‘Horrific Fire' kills at least 61 at Iraq shopping mall
Advertisement
'There was a lack of emergency exits and emergency ladders and extinguishers. And unfortunately the province was not prepared for such an incident,' he said in an interview. 'We hope what happened will be a lesson for the future.'
Muntadher Haidar lost his wife and 2-year-old son in the fire. He told a local television channel that he had spoken with his wife when she was trapped inside the mall with their child as flames engulfed the shopping center.
'She said, 'Forgive me, your son died in my arms, and the fire has reached me, goodbye,'' he told the interviewer, sobbing. " I couldn't reach them, I was outside — and I couldn't."
Advertisement
'Then the line was cut?' the interviewer asked him. Haidar nodded, saying: 'And then the line was cut.'
Some political leaders in Iraq moved quickly to cite the fire as another devastating consequence of pervasive corruption in the country. Many regional analysts argue that corruption is a legacy of the US occupation of Iraq, when money was widely dispersed for construction projects and contracts with poor oversight. And many Iraqis complain that graft has only worsened in the years since. Poorly constructed or unfinished building projects — often attributed to corruption — are common.
Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, Iraq's prime minister, said in a statement Thursday that the tragedy in Kut was 'a form of murder and corruption that is not limited to the embezzlement of funds alone,' but that it 'also relates to the laxity and disregard for the technical and administrative procedures required for safety protocols.'
Muqtada al-Sadr, an influential Shiite cleric and political leader in Iraq, offered condolences in a separate statement. 'This tragedy adds to the tragedies and suffering of the Iraqi people as a result of so many forms of corruption and repeated neglect,' he said.
The country's commission of federal integrity, an independent body that deals with government accountability, highlighted what it said were shortcomings in the initial response to the fire by the Interior Ministry's rescue services, saying in a statement that it would also investigate the blaze.
Iraq's prime minister announced three days of mourning, and the governor of Wasit province, Mohammad al-Mayahy, said he would pursue legal action against the mall's owners.
'We will not show leniency toward those who were directly or indirectly responsible for this incident, which is surrounded by suspicious circumstances,' the governor said.
Advertisement
It was not immediately clear who owned the building. Video footage from the aftermath, verified by The New York Times, showed the building covered in ash that blanketed larger pieces of debris. By Thursday afternoon, some families of the victims had taken their dead to the city of Najaf, home to the 'Valley of Peace' cemetery where many members of Iraq's Shiite Muslim majority seek to be buried.
Hussein Faiq, a student at the University of Kut, said he lost six relatives in the blaze. The youngest victims were 3 and 4 years old, he said, and the oldest were his grandparents, who were in their 50s. 'One of the bodies was burned, but the rest died from suffocation,' he said.
The fire at the mall is the latest in a list of deadly blazes in Iraq in recent years that have raised questions about safety protocols and preparedness.
In 2023, more than 100 people were killed when a blaze tore through a wedding hall. In 2021, two separate fires at hospitals that were treating COVID patients killed at least 174 people.
In both cases, investigators found that the buildings had failed to adhere to basic safety standards. The wedding hall, which contained highly flammable material, lacked fire exits or extinguishers. And the front door of one of the hospital wards was padlocked, fire trucks ran out of water, and sprinklers malfunctioned.
This article originally appeared in
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
U.S. immigration policy overhaul threatens opportunities for African skilled workers
Joseph Edlow, the newly appointed director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), has signalled a major restructuring of the H-1B system and changes to the U.S. citizenship test, moves that many analysts believe will disproportionately affect immigrants from developing regions, including Africa. In remarks made shortly after assuming office, Edlow revealed that the current structure of the H-1B system no longer serves the needs of the American labor market and requires urgent restructuring. Edlow told The New York Times that the current U.S. citizenship test is too easy and in need of reform. ' The test as it's laid out right now isn't very difficult,' he said. 'It's easy to simply memorize the answers, and I don't think that truly reflects the spirit of the law.' He added that the H-1B visa should be used to " supplement, not supplant" American workers and businesses, a sentiment consistent with calls from conservative lawmakers. In addition to H-1B changes, Edlow announced plans to revise the U.S. naturalization test, a mandatory assessment for immigrants seeking citizenship. The current test requires applicants to study 100 civics questions and answer six correctly out of 10. Edlow indicated a return to a stricter version used during the Trump era, which expanded the question pool and raised the passing requirement to 12 out of 20. How the H-1B program supports African professionals The H-1B visa program allows U.S. employers to temporarily hire foreign nationals for roles in specialty occupations—positions that require specialized knowledge and at least a bachelor's degree or its equivalent. It also covers fashion models of distinguished merit and ability. Designed to fill gaps in the American labor market, the program helps companies access talent they cannot find domestically. The visa programme, which issues 85,000 slots annually through a lottery system, has long served sectors such as technology and healthcare. However, critics argue the system has been abused to replace U.S. workers with lower-cost foreign labor. For many African professionals, the H-1B program serves as a critical entry point into the U.S. workforce, offering opportunities in fields like engineering, healthcare, information technology, and academia. It not only opens doors to global career advancement but also contributes to the transfer of skills and remittances that benefit families and economies back home. The proposed reforms come amid growing political pressure on immigration practices. Vice President JD Vance recently criticized corporations for laying off American workers and hiring cheaper foreign labor through the H-1B channel. These proposed reforms, however, will not take immediate effect. Any changes to visa policy or naturalization procedures must first undergo the federal rule-making process before implementation.
New York Post
16 hours ago
- New York Post
Dems are finally speaking up on Mamdani's sickening embrace of antisemitism — but New York's leaders remain silent
Did you hear the good news? Some top Democrats finally are finding the courage to slam Zohran Mamdani's sickening embrace of antisemitism. Sadly, the news comes with a catch: the big Dems doing the right thing are not from New York. A reasonable conclusion is that the continuing silence from Gov. Hochul, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries means they are fine with the fact that their party's nominee to be New York City's next mayor is a bigot. If ever there was an example of party loyalty being a vice and not a virtue, this is it. The silence is outrageous. Of course, Hochul, Schumer and Jeffries wouldn't dare be quiet if Mamdani was overtly anti-black or anti-Latino, but Jews and Israel are fair game and held to a double standard. The pols' refusal to speak up also reflects how an anti-Israel movement has become a powerful force in their party. The New York Times, citing a Pew Research poll, reports that 'Nearly seven in 10 Dems nationally now express an unfavorable view of Israel, compared with 37 percent of Republicans.' 'Space for extremists' Given those numbers, the state's top Dems must know that criticizing Mamdani on Israel would not be well received by many voters, especially the young socialists who are the driving force in the Queens assemblyman's rocket rise. As a result, anti-Israeli voters, at least some of them antisemites, are now a bloc to be reckoned with in the party, nationally as well as in New York. The leaders who are not afraid to speak the truth about Mamdani's bigotry are Josh Shapiro, the governor of Pennsylvania, and Rahm Emanuel, the former ambassador to Japan and the former mayor of Chicago. In separate interviews with other outlets, both men, who are Jewish, focused on Mamdani's continuing refusal to denounce the phrase, 'Globalize the intifada.' Shapiro told the Jewish Insider that Mamdani 'left open far too much space for extremists to either use his words or for him to not condemn the words of extremists that said some blatantly antisemitic things.' He was referring to the fact that Mamdani, a Muslim, defended the intifada slogan by saying it reflects 'a desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights.' In reality, the phrase is widely understood as a call to commit violence against Jews anywhere and everywhere. It is often paired by college radicals with another hateful phrase, 'From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be Free.' That one is a clear call for the elimination of Israel and the mass murder of the 7 million Jews who live there. On NBC's 'Meet the Press,' anchor Kristen Welker gave Mamdani multiple chances to denounce 'globalize the intifada,' but he refused, saying only, 'That's not language that I use.' 'The language that I use, and the language that I will continue to use to lead this city, is that which speaks clearly to my intent, which is an intent grounded in the belief in universal human rights,' he added. See, he believes in human rights– — unless you are a Jew, especially one living Iin the Jewish homeland. Mamdani has been harshly critical of Israel for years and supports the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, which would have American universities and companies boycott Israeli schools and products. If he were mayor, would city schools join the extremist movement? Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters 'Would arrest Bibi' He also regularly condemns Israel's military actions in Gaza, which he foolishly calls 'genocide.' He said that if he were mayor, Gotham would arrest Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he visited, citing the International Criminal Court's unjustified warrant. These positions are especially stunning in light of the fact that the city he wants to lead has the largest Jewish population of any city in the world. Shapiro, in his criticism, said leaders 'have to speak and act with moral clarity, and when supporters of yours say things that are blatantly antisemitic, you can't leave room for that to just sit there. You've got to condemn that.' Emanuel, who was also chief of staff during the Obama administration, made his criticism during a podcast with Free Press founder Bari Weiss. He said, 'I've never met Mamdani, but he strikes me, from a distance, as a very smart, sensitive person. But to not be sensitive to that is incredibly off-kilter to me. ' And the signs of 'we're going to globalize intifada,' …. . . it means you're not hearing a big constituency in the city you want to be mayor of.' Asked by Weiss if a politician who does not condemn 'globalizing the intifada' has a place in the party, Emanuel gave a refreshingly clear answer: 'No.' To be sure, as Shapiro and Emanuel noted, all criticism of Israel and its government is not necessarily antisemitic. Rather, it crosses the line when it goes to Israel's right to exist and when it is repeatedly singled out for behavior that is considered acceptable by other countries. That's the disgraceful history of the United Nations, where despotic nations such as China, South Africa and Iran are considered fit to judge Israel on human rights. The fact is that 2 million Arab Israelis have broad rights, including voting, yet there are next to zero Jews in most Arab and Muslim nations. The double standard reflects the normalization and internationalization of Jew hatred. That's the poisonous backdrop to Mamdani's statements and positions. He also has been silent about Hamas terrorists butchering Israeli women and children and holding hostages in Gaza for a year and 10 months, some of whom were executed. Similarly, in a 2017 rap song he professed his love for the Holy Land 5 individuals who were convicted by the US of providing material support to Hamas. A new low He has never recanted that support, nor has he condemned Iran and its other proxies, Hezbollah and the Houthis, as well as the mullahs' threats to destroy Israel. Similarly, the ongoing slaughter of Christians and Druze in Syria by Islamists hasn't stirred his concern. His top general election opponents, — two Democrats, Mayor Adams and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, — both faulted Mamdani's embrace of antisemitic garbage. As has Curtis Sliwa, the GOP nominee. Another Democrat who has been openly critical of Mamdani is Bronx Rep. Ritchie Torres, a top supporter of Israel and scourge of the rise of antisemitism in his party. In response to Torres' criticism, backers of Mamdani threatened to support primary opponents against Torres. The point is clear: Israel should no longer count on support from many Dems. Those who dare to back the Jewish state should assume their party will try to boot them from its ranks. That marks a new low in American politics, and yet top New York Dems still remain silent. Shame on them.
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Hit by Devastating Proof Epstein Birthday Book Is Real
Donald Trump's efforts to distance himself from Jeffrey Epstein are crumbling, as new reporting offers compelling evidence of a birthday book containing messages to the sex offender. The president maintains that a letter he was reported to have written to Epstein for his 50th birthday is 'fake,' but new photos and descriptions in The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal on Thursday suggest the birthday book exists. Adding to evidence that he wrote a note, Trump was on a contributor list for the 2003 book that included the names of dozens of Epstein acquaintances, according to reports in the two newspapers on Thursday. According to sources who spoke to the Journal, Epstein's accomplice and former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, sought help from a number of people, including assistants, to put together the album. A handwritten letter from Maxwell that introduced the book was highlighted in the Times piece. The letter says, 'The idea behind this book was simply to gather stories and old photographs to jog your memory about places, people and different events.' 'Some of the letters will definitely achieve their intended goal—some well… you will have to read them to see for yourself,' it said. 'I know you will enjoy looking through the book, and I hope you will derive as much pleasure looking through it as I did putting it together for you.' In addition, Epstein's brother, Mark Epstein, told the Journal that he recalls Maxwell putting together the book for his brother's birthday. Mark also contributed to the book, the newspaper noted. The Times also published what it said was a previously undisclosed photo of Trump with Epstein and singer James Brown. Trump blasted out a Truth Social rant mentioning Epstein shortly after the reports published on Thursday night, writing that 'Radical Left Democrats are doing everything in their power to distract and obfuscate from our GREAT six months of service to America.' 'They have gone absolutely CRAZY, and are playing another Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax but, this time, under the guise of what we will call the Jeffrey Epstein SCAM,' he wrote. Last week, the Journal published bombshell reporting that Trump contributed a racy letter to the 50th birthday album, written in the drawn outline of a naked woman. Trump said the report was 'fake,' and subsequently filed a lawsuit against the newspaper and its owner Rupert Murdoch. 'I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women,' he said, even though there's evidence he's drawn plenty of sketches. 'It's not my language. It's not my words.' In its Thursday report, the Journal wrote that Trump was listed under the 'Friends' category in the leather-bound book, along with former President Bill Clinton. A handwritten message from Clinton in the book, according to the Journal, read: 'It's reassuring isn't it, to have lasted as long, across all the years of learning and knowing, adventures and [illegible word], and also to have your childlike curiosity, the drive to make a difference and the solace of friends.' Reached for comment, Clinton's deputy chief of staff, Angel Ureña, referred the Daily Beast to a July 2019 statement stating that the former president 'knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to in Florida some years ago, or those with which he has been recently charged in New York.' The statement said Clinton took four trips on Epstein's plane in 2002 and 2003, accompanied by staff and a Secret Service detail, and that he had not spoken to the disgraced financier in 'well over a decade.' According to The Journal, other contributors to the book included Wall Street billionaire Leon Black, fashion designer Vera Wang, media mogul Mort Zuckerman, former Epstein and Trump attorney Alan Dershowitz, and ex-Victoria's Secret CEO Leslie Wexner. A lawyer who has represented over 200 victims of Epstein, Brad Edwards, told MSNBC on Wednesday that 'multiple' victims had spoken of the book's existence, and some even helped to compile it. He said Epstein's estate possesses the book. Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, said afterwards he planned to subpoena the estate for the book. An attorney for the estate said it would 'comply with all lawful process.' The White House did not immediately return the Daily Beast's request for comment on the new reporting. In a statement to the Times, White House communications director Steven Cheung repeated his previous claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago for 'being a creep' and that 'this is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media.' Cheung issued the same message on Tuesday after CNN published images of Epstein at Trump's 1993 wedding to Marla Maples, adding further strain to Trump's efforts to downplay their ties. Trump's White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, texted the Journal that it was 'writing yet another defamatory story about the President of the United States about an alleged letter they don't even have because the President never wrote it.' Epstein turned 50 in 2003, three years before his first arrest. He pleaded guilty in 2008 to state charges, including soliciting prostitution from a minor, and served a lenient 13-month stint in a Palm Beach County jail. In 2019, he was arrested again and charged with federal sex trafficking crimes. He died in jail while awaiting trial. It was ruled a suicide but led to substantial speculation and conspiracy theories that were stoked by Trump himself. Maxwell was convicted in 2021 and is serving a 20-year prison sentence for conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse and traffic underage girls. The president reposted a tweet in 2019 that suggested Bill and Hillary Clinton were involved in Epstein's death. Trump has for years suggested that shadowy Democratic elites are part of a 'deep state' working to undermine him, which has proven to be red meat for his base. That rhetoric has come back to bite him recently, after he declined to release the so-called 'Epstein files' his supporters have been demanding. Trump and Epstein's friendship in the '80s and '90s was already well reported, but the renewed media scrutiny and furore from his supporters over the files has shone new light on their relationship. Solve the daily Crossword
