The Republican attempt to discourage Trump lawsuits has hit a big obstacle
Republicans have hit a roadblock in an effort that could deter nonprofits, individuals, and other potential litigants from filing lawsuits to block President Donald Trump over his executive actions. As Trump faces lawsuits nationwide, GOP lawmakers had sought to bar federal courts from issuing temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions against the federal government unless the plaintiffs post what, in many cases, would be a massive financial bond at the beginning of the case.
The proposal was included in the Senate version of Trump's massive tax and immigration bill but ran into trouble with the Senate parliamentarian, who said it violates the chamber's rules. It is now unlikely to be in the final package. Federal judges can already require plaintiffs to post security bonds, but such funds are commonly waived in public interest cases. The GOP proposal would make the payment of the financial bond a requirement before a judge could make a ruling, which critics said would have a chilling effect on potential litigants who wouldn't have the resources to comply.
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer hailed the parliamentarian's ruling in a press statement and called the GOP effort 'nothing short of an assault on the system of checks and balances that has anchored the nation since its founding.' 'But Senate Democrats stopped them cold,' Schumer said. Lawmakers are running scores of provisions by the Senate parliamentarian's office to ensure they fit with the chamber's rules for inclusion in a reconciliation bill. The recommendations from Elizabeth MacDonough will have a major impact on the final version of the legislation.
On Friday, she determined that a proposal to shift some food stamp costs from the federal government to states would violate the chamber's rules. But some of the most difficult questions are still to come as Republicans hope to get a bill passed and on Trump's desk to be signed into law before July 4th. Republicans could still seek to include the judiciary provision in the bill, but it would likely be challenged and subject to a separate vote in which the provision would need 60 votes to remain. The parliamentarian's advice, while not binding, is generally followed by the Senate.
Republicans and the White House have been highly critical of some of the court rulings blocking various Trump orders on immigration, education, and voting. The courts have agreed to block the president in a number of cases, and the administration is seeking appeals as well. In April, the House voted to limit the scope of injunctive relief ordered by a district judge to those parties before the court rather than applying the relief nationally. But that bill is unlikely to advance in the Senate since it would need 60 votes to advance. That's left Republicans looking for other avenues to blunt the court orders.
'We are experiencing a constitutional crisis – a judicial coup d'état,' Rep. Bob Onder, R-Mo., said during the House debate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
an hour ago
- Saudi Gazette
US Supreme Court allows Trump to resume deportations to third countries
WASHINGTON — The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for President Donald Trump's administration to resume deportations of migrants to countries other than their homeland. By 6-3, the justices reversed a lower court order requiring the government to give migrants a "meaningful opportunity" to tell officials what risks they might face being deported to a third country. The court's three liberal justices dissented from the majority ruling, saying it was "rewarding lawlessness". The case involves eight migrants from Myanmar, South Sudan, Cuba, Mexico, Laos and Vietnam, who were deported in May on a plane said to be heading for South Sudan. The Trump administration said they were "the worst of the worst". Boston-based US District Judge Brian Murphy ruled the removals had violated an order he issued in April that migrants must have a chance to argue they could be tortured or killed if they were removed to third countries — even if their other legal appeals had already failed. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson criticised the majority's unsigned decision on Monday, calling it a "gross abuse". "Apparently, the court finds the idea that thousands will suffer violence in far-flung locales more palatable than the remote possibility that a district court exceeded its remedial powers when it ordered the government to provide notice and process to which the plaintiffs are constitutionally and statutorily entitled," Sotomayor wrote. "That use of discretion is as incomprehensible as it is inexcusable." The Department of Homeland Security said the ruling was "a victory for the safety and security of the American people." "Fire up the deportation planes," said the agency's spokeswoman, Tricia McLaughlin. The Trump administration said the eight migrants had committed "heinous crimes" in the US, including murder, arson and armed robbery. But the migrants' lawyers said in a filing to the Supreme Court that many of the detainees had no criminal convictions. The National Immigration Litigation Alliance, which has represented the plaintiffs, called the court's ruling "horrifying". Its executive director, Trina Realmuto, said the decision exposed their clients to "torture and death". Trump brought the case to the justices after a Boston-based appeals court last month declined to block the lower court ruling. The original intervention by Judge Murphy, a Biden appointee, prompted the US government to keep the migrants in the Horn of Africa nation of Djibouti, where an American military base is located. US Solicitor General John Sauer told the Supreme Court that immigration agents had "been forced to establish a makeshift detention facility for dangerous criminals" in a converted conference room. Sauer said the government is often unable to deport violent criminal migrants to their homelands as those countries refuse to take them back, which he said allows them to stay in the US "victimising law-abiding Americans". Monday's decision is another victory for the Republican president in his pursuit of mass deportations. Last month, the Supreme Court allowed Trump to end Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelan nationals, affecting about 350,000 migrants. In another ruling in May, the justices said the president could temporarily pause a humanitarian programme that has allowed nearly half a million migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela to stay in the US for two years. — BBC
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Padres star Tatis sues Big League Advance in attempt to get out of future earnings deal
San Diego Padres star Fernando Tatis Jr. filed a lawsuit Monday against Big League Advance in an attempt to void the future earnings contract he signed as a 17-year-old minor leaguer that could cost him $34 million. The lawsuit, filed in San Diego County Superior Court, accuses BLA of using predatory tactics to lure him into an investment deal that was actually an illegal loan. BLA misrepresented itself to Tatis, hiding its unlicensed status and pushing him into loan terms banned by California's consumer protection laws, the suit alleges. Attorney Robert Hertzberg said the suit also seeks public injunctive relief to protect young athletes from being lured into such deals. Hertzberg said Tatis received $2 million up front in exchange for 10 percent of future earnings. Tatis signed a $340 million, 14-year contract in February 2021. Hertzberg said Tatis would also be on the hook for future earnings from any subsequent contract he might sign unless the deal is voided. 'I'm fighting this battle not just for myself, but for everyone still chasing their dream and hoping to provide a better life for their family,' Tatis said in a statement provided by a publicist. 'I want to help protect those young players who don't yet know how to protect themselves from these predatory lenders and illegal financial schemes – kids' focus should be on their passion for baseball, not dodging shady business deals.' Tatis, a son of the former big league infielder, declined further comment before Monday night's game against the Washington Nationals. Hertzberg said that even though Tatis signed the deal in his native Dominican Republic, he is covered by California consumer protection laws. BLA declined comment. 'California lawmakers have put in place serious, straightforward protections against predatory financial activity, but BLA has still disregarded our laws to pursue a business model built on prohibited, deceptive, and abusive practices,' said Hertzberg, a former speaker of the California State Assembly and majority leader of the California Senate. Tatis has blossomed into one of the game's biggest stars, although he's been dogged by injuries and an 80-game PED suspension handed down by MLB in 2022. He debuted in 2019 and was an All-Star at shortstop in 2021 before being moved to right field, where he was an All-Star last year.
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Arizona Legislature Approves Bill That Would Provide Up To $500 Million For Chase Field Renovations
The Arizona Diamondbacks are one small step from securing up to $500 million to help with renovations to the team's downtown home, Chase Field. The Arizona House of Representatives voted to approve House Bill 2704 by a 35–20 margin on Monday. It would recapture sales taxes from the stadium and other adjacent buildings over the next 30 years and reinvest them into infrastructure at the retractable-roof structure, which has been home to the D-backs since 1998 and is owned by the Maricopa County Stadium District. The only remaining hurdle is for Gov. Katie Hobbs to sign the legislation, and she's been publicly supportive of the bill. 'I'm thrilled that the legislature has passed a bill that will keep the Diamondbacks in Phoenix and create good-paying jobs,' Hobbs said on social media Monday. 'This is a huge win for every Arizonan. I appreciate the bipartisan elected officials and the business and labor leaders who came to the table and worked with my office to make this moment possible.' The Diamondbacks say they will also contribute $250 million of the team's money to help fund renovations. Team president Derrick Hall has said the nearly 30-year-old stadium needs several upgrades, most notably to its air conditioning system, which keeps the stadium cool during Phoenix's brutally hot summer months. The team's current lease with the county expires in 2027. 'We are ecstatic over the legislative approval of HB2704,' Hall said in a statement. 'This will be a monumental victory for baseball and Diamondbacks fans when signed by Governor Katie Hobbs. We could then shift our focus to a proper lease extension negotiation with the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in hopes of modernizing and renovating this public asset to a level those fans deserve.'
