Tesco to increase meal deal prices by 25p from this week
This came following a similar increase in October 2022, when they jumped from £3.50 to £3.90, or £3 to £3.40 for Clubcard holders.
Now, shoppers are bracing for yet another price hike on Teso meal deals.
From Thursday (August 21), the price of a meal deal at Tesco - which consists of a main, snack, and a drink - will increase from £4 to £4.25 for non-Clubcard members.
Those who are part of the supermarket's loyalty scheme will have to pay £3.85, up from £3.60.
Premium meal deals, from Thursday, will cost £5.50 for Clubcard holders and £5.50 for those without one.
A Tesco spokesperson said: "Our meal deal remains great value and the ideal way to grab lunch on-the-go at just £3.85 for a main, snack and drink when bought with a Clubcard.
"With more than 20m possible combinations the Tesco meal deal has got something for every taste, from a classic Chicken Club Sandwich to Tesco Korean Style Chicken Dragon Rolls."
The latest price hike has not gone down well with shoppers, with some threatening to "boycott" buying Tesco meal deals from Thursday (when the increase is introduced).
Discovering that a @Tesco meal deal will be £3.85 *with* a Clubcard from Thursday was truly devastating 🫠 pic.twitter.com/Bqsd7jCKbJ
One person, posting on Reddit group r/Tesco, said: "Lord above give me the strength this is ridiculous. What exactly am I saving here less than 50p. Stiring up my rage OP LOL."
Another added: "I will be boycotting the meal deal from when this hike occurs."
A third shopper commented: "All the supermarkets raising their meal deal prices is so so so stupid, why would you not want to be the best price? Greed vs greed."
RECOMMENDED READING:
Tesco scraps '5-star' Clubcard offer leaving customers 'disappointed'
Tesco joins Sainsbury's in making major change to self-service checkouts
How to claim free items at Tesco with 'surprise' trick discovered by shoppers
Celebrations, Roses, Heroes and Quality Street tubs on sale for £7 at Tesco
There are already more than 20 million combinations available as part of a Tesco meal deal.
But the supermarket giant is set to expand these options even further, with the introduction of several new products to its Premium meal deal range over "the coming days".
These products will include a new Finest Salmon Konbini Roll and Finest Gochujang Konbini Roll.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
WH Smith's US adventure is now stuck in an accounting hole
This is how, in retail-land, to shatter your credibility with investors in one short statement: confess to a significant overstatement of profits related to the recognition of payments from suppliers. This stuff is sensitive – witness the upheaval after an episode at Tesco a decade ago – and basic. While it is normal for retailers to receive payments from suppliers related to the volume of goods sold, or promotional activity, accounting rules are strict. The sums must be booked as they are earned. In a multi-year agreement, payments cannot all be taken upfront. WH Smith's last annual report was also clear that the principle should be straightforward to put into practice: 'The level of complexity and judgment is low in relation to establishing the accounting entries and estimates, and the timing of recognition.' Thus a £30m profits overstatement in WH Smith's North American division – 'largely due to the accelerated recognition of supplier income' – is enormous in the context of the size of the operation. The estimate of headline trading profits in the unit this year has been slashed from £55m to £25m. Group-wide profits should still arrive at £110m this year because the UK operation – think shiny shops in airports and railway stations, rather than the now-sold dusty high street stores – is still bigger. But the 42% fall in the group's share price on Thursday, equating to almost £600m in terms of stock-market value, still looks more than justified. North America was meant to be the gleaming growth opportunity for WH Smith. The promise, after the sale of its UK high street shops, was for a pure 'global travel' retailer with a single-minded focus on expanding its presence. Its US business takes in a tech and gadget format, InMotion, plus stores for other retailers. About 40 shops were opened in US airports last year on the way to making the division 'an increasingly significant part of the group', as Carl Cowling, the chief executive, put it. At least for now, the expansion plans are intact and it's just a question of correcting the accounting errors and waiting for Deloitte, a freshly appointed independent reviewer, to run a forensic check on all the supplier contracts. Well, let's see. These types of accounting cock-ups rarely become smaller on closer inspection and the affair raises questions that Cowling, chair Annette Court and the board haven't begun to address. For starters, WH Smith investors will want a comprehensive account of how the financial controls could have failed so badly that more than half this year's promised profits from the US could evaporate in one swoop. Then they will want to know the degree to which the US operation is dependent on supplier payments. What would returns look like without them? As Peel Hunt's analyst said: 'Bigger questions remain about the margin structure of the US businesses.' Come back in November for WH Smith's full-year numbers and its complete version of what went wrong. Until then, the shares – now at the lowest in a decade – look like dead money. The US rollout plan requires projections shareholders can believe.
Wales Online
7 hours ago
- Wales Online
The nuclear button has been pressed but WRU must now get out of the URC
The nuclear button has been pressed but WRU must now get out of the URC The WRU has laid its cards on the table with a radical plan. Steffan Thomas looks at the potential holes in it Picture shows (from left) Richard Collier-Keywood, WRU chairman, Dave Reddin, WRU director of rugby and elite performance and Abi Tierney, WRU chief executive (Image: Huw Evans Picture Agency Ltd) The Welsh Rugby Union hit the nuclear button yesterday when it put forward proposals to cut the number of professional teams in Wales by half. A formal consultation process will begin in September where the WRU will consult with a number of key stakeholders including the current four professional clubs - Cardiff, Dragons, Ospreys and Scarlets - along with supporters, present and former players and the Welsh Rugby Players' Association. The WRU believe radical change is needed to drag the game in Wales out of the doldrums along with providing the platform to win the Six Nations and become "genuine wild-card World Cup winners" in the future. But a reduction to two teams is the WRU's optimal option; this could change during the consultation process where there is likely to be significant kick-back. Sign up to Inside Welsh rugby on Substack to get exclusive news stories and insight from behind the scenes in Welsh rugby. After a press conference which lasted well over an hour at the Principality Stadium yesterday and a document of more than 100 pages there remain questions which need answering. Steffan Thomas has been through the document to pick out the key points, issues and questions, as he sees it. What is the optimal solution? The optimal solution focuses on two clubs with a men's and women's team. Each squad will consist of 50 senior players and operate with playing budgets of £7.8m, while there will only be room for two non-Welsh qualified players in each side. It favours a heavily centralised system in line with the New Zealand model. In terms of the ownership model the WRU wants control of all rugby operations with the current investors taking charge of the commercial element of the club. In its own words the WRU wants "unified management and contracting of all elite players (professional men's and women's teams, national team and national academy) to align decisions on selection and talent development with players and clubs". The union insists "that PRA-style arrangements are a particularly challenging choice due to an inherent mismanagement between stakeholder objectives". In other words there is a significant lack of trust between the WRU and the four professional clubs with both parties often pulling in different directions. The WRU sees this as an opportunity to "optimise collaboration" if it can seize control of all rugby operations. Controversially it wants to build a new national campus and base the two professional clubs there. In terms of players development the main point put forward is the return of a national academy-style system and significant investment being poured into Super Rygbi Cymru. The idea behind the two-club scenario is to concentrate talent which in turn creates more competition for contracts and starting places. It's a case of elitism on steroids, with the aim of driving up standards on and off the field. Is there likely to be pushback during the consultation and what might change? Having spoken to numerous high-ranking sources within the game there will be significant pushback. Clearly clubs are going to be fighting for their lives and the first priority will be survival. On that note we do not yet know whether the WRU will simply scrap two teams or create two new entities with new branding. Under the proposed optimal system private investors are still required to pour in £17m, which amounts to £1m a year. But why would any private investor want to pour money into a club if the WRU have complete control over player contracting and development? The original PRA25 involved circa £125m worth of WRU funding over five years, while their new 'optimal solution' of two teams results in £94 worth of WRU payments. But where is the remaining £26m? That has not been accounted for but may well be kept back to invest into a new national campus, the SRC and academy system. There will also be significant investment into improving the women's game, while competition income will likely decrease with a reduction of teams, as might broadcasting income. They have also spent £6m on a roof walk, while the cost of assuming ownership of Cardiff also has to be taken into consideration There is £121m worth of investment with the three equally-funded club solutions and £116m if they go to three teams under a tiered funding model. Private investors are required to put in £25m if it's four teams, £21m with three unequally funded teams, £21m with three in a tiered funding model and £17m if they reduce to two. The academy budget per club is £800k in every mode. Join WalesOnline Rugby's WhatsApp Channel here to get the breaking news sent straight to your phone for free They are now also proposing a salary cap of £7.8m-£8m in the optimal solution which is only marginally better than where they are now. This is close to the Gallagher PREM cap but short of some of their competitors in the United Rugby Championship. It seems they are hoping to drive a harder bargain with Welsh talent with limited number of overseas player spots at clubs in England and France. This is likely to be enough to be significantly more competitive if talent is concentrated into two teams, although to really compete in the latter stages of the Champions Cup it will need to be higher. Another area where there will certainly be a significant amount of pushback is with the idea of having two teams training at the same national campus. The WRU's director of rugby and elite performance Dave Reddin was quick to stress both teams would have separate team rooms at the facility and different identities. But there are many within the game who believe this is anti-competitive, with professional sport all about different styles and cultures. Union-owned sides allow for far greater control from the national coach and potentially greater cohesion in terms of on-field partnerships and playing styles, especially if the majority of the national squad are concentrated into two teams. But it is arguably not the job of the WRU to own and control its teams, but rather to facilitate the growth of the game in Wales. Union-owned teams are arguably anti-sport and is one of the reasons the URC is an inferior competition to the French Top 14 and the Gallagher PREM. Can the new 'optimal structure' win over supporters? This remains to be seen but the reaction has not been a positive one on social media. Wales has a club-based history and it is a very tribal nation so the very idea of creating two new teams is not going to go down well. There were hints during the media interviews this week the WRU saw the SRC as the "heritage league" where tribalism can thrive and old rivalries can continue. While this has not been confirmed they may prefer to have an East and West team playing in the professional game with the current four clubs downgraded to SRC level. Reading between the lines they may view a fan supporting east Wales the same as a Cardiff fan now supporting Wales. If they can be successful and challenge for silverware then they will attract supporters. But this is highly unlikely to get buy-in from current supporters of the four professional sides, with traditional club branding more likely to attract fans. Welsh rugby's tradition is rooted firmly in the club game. What competition will they play in? A reduction to two teams playing in the URC would be a complete and utter disaster because it is a competition which Welsh fans have never truly bought into. The vast majority of Welsh fans would much prefer to face the likes of Bristol, Bath, Gloucester, Northampton Saints, Exeter Chiefs and Leicester Tigers on a weekly basis. Get the latest breaking Welsh rugby news stories sent straight to your inbox with our FREE daily newsletter. Sign up here. It would be transformational for the Welsh game and a leading figure at a Welsh club told WalesOnline this week an Anglo-Welsh league would result in its commercial income rising by at least £3m. The WRU insist they are committed to the URC but if it really wants to deliver an 'optimal solution' it has to be in an Anglo-Welsh. Anything else is sub-optimal. According to numerous people within the upper echelons of the game PRL might expand to 12 or 14 teams but would only consider two Welsh teams. Article continues below It is worth noting teams who are owned by a governing body or has significant union control is unlikely to get accepted into an Anglo-Welsh league. Like it or not radical change is required to drag Welsh rugby out of the doldrums and unlike what some fans have been saying this is not a knee-jerk reaction. But it has to be the right change and the WRU's 'optimal solution' leaves a lot to be desired.
The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
Tesco hikes meal deal prices – so which supermarket has the best value lunch?
Tesco has raised prices across its meal deals from today, meaning that a standard meal deal with a Clubcard will set you back £3.85. Whether you regularly go to Tesco for your lunch, or you're curious about whether your local supermarket's deal is as good as it seems, we've rounded up prices from all the major supermarkets to let you know the best value meal deal. It's not just the price of lunch that's on the up. The latest inflation figures show that in the year to July 2025, prices were rising at their highest rate in a year and a half. This was, in large part, because of stubbornly high food prices. Data from the Office of National Statistics showed that the cost of food and non-alcoholic drinks rose by 4.9 per cent. So if you're still feeling a pinch at the supermarket checkout, it's not in your head. You could offset this slightly by going for the cheapest meal deal, which is Co-op (with a membership) at £3.60. However, real meal deal connoisseurs know that the best way to get your money's worth is to buy the most expensive items as part of the deal. Fortunately, we've crunched the numbers for you. Read on to find out more about Tesco's price rises, and the best value meal deal in 2025 out of Asda, Morrisons, Sainsbury's and more. How Tesco's meal deal prices are changing Tesco has two tiers of meal deal, standard and 'premium', and both of these have different prices depending on whether or not you have a Clubcard. All of these prices have now increased by between six and 10 per cent, even higher than food inflation more broadly. For standard meal deals, these have increased by 25p: From £3.60 to £3.85 with a Clubcard From £4 to £4.25 without a Clubcard Meanwhile, premium meal deals have increased 50p: From £5 to £5.50 with a Clubcard From £5.50 to £6 without a Clubcard Arguably, it's more worthwhile than ever to sign up for a Clubcard if you continue to buy Tesco meal deals. According to Tesco, more than 80 per cent of its customers do this already. If you're prone to forgetting yours, I suggest getting the Tesco app and then adding your Clubcard to your Apple or Google wallet. This way, not only will you always have your Clubcard with you, but you'll avoid missing out if you can't get a signal in your local shop. However, Tesco isn't the only game in town. Though prices change depending on your location (you probably won't find these deals in airports, for example), we've rounded up the cost of all the best high street meal deals – and worked out the most valuable combo for each lunch. Best value meal deal We can't attest to the actual quality of the items in each meal deal, as we haven't tried all of them (with the significant exception of Tesco's birthday cake sandwich, which proved controversial among our testers). There are some slightly odd combinations in here, but for maximising value, this is as good as it gets. We worked out the best value meal deal by looking at the price of the individual items compared with what you could save under the deal. Where two items are the same price, we went for the one that gives you more food – for example, Waitrose's Taiko duck poke bowl and its High protein Mexican style chicken & grain salad both cost £4.75 before a meal deal, but the duck bowl is heavier, giving you more food for your money. With that in mind, here are the best value meal deals. Tesco: Save up to £4.80 Even with the price rise, Tesco's standard meal deal is cheaper than Sainsbury's with a Clubcard, but more expensive without. That said, if you go for maximum value, it's the least valuable meal deal. Here's the breakdown: Sainsbury's: Save up to £5 Sainsbury's meal deal has seen several price rises this year alone. It's much cheaper than Tesco if you don't have a Tesco Clubcard, but if you do, Tesco is 10p cheaper. However, Sainsbury's is slightly better value overall if you're trying to go for the best value meal deal. Co-op: Save up to £5.15 If you go for maximum value, Co-op isn't the biggest saving. However, it has the lowest price for a standard meal deal, as long as you're a Co-op member, which costs £1 to join. Morrisons: Save up to £5.30 Morrisons has a good value meal deal. Though it's not necessarily better than Boots', there's a slightly better saving with a Morrisons More Card than a Boots Advantage Card. However, you'll save less at Morrisons if you don't have either. Boots: Save up to £5.25 While it's not a supermarket, Boots is well known for its meal deal, and it's not shabby in terms of value for money. It's only slightly more expensive than Morrissons, and the total price of its most valuable meal deal is 10p more valuable: While it's the most expensive meal deal on this list, Waitrose's standard meal deal provides the best value, allowing you to get the most expensive items for less than half price. A benefit is that you don't need to sign up for the Waitrose loyalty scheme to benefit from the lowest price meal deal. If you do, however, you can get a free coffee or tea every day, with no other purchase necessary, when you sign up for MyWaitrose and bring in a reusable cup, which is a great perk. Asda's three-for-two meal deal Asda's meal deal is a three-for-two offer where you get the cheapest item in your lunch for free. We've included it for completeness, but it can't really be compared with the others, where you can max out the value by going for the most expensive items. The total price of your Asda meal deal will vary depending on which main, snack and drink you choose. Here are the priciest items you can get: In the end, this can only be a rough guide. With volatile food price inflation, you could, of course, make the argument that some of the individual items are overpriced in the first place. For example, the Emmi skinny caffe latte Mr Big single coffee is sold at Tesco, Sainsbury's and Ocado for £2.95, compared to £3.10 at Waitrose. However, if you're trying to beat the supermarkets at their own game, these are the combos that deliver maximal value.
