Meet Dr. Casey Means: A wellness influencer, vaccine skeptic, and Trump's pick for surgeon general
In a Truth Social post, the president even hailed Means, who will face Senate hearings for her confirmation in coming weeks, as having 'impeccable 'MAHA' credentials.' Trump announced the 37-year-old as his new nominee after his first pick, Janette Nesheiwat, withdrew from the post.
When pressed about what led him to pick Means to inform the public of the best health advice, the president told reporters: 'Bobby thought she was fantastic.' The comment signals Means had the backing of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., known for his vaccine skepticism who has already made sweeping changes to the department.
Without explicitly stating that she is part of the MAHA movement, she has voiced support for RFK Jr's agenda. The HHS secretary 'has a vision for the future that aligns with what I want for my family, future children, and the world,' Means wrote on social media after the president's announcement, praising his decades-long health and environmental advocacy.
Means grew up in Washington, D.C. before heading west to attend Stanford, where she obtained a bachelor's degree in Human Biology with honors in June 2009 and her medical degree in June 2014, the school confirmed to The Independent.
As a trained surgeon, specializing in head and neck surgery, she said she was operating multiple procedures a day before she, as she describes it, woke up to America's health crisis. 'The system is rigged against the American patient to create diseases and then profit off of them,' she told Tucker Carlson last August.
Her wake-up call happened in the operating room during her fifth year in surgical residency.
The patient lying before her was about to undergo her third sinus surgery. Although Means knew how to diagnose, write prescriptions for, and operate on the patient, she had no idea why the patient, who suffered from a variety of other ailments, was actually sick, the doctor told Carlson.
It wasn't just her one patient; Americans were overall getting sicker.
Noticing a recent rise in chronic illnesses, like dementia, diabetes, and obesity, she became disillusioned with the medical field. At 30, she ended up 'putting down her scalpel forever,' she told Joe Rogan last October. Means then decided instead to focus on the root cause of why Americans are getting sicker, and she believes the core problem is metabolic health.
That's the focus of the book she co-wrote with her brother Calley Means: Good Energy: The Surprising Connection Between Metabolism and Limitless Health. The 2024 New York Times bestseller discusses how to take small steps to improve one's health.
This includes eating healthily, sleeping more and leading an active lifestyle — aspects that Levels, the company she co-founded, tracks. For $199 per year or $40 per month, users can monitor their metabolic health insights through data, like diet, glucose levels, sleep and exercise.
Means has echoed some of her future boss Kennedy's stances.
She's spoken about raw milk, and how the issue is overregulation, not milk. 'When it comes to a question like raw milk, I want to be free to form a relationship with a local farmer, understand his integrity, look him in the eyes, pet his cow, and then decide if I feel safe to drink the milk from his farm,' she told Bill Maher in November. Before Trump was elected, Kennedy vowed to end the FDA's 'aggressive suppression' of raw milk. The CDC has said drinking raw milk can lead to ' serious health risks.'
She's also a vaccine skeptic. She has advocated for research into the 'cumulative effects' of vaccines.
'There is growing evidence that the total burden of the current extreme and growing vaccine schedule is causing health declines in vulnerable children,' she wrote in her latest newsletter.
Means has questioned why babies are inoculated within the first few hours of being born, claiming the practice puts people on a 'pharma treadmill for life.' She argued on Carlson's show that newborns don't need to be vaccinated with Hepatitis B shots, for example, because it's 'a sexually transmitted disease and IV drug-user disease, of course, which babies are not going to be exposed to.' According to the CDC, infants are usually given a Hep B vaccine because if they get infected, they have a 90 percent chance of developing a lifelong, chronic infection. Additionally, many women are not symptomatic and don't know they've been infected, so they could potentially pass along the infection at birth.
Her brother also claimed that the FDA was only testing drugs — not vaccines — through the double-blind studies, a golden standard in the medical field in which one group is given a placebo and the other is given the drug but neither the participants nor the researchers know which group received which tablet.
The HHS and its head repeated this claim last month when the department issued a new policy requiring placebo testing on all vaccines; the move essentially questions the safety of all longstanding vaccines. Many experts have pushed back against this allegation, stating that many childhood vaccines have been tested against a placebo, and warned of the dangers of adding a step to the vaccine approval process.
Part of the issue with medical research, the brother-sister duo argued to Rogan, is that it is studied in isolation rather than as a whole. That includes the impact of vaccines and its potential link to autism, she said, referencing another Kennedy buzzword.
'I bet that one vaccine probably isn't causing autism but what about the 20 [vaccines] that [kids] are getting before 18?' Means asked Rogan.
The surgeon has advocated taking a holistic approach to medicine.
She's repeatedly argued to study the body as a whole. Means told Bill Maher in November about America's 'disconnection crisis' in treatment.
'We're disconnecting the body into 100 separate parts and not seeing it as a unified system,' she told the comedian. What humans have done to the environment is a reflection of what Americans have done to their bodies, Means added, citing pesticides and treatment of animals.
This argument gets to another point Means frequently makes: she believes America is suffering from a spiritual crisis.
'We cannot go on poisoning the earth without destroying our own health; we are one with nature,' she wrote in her most recent newsletter.
Humans used to be very connected to nature, the doctor has said. America's current health crisis is 'simply a reflection of a destroyed ecosystem and humans have become so powerful and so technologically advanced and so connected in the recent decades that we now actually do have the power to destroy our world and destroy our health.'
Perhaps there's no greater metaphor for this disconnect between nature and humans today, as far as Means is concerned, than the birth control pill.
Contraceptive medications 'are literally shutting down the hormones in the female body that create this cyclical, life-giving nature of women,' Means said. 'The spraying of these pesticides, the things that give life in this world — which are women and soil — we have tried to dominate and shut down the cycles. We have lost respect for life.'
She praised the pill as 'liberation' for women, giving them the freedom to choose what to do, but then suggested it was being overprescribed. Birth control pills are being 'prescribed like candy,' Means told Carlson, arguing that they've also been used for treatment of acne and polycystic ovarian syndrome.
The surgeon believes PCOS — the leading cause of infertility in the U.S. — could be treated naturally with a change of diet rather than with drugs.
Infertility has become a recent talking point of the Trump administration. Trump has dubbed himself the ' fertilization president ' after expanding access to in vitro fertilization.
Means has no children of her own but said she cannot wait to become a mother one day. She told Carlson: 'I can think of no greater thing that we can do than have children and keep them healthy.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump will host Kennedy Center Honors in presidential first. Here's who's on the honorees list
Ten years after his career as a television star ended when he launched his first campaign for the presidency, President Donald Trump is returning to his presenter roots as host of this year's Kennedy Center Honors award ceremony this December. The president, who appointed himself head of the Kennedy Center shortly after taking office, made the announcement himself at a press conference to unveil this year's slate of honorees. He claimed the Kennedy Center board had requested that he serve as the emcee of this year's show, stepping into shoes once filled by the late CBS News anchor Walter Cronkite from 1981 to 2002, then by Ambassador Caroline Kennedy — the daughter of President John F. Kennedy, for whom the arts center is named — from 2003 to 2012. More recently, the award ceremony was hosted by Glenn Close, Stephen Colbert, Gloria Estefan, LL Cool J, and David Letterman.
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
NASA's nuclear gamble on the moon faces growing skepticism
Fast-tracking a NASA plan to build a nuclear reactor on the moon may sound dubious. Experts say that's because it is. 'The whole proposal is cock-eyed and runs against the sound management of a space program that is now being starved of money,' national security analyst, nuclear expert and author Joseph Cirincione told The Independent. Nuclear has been used in space since the 1960s. That's nothing new. The U.S. launched its first test reactor into orbit in 1965, and the former Soviet Union has sent up dozens more. NASA says that a new 100-kilowatt reactor could be used to power a future base at the lunar South Pole, and fuel prospective missions to Mars and beyond. Nuclear would help to fill gaps in solar energy that occur when that side of the moon is in darkness for two weeks. The majority of space experts have said that placing a reactor on the moon is possible, so, why is NASA's current plan 'cock-eyed?' The problem is the proposed timeline. Interim NASA Administrator Sean Duffy, who also serves as President Donald Trump's Secretary of Transportation, pushed to expedite the project, detailed in a memo this week. Duffy said the administration wanted to have a nuclear reactor ready to launch by 2030. Earlier this year, China and Russia announced a plan to build a nuclear reactor for a lunar base by 2035. 'The first country to do so could potentially declare a 'keep-out' zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first,' Duffy said. NASA first announced in 2021 that it would put a reactor on the moon 'within a decade.' In 2024, NASA then said that their target date for delivery a reactor to the Earth-based launchpad was the early 2030s. But, Cirincione says essentially no progress has been made. 'It was in the last Trump administration that NASA had put out a press release, they had a YouTube video, they had these announcements about how they're going to develop these small, modular nuclear reactors for use on the moon, and it was going to be ready by 2026,' said Cirincione, who is vice-chair of the Center for International Policy, a non-profit that advocates for a peaceful approach to foreign policy. 'Oh, really? So, where is it?' Ultimately, the expert believes a nuclear reactor on the moon could take up to 20 years to become a reality. NASA would need a working launch vehicle, a small and adaptable reactor, and the ability to land on the moon. Right now, the SpaceX Starship is the only vehicle option – but it has exploded during several of its test flights. NASA has been working with Boeing on a Space Launch System - the main competitor to Space X's Starship - but that program would be canceled under the Trump administration's proposed cuts which slash 24 percent from NASA's overall budget. Landing on the moon is no picnic, and attempts by Japanese space companies in 2023 and 2025 ended in crashes. There are also the scientific and technological advances needed for the nuclear reactors. The reactors must be able to withstand harsh conditions on the moon, including temperatures swings from 250 degrees Fahrenheit during the day to minus 400 degrees at night. 'Small modular nuclear reactors, it turns out, are always just around the corner – a corner you never get to turn,' Cirincione said. Many scientists and nuclear energy experts have shared in Cirincione's skepticism. Dr. Kathryn Huff, a former nuclear energy official at the U.S. Department of Energy, and professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, wrote in a Bluesky social media post that she's not 'bullish' on 'unrealistic timelines.' 'The 2030 target does not align well with recent budgetary trends…' she explained in a statement, shared by the university. 'Accelerating the FSP program could come at the expense of other critical priorities, including earth science, climate observation and space-based weather forecasting – all core elements of NASA's public-serving mission.' Dr. Alfredo Carpineti, an Italian astrophysicist, wrote in IFLScience this week that the proposal is 'unfeasible.' 'Even if we allow landing the nuclear reactor on December 31, 2030, the timing is really too short for something that must not have any faults if you want to operate it safely,' Carpineti wrote. Others were more optimistic about NASA's accelerated timeline. Sebastian Corbisiero, a senior program manager at Idaho National Laboratory who leads the Energy Department's space reactor program, told The Independent that a nuclear reactor on the moon is 'doable' by 2030. 'Nuclear reactor technology has been around for decades, so its well known,' he said. 'Some key differences with a space reactor is that it needs to fit on a rocket, so there are mass and volume requirements; and that the system needs to operate in vacuum – so components will need to be built to survive that environment.' Dr. Bhavya Lal, a former associate administrator for technology, policy, and strategy at NASA, and former aerospace executive Roger Myers, recently argued that it would be possible to have nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030, and it would take $3 billion to do so. 'It's possible, but it will require serious commitment,' Lal told The Independent. But even if plans are speeded up, Lal says there's no need to worry about the prospect of the moon blowing up. It's 'simply not grounded in science,' she said.
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
AI could soon detect early voice box cancer from the sound of your voice
AI could soon be able to tell whether patients have cancer of the voice box using just a voice note, according to new research. Scientists recorded the voices of men with and without abormalities in their vocal folds - which can be an early sign of laryngeal cancer - and found differences in vocal qualities including pitch, volume, and clarity. They now say AI could be used to detect these 'vocal biomarkers', leading to earlier, less invasive diagnosis. Researchers at Oregon Health and Science University believe voice notes could now be used to train an AI tool that recognises vocal fold lesions. Using 12,523 voice recordings from 306 participants across North America, they found distinctive vocal differences in men suffering from laryngeal cancer, men with vocal fold lesions, and men with healthy vocal folds. However, researchers said similar hallmark differences were not detected in women. They are now hoping to collect more recordings of people with and without the distinctive vocal fold lesions to create a bigger dataset for tools to work from. In the UK, there are more than 2,000 new cases of laryngeal cancer each year. Symptoms can include a change in your voice, such as sounding hoarse, a high-pitched wheezing noise when you breathe, and a long-lasting cough. 'Here we show that with this dataset we could use vocal biomarkers to distinguish voices from patients with vocal fold lesions from those without such lesions,' said Dr Phillip Jenkins, the study's corresponding author said. 'To move from this study to an AI tool that recognises vocal fold lesions, we would train models using an even larger dataset of voice recordings, labeled by professionals. We then need to test the system to make sure it works equally well for women and men. 'Voice-based health tools are already being piloted. Building on our findings, I estimate that with larger datasets and clinical validation, similar tools to detect vocal fold lesions might enter pilot testing in the next couple of years," he predicted. It comes after research from US-based Klick Labs, which created an AI model capable of distinguishing whether a person has Type 2 diabetes from six to 10 seconds of voice audio. The study involved analysing 18,000 recordings in order to identify acoustic features that differentiated non diabetics from diabetics and reported an 89 per cent accuracy rating for women and 86 per cent for men. Jaycee Kaufman, a research scientist at Klick Labs, praised the future potential for AI-powered voice tools in healthcare, saying: 'Current methods of detection can require a lot of time, travel and cost. Voice technology has the potential to remove these barriers entirely.'
