
Report into Black Hawk helicopter and American Airlines crash reveals fatal mistakes before collision
All 64 people on board the plane and three crew members on the Hawk were killed during the mid-air collision in Washington DC on January 29. Previous reports found that the chopper was flying too high when it collided with the passenger jet in America's worst aviation disaster since 2001. Now an investigation by The New York Times has looked at the other errors that led up to the crash.
Capt. Rebecca M. Lobach failed to follow instructions from her co-pilot and flight instructor, Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Loyd Eaves, who reportedly asked her to change course, according to The Time s.
The Black Hawk crew was said to have been first alerted to a regional passenger jet in its vicinity by Ronald Reagan National Airport air traffic control.
Eaves and Lobach acknowledged the message, and asked to fly by 'visual separation', a common procedure that allows the pilot to avoid collisions by sight rather than relying on air traffic control instructions. A controller approved the request but it appears not to have been followed.
The Hawk was 15 seconds away from crossing paths with the jet when Eaves told Lobach to take a sharp left toward the east river bank, the Times reports. But this turn failed to happen, and the two aircraft struck one another.
The report goes on to say that radio communication between air traffic controllers and the pilots became disrupted, with some of the air instructions being 'stepped on'.
This meant that communication dropped as soon as a member of the Hawk crew pressed down on the microphone to speak, and subsequently, key information may have gone unheard.
There were other issues that contributed to the tragedy, the investigation found.
Technology that tracked the aircraft's movements over the Potomac was switched off at the time of the crash, Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, told The Times. It was reportedly done to comply with U.S. Army protocol, which allows for pilots to practice secretly while airlifting a senior government official in an emergency.
Air traffic control errors may also have played a part, the report adds. After giving the Hawk crew permission for visual separation, air control staff continued to monitor its movements but failed to deliver vital emergency instructions to the members as they closed in on the AA jet, aviation experts said.
Captain Lobach and Warrant Officer Eaves were believed to be wearing night-vision goggles at the time of the military exercise, according to investigators. Such equipment was necessary for her evaluation as they can enhance visibility at night in complex surroundings, yet this can be skewered by bright urban lights, military pilots added.
'Multiple layers of safety precautions failed that night,' said the Federal Aviation Administration's deputy administrator under President Joe Biden, Katie Thomson.
Brig. Gen. Matthew Braman, the Army's director of aviation, added: 'I think what we'll find in the end is there were multiple things that, had any one of them changed, it could have well changed the outcome of that evening.'
In statement to The Times the FAA said it could not discuss any aspect of its ongoing investigation into the deadly crash.
The Army has since made changes to how its helicopters use a safety system that broadcasts aircraft location and has reduced the number of flights over Washington following the DC crash, the head of Army aviation said earlier this month. The FAA has also permanently closed a route along the Potomac River that directly intersected the flight path for the runway where January's collision took place.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
GOP Rep's 'no tax on tips' backfires on social media
A Republican politician unintentionally provoked a wave of criticism in a misguided attempt to promote President Donald Trump's 'No Tax on Tips' initiative. Congresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks (pictured) shared two photos to X on Monday after she dined at Sundown Bar and Grill in Iowa for lunch on Sunday. In one of the pictures, Miller-Meeks smiles broadly while showing off the receipt for her meal - a chilly steak sandwich and some nuggets - which totaled $18.19 including tax. But it was her tip which has left online commentators so divided. Miller-Meeks left $21 in bills, along with several coins on the table to cover her bill, amounting to a tip of about $3. 'I got to celebrate No Tax on Tips with our wonderful server, she's thrilled about this provision and excited to keep more of what she earns,' she wrote. Despite offering a 20 percent tip on her meal, Miller-Meeks has been slammed for the sum. 'Imagine showing the world you're a cheapskate,' one furious X user wrote. 'Did you really only tip $3? And broadcast it as a win?' Her defenders pointed out that she left a 20 percent tip on her bill, an amount generally considered a good - or at the very least, standard - tip at restaurants in the US. One person, defending Miller-Meeks, responded to another user who had been particularly critical of her tip. 'Why are you trying to make someone who tipped 20% seem stingy? Oh I know, you want internet clout from libs,' the commenter said. 'Further, what are your tipping habits? Do you think 20% is to [sic] little?' Anthony Fakhoury, a spokesperson with Miller-Meeks' office, told CBS : 'The Congresswoman left a 20% tip. 'Unlike Democrats, she did not vote to increase taxes on hardworking Iowans. "No Tax on Tips" means more money in the pockets of servers, not the IRS.'


Daily Mail
11 hours ago
- Daily Mail
GOP Rep. attempts to promote 'No Tax on Tips' on social media but goes viral for all the wrong reasons
A Republican politician unintentionally provoked a wave of criticism in a misguided attempt to promote President Donald Trump 's 'No Tax on Tips' initiative. Congresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks shared two photos to X on Monday after she dined at Sundown Bar and Grill in Iowa for lunch on Sunday. In one of the pictures, Miller-Meeks smiles broadly while showing off the receipt for her meal - a chilly steak sandwich and some nuggets - which totaled $18.19 including tax. But it was her tip which has left online commentators so divided. Miller-Meeks left $21 in bills, along with several coins on the table to cover her bill, amounting to a tip of about $3. 'I got to celebrate No Tax on Tips with our wonderful server, she's thrilled about this provision and excited to keep more of what she earns,' she wrote. Despite offering a 20 percent tip on her meal, Miller-Meeks has been slammed for the sum. 'Imagine showing the world you're a cheapskate,' one furious X user wrote. 'Did you really only tip $3? And broadcast it as a win?' A third added: 'Pulling out coins to tip is the most old woman politician thing she could do.' But Miller-Meeks' tip has reignited a fiery debate about what the expectation is for tipping culture in the United States. Her defenders pointed out that she left a 20 percent tip on her bill, an amount generally considered a good - or at the very least, standard - tip at restaurants in the US. One person, defending Miller-Meeks, responded to another user who had been particularly critical of her tip. 'Why are you trying to make someone who tipped 20% seem stingy? Oh I know, you want internet clout from libs,' the commenter said. 'Further, what are your tipping habits? Do you think 20% is to [sic] little?' Anthony Fakhoury, a spokesperson with Miller-Meeks' office, told CBS: 'The Congresswoman left a 20% tip.

Rhyl Journal
14 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Trump offers assurances that US troops will not be sent to help defend Ukraine
Mr Trump also said in a morning TV interview that Ukraine's hopes of joining Nato and regaining the Crimean Peninsula from Russia are 'impossible'. The Republican president, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders held hours of talks at the White House on Monday aimed at bringing an end to Russia's war against Ukraine. While answering questions from journalists, Mr Trump did not rule out sending US troops to participate in a European-led effort to defend Ukraine as part of security guarantees sought by Mr Zelensky. Mr Trump said after his meeting in Alaska last week with Vladimir Putin that the Russian leader was open to the idea of security guarantees for Ukraine. But asked on Fox News Channel's Fox & Friends what assurances he could provide going forward and beyond his term that American troops would not be part of defending Ukraine's border, Mr Trump said: 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president.' Mr Trump would have no control over the US military after his terms ends in January 2029. Speaking later, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that 'US boots will not be on the ground' as part of any potential peacekeeping mission. The president also said in the interview that he is optimistic that a deal can be reached to end the Russian invasion, but he underscored that Ukraine will have to set aside its hope of getting back Crimea, which was seized by Russian forces in 2014, and its long-held aspirations of joining the Nato military alliance. 'Both of those things are impossible,' Mr Trump said. Mr Putin, as part of any potential deal to pull his forces out of Ukraine, is looking for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, as well as recognition of Crimea as Russian territory. Mr Trump said on Monday that he was arranging for direct talks between Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky. But the Kremlin has not yet said whether Mr Putin, who has resisted previous calls by Mr Trump and others for direct negotiations on ending the war, is committed to a face-to-face meeting with the Ukrainian leader. Asked whether Mr Putin had promised Trump that he would meet directly with the Ukrainian leader, Ms Leavitt responded affirmatively. 'He has,' she said of Mr Putin. Mr Trump, early on Monday during talks with Mr Zelensky and European leaders, said that he was pressing for three-way talks among Mr Zelensky, Mr Putin and himself. But after speaking to Mr Putin later in the day, Mr Trump said that he was arranging first for a face-to-face between Mr Zelensky and Mr Putin and that three-way talks would follow if necessary. 'It was an idea that evolved in the course of the president's conversations with both President Putin, President Zelensky and the European leaders yesterday,' Ms Leavitt said. But when discussing a phone call held after the meeting between Mr Trump and the Russian leader, Mr Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov gave no indication that either a bilateral or a trilateral meeting with Ukraine had been agreed. Mr Trump said he believed Mr Putin's course of action would become clear in the coming weeks. 'I think Putin is tired of it,' Mr Trump said. 'I think they're all tired of it. But you never know. We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks. That I can tell you.' Later on Tuesday, Senator Lindsey Graham told The Associated Press in a phone interview that if peace talks between Ukraine and Russia are not 'moving in the right direction' by the time Congress returns next month, then 'Plan B needs to kick in'. For months, the Republican senator has been pressing Mr Trump to support a bipartisan sanctions bill that would impose steep tariffs on countries helping fund Russia's war. On Tuesday morning, following a phone call with Mr Trump, Mr Graham signalled the president may now be willing to back the effort. 'Trump believes that if Putin doesn't do his part, that he's going to have to crush his economy. Because you got to mean what you say,' Mr Graham told reporters in South Carolina earlier on Tuesday.