Trump extends Mexico trade talks another 90 days, keeps tariffs in place
Trump, posting on Truth Social, said his phone conversation with Sheinbaum was 'very successful in that, more and more, we are getting to know and understand each other.'
Trump said that goods from Mexico imported into the U.S. would continue to face a 25% tariff that the U.S. president has ostensibly linked to fentanyl trafficking. The Republican said that autos would face a 25% tariffs, while copper, aluminum and steel would be taxed at 50%.
Trump said that Mexico would end its 'Non Tariff Trade Barriers,' but he didn't provide specifics.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Some goods continue to be protected from the tariffs by the 2020 U.S. Mexico Canada Agreement, or USMCA, which Trump negotiated during his first term.
Story continues below advertisement
But Trump appeared to have soured on that deal, which is up for renegotiation next year. One of his first significant moves as president was to tariff goods from both Mexico and Canada earlier this year.
0:52
Mexico, Canada coordinate as Trump warns of new USMCA tariffs
U.S. Census Bureau figures show that the U.S. ran a $171.5 billion trade imbalance with Mexico last year. That means the U.S. bought more goods from Mexico than it sold to the country.
The imbalance with Mexico has grown in the aftermath of the USMCA as it was only $63.3 billion in 2016, the year before Trump started his first term in office.
Besides addressing fentanyl trafficking, Trump has made it a goal to close the trade gap.
Sheinbaum celebrated the tariff pause in a post on X, saying her call with Trump was 'very good' and that Mexico 'avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow.'
Story continues below advertisement
—With additional files from Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
25 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Months into his worldwide trade war, Donald Trump still appears resistant to learning how tariffs work
There have been a lot of headlines lately about how U.S. President Donald Trump is winning his trade wars, which he is, in the same way that one can score a goal in hockey by shooting the puck into one's own net. Some of Trump's latest wins have included separate deals with the United Kingdom and European Union members, in which imports from those places will be hit with a 15 per cent tariff upon arrival in the United States. Trump sees this as a win because foreign imports will be tariffed, while American goods will face no such treatment in the EU or Britain. He even explains it this way: 'They' will pay something. 'We' will pay nothing.
Global News
25 minutes ago
- Global News
Ford government started studying Hwy. 401 tunnel after private-sector bids: docs
Years before Ontario Premier Doug Ford stood in Etobicoke to declare his government's desire to build an express tunnel underneath Highway 401, the province began looking for ways to relieve North America's most congested artery. Instead of turning to the traditional public procurement process for solutions to Toronto's traffic woes, the government opted for a new route: an open portal where private companies could submit unsolicited proposals on public infrastructure projects. Over a three-year period, that portal, internal government documents reveal, received three unsolicited proposals to specifically alleviate traffic along the 401 — among them tunnels, tolled roads and managed lanes. In September 2024, Ford announced a feasibility study for a 50-kilometre tunnel beneath the province's largest highway and said he wanted a third-party analysis of the idea to determine the final length and scope of the mega project. Story continues below advertisement What Ford didn't mention when he stood at the podium was the fact his government had been considering the idea since 2019, had already studied it, and even abandoned the plan after encountering 'challenges and risks.' Hundreds of pages of internal government presentations and emails, obtained by Global News using freedom of information laws, demonstrate how suggestions from three private construction firms helped spark the idea to build one of the largest public infrastructure projects in Ontario's history. The Ministry of Transportation said in a statement the tunnel was part of its plan 'to build a modern and integrated transportation network, and give Ontarians options.' Private proposals In 2019, the Ministry of Infrastructure set up a new provincial portal to receive ideas for big projects from the private sector. The Ford government was looking for ideas that relate to Ontario's 'core types of infrastructure, including new transit infrastructure, health care facilities, highways, law enforcement facilities and housing.' Story continues below advertisement While it's unclear exactly how many proposals have been submitted to the government through the portal, the documents obtained by Global News show that, between 2019 and 2021, three separate private highway plans were sent to the government. One was for two 22-kilometre tolled tunnels under Highway 401, submitted by the construction firm Aecon in 2019. As Global News previously reported, the Aecon idea for a privately-operated tunnel solution to gridlock had also been pitched to the City of Toronto and to the previous Ontario Liberal government. Another proposal came, also in 2019, from Cintra for a ''U-Ring' of managed lanes' on Highway 427, Highway 401, the Gardiner Expressway and Don Valley Parkway. The final pitch, in September 2021, was to expand the central section of Highway 401 with tolled expressway lanes. That was submitted by Acciona. According to internal documents, the government directed civil servants to assess 'the feasibility and benefits of a tunnel or similar large-scale capital infrastructure project on the central Hwy 401 corridor.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The studies considered three tunnel concepts and two elevated roadways. View image in full screen A summary of Highway 401 tunnel bids contained in a government assessment. Global News Ontario NDP Leader Marit Stiles said she was concerned the private bids had helped to create the idea. Story continues below advertisement 'Usually in a situation like that you would not have them all arrive unsolicited; you would put out a public call and the government didn't do that,' she said. 'Whenever I hear about situations like that, it reminds me a little bit about the Greenbelt scenario, where suddenly some developers seem to know that there were going to be possible changes coming. So it's a question really of who knew what, when and why?' Project studied in detail Government documents suggest the 'initial assessment' of a tunnel under Highway 401 began sometime in late 2019, soon after the government's Unsolicited Proposal portal was populated with ideas. Hundreds of pages of emails viewed by Global News show officials with the Ministry of Transportation and external consultants studied the tunnel in detail to 'complete preliminary evaluation and costing of options including considerations for tunnelling beneath Highway 401.' Story continues below advertisement While the work was paused in 2021 — as the province began focusing on a GTA-wide transportation strategy — it was restarted in the summer of 2024, when two ministers were told about the plan. 'The original reason this briefing came about was because Minister Sarkaria and Minister Surma caught wind of the Tunnelling USP from a few years ago and requested a briefing,' one email sent between civil servants said. 'I believe that was in early July.' The vast majority of the messages were sent between civil servants and political staff through the summer of 2024 as they prepared to brief Infrastructure Minister Kinga Surma and Transportation Minister Prabmeet Sarkaria on what work had been done so far. The emails suggest work already completed on the tunnel included: a price estimate, technical studies and assessments of the market to build it. 'I see from previous materials that project planning was paused in late 2021, pending the release of the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH) Transportation Plan. Can you please confirm whether this work has resumed? And if not, why has it not resumed?' an email sent from a political staffer to a civil servant last summer asks. The email also requested, 'information on: any geotechnical work has been done already and what work will be required should tunnelling be pursued; the timelines for planning and design and estimated timelines for overall project; and finally, estimated costs of planning and design, and estimated costs Total Project Costs.' Another message from a civil servant highlighted the similarities between the plan Ford announced in the summer of 2024 and the work completed years earlier. Story continues below advertisement 'This is pretty much where the USP evaluation ended up,' one frustrated email read after Ford held a news conference to announce his plan. 'Would have saved us all a lot of time if MO simply gave this as a directive, ahead of this announcement. Now, let's wait for more clear instruction from MO/DMO.' MO is generally short for the minister's office, which is the political arm of the ministry. DMO usually means the deputy minister's office, run by senior civil servants. Stiles said the government should release the work it had previously done on a project she said its latest studies will show is unviable. 'We will be demanding the government release that information,' Stiles said. 'This is a process that raises a lot of questions; it seems to have been done secretly without a public request for proposals.' Despite the similarity, the Ford government has forged ahead by issuing a request for private companies to study whether a tunnel is feasible. Global News asked the Ministry of Transportation why it was launching a new feasibility study for the project, given the apparent breadth of its 2021 analysis. 'Initial proposals provided preliminary information however, the landscape has changed and studies show congestion has gotten worse, costing our economy $56 billion every year,' a spokesperson said. Story continues below advertisement 'We are looking at all options to get commuters out of traffic and this feasibility study will provide valuable information directly from industry partners.' Government gets 'antsy' to restart project Once the project had been revived, communications seen by Global News make it clear that political staff were keen to get moving. 'MO is following up weekly and getting antsy,' one early September email said. Another said: 'MO are also quite eager and have been asking regularly for this briefing — I don't think they understand what is taking so long (which is fair).' But roughly a year after the minister's office restarted the project, there has been no word on the status of the renewed feasibility study. Matti Siemiatycki, director of the infrastructure institute at the University of Toronto, said the tunnel was a 'dream' and not a practical plan. Story continues below advertisement Despite opposing the plan and saying it 'won't solve the problem' of congestion on Highway 401, he said the government should keep studying it after winning an election with it in their platform. 'Actually, I support them continuing to study it in part because the premier raised it in advance of the election — he won the election, so this is something that has now been through the political system,' Siemiatycki said. 'It should be studied technically and all the documents should then be released. And the public can see and then we make a decision on what to do.'
Canada News.Net
2 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Trump warns of more tariffs, but India will keep buying Russian oil
NEW DELHI, India: India has made it clear that it will continue purchasing crude oil from Russia despite escalating threats from U.S. President Donald Trump. The Ministry of External Affairs described India's relationship with Moscow as "steady and time-tested," insisting it should not be interpreted through "the prism of a third country." Foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, speaking at the ministry's weekly press briefing on Friday, stressed that India's approach to energy security is driven by practical considerations — chiefly, the availability of oil in global markets and prevailing international conditions. His remarks came in response to Trump's recent statement that he intends to impose a 25 percent tariff on Indian goods, plus an additional import tax, citing New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian oil. Trump's warning is part of his increasingly tough stance toward Moscow, which he accuses of stalling efforts to reach a ceasefire in Ukraine. The U.S. president has threatened fresh economic sanctions against Russia if progress is not made. India's oil imports from Russia have surged dramatically since early 2022. In January of that year, India was importing around 68,000 barrels per day (bpd) from Russia. By June, that figure had jumped to 1.12 million bpd, peaking at 2.15 million bpd in May 2023. At one point, Russian oil accounted for nearly 40 percent of India's crude imports, making Russia India's largest single supplier, according to data from analytics firm Kpler cited by the Press Trust of India. India consumes roughly 5.5 million barrels of oil per day, with about 88 percent of that demand met through imports. While India historically sourced most of its crude from Middle Eastern countries, the landscape shifted dramatically following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. As Western nations imposed sanctions and shunned Russian energy, Moscow began offering steep discounts on crude deals that India, the world's third-largest oil importer after China and the U.S., found hard to ignore. By taking advantage of discounted Russian supplies, India has sought to cushion itself against global price volatility and secure its energy needs in an uncertain geopolitical environment. Despite growing pressure from Washington, New Delhi shows no sign of changing course, underscoring the complex balancing act it maintains between long-standing ties with Russia and its expanding strategic partnership with the United States.
