
EU reaches tariff deal with US to avert rift
The pact was concluded less than a week before a Friday deadline for US President Donald Trump's higher tariffs to take effect and was quickly praised by several European leaders, including German chancellor Friedrich Merz and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who called it 'sustainable.'
Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen announced the deal Sunday at his golf club in Turnberry, Scotland, although they didn't disclose the full details of the pact or release any written materials.
The 15% rates will take effect Aug 1, according to a US official.
'It's the biggest of all the deals,' Trump said, while von der Leyen added it would bring 'stability' and 'predictability.'
US equity futures climbed, with S&P 500 contracts rising 0.4% after the index notched its fifth-straight all-time high last Friday.
The deal would leave EU exports facing much higher tariffs than the bloc would charge for imports from the United States, with von der Leyen saying the aim is to rebalance a trade surplus with the United States.
But those kinds of tradeoffs in the agreement angered some European industry groups, with Germany's main lobby saying it 'sends a fatal signal to the closely intertwined economies on both sides of the Atlantic.'
Von der Leyen and Trump also differed on some of the key terms of the deal they announced. The US president said the tariff level would apply to 'automobiles and everything else,' but not pharmaceuticals and metals.
The chief of the EU's executive arm said later at a news conference that the 15% rate would be all inclusive, wouldn't stack on top of industry-specific tariffs and would cover drugs, chips and cars.
Metals duties 'will be cut and a quota system will be put in place,' she said.
'We have 15% for pharmaceuticals. Whatever the decision later on is, of the president of the United States, how to deal with pharmaceuticals in general globally, that's on a different sheet of paper,' von der Leyen said, adding that the overall rate 'is not to be underestimated but it was the best we could get.'
Senior US officials later said that the two sides agreed on a 15% tariff level for the EU's pharmaceutical exports.
A separate Section 232 probe on pharmaceuticals is still coming over the next three weeks, but the EU tariff level will remain at 15%, the officials added.
The EU agreed to purchase US$750bil in American energy products, invest US$600bil in the United States on top of existing expenditures, open up countries' markets to trade with the United States at zero tariffs and purchase 'vast amounts' of military equipment, Trump said.
Von der Leyen said no decisions have been made on European wine and spirits, but the matter would be sorted out soon.
Key to getting the 15% rate to apply to pharmaceuticals and semiconductors was the bloc's promise to make US investments, according to sources.
Ahead of the meeting, the EU was expecting a 15% charge on its imports to also apply to most pharmaceuticals. The products had been one of the negotiation's main sticking points.
Without a deal, Bloomberg Economics estimated that the total US average effective tariff rate would rise to nearly 18% on Aug 1 from 13.5% under current policies.
The new deal brings that number down to 16%.
The deal doesn't cover the EU's steel and aluminium exports, which will remain subject to 50% tariffs, according to senior US officials. Aerospace tariffs, meanwhile, will remain at 0% pending the outcome of a Section 232 probe, the officials added.
Officials had discussed terms for a quota system for steel and aluminium imports, which would face a lower import tax below a certain threshold and would be charged the regular 50% rate above it.
The EU had also been seeking quotas and a cap on future industry-specific tariffs.
For months, Trump has threatened most of the world with high tariffs with the goal of shrinking US trade deficits. But the prospect of those duties – and Trump's unpredictable nature – put world capitals on edge.
In May, he threatened to impose a 50% duty on nearly all EU goods, adding pressure that accelerated negotiations, before lowering that to 30%.
The transatlantic pact removes a major risk for markets and the global economy – a trade war involving US$1.7 trillion worth of cross-border commerce – even though it means European shipments to the United States are getting hit with a higher tax at the border.
The goals, Trump said, were more production in the United States and wider access for American exporters to the European market.
Von der Leyen acknowledged part of the drive behind the talks was a reordering of trade, but cast it as beneficial for both sides.
'The starting point was an imbalance,' von der Leyen said.
'We wanted to rebalance the trade we made, and we wanted to do it in a way that trade goes on between the two of us across the Atlantic, because the two biggest economies should have a good trade flow.'
The announcement capped off months of often tense shuttle diplomacy between Brussels and Washington.
The two sides appeared close to a deal earlier this month when Trump made his 30% threat.
The EU had prepared to put levies on about €100bil (US$117bil) – about a third of American exports to the bloc – if a deal wasn't reached and Trump followed through on his warning.
US and European negotiators had been zeroing in on an agreement this past week, and the decision for von der Leyen to meet Trump at his signature golf property brought the standoff to a dramatic conclusion.
The EU, for weeks, indicated a willingness to accept an unbalanced pact involving a reduced rate of around 15%, while seeking relief from levies on industries critical to the European economy.
The US president has also imposed 25% duties on cars and double that rate on steel and aluminium, as well as copper.
Several exporters in Asia, including Indonesia, the Philippines and Japan, have negotiated reciprocal rates between 15% and 20%, and the EU saw Japan's deal for 15% on autos as a breakthrough worth seeking as well.
Washington's talks also continue with Switzerland, South Korea and Taiwan.
Trump said he is 'looking at deals with three or four other countries' but 'for the most part' others with smaller economies or less significant trading relationships with the United States would receive letters simply setting tariff rates.
Trump had announced a range of tariffs on almost all US trading partners in April, declaring his intent to revive domestic manufacturing, help pay for a massive tax cut and address economic imbalances he has said are detrimental to US workers.
He put them on pause a week later when investors panicked. — Bloomberg
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
37 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: 'AI is too important not to regulate'
TECH titans have finally got what they were clambering for: a free pass to artificial intelligence (AI) development, thanks to United States President Donald Trump's AI Action Plan unveiled on Wednesday in Washington, at a tech summit attended by the elites of the industry. Calling it "Winning the AI Race", he said his action plan is designed to put the US ahead of other nations. "America must once again be a country where innovators are rewarded with green light, not strangled with red tape", the media quoted him as saying. There is only one way to read Trump's "green light" message: whatever regulations that stand in the way of AI "innovation" will be removed. First to go will be whatever that remains of the former administration's regulations. Is this the right path to take on AI? While tech titans will say yes, there are others who say no because AI comes with so many unknowns. Not even the AI entrepreneurs know where the technology is taking us. Certainly, AI has promises of benefits, but they come clothed with known and unknown risks. Alphabet and Google chief executive officer Sundar Pichai writing an opinion piece in the Financial Times on May 23, 2023 said that "AI is too important not to regulate and too important to regulate well", meaning regulating in a way that balances innovation and potential harms. But a race to be first will certainly not strike the right balance. Google's promise is to develop AI responsibly, but when the profit chase becomes hot would the pledge still hold? Pichai must know AI is fast becoming a crowded space, with every company racing to shape the technology according to its business needs. In other words, profit before people and planet. Our bad old free market economic model — the myth that markets perform best when they are free of regulations — has followed us into the digital world. Myth-busting economist Ha-Joon Chang has made it crystal clear that the free market doesn't exist anywhere in the world. With this "free-to-choose" mindset, nothing can be developed responsibly, let alone AI. We have long been witnesses of irresponsible capitalism, at times victims even. Hence the call for "compassionate capitalism", a sign that the free-to-choose market model has hit the lowest of low. Innovative AI development is only possible in a regulation-free space is a similar myth by another name. This is why the European Union has opted for the AI Act, one of whose aims is to make the technology "work for people and is a force for good in society". It came into effect on Aug 1 last year, claiming the honour of being the first-ever legislation to address the risks of AI. Whether or not such a goal is enforced is a question of political will, not the fault of the law. The EU model isn't the only way to tame AI. A better approach is a global AI treaty. But this will only work in a rules-based world order. Ours isn't. The Paris Treaty on climate change is in a bit of a shambles. So are the Rome Statute and the Law of the Sea. Regional or national approach may be inevitable.


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Netherlands bars two hardline Israeli ministers
AMSTERDAM: The Netherlands has declared Israel's finance and national security ministers persona non grata for inciting violence and urging ethnic cleansing in Gaza. In June, the Netherlands backed a failed Swedish proposal to impose EU sanctions on Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir. "They repeatedly incited settler violence against Palestinians, promoted illegal settlement expansion, and called for ethnic cleansing in Gaza," Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp told parliament in a letter released late Monday. Smotrich responded on X, saying European leaders had succumbed to "the lies of radical Islam that is taking over" and "rising antisemitism." Ben-Gvir said he would continue to act for Israel, even if he was banned from entering "all of Europe." "In a place where terrorism is tolerated and terrorists are welcomed, a Jewish minister from Israel is unwanted, terrorists are free, and Jews are boycotted," he wrote on X. Veldkamp said the Netherlands wanted to "relieve the suffering of the population in Gaza" and was exploring further ways to contribute to humanitarian aid. "Airdrops of food are relatively expensive and risky," he said. "This is why the Netherlands is also taking steps to further support land-based aid delivery." Aid drops resumed in Gaza on Sunday as Israel announced temporary humanitarian pauses in parts of the besieged territory. Around 2.4 million Palestinians in Gaza are facing what UN aid agencies have warned is a deadly wave of starvation and malnutrition. The UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Initiative (IPC) said on Tuesday that famine is unfolding across much of Gaza, with thresholds breached and over 20,000 children treated for acute malnutrition since April. Veldkamp said the Netherlands would push to suspend the trade element of the EU-Israel Association Agreement if Israel fails to meet its humanitarian obligations. "The summons will also be used to remind Israel to comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law," he said. After speaking by phone with Israeli President Isaac Herzog, Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof said the government's position was "crystal clear." "The people of Gaza must be given immediate, unfettered, safe access to humanitarian aid," he said. Israel's foreign ministry said Foreign Affairs Minister Gideon Sa'ar had summoned the Dutch ambassador Marriët Schuurman to Jerusalem for a formal reprimand on Tuesday afternoon. "The conversation will take place in light of the Dutch government's decisions to take measures against Israel, including against its right to defend itself and against ministers in its government," the ministry said in a statement. The war in Gaza was sparked by Hamas's Oct 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed 59,921 Palestinians, also mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory.

The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Dewan Rakyat passes Fisheries Act 1985 amendments
KUALA LUMPUR: The Dewan Rakyat has passed the Fisheries (Amendment) Bill 2025, among others, to strengthen action against illegal, unregulated and unreported fishing (IUU). Deputy Minister of Agriculture and Food Security Datuk Seri Arthur Joseph Kurup stated that the country incurred losses estimated at around RM823mil due to encroachment by foreign fishermen from 2020 to 2024, encompassing the loss of commercial catches, destruction of marine habitats, and pressure on local fisheries resources. He said the bill was not just a legislative amendment, but a reform to strengthen the governance of the national fisheries sector, ensure the sustainability of resources, and protect the rights of fishermen, including those in small communities in rural areas and on islands. "This bill not only takes into account domestic needs but also aligns our country with international practices and European Commission recommendations and positions Malaysia as a country that is firm in tackling IUU," he said when winding up the debate on the bill in the Dewan Rakyat on Tuesday (July 29). Arthur said the bill, among other things, amended provisions involving regulation, transhipment, landing and maintenance of vessels as well as expanding the definition of offences involving fishing methods that damage habitats to tackle IUU. For example, he noted that the amendment to Section 26 of the Fisheries Act 1985, which prohibits fishing using explosives, poisons, or pollutants, as well as devices that use electric current and prohibited tools, is crucial in curbing IUU activities. In addition, the bill includes a new subsection 13(3A), which sets a period of prohibition on re-applying for a licence of not more than five years from the date the licence was revoked. Arthur said it was a preventive measure to protect the country's fishery resources and was considered a severe punishment to deter offenders from repeating the same offence. The sitting continues on Wednesday (July 30). – Bernama