'Good guy' motorist who chased hit-and-run driver but ended up in court instead is banned from roads for 12 months
Police have been accused of 'going after the good guy' after a motorist who pursued another driver who had collided with him ended up in court himself.
Gavin Webb willingly handed police dashcam footage of him following the driver who had just hit his car and sped off without stopping.
But instead officers used the video against the 48-year-old who was charged and prosecuted while the other motorist got off scot-free.
Webb's Audi A5 was hit by the impatient Vauxhall driver when he allegedly mounted the kerb and cut him up in Poole, Dorset, on February 4 this year.
The driver did not stop after the collision so Webb decided to follow him.
He called 999, reported what had happened and told the operator he was following the culprit before delivering an 'informed commentary' of the other driver's overtaking manoeuvres and alleged speeding in a residential area.
At one point he can be heard telling the call handler 'he's going to have a head on crash'.
The dashcam footage shows the Vauxhall driver turn his car around after getting blocked in, prompting Webb to get out and tell him the police were on their way.
The video shows the driver then 'ramming' Webb - still on foot -out of the way and driving off again.
Webb, a sales accounts manager for a company that sells historic coins, followed him again before finding the Vauxhall in a dead end road.
A court heard Webb immediately gave his dashcam footage to two police officers who told him 'good job'.
But when the footage was later reviewed a decision was made to charge the defendant with dangerous driving.
The other driver was later identified and attended a voluntary police interview over the matter but was not charged.
Webb, a father-of-three, faced the prospect of jail had he not admitted the charge. He was banned from driving for 12 months and ordered to carry out community service.
His lawyer told the court Webb's intentions were 'pure' and the 'system' has gone 'after the good guy'.
James Moore said: 'This is an incredibly unique offence.
'The chap who made off is the instigator and protagonist of this whole incident.
'He illegally and dangerously cuts up Mr Webb, who is moving forward and there's a collision. He was not responsible for that accident.
'He rings 999 and says 'please come as quick as you can.' Not once does the controller say desist, don't follow him. He is actively encouraged to pursue.
'He was driving in a manner which is in control and gives a very informed commentary.
'He has not collided with any vehicles, he has not injured any persons.'
Mr Moore said the other driver's insurance had paid out for the damaged caused in the initial collision.
He added: 'The prosecution present this as he was angered, lost the plot and pursued this chap. No, Mr Webb is concerned the driver of that vehicle is a risk to other members of the public and might be in a stolen vehicle.
'If the guy who had been driving that car had been found with a load of weapons or drugs, (Webb) wouldn't be here today, he would be applauded for apprehending him.
'This is well-intentioned. Ten years ago he would not be here, but we live in a world now where everyone is held to the book regardless.'
He said a prison sentence would be appropriate 'for people who aren't insured, under the influence or evading the police – this is the flipside'
Mr Moore told Poole Magistrates' Court his client was a 'member of the public who has slightly crossed the line' while thinking he was doing the right thing.
He added: 'He's a decent, law-abiding guy. Sometimes the system should use a bit of discretion and not go after the good guy.'
But Nicola Rees, prosecuting, said the dashcam video showed Webb dangerous driving at high speeds through residential roads.
She said: 'He captured the initial incident on dashcam, he could've reported it. Instead he went on a high speed chase through busy streets and residential roads, dangerous driving himself.
'It was a deliberate decision to ignore the rules of the road. He sped significantly in excess of the limit.'
Michael Harris, chair of the bench, described it as a 'moment of complete stupidity'.
Sentencing on Monday, he said Webb was lucky it wasn't more serious, as a pedestrian could have stepped out between two cars, or a car could have pulled out from a side road.
Mr Harris said: 'We are going to deal with this as leniently as we can. But this offence is so serious we could have imposed a custodial sentence.
'We have gone outside the guidelines based on what we have heard about you and our understanding of what happened.'
Mr Harris said if Webb had not admitted the offence and been found guilty after a trial he would have been facing custody.
The maximum sentence for dangerous driving is two years' imprisonment.
Mr Harris told Webb: 'I want you to understand how close this is to the edge. This was a strange one. I feel confident we won't see you again.'
Webb, of Poole, was given a 12-month community order with a requirement to carry out 30 hours of unpaid work and banned from driving for 12 months.
He was also ordered to pay £114 victim surcharge and £85 prosecution costs.
A spokesperson for Dorset Police confirmed the other driver had attended for a voluntary police interview but 'no further action' was brought against him.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE The cars smuggled out of Britain after being stolen to order: Moment shipping container hiding three pick-up trucks is intercepted by investigators as it made its way to Africa
This is the dramatic moment investigators opened a shipping container at a UK port hiding three stolen pick-up trucks which were intended to be smuggled to Africa. The three vehicles worth at least £40,000 each were found to have been stacked on top of each other in the container which was intercepted at Felixstowe in Suffolk. Experts told a new Channel 4 Dispatches documentary that Hyundai, Kia, Toyota and Lexus cars were increasingly being stolen as well as higher-value Range Rovers. The Middle East and Africa have a huge market for second-hand car parts, driving the demand for stolen cars in the UK which is also linked to illegal drugs market. The sting was carried out by Adam Gibson, an officer from the National Vehicle Crime Intelligence Service (NaVCIS), a privately-funded force working with the UK police. Mr Gibson could not reveal on camera why the containers he was checking were deemed suspicious amid fears such a revelation could give criminals an advantage. But the clip showed his team opening up the unit at Felixstowe, which is the UK's largest container port where 11,000 shipping containers pass through each day. Felixstowe is the UK's largest container port where 11,000 containers pass through each day Inside the container he found three cars stacked on top of one another, all stolen and with falsified paperwork. Mr Gibson said: 'We've seen five cars in a container this size, so you'll see quite quickly from the way it's probably loaded that something's not quite right.' Looking inside, he added: 'They've got £40,000 plus per car. That's not how you load them in a container. This box is headed to Africa, which the roads out in Africa are obviously suited to this kind of thing.' A white pick-up truck Mr Gibson found had a 2022 number plate - but he determined that it was actually made in 2023 and had been reported stolen from Kent in January. He continued: 'Whereas we were finding Range Rovers worth £150,000, we're getting pickup trucks and SUVs worth £40,000 now. 'We are seeing brands like Hyundai, Kia, Toyota, Lexus. So the quality has dropped off, I suppose, but the volume has gone up.' Across three containers, Mr Gibson found 12 cars in total - with family photographs visible inside at least one of them. He added: 'Some gangs will literally gut the car of any personal effects. Others will just leave everything. 'There's kids' seats, toys, all sorts of them. I'm constantly told by people that vehicle crime, where it's victimless, it's just the insurance companies. 'Yes, the insurance company pay out, but we all get our premiums go up because the insurance aren't going to absorb it. So it has a knock-on effect on everyone else.' Last year the number of stolen vehicles recovered by NaVCIS increased to 589, having been at 76 in 2021 – and many of them had been broken down for parts. The documentary also obtained exclusive figures suggesting seven out of ten cars stolen in England and Wales are never recovered. Freedom of Information requests to police forces in England and Wales also revealed that – for the 18 forces who responded - only 3.4 per cent of reports of a car being stolen between 2020 and 2024 led to someone being charged or summonsed. Highly organised gangs are stealing cars then dismantling them at so called 'chop shops' before shipping them out of the country. In one clip, two car thieves demonstrate how they can use keyless technology bought from the dark web how they can steal a car in just 20 seconds.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Race and lack of accountability involved in Child Q strip search, tribunal hears
Race and lack of accountability are at the heart of why and how a 15 year-old black girl was strip-searched at school by police after being wrongly suspected of carrying cannabis was handled, a misconduct hearing has been told. The degree of failures surrounding the 'grossly disproportionate search', allegedly without an appropriate adult present, meant the Metropolitan Police officers did not look to protect a potentially vulnerable child, according to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). Their actions could possibly undermine public trust and confidence in the police, the IOPC warned. The girl, known as Child Q, was strip searched by officers in Hackney, east London, on December 3 2020. She arrived for a mock exam smelling of cannabis and was taken to the medical room to be strip-searched while teachers remained outside. This involved the removal of her clothing including underwear, her bending over and having to expose intimate parts of her body while she was menstruating, the panel heard. Trainee detective constable (TDC) Kristina Linge, Pc Victoria Wray and Pc Rafal Szmydynski, who were all police constables at the time, all deny gross misconduct over their treatment of the girl. In closing submissions Elliot Gold, for the IOPC, said discrimination is not the sole ground the panel needs to consider, but added: 'The issue of race provides you with the only explanation that is left as to why the officers' failures were so great and why so much went wrong and the only explanation as to why it all went so badly.' He told the tribunal panel in south-east London, who could consider sacking the officers if gross misconduct is proved: 'The resolution of this case should primarily be forward-facing. 'It is about preventing similar misconduct from recurring in the future, with the consequent damage to trust and confidence in the police, especially within the black community, which these events have caused.' He added: 'This case shows, that members of racial groups need protection from conduct driven by unrecognised or unconscious bias as much as from conscious and deliberate discrimination.' Mr Gold also noted 'there are almost no contemporaneous documents or records of this case – why? That's because it is the officers who failed to make them.' No drugs were found by the teachers before the school's safeguarding deputy called police. They were called amid fears Child Q could have been carrying drugs for someone, being exploited or groomed in the community – which meant it was a safeguarding issue for her and other school pupils. Mr Gold said 'there is a potential evidential conflict as to whether the teachers were insistent there should be a search'. He added: 'There may be criticism of the school calling the police for advice on a safeguarding matter but that shows they did not know what to do, rather than being insistent (on a search) it shows uncertainty.' Child Q's mother, who was described as a 'supportive' parent, was not present during the strip search and neither was any appropriate adult. Mr Gold said that 'simply being questioned by two police officers, two white police officers for a young black girl may be daunting.' Mr Gold said: 'No adult was present to assist child Q during this time – whether during the conversation with child to decide on the search, when the decision was made to perform a search or when the decision was made to perform a strip search.' PC Linge told Child Q she would be arrested if she failed to consent to being searched, the panel heard. Child Q told the two officers who searched her that she was menstruating, but the search continued during which her sanitary pad was exposed, the panel was told. When no drugs were found after the strip search, Child Q's hair was also scoured. When Child Q said she was on her period this was 'a new piece of evidence' for the officers and it was a chance for the officers to consider the proportionality of what they were doing, according to the IOPC. Within days of the strip search, Child Q had gone to her doctor with symptoms of anxiety. Mr Gold went through a series of doctors' notes including one which suggested Child Q had the 'appearance of symptoms of anxiety consistent with PTSD'. He added: 'No one is likely to suggest that Child Q was anything other than distressed and shaken by a traumatic episode.' According to the allegations, Pcs Linge and Szmydynski performed a search that exposed the girl's intimate parts when this was 'disproportionate in all the circumstances'. Pcs Linge and Wray are also accused of performing or allowing the search in a manner which was 'unjustified, inappropriate, disproportionate, humiliating and degrading'. It is alleged that all of this happened without authorisation, in the absence of an appropriate adult, and with no adequate concern being given to Child Q's age, sex, or the need to treat her as a child, and that the child's race was an effective cause of this. Pcs Szmydynski and Linge are further accused of giving a 'misleading record' of the search afterwards. Outrage over Child Q's treatment led to protests outside Stoke Newington Police Station. Scotland Yard has previously apologised over the incident.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Inmate died after ‘restraint-related' incident in prison, inquest hears
A home office doctor has warned jurors about the 'complex' restraint-related death of a father-of-four prisoner, an inquest heard. Azroy Dawes-Clarke, 28, from Romford, east London, was an inmate at HMP Elmley, on the Isle of Sheppey, when he died after suffering multiple cardiac arrests on November 10 2021. He is alleged to have attempted to commit suicide by suffocation before becoming violent and being 'restrained' by prison staff. The medical cause of death has been given as hypoxic ischemic brain injury but it is unclear when and by whom that injury was caused. On Wednesday, Home Office forensic pathologist Dr Olaf Biedrzycki told jurors at Kent and Medway Coroner's Court in Maidstone that medically, Mr Dawes-Clarke's case was 'about as difficult as it gets' for him. He said: 'The cause of death is given as hypoxic ischemic brain injury that's due to either the fact that his heart or lungs stopped working … and that happened very quickly after a period of third-party restraint, which happened shortly after seizure-like activity, which was treated with Diazepam. 'That all followed compression of the neck with a ligature.' There had been a previous incident where Mr Dawes-Clarke had attempted to self-harm or commit suicide two days before his death, the court heard. Body-worn camera footage taken in HMP Elmley and shown in court showed four officers kneeling on and next to Mr Dawes-Clarke, who was face down on the floor prior to his first cardiac arrest. He could be heard yelling repeatedly while restrained, until he was handcuffed and then went limp. One officer was heard saying, 'Have we got a pulse on him? We're not sure if he's breathing, we're not sure', as Mr Dawes-Clarke lay on the floor. Medical staff began CPR before he was taken to hospital, he suffered two more cardiac arrests in the ambulance and a fourth upon his arrival at hospital, where he died soon after. Dr Biedrzycki added that the 'crux' of the inquest would be whether Mr Dawes-Clarke recovered between the suicide attempt and the restraint from prison officers. 'The restraint element is of greater importance if you conclude that the initial ligature compression did not actually cause him to be unconscious and fitting,' he added. Mr Dawes-Clarke's alleged history of self-harm and suicide attempts whilst in prison was not known to the family; he also had several physical health conditions that required ongoing treatment, the court heard. His mother, Marcia Neil, was indignant through tears as she told the court: 'Maybe if they'd phoned me, I could have helped!' Reading a pen portrait, his sister, Shay Inico, said: 'My brother was more than just family; he was my anchor, my confidant, and my unwavering source of support. He was kind-hearted and compassionate, always putting the needs of others before his own. 'Losing him in such a senseless and cruel manner has completely shattered me. The thought of him being restrained, suffering and treated without dignity haunts me every single day.' Father-of-four Mr Dawes-Clarke liked fantasy films and played semi-professional football, he was in the Arsenal FC academy while he was growing up. 'I share this statement because my brother's story deserves to be heard. He was a person full of love, kindness, and potential. He was not defined by his circumstances, and he deserved so much more than the injustice he faced. His life mattered, and his memory will forever remain in our hearts,' said Ms Inico. On Wednesday, his mother, sister and uncle were in court to observe proceedings, and his brother appeared via video-link. Mr Dawes-Clarke was recalled to HMP Elmley on April 23 2020 after breaching his license. 'Where restraint-related deaths do occur, they're invariably erroneously complex cases,' Dr Biedrzycki warned jurors. He added: 'This is about as difficult as it gets for forensic pathologists, and I don't have all the answers.' The inquest continues and is listed until July 11.
