Former CEO sues Bank Rakyat and foundation, claims over RM36m
The case has since been brought to court with a claim for damages of over RM36 million.
In a suit filed at the Kuala Lumpur High Court on June 5,...
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
10 hours ago
- The Star
Najib betrayed public's trust, court told
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here was told that former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak betrayed the public's trust by misusing RM42mil from SRC International Sdn Bhd, funds that were meant to benefit Malaysia's energy future and civil service pensioners. Counsel Kwan Will Sen, representing SRC International and its subsidiary, Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd, in a civil suit against Najib, said it has been 10 years since the money ended up in Najib's personal accounts and now, the two companies want it returned. Kwan made these remarks while delivering the opening statement on the first day of the trial in the civil suit filed by SRC International and Gandingan Mentari against Najib, who is the sole defendant. 'Three courts, namely the High Court, Court of Appeal and Federal Court, have already found him criminally guilty of these very acts beyond a reasonable doubt. 'Najib was the finance minister at the time and had full control over SRC International. He held key positions, including that of adviser emeritus. 'As such, no significant transaction occurred without his knowledge or consent,' he said yesterday, Bernama reported. Kwan added that evidence will show the RM42mil was transferred from SRC International and ultimately ended up in Najib's personal bank accounts. Of this sum, RM32mil was immediately transferred to two companies that had previously covered shortfalls in Najib's accounts. 'These transfers were made pursuant to instruction letters bearing his personal signature. 'The remaining RM10mil was spent through personal cheques issued by Najib himself. 'We say that the money trail is clear, the documentary evidence is overwhelming, and Najib's own sworn admissions are damning. 'We will prove our case under three complementary causes of action: knowing receipt, dishonest assistance and misfeasance in public office. 'On any of these grounds, justice demands that these public funds be returned to their rightful owners, the Malaysian people,' Kwan said. The court also heard testimony from the first witness, former chief executive officer of Yayasan Rakyat 1Malaysia, Ung Su Ling, 57, whose appointment was approved by Najib. The hearing before Justice Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah Raja Mohzan is set to continue on Nov 6. The lawsuit, filed in May 2022, accuses Najib of breach of fiduciary duties, knowing receipt of funds, dishonest assistance, tort of misfeasance in public office, and abuse of power in relation to the misappropriation of SRC International funds.
Borneo Post
16 hours ago
- Borneo Post
High Court upholds 7-year sentence for man convicted of drug use
Judge Wong emphasised that mental illness does not automatically render someone unfit to plead, and Fadzlan's conduct during proceedings showed he understood the case. – Stock photo SIBU (Aug 15): The High Court here today dismissed Mohamad Fadzlan Shaini's appeal against his conviction and sentence for consuming dangerous drugs. Fadzlan was sentenced by the Kapit Sessions Court on Nov 14 last year to seven years' imprisonment and three strokes of the cane after pleading guilty to consuming amphetamine and methamphetamine under Section 15(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act (DDA) 1952, with sentencing under Section 39C(2) of the Act. In rejecting the appeal, High Court Judge Wong Siong Tung said the Sessions Court had complied with procedural requirements, including explaining the charge and its consequences to the appellant in Bahasa Malaysia, and found no evidence to challenge the legality of the proceedings. Regarding Fadzlan's mental health, the court noted that the medical report presented was neither submitted to the Sessions Court nor conclusive about his fitness to plead. Judge Wong emphasised that mental illness does not automatically render someone unfit to plead, and Fadzlan's conduct during proceedings showed he understood the case. The court also found no evidence that a police officer had influenced Fadzlan's guilty plea. Affidavits submitted failed to show any direct communication between the officer and the appellant. Judge Wong concluded that the appellant's grounds were inconsistent and lacked credibility, upholding the conviction and sentence. Fadzlan, who had a previous drug offence, was represented by lawyer Harold Emparak, while Deputy Public Prosecutor Mark Kenneth Netto represented the prosecution. appeal dismiss drugs jail Kapit Sibu
Malay Mail
19 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Appeals Court reinstates Perak man's eight-month jail term for outraging stepdaughter's modesty
PUTRAJAYA, Aug 15 — The Court of Appeal today reinstated an eight-month prison sentence on a 52-year-old man, for outraging the modesty of his teenage stepdaughter, overturning the High Court's earlier decision to acquit him. A three-man bench, led by Justice Datuk Azman Abdullah, allowed the prosecution's appeal, setting aside the High Court's acquittal, and restoring the conviction and sentence imposed by the Magistrate's Court in November 2023. Delivering the court's unanimous decision, Justice Azman said that the High Court had erred in acquitting and discharging the man, who works as a security guard. He said the High Court judge did not assess the victim's testimony thoroughly, and had ignored her spontaneous response following the incident, which included kicking the respondent (the man), calling for her younger brother, her aunt, and her mother, and lodging a police report. 'We find that there is overwhelming evidence showing the victim to be a credible witness, and her testimony is consistent with the police report,' Justice Azman said, sitting with Justices Datuk Azmi Ariffin and Datuk Hayatul Akmal Abdul Aziz. He also said that the man's defence that he entered the room to retrieve dirty clothes was unreasonable, as he entered through the bathroom door without knocking on the door, because the victim's room door was locked. The victim's testimony was not a fabrication intended to incriminate the respondent, he added. The Magistrates' Court had earlier found the man guilty of using criminal force with the intention of outraging the victim's modesty. The incident occurred at a house in Muallim district, Perak, at about 9 am on July 9, 2022, when the victim was 19 years old. He subsequently appealed to the High Court, which acquitted and discharged him last year. The prosecution then brought the matter to the Court of Appeal. Deputy public prosecutor Solehah Noratikah Ismail argued that the man's act of entering the victim's locked bedroom via a bathroom connected to the kitchen, while she was asleep, demonstrated malicious intent. The man's lawyer, Siti Umairah Zainudin, submitted that the High Court had correctly acquitted her client after considering inconsistencies in the victim's testimony. — Bernama
