
What the NatWest chief hopes to learn from his customers
Surrounded by about £10 million worth of high-grade metal stored in a warehouse on the outskirts of Leighton Buzzard, Paul Thwaite, the chief executive of NatWest, is a world away from London's Square Mile financial district.
The boss of the FTSE 100 lender is visiting Dynamic Metals, a family-owned company in Bedfordshsire that supplies customers in defence, aerospace and Formula One and is one of the 1.5 million firms served by Britain's biggest business bank.
Over the whine of industrial bandsaws, Alex Bailey, Dynamic's operations director, gives Thwaite, 53, a tour of the site, which has been extended using financing supplied by NatWest and is partly powered by roof-mounted solar panels funded by the bank's asset finance business.
Trips like these are more than just a chance for Thwaite to see the lender's finance in action, however. They also give him a glimpse of business sentiment on the ground.
Two hours earlier he attended a roundtable at the bank's Milton Keynes branch with 14 of its business customers, ranging from a professional services software company and IT security firm to a pipe coupling manufacturer and baby clothes maker. The overwhelming message from them was that despite all the talk from the government about prioritising economic growth, very little seemed to have changed in practice, and that red tape was stifling.
'I'm going to have to have a compliance department,' Seth Woodmansterne, the managing director of a greetings card supplier, told Thwaite, to laughter from the others. 'We're talking about greeting cards!'
For Thwaite, who tries to meet customers at least every week, events like these are 'very valuable' and are a 'much better way of getting insight' than the reams of reports from consultancies that he reads. 'Hearing it direct is better than through others,' he told The Times in an interview afterwards.
It's typical of the down-to-earth Liverpudlian, who previously ran the NatWest division that looks after its business customers and was suddenly thrust into the top job two years ago after Dame Alison Rose was pushed out by the previous government over the Nigel Farage account closure scandal. Ministers were able to intervene because the state at the time still owned 39 per cent of NatWest, a stake that was a legacy of the bank's £45.5 billion taxpayer bailout during the 2008 financial crisis.
• Pay boost for NatWest chief from shareholders
In a watershed moment for the lender, however, the government finally sold its remaining shares in NatWest last month, returning it to full private ownership after years of painful restructuring.
The state's exit, which cemented a £10.5 billion loss for taxpayers, is 'a new chapter' for the group and its employees, thousands of whom, like Thwaite, were working at the lender during the bailout. Now that NatWest is out of the government's grasp, there is speculation in the City about what Thwaite does next.
He has already put growth firmly on the agenda, having last year acquired both a £2.5 billion portfolio of residential mortgages from Metro Bank and most of Sainsbury's banking operations. This has spurred speculation in the City that further deals may be in the offing.
It emerged this year that NatWest had made an unsuccessful approach for Santander's UK business. Last week Benjamin Toms, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets, a stockbroker, also tipped NatWest as the most logical suitor for TSB.
Sabadell, the Spanish owner of TSB, has confirmed that it had 'received preliminary non-binding expressions of interest' in its British high street business, one of which is believed to have come from Santander.
Toms reckoned TSB could be worth £2.6 billion, which NatWest could pay without needing to raise capital, and that buying it would boost NatWest's market share in UK mortgages 'where the bank is underpenetrated' by about two percentage points.
Yet Thwaite, who would not comment specifically on TSB, signalled that NatWest was not interested in a bid, insisting there was a 'very high bar' for any dealmaking 'financially and operationally and culturally' and that management were confident in their ability to grow the business organically.
'My responsibility to the company and the shareholders is to do things that make compelling sense for shareholders,' he said. 'Adding a couple of percentage points to market share is not an existential issue.'
Thwaite has spent his entire career in banking. After studying management science and chemistry at the University of Manchester, he joined the Santander graduate scheme before quickly switching to NatWest in 1997. He has stayed ever since, rising through the ranks in a variety of roles before taking charge during the reputational crisis caused by the Farage debacle in July 2023. The chaotic departure of Rose was announced in the middle of the night and Thwaite received a call late in the evening from Sir Howard Davies, NatWest's then chairman, asking him to step up and become chief executive.
'It's a crucible moment because you suddenly find yourself in a position which you maybe hadn't anticipated two days before.'
Even so, Thwaite said he 'wasn't fazed by it' and 'jumped straight in'.
Since then, as well as having struck the Sainsbury's and Metro deals, he is at the forefront of industry lobbying efforts aimed at encouraging the government to scrap the ring-fencing regime, a central plank of Britain's reforms to make banks safer following the 2008 crisis by forcing them to legally separate their retail divisions from riskier operations.
• Banks' ring-fencing rules under scrutiny by City watchdog
The industry claims the rules are inefficient and have been supplanted by other regulatory changes, although critics would argue that axing the regime will make banks less safe.
Thwaite insisted that 'NatWest will not forget the lessons of the financial crisis' and that he is simply posing the question, 'is it the right time to review' the rules?
The government is likely to be receptive to the idea. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, has put deregulation across industries at the centre of her drive to boost growth and is under pressure to show progress, with the latest official figures showing the UK economy contracted by a bigger-than-expected 0.3 per cent in April.
The small businesses at the roundtable hosted by NatWest in Milton Keynes certainly felt they were getting little help from either central or local government, with Woodmansterne, the greetings cards boss, telling Thwaite 'I have no engagement whatsoever, despite trying, from MPs or council'.
The NatWest boss said that 'there is no doubt from what I see in my interactions [with government] that they are determined to find a way to grow' and that 'you could argue it's still relatively early days'.
'What you've heard from the businesses today is they want, people want, to see the tangible benefits. I think we're approaching the moment of truth.'
The boss of NatWest has retreated from the 'purpose-led' strategy of his predecessor that came under attack during the scandal over its decision to close the Coutts account of Nigel Farage.
NatWest, which owns the Coutts private bank, became embroiled in the culture wars two years ago when Farage, who leads Reform UK, obtained Coutts internal documents about its decision. These showed that its reputational risk committee believed his public views 'were at odds with our position as an inclusive organisation'.
This stoked a row over freedom of speech and the affair ultimately cost Dame Alison Rose her job as NatWest chief executive, with Paul Thwaite promoted to replace her. It also led to close scrutiny of Rose's interest in diversity and inclusivity in business, which she had championed.
Since then, there has been a shift in stance at the group. In the last annual report published under Rose there were 262 instances of the word 'purpose'. This compares with 125 in the most recent report under Thwaite, where there was no mention at all of the lender being 'purpose-led'.
In an interview with The Times, Thwaite, who said he abhors corporate jargon, asked: 'Could you name the purpose?'
He said the strategy now was 'about what we're doing with our customers, not what the bank's doing about particular issues' such as the energy transition and social mobility.
'I think a lot of the communication about the bank, both external and internal, talked to those topics, and it could have drawn the link more clearly between how those topics are in service of our customers.'
However, he insisted that NatWest had not pulled back from environmental, social and governance (ESG) policies, even though there has been a broader shift away from these areas in the wider corporate world recently.
'We're still one of the biggest banks for sustainable finance. We have brilliant ESG teams, we're following our customers.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
39 minutes ago
- Times
Leaving oil and gas in the ground was always a pipe dream
Just call me Mystic Mac. As I forecast in this space earlier this month, the UK has finally opened the door to the development of the Rosebank oilfield off Shetland and the Jackdaw gas field off Aberdeen. Ed Miliband, the net zero secretary, famously said that drilling in these two modest reserves would constitute 'climate vandalism'. Well, it looks like he will shortly have to get his spray paint out and daub 'Just Start Oil' on the door of the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero. To be honest, it didn't take supernatural foresight to predict that these totemic fields would ultimately get the go-ahead. They were given licences by the last government. Production was halted only by a bizarre judgment by the Court of Session in Edinburgh. In January Lord Ericht ruled in favour of the climate activists, Uplift and Greenpeace, who argued that the UK government hadn't carried out a full environmental impact assessment of the emissions from the burning of fossil fuels downstream. It had merely provided an assessment of the carbon dioxide from the process of extracting it and piping it ashore. New methods of extraction can and are producing significant reductions in producer emissions. But the UK government had not formally included an assessment of the downstream emissions since it was deemed self-evident that burning hydrocarbons produces greenhouse gases. What did the court expect? That it would be used to oil bicycle chains and fill balloons? Shell says that Jackdaw alone would produce enough gas to heat 1.4 million households. The environmental and health impact on those households of withdrawing their main source of heating was not, of course, considered in this pettifogging ruling — because that would have required an ounce of common sense. Nor did the court recognise that the gas, which would have to be imported to fuel those domestic boilers if Jackdaw were stoppered, might produce more emissions than using our domestic supply. Yet it should be patently obvious that shipping liquefied natural gas 3,000 miles from America by tanker is more profligate in emissions than using what's produced by extraction from our backyard. The court was tacitly endorsing the perverse logic of the Scottish government and lobbyists such as Greenpeace that, in some morally inexplicable way, imported oil and gas is good while ours is bad. But Sir Keir Starmer was never going to start shutting down an industry that generates about £25 billion a year, according to Offshore Energy UK, and supports around 100,000 jobs. Pointlessly sacrificing these new fields would only have indicated to the few companies still operating in the region that the government is hell bent on closing down the North Sea prematurely. The new rules announced last week by Michael Shanks, the energy minister, will allow further development of the Cambo and Clair fields, expansion of which had also been placed on hold following the January court ruling. This whole episode served only to showcase the absurdity of what is being called the managerial 'lanyard class's' thinking about energy. The Treasury is not stupid and was never going to endorse an exercise in performative self-harm. Nor was No 10. 'Keeping it in the ground', as Patrick Harvie used to advocate, was not what Labour meant by a rational and measured transition to renewable energy. The UK depends on oil and gas for 75 per cent of its energy usage. So the UK government has rejigged the approval process to include a statement of the bleedin' obvious — viz, that burning oil and gas produces emissions. Industry sources believe, rightly, that by submitting this new and more politically correct prospectus, they will be able to go ahead. That is, if firms like Equinor haven't given up in disgust. They're already being hit by a 78 per cent profits tax on North Sea oil, which makes you wonder why they bother. It's not as if the oil price is exactly soaring right now, despite the nasty business in the Strait of Hormuz. Companies such as Harbour Energy have given up and pulled out. Norwegian-owned Equinor, in Rosebank, is hanging on, presumably in the hope that it will be well placed to bid for future wind farm development. It installed the first commercially viable floating wind farm, Hywind, off Peterhead. All of which underlines the lamentable state of our whole approach to energy. Oil companies, demonised by the environmental lobby, happen to possess the very skills and technology which will be needed if and when the green energy bonanza finally materialises. Greenpeace seems to think the wind energy in the North Sea can be harnessed by Native American dream-catchers and transmitted into people's homes by daisy chains. In fact it requires heavy-duty platforms, implanted in turbulent waters, to support wind turbines the size of the Eiffel Tower — and also the laying of undersea cables to get it to the grid (if it can be upgraded in time). This is not very different, technologically, from what fossil fuel companies have been doing for the past 50 years. Rosebank and Jackdaw are not going to solve the UK's strategic energy deficit. They are rather modest operations in a North Sea field that is in steep and irrevocable decline. The glory days are over. But we still need whatever they can provide, if only to ensure a measure of energy security and help reduce costly imports. One of the more specious arguments currently deployed by opponents of Rosebank and Jackdaw is that their hydrocarbons will be exported and are therefore of no use here. Not so: gas goes directly to the UK. Oil is mostly exported to Rotterdam for refining, but it comes back as petrol and other products. It isn't refined here because we've closed nearly all our own refineries, such as Grangemouth, because of our perverse belief that it is morally preferable to import hydrocarbons. Abandoning the North Sea won't bring forward net zero by a single day. It will merely increase our dependency on authoritarian governments in the Middle East, make energy bills even more unaffordable, and deprive the UK of billions in oil revenues to spend on the NHS. Predictably, the Scottish government has not responded to the energy U-turn. The SNP is still under the sway of environmental cretinism. No wonder Fergus Ewing, a voice of energy sanity, has decided to walk. Perhaps Ed Miliband may be following him in the not-too-distant future.


Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Full list of Santander bank branches closing this week
More bank branches are shutting across the UK after Santander confirmed a list of closures. The UK high streets have been obliterated in recent years, even before the coronavirus pandemic as people have turned to online shopping. Changing customer habits are also reshaping banking, with many big names exiting towns and cities. And it isn't just banks bidding farewell. Poundland – a staple on every high street – announced a closure of almost 70 stores last week after a rescue deal. Here are the Santander branches closing this week. Aberdare – June 24 Blackwood – June 23 Brecon – June 25 Cleveleys – June 23 Dungannon – June 23 Eltham – June 23 Glasgow LDHQ – June 24 Glasgow MX – June 23 Greenford – June 24 Magherafelt – June 24 To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Santander told Metro previously that customer behaviour is changing and it needs to ensure that the business remains 'fit for future.' More Trending A Santander spokesperson said: 'Our new combination of full-service branches, alongside Work Cafés, counter-free branches and reduced hours branches, aims to provide the right balance between digital banking and face-to-face money management and guidance. 'As a business, we must move with customers and balance our investment across all the places where we interact with customers, to deliver the very best for them now and in the future.' The bank said that closing a branch is 'always a very difficult decision.' View More » It comes after the closure of ten Santander and eight NatWest branches last week. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Martin Lewis' MSE shares major update on £100,000,000 Mastercard compensation payouts MORE: Major UK high street bank could be put up for sale MORE: Full list of 55 NatWest branches that will close in another blow to high street Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.


Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Businesses call for action on abuse of public-facing staff
Business leaders are urging the government to broaden legislative action to protect all public-facing workers amid soaring levels of violence and abuse. Some 42 per cent of workers in pubs, restaurants, hotels and transport said they experienced some form of abuse between October and March, a year-on-year increase of 19 per cent, according to the new figures from the Institute of Customer Service. An all-party parliamentary group, which works alongside the industry group UK Hospitality, whose members include retailers, hospitality groups, call centres and transport companies, has been tracking customer service across all sectors over the past five years. • Extra costs holding back hospitality sector, says Whitbread boss Over a third, or 37 per cent, of the 1,050 respondents to the organisation's latest survey said they had considered leaving their role because of incidents which include racial abuse and sexual harassment, while over a quarter said they had taken sick leave after such incidents. One in five workers said they had been threatened with violence, the highest level that the group had recorded. Jo Causon, chief executive of the Institute of Customer Service, said the research showed how 'frontline workers are facing unacceptable levels of assault and abuse from some customers'. Common assault is already an offence and the previous Conservative government had originally rejected calls to create a separate offence specifically linked to shopworkers, arguing it did not think it was 'required or will be most effective'. However, the retail industry argued that incidents were rising and Rishi Sunak's government reversed its position, although its plan to introduce a new offence was abandoned when parliament was dissolved for the general election. • Shops 'at breaking point' as thefts and abuse rocket While there has been a crackdown on retail crime, with a standalone offence of assaulting a retail worker in England and Wales set to be introduced as part of the government's Crime and Policing Bill, which is making its way through parliament, businesses are calling for the bill to be amended to include all those working in public-facing roles. In a letter to the government, 76 businesses said that current legislation provided 'only a partial solution to an endemic and preventable issue'. The signatories of the letter include Sky, Hays Travel, Wickes, Virgin Media 02, United Utilities and DPD. 'These professionals form the bedrock to our society and our economy,' the letter said. Causon added: 'Introducing appropriate protection for customer-facing workers is not only the right thing to do on a societal level, it is critical the UK's business performance isn't impacted by workers up and down the country taking time off sick or thinking about leaving their jobs altogether.'