
Experts ask why Black Hawk helicopter may have been flying above allowed altitude before crash
This data point is one of several key mysteries investigators are exploring as they seek to explain what caused the nation's worst air disaster in more than a decade, aviation experts said.
"That's the $64 million question that needs to be answered," said Greg Feith, a former senior air safety investigator with the National Transportation Safety Board, in an interview with CBS News.
The permitted flight ceiling on the Potomac River near Reagan National Airport is 200 feet – a crucial ceiling for keeping the heavy flow of military helicopters safely clear of the steady commercial aircraft traffic into and out of the nation's capital.
Data from FlightRadar24, which tracks and records aircraft data for most flights across the U.S., showed the helicopter's last estimated altitude was about 400 feet when it crashed. The jet's altitude was about 375 to 400 feet, according to data from FlightAware and FlightRadar24.
"They're military pilots; they're familiar with the routes," Feith said. "Why is it on this day, on that flight, they were [as much as] 150 to 200 feet higher than they knew they should be?"
Steven B. Wallace, a former director of accident investigations for the Federal Aviation Administration, told CBS News he believes investigators will direct attention to the altitude of the Black Hawk.
"I don't want to speculate on the cause, but I can speculate what's going through the mind of the investigators," Wallace said. "I think that is very likely going to be the focus."
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said the investigation is examining if the aircraft was at the right altitude at the time. NTSB investigators have not so far disclosed the helicopter's altitude in their briefings, and said their working groups will evaluate "pre-impact course and altitude."
The Army helicopter's deviation above the flight ceiling is one of several similar near collisions involving helicopters at Reagan National that date back more than a decade.
A near midair collision between an airplane and a helicopter in July 2015 occurred 400 feet off the ground on approach to the same runway being used in Wednesday's crash – Runway 33 — according to a CBS News Data Team review of anonymous reports to NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System.
The pilot's report said the aircraft "came within very close contact of another aircraft."
"This occurred about 400 feet off the ground to the point where the pilot monitoring had to take the controls to make a correction in order to prevent it from becoming a midair collision," the 2015 report said.
Two years earlier, in May of 2013, a pilot reported problems with a helicopter while circling to land on Runway 33. That is a shorter runway intended for smaller aircraft, like American Airlines 5342. Pilots who land there told CBS News they want to be at the "floor," or lowest altitude during their approach because they need to hit the beginning of the runway to have maximum distance to stop.
"As we continued our approach; Tower instructed the helicopter to 'make a right 360 for a jet on a 2 mile final for Runway 33; and to report him in sight," the pilot wrote.
"The Tower then asked the helicopter if he had us in sight. He replied 'yes'; and the Tower told him to maintain visual separation," the report said. "As we began our turn from base to final; the helicopter made what looked like a right turn directly into our flight path."
The pilot reported having to execute a hard right turn and abort the approach to avoid a collision. "I'm not sure how close we came to the helicopter since it was on the left side of the aircraft; but I would guess it was only a few hundred feet," the report said.
CBS News' review of the NASA safety data identified at least nine near midair collisions at the airport since 2005, including three involving helicopters.
Feith said he believes investigators from the NTSB and the military will be examining the altimeters in the helicopter to see if they malfunctioned, checking for any wind impact that could have hindered the pilot's ability to hold the helicopter at 200 feet, and exploring whether or not the crew should have been using night vision goggles.
He said the flight recorders on both aircraft will be helpful in determining what happened. Authorities reported that they had been recovered from the Potomac River on Thursday.
"If they had been at 200 feet, there wouldn't have been an issue because the plane typically would've been 400 to 500 feet off the ground," Feith said. "Those two RJ [regional jet] pilots didn't know what hit them until the helicopter hit them."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
a day ago
- USA Today
Plane makes emergency landing after flames shoot from engine: Watch
A flight bound for Germany made an emergency landing in Italy after airline officials reported a pilot was forced to cut the engine. Condor Airlines flight DE3665 from Corfu, Greece bound for Dusseldorf departed Ioannis Kapodistrias International Airport at 8:19 p.m. local time on Saturday, Aug. 16, according to information from Flight Aware, which tracks flight paths. Video provided by Reuters shows a series of sparks coming from the Boeing 757 after taking off. According to local media outlets, including German paper Die Welt and The Daily Mail, passengers saw flames shooting from one of the plane's engines midair. The plane landed in Italy's coastal city of Brindisi at 8:30 p.m. local time, data from FlightAware shows. No injuries were reported. See sparks coming plane engine shortly after takeoff Where to see northern lights tonight: These states could catch a glimpse. Condor flight from Greece experiences engine 'disturbance' According to a statement to USA TODAY on Tuesday, Aug. 19, the flight crew received a message indicating "a parameter indication outside the normal range caused by a disturbance in the air flow supply to the engine." "What happened was a reaction near the engine that normally takes place in the engine's combustion chamber leading to a visible reaction at the rear of the engine," Condor Airlines said. The engine was shut down "in a controlled manner" before landing in Italy, the airline said, and another aircraft completed the route to Dusseldorf on Sunday, Aug. 17. "Due to the fault message, it was precautionarily decided to divert to Brindisi. This posed no danger to the guests or crew members at any time," Condor Airlines said. "We apologize for any inconvenience caused, but the safety of our passengers and employees is always our top priority." Natalie Neysa Alund is a senior reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at nalund@ and follow her on X @nataliealund.


Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
Delta Passenger Swaps Seat To Be With Air Hostesses, Outrage Over Why
The Federal Aviation Administration says that flight attendants are expected to "verify that the armrests are in the normal forward/down position in order to ensure that they do not obstruct the passageway between the row or seats leading from the aisle to the emergency exit." A spokesperson for Delta told Newsweek: "Armrests must be lowered upon taxi, takeoff and landing. This is announced ahead of takeoff and landing." Asked whether passengers are allowed to stay among flight attendants during a flight journey, as the woman allegedly did in the Reddit post, the spokesperson added: "No further comment on the rest of the post, as we are unable to verify the accuracy of the claims made by the poster." Scientific research also supports the importance of proper seat belt use. An October 2020 study published in World Neurosurgery found that, while lap seat belts can help protect passengers from turbulence, they may be less effective during sudden deceleration during takeoff or landing. The study recommended enhanced safety harnesses as a more-protective alternative in such cases. 'Infuriating' The woman in the Reddit post said that the encounter began before takeoff, when she found the armrest already raised as she arrived at her assigned seat. "He was on the phone before takeoff, so I didn't know when/how to interject before I asked for my seat belt," she said. She added that the issue continued throughout the flight until she finally sought help from a flight attendant. "I ended up asking FA [flight attendant] for help. The FA walked me back to the seat and shook him awake from his nap. She told him we must put the armrest down for safety and I need to be able to fit in the seat and put my seat belt on. "He put up a complaint that he is 6'5" but we were able to get the armrest down and he moved his leg straighter so our thighs were no longer touching." When the poster initially tried asking the man directly to put down the armrest, she said he replied: "I could try." The experience left her so unsettled that she temporarily removed herself from the situation. "I was in the back when I made this post and I first stayed in the bathroom an extra long time and then I was standing in the back," she wrote. "The leg touching was very uncomfortable and I didn't want to go back to my seat." The Reddit post sparked swift reactions, with users sharply criticizing the man's response and lack of spatial awareness. "Some people really have zero boundaries. It's infuriating," wrote u/ProfessorRealistic86. Another commenter, u/Traditional-Buddy136, reacted to the attached image by saying: "Good Lord. That's an entire leg." Others pointed out inappropriate body language, with u/Intelligent-Award881 adding: "And then the hand in the crotch thing. Bro, find another place and time for that." Seat-belt safety has also become part of the debate. One Reddit commenter, u/tireddoc1, criticized the passenger's dismissive remark, writing: "Such an ignorant comment about the seat belt." U/Rubes2525 added: "Seatbelts are also to make sure you don't slam your head on the ceiling in case of turbulence. Keeping your seat belts fastened during the flight has little to do about a potential crash." Some Reddit users called for better passenger education. "They should play a video on [airplane etiquette] before playing the safety video," suggested u/Constant-Juggernaut2. Newsweek has contacted the original poster for comment via the Reddit messaging system. Stock image: A flight attendant directs a woman on a plane toward a seat. Stock image: A flight attendant directs a woman on a plane toward a seat. Getty Do you have a travel-related story to share? Let us know via life@ and your story could be featured on Newsweek.


The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
Reagan National flights resuming after tower fire alarm
Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport resumed flights on Monday after stopping them earlier in the day after an air traffic control fire alarm went off. In an earlier statement on Monday, obtained by The Hill's sister network NewsNation, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said that the agency was 'pausing flights heading to Reagan Washington National Airport due to a fire alarm in the air traffic control tower.' The FAA said in a later statement to NewsNation that it was 'slowing flights into Reagan Washington National airport due to volume after inbound flights were paused because a fire alarm was activated in the air traffic control tower.' 'The tower is back to being fully operational,' the agency added. According to the flight tracking website FlightAware, 173 flights headed to National Airport were delayed Monday. Earlier this year, National Airport experienced a tragedy when an American Airlines flight and an Army Black Hawk helicopter collided near the airport, leaving no survivors. In the following months, a number of notable aviation incidents also raised questions about flight safety in the U.S.