousted as Red Bull team principal and CEO. Russell claimed his sixth podium of the season at the Hungaroring and has excelled in an inconsistent Mercedes car, while also stepping up to lead the team alongside 18-year-old Italian rookie Antonelli following Lewis Hamilton's move to Ferrari. Hamilton, who won six of his seven world championships under Wolff at Mercedes, endured another difficult weekend for the Scuderia and labelled himself 'useless' after qualifying. The downbeat 40-year-old said Ferrari should change their driver but Wolff is convinced he will bounce back from his first-season struggles with the Prancing Horse. 'It's a characteristic of the greats: if they know they haven't been up to par, they don't blame the team but look within. Once this moment has passed, he'll come back with the same motivation as always,' Wolff said. Formula One will have a new set of regulations for next season, with major changes to power unit and aerodynamic rules that will bring an end to the ground-effect era in which Mercedes have struggled to match Red Bull and, this season, McLaren. Wolff is optimistic that his team will be stronger next season and admitted he would relish the chance to go head-to-head in a title battle with Hamilton and Ferrari. 'Seeing Ferrari against Mercedes would be fantastic,' Wolff added. 'I have no doubt this duel will happen, next year or in the future. We will experience it and it will be fantastic.'