Morero Points Finger at DA for Joburg's R23. 6bn Crisis, Says City Paying Price for Past Misrule
Addressing the media at the Joburg Theatre on Thursday, Morero unpacked the city's R23.6 billion in unauthorised, irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure (UIFW), calling it a 'direct consequence of failures by the previous administration to follow financial laws, fix broken systems, and take accountability.'
Morero's remarks follow a damning letter from Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana, sent on 30 July, raising alarm over Johannesburg's apparent failure to comply with the Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA).
The minister gave the city 14 days to respond — a deadline Morero says his office met with a full breakdown of the crisis and its origins.'It must be understood that the city's financial crisis did not begin yesterday,' said Morero.
'This R23.6 billion figure is not the result of one year's missteps. It is the result of years of cumulative damage, largely caused by the DA-led coalition and its inability to govern the city responsibly.'
Morero accused the DA of allowing unlawful expenditure to pile up while failing to implement mechanisms for oversight and accountability. In particular, he criticised their refusal to activate the city's disciplinary board, which is mandated to investigate financial misconduct. 'For years, they simply looked the other way,' he said.
'They did not establish the disciplinary board. They did not regularise irregular spending. And now, our administration is left to deal with the aftermath.'
According to the 2023/24 financial statements, the UIFW figure includes R13 billion in unauthorised expenditure, R9.9 billion in irregular expenditure, and R735 million in fruitless expenditure.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: New reform tracker helps answer the question, ‘Will SA be okay?'
Finally, we are getting a live report card to help us answer this question. Last week, I was asked to be MC at the two launches of the Business Leadership SA Reform Tracker. It has a rather grand title. But, unlike so many other names in the economic and political space, it does what it says on the tin. It is tracking our reforms. Not quite minute by minute, but not far off. As someone who identifies as a 'journalist' and watches everything that happens as much as I can, I'm often asked certain questions by people I bump into, or audiences I speak in front of. The questions are wide-ranging, from 'who should I vote for' to 'should I emigrate', to 'will our economy start to grow now that…' I could go on. But in reality, they're the same question. Everyone who asks me one of those questions is asking something much more fundamental. They're asking, really: 'Will South Africa be okay?' It was a question summed up incredibly well by my old journalistic colleague and friend, Jan-Jan Joubert. He wrote a very well-researched answer and published it as a book. There is something almost peculiar to the South African middle class about this question. I don't think people in New Zealand or, dare I say it this particular Monday, Australia ask themselves this. Or people in the UK or Spain — despite the fact that in both those countries there are serious economic and political problems. But, considering the era of State Capture we have come from, I think it's fully understandable. I mean, look around. In Johannesburg, the mayor blames the DA for the state of the city while he himself has not appointed a finance head, or someone to actually manage the roads. That pothole that you see twice a day? There is actually no one in charge of fixing that right now. Our economy is still growing incredibly slowly, and it seems that people are putting more energy into arguing about the definition of employment than actually making changes that will result in more jobs. Just this weekend we saw a liar, someone who was central to the Guptas, who has been able to use the Hawks to have his ex-wife literally locked up in jail, still mouthing off about the state of the ANC? Malusi Gigaba should be in court. Not being given interview after interview as the chairperson of a portfolio committee in Parliament. But as we all know, there are virtually no Zondo prosecutions. And institutions such as Transnet are still battling to recover from State Capture. Progress However, it's important to note that there is progress. Finally, we are getting a live report card to help us answer the question: 'Will South Africa be okay?' Last week, I was asked to be MC at the two launches of the Business Leadership South Africa Reform Tracker. It has a rather grand title. But, unlike so many other names in the economic and political space, it does what it says on the tin. It is tracking our reforms. Not quite minute by minute, but not far off. Now, when I was at school, my reports were written in quite dry, dull text. They were very different from my tests, in which red was a prominent feature. Here, you get red, yellow and green. So at a glance, you can see how we are doing. But you can also click on each little tile and read what has been written about that sector. It might be that there is progress but still work to do; the story might be a lot more complicated than a single colour can indicate. And, wonderfully, there is also a way for you, perhaps as someone working in one of these sectors, to send some feedback. You might know that something has changed, or that in fact there has been more progress than the tracker is showing. Now, as a journalist, it's tempting to look for the red and start to get a little stroppy with a few politicians. Journalistic instincts But Dr Stuart Theobald, the founder and chairperson at Krutham who put the whole thing together, tells me that we should just wait a little before people like me go back to our journalistic instincts. He acknowledges that, yes, some reforms have stopped because of political problems, or opposition. And some have just failed. But some have been stopped deliberately, because the reform no longer makes sense. In other words, yes it's stopped — but for a good reason. So, if you are interested, it does make sense to actually go a little deeper into each sector, just to see how things really are. I know that one of the reasons you really read this is because you are searching for an answer to that question: 'Will South Africa be okay?' I mean, there is a lot to be worried about. Just as there is in the US, or China, or many, many other places right now. It might be worth just checking in with this tracker from time to time. Perhaps put it on your browser dashboard or something.
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Dispute over details of number of households serviced takes centre stage in Zandile Gumede fraud case
Former eThekwini mayor Zandile Gumede and her spokesperson Siphelele Jiyane. Image: Tumi Pakkies / Independent Newspapers The State and the defence on Monday disagreed on how a previous State witness established the number of households that needed to be serviced in a R320 million Durban Solid Waste tender deal as these were contained in a closed 2017 tender advertisement. Former eThekwini mayor Zandile Gumede and her 21 co-accused are charged with multiple counts of fraud, racketeering, corruption, money laundering, contravention of the Municipal Finance Management Act and the Municipal Systems Act, relating to the Durban Solid Waste (DSW) tender of more than R320 million. The State on Monday at Durban High Court proposed to the current witness, that those figures in the tender's bid specification were provided by Allan Robert Abbu. Abbu, at the time, was the Deputy Head for cleansing and solid waste. The media is prohibited from naming State witnesses. However, Abbu's counsel, advocate Jay Naidoo SC, disputed this, saying that the previous witness X, who had drafted the tender advertisement, said Abbu gave her a document that had the figure of the number of households that needed to be serviced. Advocate Jimmy Howse SC interjected and reminded the witness in her evidence in chief that she had told the court that she was under pressure while drafting the advertisement, as Abbu also wanted her to draft a report that was to go to the Bid Adjudication Committee (BAC). Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Howse reminded witness X that she had said while she was drafting the document, that she made a lot of errors because she was under pressure and Abbu was standing behind her. Naidoo said if the State could tell him where witness X said Abbu was dictating the numbers of households to be serviced while he stood behind her, it would be different. 'Her evidence was that Abbu was in and out of her office,' he said. He said the document that contained the household numbers that Abbu gave to witness X is not disputed by the defence. The State is currently leading evidence of witness Y, who said part of her job was to confirm project budgets and estimate them. Witness Y told the court that the number of households that were in the BAC report prepared by witness X was tripled, and some were doubled.
TimesLIVE
17 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Israelis stage nationwide protests to demand end to Gaza war and release of hostages
Thousands of Israelis took part in a nationwide strike on Sunday in support of families of hostages held in Gaza, calling on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to reach an agreement with Hamas to end the war and release the remaining captives. Demonstrators waved Israeli flags and carried photos of hostages as whistles, horns, and drums echoed at rallies across the country. Some protesters blocked streets and highways, including the main route between Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. 'Today, everything stops to remember the highest value: the sanctity of life,' Anat Angrest, the mother of hostage Matan Angrest, told reporters at a public square in Tel Aviv. Among those who met with families of hostages in Tel Aviv was Israeli Hollywood actress Gal Gadot, known for her role as Wonder Woman and starring in the Fast & the Furious franchise. Ahead of Sunday, some businesses and institutions said they would allow staff to join the nationwide strike called by the hostages' families. While some businesses closed, many remained open across the country on what is a working day in Israel. Schools are on summer recess and were not affected. A major rally was scheduled to take place in Tel Aviv in the night. Israeli police said 38 demonstrators had been detained by 2pm. Some protesters blocking roads scuffled with police and were carried away by officers. Demonstrations across the country were briefly halted around 4pm local time when air raid sirens sounded in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and elsewhere, warning of an incoming missile fired from Yemen. The missile was intercepted without incident. On Sunday, Netanyahu told the cabinet: 'Those who call today for an end to the war without defeating Hamas are not only hardening Hamas' position and delaying the release of our hostages. They are also ensuring the horrors of October 7 will repeat themselves over and over again.' The prime minister, who leads the country's most right-wing government in history, said his government was determined to implement a decision for the military to seize Gaza City, one of the last major areas of the enclave it does not control. The decision is widely unpopular among Israelis and many of the hostages' families, who fear an expanded military campaign in Gaza could risk the lives of their loved ones held captive. There are 50 hostages held by militants in Gaza, of which Israeli officials believe around 20 are alive. 'There is no time, not for the lives wasting away in hell or for the fallen who may vanish in the ruins of Gaza,' the Hostages Families Forum, which represents many families of captives held in Gaza, said on Sunday. After nearly two years of war in Gaza, ignited by the Hamas-led attack on Israel in October 2023, most of the hostages who have been freed so far emerged as a result of diplomatic talks. Negotiations towards a ceasefire that could have seen more hostages released collapsed in July. The Palestinian militant group Hamas has said it would only free the remaining hostages if Israel agrees to end the war, while Netanyahu has vowed Hamas cannot stay in power. The Israeli government has faced sharp criticism at home and abroad, including from some of its closest European allies, over the announcement the military would soon seize Gaza City. On Sunday, Hamas called the plan criminal, saying it would force the displacement of hundreds of thousands from Gaza City. More than 61,000 Palestinians have been killed in Israel's military campaign in Gaza, according to local health officials there. They said on Sunday at least 29 had been killed in the past day. Around 1,200 people were killed and 251 were taken into Gaza during Hamas' attack on Israel. More than 400 Israeli soldiers have been killed in Gaza since then. Opposition leader Yair Lapid, who attended a rally in Tel Aviv, expressed support for the protesters. He wrote on X: 'The only thing that strengthens the country is the wonderful spirit of the people who are going out from home today for Israeli solidarity.'
