‘Horrific Fire' kills at least 61 at Iraq shopping mall
Advertisement
'There was a lack of emergency exits and emergency ladders and extinguishers. And unfortunately the province was not prepared for such an incident,' he said in an interview. 'We hope what happened will be a lesson for the future.'
Muntadher Haidar lost his wife and 2-year-old son in the fire. He told a local television channel that he had spoken with his wife when she was trapped inside the mall with their child as flames engulfed the shopping center.
'She said, 'Forgive me, your son died in my arms, and the fire has reached me, goodbye,'' he told the interviewer, sobbing. " I couldn't reach them, I was outside — and I couldn't."
Advertisement
'Then the line was cut?' the interviewer asked him. Haidar nodded, saying: 'And then the line was cut.'
Some political leaders in Iraq moved quickly to cite the fire as another devastating consequence of pervasive corruption in the country. Many regional analysts argue that corruption is a legacy of the US occupation of Iraq, when money was widely dispersed for construction projects and contracts with poor oversight. And many Iraqis complain that graft has only worsened in the years since. Poorly constructed or unfinished building projects — often attributed to corruption — are common.
Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, Iraq's prime minister, said in a statement Thursday that the tragedy in Kut was 'a form of murder and corruption that is not limited to the embezzlement of funds alone,' but that it 'also relates to the laxity and disregard for the technical and administrative procedures required for safety protocols.'
Muqtada al-Sadr, an influential Shiite cleric and political leader in Iraq, offered condolences in a separate statement. 'This tragedy adds to the tragedies and suffering of the Iraqi people as a result of so many forms of corruption and repeated neglect,' he said.
The country's commission of federal integrity, an independent body that deals with government accountability, highlighted what it said were shortcomings in the initial response to the fire by the Interior Ministry's rescue services, saying in a statement that it would also investigate the blaze.
Iraq's prime minister announced three days of mourning, and the governor of Wasit province, Mohammad al-Mayahy, said he would pursue legal action against the mall's owners.
'We will not show leniency toward those who were directly or indirectly responsible for this incident, which is surrounded by suspicious circumstances,' the governor said.
Advertisement
It was not immediately clear who owned the building. Video footage from the aftermath, verified by The New York Times, showed the building covered in ash that blanketed larger pieces of debris. By Thursday afternoon, some families of the victims had taken their dead to the city of Najaf, home to the 'Valley of Peace' cemetery where many members of Iraq's Shiite Muslim majority seek to be buried.
Hussein Faiq, a student at the University of Kut, said he lost six relatives in the blaze. The youngest victims were 3 and 4 years old, he said, and the oldest were his grandparents, who were in their 50s. 'One of the bodies was burned, but the rest died from suffocation,' he said.
The fire at the mall is the latest in a list of deadly blazes in Iraq in recent years that have raised questions about safety protocols and preparedness.
In 2023, more than 100 people were killed when a blaze tore through a wedding hall. In 2021, two separate fires at hospitals that were treating COVID patients killed at least 174 people.
In both cases, investigators found that the buildings had failed to adhere to basic safety standards. The wedding hall, which contained highly flammable material, lacked fire exits or extinguishers. And the front door of one of the hospital wards was padlocked, fire trucks ran out of water, and sprinklers malfunctioned.
This article originally appeared in
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump official says administration will change visa, citizenship tests
The new head of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said in an interview with The New York Times Thursday that the Trump administration would make changes to the visa system for skilled workers and look to make the test for U.S. citizenship more difficult. 'The test as it's laid out right now, it's not very difficult,' said Joseph Edlow, who assumed the role in mid-July. 'It's very easy to kind of memorize the answers. I don't think we're really comporting with the spirit of the law.' The first Trump administration instituted a version of the test with an expanded pool of questions that was later rolled back under former President Biden. Edlow told the Times that the government planned to return to a version of the test from the first term. Edlow also told the Times that the administration would seek to modify the H1-B visa program for skilled workers by prioritizing people who will earn higher wages. 'I really do think that the way H-1B needs to be used, and this is one of my favorite phrases, is to, along with a lot of other parts of immigration, supplement, not supplant, U.S. economy and U.S. businesses and U.S. workers,' Edlow said. The program was a flashpoint among Trump's allies in December, before the president took office. Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy faced backlash from the MAGA base after they defended the use of the program to hire highly skilled engineers. Alongside an aggressive push to deport immigrants, Trump also took aim at several avenues for legal immigration at the beginning of his term. A phone app run by Customs and Border used during the Biden administration to register asylum claims now allows immigrants to register their departures from the United States if they choose to self-deport.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
MAGA Star Hit With Bombshell Allegations After Wife's Biblical Divorce Drama
The adulterous MAGA politician whose wife is divorcing him on 'biblical grounds' has been hit with even more cheating accusations. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and his estranged wife Angela declared three separate homes as their primary residence in mortgage documents, allowing them to lock in improperly low lending rates, the Associated Press reported. They also allegedly double-dipped on a tax break for primary residences and listed two other investment properties as vacation homes on the mortgage applications. Interest rates on mortgages for primary homes are much lower than the rates for secondary homes or investment properties, allowing the couple to potentially save hundreds of thousands of dollars with the false statements, The New York Times reported. It's a federal and state crime to knowingly make false statements on mortgage documents. The Paxtons did not respond to The New York Times or the AP's request for comment. The Daily Beast has reached out as well. The couple have long resided in a $1.5 million home in a gated community in the Dallas suburbs, according to the AP. That house is in the district that Angela, a state senator, represents. It's also where Ken Paxton—who is challenging incumbent Sen. John Cornyn in the 2026 Republican primary for U.S. Senate—said he lived until recently. Angela announced earlier this month that she's leaving Ken, a staunch Christian conservative and anti-abortion crusader who confessed to carrying on a years-long affair. 'I believe marriage is a sacred covenant and I have earnestly pursued reconciliation,' she wrote in a social media post. 'But in light of recent discoveries, I do not believe that it honors God or is loving to myself, my children, or Ken to remain in the marriage.' Besides the Dallas home, the couple—who have four children and five grandchildren—also own two rental properties in Austin, a rental property in College Station, Texas, and a fourth rental property in Broken Bow, Oklahoma, the AP reported. On mortgage documents, they listed the Dallas home and the two Austin properties as their primary residences. They also collected a homestead property tax break on both the Dallas home and one of the Austin properties—a home worth $1.1 million—that is only supposed to apply to the primary residence. They rent out the College Station home even though the mortgage says the property is for the Paxtons' exclusive use and cannot be rented out. And the Broken Bow home—a luxury five-bedroom cabin—is available for rent on Airbnb even though the $1.2 million mortgage, which is in Ken Paxton's name, stipulates that it can't be rented out. The findings are ironic given that President Donald Trump has accused his political adversaries—including California Sen. Adam Schiff and New York Attorney Letitia James—of mortgage fraud based on far less serious circumstances, according to the AP. Last month, Paxton told reporters, 'I hope that if [James] has done something wrong, I hope that she's actually held accountable.' Conveniently, Ken Paxton's office is the primary agencies tasked with investigating allegations of mortgage fraud, making him unlikely to face much legal trouble in Texas, the outlet reported. He has already weathered several scandals over the years. In 2015, he was indicted for securities fraud and paid a $300,000 settlement deal to avoid a criminal trial. Then in 2023, he was impeached by the Republican-controlled state House over accusations of corruption and abuse of power connected to his affair, though the state Senate acquitted him. His wife sat out the vote.
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
Project Veritas Withdraws Lawsuit Against The New York Times
The conservative group Project Veritas this week dropped its yearslong libel lawsuit against The New York Times. The lawsuit accused The Times of defamation for an article published in 2020 that reported that researchers from Stanford University and the University of Washington had described some videos produced by Project Veritas as probably part of a coordinated disinformation effort. The group also sued the researchers. Project Veritas lost its defamation claims against the university researchers in 2022, and was ordered to pay Stanford nearly $150,000 in legal fees. But the group had continued to pursue its claims against The Times after defeating the news organization's motion to dismiss. 'We are pleased that Project Veritas decided to withdraw its libel suit without any settlement,' Charlie Stadtlander, a Times spokesman, said in a statement, adding: 'The claim against The Times should never have been brought.' Lawyers for Project Veritas did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Months after Project Veritas filed its lawsuit, The Times published an article about a federal investigation into Project Veritas for possible involvement in the reported theft of a diary belonging to Ashley Biden, the daughter of President Joe Biden. The article quoted memos written by some of the group's lawyers. Lawyers for Project Veritas accused The Times of intruding on attorney-client privilege and trying to embarrass an opponent in active litigation. A judge ordered The Times to stop publication of any Project Veritas documents, a decision that First Amendment advocates protested as an attack on press freedom. A New York State appeals court ruled in February 2022 that The Times was free to publish while it appealed the judge's order. With Project Veritas's decision to drop the libel suit, the group's accusations of intruding on attorney-client privilege were also dropped.
