Long before ChatGPT, this Nobel Laureate helped AI think like humans; not by mimicking our intelligence, but our stupidity
artificial intelligence
trace back to a Nobel Prize–winning economist who spent decades dissecting
human errors
.
Herbert A. Simon
, acclaimed for redefining decision-making, not only exposed our psychological blind spots but also seeded the field of AI more than 70 years ago.
The Nobel Prize That Began with Human Error
Herbert Simon, awarded the 1978 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, challenged the prevailing economic philosophy of 'homo economicus'—the idea that humans always make perfectly rational choices. Through his groundbreaking research in the 1950s, Simon introduced the concept of
bounded rationality
, arguing that our decisions are inherently limited by time, information, and cognitive capacity. Unlike traditional models assuming full knowledge and optimal choices, Simon revealed the truth: people often opt for options that are merely "good enough."
From 'Perfect' to Satisficing: Rewriting Decision Theory
Simon coined the term satisficing—a fusion of "satisfy" and "suffice"—to describe our tendency to choose the first viable option rather than the optimal one. This human shortcut explains everyday choices: clicking "Next" to Terms and Conditions without browsing or buying a product after glancing at reviews. Bounded rationality and satisficing debunked the myth of human rationality and laid the foundation for
behavioral economics
and choice architecture.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Ogni uomo dovrebbe possedere queste scarpe comode
booofer.com
Acquista Ora
Undo
Pioneering AI Through Realistic Human Models
Years before modern AI, Simon believed computers could replicate human thinking—flaws included. Alongside Allen Newell in the 1950s, he co-developed the Logic Theory Machine and the General Problem Solver, early AI programs that mimicked human problem-solving. These efforts proved that machines could emulate our intuitive, heuristic-based processes rather than merely perform flawless calculations. Simon viewed cognition as something messy, intuitive, and 'good enough'—the very elements we see in today's AI tools.
— ArinahZainordin (@ArinahZainordin)
Bridging Cognitive Limits and Machine Intelligence
Simon believed intelligent systems needed to reflect human limitations, not surpass them. His insights inspired current AI design principles, including simple user interfaces, smart defaults, and behavioral nudges. These echo his view that clarity, not complexity, drives decisions. As summarized by Investopedia, Simon's career 'established the foundations of modern behavioral economics and artificial intelligence research' through his work on bounded rationality and machine modeling.
You Might Also Like:
Sapiens author Yuval Noah Harari warns about the rise of autonomous intelligence: 'AI is not a tool, it is an agent'
Why Simon Still Matters in the Age of AI
AI today often focuses on optimization and unfettered data analysis. Simon's work remains crucial, reminding us that superior algorithms must account for human constraints. His blend of psychology and computer science reshaped how we understand both decision-making and AI's role in decision support—what we now call
decision intelligence
.
Choosing the Easy Yes
Simon's legacy emphasizes simplicity. Instead of presenting endless options, designers are urged to make decisions easy to accept. Want people to buy? Offer the best choice up front. Need users to act? Pick the simplest path for them. Simon's lessons on simplicity and human behavior echo across tech, economics, and everyday life.
Herbert A. Simon (1916–2001), a professor at
Carnegie Mellon University
, reshaped multiple fields—from economics and psychology to computer science. His 1947 work Administrative Behavior and 1956 papers launched ideas that would later make AI empathic to human limitations. Awarded both the Turing Award (1975) and Nobel Prize (1978), Simon was a pioneer who didn't just theorize human error—he turned it into the blueprint for smart machines and systems that truly reflect how we think.
You Might Also Like:
Legendary sci-fi writer's chilling AI prediction resurfaces: 'Robots will turn organic as humans become machines'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Former OpenAI exec says team building is like solving puzzle: ‘The teams that I've helped build are a team of…'
Former OpenAI executive Peter Deng believes that building the right team is like solving a complex puzzle — every piece must fit perfectly. Now a general partner at Felicis Ventures , Deng shared his views on leadership, team-building, and hiring during a recent episode of Lenny's Podcast. Speaking at the podcast, Deng compared strong teams to the Avengers, where each member brings a different 'superpower' to the table. "The teams that I've helped build are — the most successful ones are a team of Avengers that are just very different, have very different superpowers," he said. Deng is known for his work on major consumer tech products, including ChatGPT Enterprise, Facebook Messenger , and Uber Reserve. At OpenAI, he played a key role in shaping the user experience of AI tools. "As a leader, you have to set up your team the right way," Deng said. "You have to really think about your team as a product and what are the various pieces you need to really stretch the gamut of what you're thinking about," Deng stated. "But together, you as the leader are the one who's helping adjudicate any differences or any disagreements, but you know you're getting the best outcome when everyone's pulling and obsessing over a different thing," he said by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo Ex-OpenAI VP on what he looks for in candidates When hiring, Deng said two traits matter most: the ability to work independently and a deep desire to grow. "I think the growth mindset thing is so important to me — that we build an org where people are self-reflective, and want to get better, and take that feedback, and give that feedback," he said. "And it just is this meta unlock that I found to be true." He added that he actively looks for specialists who fill specific gaps, likening the process to designing a role-playing game (RPG) team. "It's almost like you're playing an RPG where everyone has different sliders and you have to create this super team where everyone actually spikes in different ways," Deng explained. OPPO Find X8 Ultra Review: Camera Powerhouse with Next-Gen Imaging!
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Dow Jones falls 500 points, Nasdaq, S&P 500 slip 1% as Trump slaps tariffs on Japan, South Korea
Wall Street 's main indexes extended their fall on Monday after U.S. President Donald Trump said he would impose a 25% tariff on goods from Japan and South Korea, starting on Aug. 1, while Tesla shares dropped after CEO Elon Musk announced his political party ambitions. At 12:55 a.m. ET, the Dow Jones fell 533.75 points or 1.19% to 44,290.86, the S&P 500 declined 60.72 points or 0.97% to 6,215.29, and the Nasdaq dropped 210.57 points or 1.02% to 20,378.44. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Científica argentina revela hallazgos sobre el magnesio Salud Esencial Leer más Undo Electric vehicle maker Tesla fell 7% to a near one-month low and was on track for its worst day in over a month. Musk announced the formation of a U.S. political party named the "American Party", marking a new escalation in his feud with Trump. "Tesla investors are starting to vote their displeasure with him getting back into politics. The potential for him to start his own American party is just the exact opposite of what (they) want," said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B Riley Wealth. Live Events Meanwhile, investors turned cautious as they awaited a flurry of U.S. trade announcements expected within 48 hours, with a key deadline to finalize new pacts looming. President Donald Trump said on Sunday that the country is on the cusp of several deals and would notify other countries of higher tariff rates by July 9. He added that those duties are set to take effect on August 1. In April, Trump unveiled a base tariff rate of 10% on most countries and additional duties ranging up to 50%. Subsequently, he delayed the effective date for all but 10% until July 9. The new date offers countries a three-week window for further negotiations. While the Nasdaq in April tumbled into bear market territory on tariff fears, both the index and the S&P 500 had just closed at record highs on Thursday after a robust jobs report. The Dow was about 1% away from an all-time high. Still, investors took to the sidelines, wary of shifting trade policies. Trump also threatened an extra 10% tariff on countries aligning themselves with the "Anti-American policies" of the BRICS group of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. Ten of the eleven major S&P sectors were trading in the red, with consumer discretionary falling the most by 1.1%. Shares of WNS jumped 14.3% after the French IT services firm Capgemini agreed to buy the outsourcing firm for $3.3 billion in cash. Trump's inflation-causing tariff policies have further complicated the Fed's path to lower rates. As a result, minutes of its June meeting, scheduled for release on Wednesday, should offer more clues on the monetary policy outlook. Traders have fully priced out a July rate cut, with September odds at 64.4%, according to CME Group's FedWatch tool. Attention is also on a sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, passed by House Republicans after markets closed on Thursday, that is set to swell the national deficit by over $3 trillion in the next decade. Declining issues outnumbered advancers by a 3.39-to-1 ratio on the NYSE, and by a 2.51-to-1 ratio on the Nasdaq. The S&P 500 posted 24 new 52-week highs and three new lows, while the Nasdaq Composite recorded 69 new highs and 32 new lows.
Economic Times
35 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Skip the AI FOMO, cash in where no one's looking: Bernstein backs old-school payouts and warns AI may be the next dot-com bubble
ChatGPT's role in market surge Live Events Cycles do not last forever Why dividend stocks matter now Utilities quietly hold their own (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Richard Bernstein, Chief Investment Officer at Richard Bernstein Advisors , sees too much heat in the artificial intelligence trade. In a note dated 30 June, he drew a sharp line between today's AI rush and earlier booms that went too far.'Investors seem universally focused on 'AI', which seems eerily similar to the '.com' stocks of the Technology Bubble and the 'tronics' craze of the 1960s,' Bernstein wrote. He added that while AI dominates headlines, 'we see lots of attractive, admittedly boring, dividend-paying themes.'Since OpenAI's ChatGPT appeared in November 2022, the numbers have been hard to ignore. The S&P 500 has gained 54 percent. The Nasdaq 100 has soared 90 percent. Some valuations have pushed back to levels last seen just before the dot-com crash or even the market peak in has made investors pile into anything labelled AI. But Bernstein says that might not be smart money at this stage. He made clear he is not calling the exact top. Still, trends do not run forever.'The best time to invest in something is when it's out of favour — not after a massive rally has occurred,' he laid out how investor moods flip as markets change. Early in a bull run, fear rules. People look for dividends and lower-risk bets. Once they feel bold, they chase high growth stories instead.'At the beginning of a bull market when momentum and beta strategies are by definition most rewarded, investors' fears lead them to emphasise dividends and lower-beta equities,' he said. 'In later-cycle periods when dividends and lower beta become more attractive, investors' confidence leads them to risk-taking and momentum investing.'His take? We are no longer early in this cycle. 'We clearly are not at the beginning of a bull market and, as we've previously written, the profits cycle is starting to decelerate,' he where does that leave investors who do not want to get burnt? Bernstein says boring can be smart. He points to dividend stocks, especially in the utilities sector, as ready for a fresh companies pay steady sums to shareholders. Some pocket the money. Many reinvest it back into the stock, which helps their position grow over time.'One of the easiest methods for building wealth has historically been the power of compounding dividends,' Bernstein said. 'Compounding dividends is boring as all get out, but it's been highly successful through time.'People might assume high-flying tech leaves old utility stocks in the dust. Bernstein says that is not quite true.'In fact, compounding dividend income has been so successful, that the Dow Jones Utilities Index's returns have been roughly neck-and-neck with NASDAQ returns since NASDAQ's inception in 1971,' he do not need to pick single stocks to get in. Funds like the SPDR S&P Dividend ETF and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF spread the bets and deliver a mix of steady message is not about ditching technology altogether. It is about seeing the pattern. Big fads rise fast. They fall just as fast when the shine wears off. While the AI hype carries on, he thinks dividends could quietly do the heavy trick, he suggests, is to look where others are not. Sometimes the most boring corner of the market can end up paying the best.
