‘Horrific Fire' kills at least 61 at Iraq shopping mall
Advertisement
'There was a lack of emergency exits and emergency ladders and extinguishers. And unfortunately the province was not prepared for such an incident,' he said in an interview. 'We hope what happened will be a lesson for the future.'
Muntadher Haidar lost his wife and 2-year-old son in the fire. He told a local television channel that he had spoken with his wife when she was trapped inside the mall with their child as flames engulfed the shopping center.
'She said, 'Forgive me, your son died in my arms, and the fire has reached me, goodbye,'' he told the interviewer, sobbing. " I couldn't reach them, I was outside — and I couldn't."
Advertisement
'Then the line was cut?' the interviewer asked him. Haidar nodded, saying: 'And then the line was cut.'
Some political leaders in Iraq moved quickly to cite the fire as another devastating consequence of pervasive corruption in the country. Many regional analysts argue that corruption is a legacy of the US occupation of Iraq, when money was widely dispersed for construction projects and contracts with poor oversight. And many Iraqis complain that graft has only worsened in the years since. Poorly constructed or unfinished building projects — often attributed to corruption — are common.
Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, Iraq's prime minister, said in a statement Thursday that the tragedy in Kut was 'a form of murder and corruption that is not limited to the embezzlement of funds alone,' but that it 'also relates to the laxity and disregard for the technical and administrative procedures required for safety protocols.'
Muqtada al-Sadr, an influential Shiite cleric and political leader in Iraq, offered condolences in a separate statement. 'This tragedy adds to the tragedies and suffering of the Iraqi people as a result of so many forms of corruption and repeated neglect,' he said.
The country's commission of federal integrity, an independent body that deals with government accountability, highlighted what it said were shortcomings in the initial response to the fire by the Interior Ministry's rescue services, saying in a statement that it would also investigate the blaze.
Iraq's prime minister announced three days of mourning, and the governor of Wasit province, Mohammad al-Mayahy, said he would pursue legal action against the mall's owners.
'We will not show leniency toward those who were directly or indirectly responsible for this incident, which is surrounded by suspicious circumstances,' the governor said.
Advertisement
It was not immediately clear who owned the building. Video footage from the aftermath, verified by The New York Times, showed the building covered in ash that blanketed larger pieces of debris. By Thursday afternoon, some families of the victims had taken their dead to the city of Najaf, home to the 'Valley of Peace' cemetery where many members of Iraq's Shiite Muslim majority seek to be buried.
Hussein Faiq, a student at the University of Kut, said he lost six relatives in the blaze. The youngest victims were 3 and 4 years old, he said, and the oldest were his grandparents, who were in their 50s. 'One of the bodies was burned, but the rest died from suffocation,' he said.
The fire at the mall is the latest in a list of deadly blazes in Iraq in recent years that have raised questions about safety protocols and preparedness.
In 2023, more than 100 people were killed when a blaze tore through a wedding hall. In 2021, two separate fires at hospitals that were treating COVID patients killed at least 174 people.
In both cases, investigators found that the buildings had failed to adhere to basic safety standards. The wedding hall, which contained highly flammable material, lacked fire exits or extinguishers. And the front door of one of the hospital wards was padlocked, fire trucks ran out of water, and sprinklers malfunctioned.
This article originally appeared in
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Ken Paxton Claimed Three Houses as His Primary Residence, Records Show
Attorney General Ken Paxton of Texas and his now-estranged wife, Angela, declared three separate Texas homes as their primary residence in mortgage documents, according to records obtained by The New York Times. The possible misrepresentation could have allowed the couple to secure more favorable loan terms and save hundreds of thousands of dollars. The issue, first reported by The Associated Press, emerged Thursday, two weeks after his wife, a state senator, filed for divorce, accusing him of adultery, and a little more than three months after Mr. Paxton announced that he would challenge Senator John Cornyn in what could be the Republican primary season's toughest, most expensive race in 2026. The Paxtons did not respond to questions about their real estate holdings. The Paxtons reside in a home worth more than $1 million in McKinney, a suburb of Dallas, according to their voter registration records. That house is in the State Senate district that Ms. Paxton represents and the one Mr. Paxton represented as a state senator before he was elected attorney general in 2014. The couple also holds mortgages on two houses in Austin, each of which they also called their primary address. Those houses appear to be rental properties, based on online listings. Mr. Paxton has disclosed rental income from two Austin sources on his financial disclosure documents. Properties that generate rental income are considered investment properties and can be more difficult to finance than owner-occupied homes because they are considered riskier investments. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Wall Street Journal
3 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Democrats' ‘Autopsy' Flop
It's hard to know who is currently winning the contest for 2024 ostrichism: A Democratic Party conducting an election 'autopsy' that ignores Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, or the hooting media that ignores everything beyond the Biden/Harris campaign disaster. It is this echo chamber that elected Donald Trump twice, and the question is when the left will remember that voters are the ones who pick the president. The New York Times's revelation that the Democratic National Committee's 2024 campaign autopsy won't touch on Mr. Biden's decision to run again, his coronation of Ms. Harris, or her key decisions, is certainly worth a skewering. As is the news that the report will instead devote most of its attention to 'outside groups,' including the party's main SuperPAC, which apparently lost Democrats the whole kaboodle by misallocating advertising dollars.
Gizmodo
3 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Court Rules Mike Lindell Doesn't Have to Pay $5 Million in Hacked Voting Machine Bet
Mike Lindell, the founder and CEO of MyPillow, could be considered a loser in many ways, but not in a way that will cost him $5 million. The New York Times reports that a federal appeals court ruled on Wednesday that Lindell will not have to pay out the prize money for his 'Prove Mike Wrong' challenge, which offered up a $5 million reward to anyone who could sufficiently debunk his baseless claim that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump. Lindell offered up the prize money in 2021 during his 'Cyber Symposium' event that he held in South Dakota, in which he laid out his 'evidence' to prove that China hacked US voting machines and changed votes. Lindell invited cybersecurity experts to the event and offered up the prize money to anyone in attendance who could prove his findings to be inaccurate—a challenge that software engineer Robert Zeidman took on. If you assume that proving Lindell's findings are false would be easy, you're not wrong. Lindell's argument primarily hung on the idea that data from voting machines could be seen moving across Chinese servers. According to Zeidman's account, he determined that Lindell's files of 'proof' that votes were being manipulated by China were, in fact, a collection of nonsense data. Zeidman told Politico that the supposed 'evidence' contained no voting machine packet capture data that would have shown the votes being transferred to Chinese servers. So he wrote up his report, submitted it, and sat back and waited for his $5 million payday. The hard part, it turns out, is getting conspiracy theorists to admit they are wrong. Zeidman said he never heard from Lindell and had to file an arbitration lawsuit to have a court adjudicate whether he actually debunked the MyPillow guy's findings. In 2023, a private arbitration panel ruled in Zeidman's favor, determining that he proved 'unequivocally' that Lindell's data did not reflect 2020 election data. Lindell was given 30 days to pay up. Now it looks like that payday will probably never come. Lindell appealed the ruling and got a decision in his favor, thanks to the fact that he provided extremely broad rules that apparently gave him lots of outs. 'From the four corners of the Challenge contract as defined by the Official Rules, there is no way to read 'information related to the November 2020 election' as meaning only information that is packet capture data,' the court ruled. 'It's a great day for our country,' Lindell told the Times, as if the entire United States was holding its breath, hoping that Mr. MyPillow wouldn't have to give up any of his money. While Lindell seems to have wriggled out of this case for now, he'll still have plenty more lawyer fees in front of him. Earlier this year, a court ruled that he must pay $2.3 million to a former employee of Dominion Voting Systems after Lindell called the worker a 'traitor to the United States.' Lindell plans to appeal that one, too.
