Ramsay Health Care Limited's (ASX:RHC) On An Uptrend But Financial Prospects Look Pretty Weak: Is The Stock Overpriced?
ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity.
We've discovered 3 warning signs about Ramsay Health Care. View them for free.
ROE can be calculated by using the formula:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Ramsay Health Care is:
0.5% = AU$29m ÷ AU$5.4b (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2024).
The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each A$1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made A$0.01 in profit.
See our latest analysis for Ramsay Health Care
So far, we've learned that ROE is a measure of a company's profitability. We now need to evaluate how much profit the company reinvests or "retains" for future growth which then gives us an idea about the growth potential of the company. Assuming everything else remains unchanged, the higher the ROE and profit retention, the higher the growth rate of a company compared to companies that don't necessarily bear these characteristics.
As you can see, Ramsay Health Care's ROE looks pretty weak. Not just that, even compared to the industry average of 3.0%, the company's ROE is entirely unremarkable. For this reason, Ramsay Health Care's five year net income decline of 17% is not surprising given its lower ROE. We believe that there also might be other aspects that are negatively influencing the company's earnings prospects. For instance, the company has a very high payout ratio, or is faced with competitive pressures.
With the industry earnings declining at a rate of 19% in the same period, we deduce that both the company and the industry are shrinking at the same rate.
Earnings growth is an important metric to consider when valuing a stock. The investor should try to establish if the expected growth or decline in earnings, whichever the case may be, is priced in. This then helps them determine if the stock is placed for a bright or bleak future. Is Ramsay Health Care fairly valued compared to other companies? These 3 valuation measures might help you decide.
Ramsay Health Care's declining earnings is not surprising given how the company is spending most of its profits in paying dividends, judging by its three-year median payout ratio of 85% (or a retention ratio of 15%). With only a little being reinvested into the business, earnings growth would obviously be low or non-existent. Our risks dashboard should have the 3 risks we have identified for Ramsay Health Care.
In addition, Ramsay Health Care has been paying dividends over a period of at least ten years suggesting that keeping up dividend payments is way more important to the management even if it comes at the cost of business growth. Existing analyst estimates suggest that the company's future payout ratio is expected to drop to 63% over the next three years. Accordingly, the expected drop in the payout ratio explains the expected increase in the company's ROE to 7.7%, over the same period.
Overall, we would be extremely cautious before making any decision on Ramsay Health Care. Because the company is not reinvesting much into the business, and given the low ROE, it's not surprising to see the lack or absence of growth in its earnings. Having said that, looking at current analyst estimates, we found that the company's earnings growth rate is expected to see a huge improvement. To know more about the company's future earnings growth forecasts take a look at this free report on analyst forecasts for the company to find out more.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
a few seconds ago
- Bloomberg
ASX Shares Dive After US Rival Cboe Challenges Market Dominance
ASX Ltd shares tumbled the most in two years as potential market competition from Cboe Global Markets Inc and regulatory issues weigh on Australia's embattled main exchange operator. The stock plunged as much as 11% on Thursday, the most since June 2023, after the nation's financial regulator said it was in the final stages of considering a listing market application from Cboe's Australian unit. The move would allow local companies to list on an exchange run by the US rival, threatening to end ASX's local market domination amid ongoing operational concerns.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Major bank eases home rule rules for these Aussie workers: ‘Cutting red tape'
ANZ has become the latest Big Four bank to ease its home loan lending rules for self-employed Australians. More than two million Aussies work for themselves, but they are typically seen as riskier applicants by the banks and therefore have to meet stricter rules to get a mortgage. ANZ said it was aiming to make it easier for self-employed Aussies to purchase a home. It said the changes were sparked by customer feedback, with small business customers saying they were facing challenges when applying for loans, particularly due to their irregular income patterns. ANZ managing director small to medium enterprise, Paul Presland, said small business owners, freelancers, entrepreneurs and sole traders deserved the same access to homeownership as other workers. RELATED Westpac changes mortgage rules to benefit millions of self-employed Australians Little-known Centrelink perk offers Australian students free flights Hidden way Aussies are cutting $20,000 from their tax bill every year 'These changes are about cutting red tape and recognising the value small businesses bring to our economy,' he said. 'We know they are already juggling enough – banking shouldn't be another pain point.' What are the main changes? ANZ said the changes would position it as a 'market leader' in home lending for small business owners. It continues to accept one year of income financials, rather than the traditional two, for self-employed customers. Some of the key new changes, which are now in effect, include allowing business overdrafts to be spread out over 10 years, rather than seven. The bank said this would act to boost borrowing capacity. When customers have an existing fixed rate of term asset finance, lease or hire purchase, ANZ said it will use the actual repayment when making its assessment, rather than adding the traditional 3 per cent interest rate buffer. Self-employed customers now only need to provide one year of income documentation, rather than two, where they receive income through director fees or company dividends. Major banks simplify lending for self-employed Aussies All of the Big Four banks have announced tweaks to their home loan policies for self-employed applicants in recent months. Commonwealth Bank made the move to accept one-year financials for self-employed customers in October last year, rather than two years. NAB changed its policy earlier this year, with eligible self-employed Aussies only needing to provide a single year's financial statement. Westpac similarly introduced a one-year income assessment, down from the standard two, in July. Various eligibility criteria apply, including around how long the business has been trading for, with most banks requiring an 80 per cent loan-to-value ratio. 1 in 4 small business owners find it hard to get home loan The changes come as recent research by Great Southern Bank found 40 per cent of people thought it was harder to get a home loan as a small business owner. The main hurdles included instability of income, stringent lending criteria, being seen as too high risk, and the complex process of gathering necessary documentation. Marina Michael, a mortgage broker specialising in helping self-employed clients, told Yahoo Finance every bank had a different appetite for self-employed borrowers. 'Traditionally, especially before Covid, every lender was looking at a minimum of two years of financials, including the tax returns, the company tax returns and your individuals, and your notice of assessment,' she said. Another option for people to consider are low doc home loans, where banks can accept recent BAS or recent business bank statements and an accountant's declaration instead of the regular tax returns and financials. However, these often come with a 1 to 1.5 per cent interest rate in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Study attributes 440 'excess deaths' to January's Los Angeles wildfires
By Steve Gorman LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -Wildfires that devastated parts of the Los Angeles area in January indirectly led to hundreds of deaths in the ensuing weeks, far exceeding the official toll of 31 fatalities, according to a study released on Wednesday. The research, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, or JAMA, estimated 440 "excess deaths" were attributable to the fires from January 5 to February 1, using models that compared predicted mortality under normal circumstances to actual numbers documented during that period. The additional deaths likely reflect a mix of factors, including increased exposure of people with heart and lung disease to poor air quality from smoke and toxins released by the fires, as well as healthcare delays and disruptions, the study said. The findings "underscore the need to complement direct fatalities estimates with alternative methods to quantify the additional mortality burden of wildfires and of climate-related emergencies more broadly," the researchers wrote. Two wind-driven wildfires that erupted during the first week of January on opposite sides of Los Angeles damaged or destroyed nearly 16,000 structures combined - laying waste to much of the seaside district of Pacific Palisades and the foothill community of Altadena. Together, the blazes scorched 59 square miles (152 sq km), an area larger than Paris. The official tally of people who perished as a direct result of the fires stands at 31, after the most recent set of human remains were unearthed in Altadena in July, six months after the fires. Governor Gavin Newsom in February requested nearly $40 billion in wildfire aid from Congress. Some estimates put economic losses from the fires at more than $250 billion, making the conflagration one of the most costly natural disasters in U.S. history. The JAMA study acknowledged some limitations, saying the data may need to be revised upward in the future and the research did not reflect any fire-attributable deaths beyond Feb. 1.
