US neo-fascist group claims it is part of Texas floods relief efforts
Patriot Front, founded following the deadly 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, after which its leader, Thomas Rousseau, a Texan, was later charged for his participation, has claimed on its Telegram app channel that it has shown up in the areas near Camp Mystic, where 27 young campers lost their lives.
'Patriot Front is here in central Texas,' Rousseau declares in a video statement, amid the backdrop of what sounds like buzzing chainsaws in the flood-ravaged community, 'responding to the flooding, which has destroyed communities and taken the lives of scores of Americans.'
Rousseau goes on to claim that his so-called 'activists' are distributing supplies to survivors, but clarifies that his group is prioritizing their 'people' and 'European peoples' in those operations.
The far-right compulsion to disguise racist actions under the terms of humanitarianism has its roots in Adolf Hitler's autobiography, Mein Kampf, in which he prescribes to his readers to take pride in keeping their collective communities strong as a not-so-hidden metaphor for cleansing it of what is deemed other, undesirable peoples.
Similarly, American hate groups, second amendment-oriented militias and neo-Nazi street gangs have long shown up as community relief cadres across the US, in a sort of ploy to whitewash their images as dangerous forces in the country.
After hurricanes struck the Carolinas and Florida in fall 2024, Patriot Front also exploited the moment during a particularly polarizing presidential campaign season, showing up to clear debris in badly hit communities.
'It's not surprising to see Patriot Front inserting itself into disaster relief in Texas,' said Heidi Beirich, co-founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, who has researched rightwing extremism in the US for decades.
'The group was founded there, and like other extremist groups, they want to take advantage of relief efforts to mainstream their ideas, present themselves as non-threatening and helping the community, and ultimately use what they hope will be positive PR to recruit and grow,'
Beirich noted that everyone from Klansmen to armed militias have seen value in public appearances providing disaster aid.
Sign up to Headlines US
Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
'We've seen David Duke do this in the past, and more recently Veterans on Patrol inserted themselves into the relief efforts in Asheville after last year's hurricane,' she said. 'The concern is that it works – and Patriot Front's white supremacist agenda gets laundered as positive, and that helps them spread hate and recruit.'
Last week, Patriot Front caused a stir in Louisville, Kentucky, over the holiday weekend when its masked members marched to the beat of drums in downtown streets while holding a Confederate banner – which has become a commonplace demonstration for the group, having previously appeared in Boston around the Fourth of July weekend in 2022.
Patriot Front's Rousseau has sometimes tried to soften his image in public statements, referring to himself and his crew merely as political 'activists'. But recent Guardian reporting shows the group has increasingly allied itself with the neo-Nazi Active Club movement and the white supremacist leader Robert Rundo.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
11 minutes ago
- Sky News
US trade war: The state of play as Trump signs order imposing new tariffs - but there are more delays
Donald Trump's trade war has been difficult to keep up with, to put it mildly. For all the threats and bluster of the US election campaign last year to the on-off implementation of trade tariffs - and more threats - since he returned to the White House in January, the president 's protectionist agenda has been haphazard. Trading partners, export-focused firms, customs agents and even his own trade team have had a lot on their plates as deadlines were imposed - and then retracted - and the tariff numbers tinkered. While the UK was the first country to secure a truce of sorts, described as a "deal", the vast majority of nations have failed to secure any agreement. Deal or no deal, no country is on better trading terms with the United States than it was when Trump 2.0 began. Here, we examine what nations and blocs are on the hook for, and the potential consequences, as Mr Trump's suspended "reciprocal" tariffs prepare to take effect. That will now not happen until 7 August. 2:49 Why was 1 August such an important date? To understand the present day, we must first wind the clock back to early April. Then, Mr Trump proudly showed off a board in the White House Rose Garden containing a list of countries and the tariffs they would immediately face in retaliation for the rates they impose on US-made goods. He called it "liberation day". The tariff numbers were big and financial markets took fright. Just days later, the president announced a 90-day pause in those rates for all countries except China, to allow for negotiations. The initial deadline of 9 July was then extended again to 1 August. Late on 31 July, Mr Trump signed the executive order but said that the tariff rates would not kick in for seven additional days to allow for the orders to be fully communicated. Since April, only eight countries or trading blocs have agreed "deals" to limit the reciprocal tariffs and - in some cases - sectoral tariffs already in place. Who has agreed a deal over the past 120 days? The UK, Japan, Indonesia, the European Union and South Korea are among the eight to be facing lower rates than had been threatened back in April. China has not really done a deal but it is no longer facing punitive tariffs above 100%. Its decision to retaliate against US levies prompted a truce level to be agreed between the pair, pending further talks. There's a backlash against the EU over its deal, with many national leaders accusing the European Commission of giving in too easily. A broad 15% rate is to apply, down from the threatened 30%, while the bloc has also committed to US investment and to pay for US-produced natural gas. 1:40 Where does the UK stand? We've already mentioned that the UK was the first to avert the worst of what was threatened. While a 10% baseline tariff covers the vast majority of the goods we send to the US, aerospace products are exempt. Our steel sector has not been subjected to Trump's 50% tariffs and has been facing down a 25% rate. The government announced on Thursday that it would not apply under the terms of a quota system. UK car exports were on a 25% rate until the end of June when the deal agreed in May took that down to 10% under a similar quota arrangement that exempts the first 100,000 cars from a levy. Who has not done a deal? Canada is among the big names facing a 35% baseline tariff rate. That is up from 25% and covers all goods not subject to a US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement that involves rules of origin. America is its biggest export market and it has long been in Trump's sights. Mexico, another country deeply ingrained in the US supply chain, is facing a 30% rate but has been given an extra 90 days to secure a deal. Brazil is facing a 50% rate. For India, it's 25%. What are the consequences? This is where it all gets a bit woolly - for good reasons. The trade war is unprecedented in scale, given the global nature of modern business. It takes time for official statistics to catch up, especially when tariff rates chop and change so much. Any duties on exports to the United States are a threat to company sales and economic growth alike - in both the US and the rest of the world. Many carmakers, for example, have refused to offer guidance on their outlooks for revenue and profits. Barriers to business are never good but the International Monetary Fund earlier this week raised its forecast for global economic growth this year from 2.8% to 3%. Some of that increase can be explained by the deals involving major economies, including Japan, the EU and UK. US growth figures have been skewed by the rush to beat import tariffs. There is an elephant in the room: inflation. Countries imposing duties on their imports force the recipient of those goods to foot the additional bill. Do the buyers swallow it or pass it on? The latest US data contained strong evidence that tariff charges are now making their way down the country's supply chains, threatening to squeeze American consumers in the months ahead. It's why the US central bank has been refusing demands from Mr Trump to cut interest rates. You don't slow the pace of price rises by making borrowing costs cheaper. A prolonged period of higher inflation would not go down well with US businesses or voters. It's why financial markets have followed a recent trend known as TACO, helping stock markets remain at record levels. The belief is that Trump always chickens out. He may have to back down if inflation takes off.
Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
Boeing sued by flight attendants over MAX 9 mid-air panel blowout
Aug 1 (Reuters) - Four flight attendants on the Alaska Airlines (ALK.N), opens new tab 737 MAX 9 plane that experienced a mid-air cabin panel blowout in January last year are suing Boeing (BA.N), opens new tab for physical and emotional injuries. In separate lawsuits, they are seeking compensation for past and future economic damages, citing physical and mental injuries, emotional distress and other financial costs. "Each of the four flight attendants acted courageously, following their training and putting their passengers' safety first while fearing for their lives," Tracy Brammeier, the attorney representing each of the plaintiffs, said. "They deserve to be wholly compensated for this life-altering traumatic experience." Boeing declined to comment, while Alaska Airlines did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment. The lawsuits were filed on Tuesday in Seattle's King County Superior Court and accuse Boeing of negligence and failure to exercise reasonable care in the production, sale and repair of 737 MAX jets and its parts. "Boeing knew or should have known of the quality control issues present in its production of the 737 MAX line of aircraft," the filings said. The incident sparked a crisis for the planemaker and prompted the U.S. Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into the company and declare that Boeing was not in compliance with a 2021 deferred prosecution agreement. Last month, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) said Boeing had failed to provide adequate training, guidance and oversight to prevent the incident. The board criticized Boeing's safety culture and its failure to install four key bolts in the panel during production, and accused the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of ineffective oversight.
BreakingNews.ie
32 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Trump signs order imposing new tariffs on a number of trading partners
President Donald Trump has signed an executive order that sets new tariffs on a wide swath of US trading partners to go into effect on August 7. The move is the next step in his trade agenda that will test the global economy and sturdiness of American alliances built up over decades. Advertisement The order was issued shortly after 7pm on Thursday. It came after a flurry of tariff-related activity in the last several days, as the White House announced agreements with various nations and blocs ahead of the president's self-imposed Friday deadline. The tariffs are being implemented at a later date in order for the rates schedule to be harmonised, according to a senior administration official who spoke to reporters on a call on the condition of anonymity. After initially threatening the African nation of Lesotho with a 50% tariff, the country's goods will now be taxed at 15%. Taiwan will have tariffs set at 20%, Pakistan at 19% and Israel, Iceland, Norway, Fiji, Ghana, Guyana and Ecuador among the countries with imported goods taxed at 15%. Switzerland would be tariffed at 39%. My statement on Canada-U.S. trade: — Mark Carney (@MarkJCarney) August 1, 2025 Mr Trump had announced a 50% tariff on goods from Brazil, but the order was only 10% as the other 40% were part of a separate measure approved on Wednesday. Advertisement The order capped off a hectic Thursday as nations sought to continue negotiating with Mr Trump. It set the rates for 68 countries and the 27-member European Union, with a baseline 10% rate to be charged on countries not listed in the order. The senior administration official said the rates were based on trade imbalance with the US and regional economic profiles. On Thursday morning, Mr Trump engaged in a phone conversation with Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum on trade. As a result of the conversation, the US president said he would enter into a 90-day negotiating period with Mexico, one of the nation's largest trading partners. Advertisement The current 25% tariff rates are staying in place, down from the 30% he had threatened earlier. Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum (Marco Ugarte/AP) 'We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow and we got 90 days to build a long-term agreement through dialogue,' Ms Sheinbaum wrote on X after a call with Mr Trump that he referred to as 'very successful' in terms of the leaders getting to know each other better. The unknowns created a sense of drama that has defined Mr Trump's rollout of tariffs over several months. However, the one consistency is his desire to levy the import taxes that most economists say will ultimately be borne to some degree by US consumers and businesses. 'We have made a few deals today that are excellent deals for the country,' Mr Trump told reporters on Thursday afternoon, without detailing the terms of those agreements or the nations involved. Advertisement The senior administration official declined to reveal the nations that have new deals during the call with reporters. Mr Trump said that Canadian prime minister Mark Carney had called ahead of 35% tariffs being imposed on many of his nation's goods, but 'we haven't spoken to Canada today'. Mr Trump separately on Thursday amended a previous order to raise the fentanyl-related tariff on Canada from 25% to 35%. Mr Trump had imposed the Friday deadline after his previous 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April resulted in a stock market panic. Advertisement His unusually high tariff rates, unveiled in April, led to recession fears — prompting Mr Trump to impose a 90-day negotiating period. When he was unable to create enough trade deals with other countries, he extended the timeline and sent out letters to world leaders that simply listed rates, prompting a slew of hasty deals. Mr Trump reached a deal with South Korea on Wednesday, and earlier with the European Union, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines. His commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said on Fox News Channel's Hannity that there were agreements with Cambodia and Thailand after they had agreed to a ceasefire to their border conflict. Going into Thursday, wealthy Switzerland and Norway were still uncertain about their tariff rates. EU officials were waiting to complete a crucial document outlining how the framework to tax imported cars and other goods from the 27-member state bloc would operate. Mr Trump had announced a deal on Sunday while he was in Scotland. Mr Trump said as part of the agreement with Mexico that goods imported into the US would continue to face a 25% tariff that he has ostensibly linked to fentanyl trafficking. He said cars would face a 25% tariff, while copper, aluminium and steel would be taxed at 50% during the negotiating period.
