RTI Act a tool for empowerment, Adivasi women told
Rehana interacted with tribal women from Alluri Sitarama Raju (ASR), Manyam, and Prakasam districts during a virtual awareness programme on Friday. She noted that women in tribal regions often face challenges due to illiteracy and lack of access to information. However, she said that a culture of awareness and questioning can be fostered by identifying and training active and enthusiastic tribal women. Once equipped with knowledge of the RTI Act, these women can play a key role in resolving local issues by helping others obtain critical information.
"State and central governments are spending huge amounts for the welfare and development of tribal populations across the country. It is your right to know how much money is coming to your village and your people. Take advantage of the RTI Act to get the details of the schemes and programmes," said Rehana Begum. She explained that awareness about the schemes would also help hold officials accountable and ensure proper implementation.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
A lack of awareness, especially among tribal women, often leads to misappropriation or diversion of funds, she added.
The five-day awareness programme, held in Anakapalli district from July 14 (Monday) to July 18 (Friday), was jointly organised by LibTech India and the United Forum for RTI Campaign–Andhra Pradesh, in collaboration with various voluntary organisations. Tribal women from Manyam, Alluri Sitarama Raju, and Prakasam districts participated in the event.
Rehana Begum highlighted how such initiatives can have a lasting impact on women in remote tribal regions by deepening their understanding of rights and entitlements. She also noted that awareness campaigns by voluntary organisations complement the government's goal of empowering citizens through transparency.
Representatives from LibTech India, including BDS Kishore, and members of the United Forum for RTI Campaign also participated in the event.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
SC upholds relief to BJP MP Tejasvi Surya in criminal case
The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed the Karnataka government 's plea against a high court order quashing the criminal case against BJP MP Tejasvi Surya . "What is this? Don't politicise the matter. Fight your battles before the electorate," a bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and K Vinod Chandran said. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Healthcare Finance Operations Management CXO Product Management Degree Technology Data Analytics Cybersecurity Digital Marketing Public Policy Leadership Design Thinking healthcare Data Science Project Management PGDM MCA Artificial Intelligence Management MBA Data Science Others others Skills you'll gain: Financial Analysis in Healthcare Financial Management & Investing Strategic Management in Healthcare Process Design & Analysis Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Certificate Program in Healthcare Management Starts on Jun 13, 2024 Get Details Surya was alleged to have disseminated fake news on a farmer's suicide in state's Haveri district . by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo The bench dismissed the appeal of the state government and cautioned its against politicisation of legal proceedings. The case stemmed from a post shared by Surya on November 7, 2024, in which he cited a report from Kannada news portals claiming that a farmer, Rudrappa Channappa Balikai, had died by suicide after discovering that his land had been taken over by the Waqf Board . Live Events The post was subsequently deleted after it emerged that the claim was unfounded.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
World's major courts take growing role in climate fight
PARIS: The world's top court is poised to tell governments what their legal obligations are to tackle global warming, and possibly outline consequences for polluters that cause climate harm to vulnerable countries. Wednesday's highly anticipated advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice comes in the wake of landmark international decisions that experts say together have the potential to significantly shape climate action. How has climate litigation evolved? Andrew Raine, deputy director of the UN Environment Programme 's law division, said frustration over the pace of climate action had spurred people, organisations and countries to turn to the courts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "When political systems fall short, the law is increasingly seen as a tool for driving ambition and enforcing commitments that have been made," he told AFP. These have been bolstered by increasingly precise and detailed climate science, including from the UN's IPCC climate expert panel. Almost 3,000 climate cases have been filed up to the end of 2024, in nearly 60 countries, according to the Grantham Research Institute, using data compiled by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. While not all have been successful -- and some have tried to slow climate progress -- there have been notable cases in recent years that have pushed states to do more. Urgenda, an environmental organisation in the Netherlands, notched a win at the Dutch Supreme Court in 2019, with justices ordering the government to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by the end of the following year. And in 2021, the German Constitutional Court found that the government's failure to sufficiently cut planet-heating pollution placed an unacceptable burden on future generations. Raine said that litigation was increasingly crossing borders, with 24 cases brought before international or regional courts, tribunals or other bodies. "This marks a turning point and it reflects the transboundary and shared nature of the climate crisis," he said. Why have recent cases been deemed historic? Two in particular have been hailed as watershed moments that will help shape how courts, governments and businesses understand and act on their climate responsibilities. Last year, an advisory opinion by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea said carbon emissions can be considered a marine pollutant and that countries have a legal duty to take measures to reduce their effects on oceans. The tribunal made clear that the work of defining countries' obligations is not limited to the Paris climate agreement or the UN body that runs climate change negotiations. Major polluters have argued that the UN framework is sufficient and against courts taking climate decisions. Another major advisory opinion was issued this month, with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights reaffirming the right to a healthy climate system and acknowledging the rights of nature. But perhaps the court's most profound statement was to place protection against irreversible climate harms on the same level as international prohibitions on genocide and torture, said Cesar Rodriguez-Garavito, Professor of Law and Director of the Climate Law Accelerator at New York University. The court said "massive and serious harm to the climate system through emissions, through deforestation and so on, is absolutely forbidden by international law," he said. In his view this made it the strongest statement yet by any international court on states' duty to avoid causing severe ecological destruction. All eyes are now on the ICJ. What could be the impact? Vanuatu, one of many low-lying islands threatened by sea level rise, has asked the ICJ to give its opinion on states' obligations to reduce emissions. But the potentially more controversial request is what -- if any -- legal consequences there might be for major polluters who cause severe climate damages. "These are questions of global justice," said Rodriguez-Garavito, potentially touching on contentious issues of "reparations for climate harms" to those least responsible for emissions. While advisory opinions like the ICJ are not legally enforceable, Raine said they carry significant weight. "They clarify how international law applies to the climate crisis, and that has ripple effects across national courts, legislative processes and public debates," he said. "It doesn't force states to act, but it shows them where the law stands and where they should be headed."
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Madras HC restrains DMK from using OTP verification messages for their party's enrollment drive 'Oraniyil Tamil Nadu'
MADURAI: Madras high court on Monday ordered an interim injunction to the limited extent of restraining DMK from using OTP verification messages for their party's enrollment drive 'Oraniyil Tamil Nadu', since the matter involves aspects of data protection and privacy which are to be examined by the court. A division bench of Justice S M Subramaniam and Justice A D Maria Clete observed that 'Oraniyil Tamil Nadu' is a door-to-door membership drive done by a recognised political party (DMK) in the state. Since personal data is being collected from the people, this public interest litigation raises serious concerns about the right to privacy and the infrastructure available for data protection. The judges observed that digital membership drive by political parties in a new area of study. The aspect of how the data is stored and processed is to be looked into to safeguard the right to privacy and right to political affiliation of the citizens. Several aspects as to whether consensus is obtained from the people for the enrollment drive, whether such a process of data collection from the public would put other smaller parties in a disadvantageous position should also be examined. Hence, the judges passed an interim order to a limited extent restraining DMK from using OTP verification messages for 'Oraniyil Tamil Nadu' enrollment drive. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 most beautiful women in the world Undo The judges ordered notice and sought response from the Centre, state and DMK. The hearing in the case was adjourned by two weeks. The court passed the order while hearing a public interest litigation filed by S Rajkumar, a resident of T Athikarai village in Sivaganga district. The petitioner said that the DMK party cadres and functionaries under the guise political campaign 'Oraniyil Tamil Nadu' are collecting the personal and Aadhaar details from the public in his locality. They also demanded personal details and identification documents including Aadhaar, voter identity cards from his family members, claiming it was required for the sanction of govt benefits. They threatened to stop the monthly monetary assistance received by the women in the family when they refused to give them the documents. The petitioner also claimed that DMK cadres are also collecting the mobile numbers of people and are sending them messages regarding 'Oraniyil Tamil Nadu' campaign which. Many people are unaware of the implications of the messages and the OTP, he said, adding that the DMK party cadres were also threatening the people that govt schemes would be stopped if they fail to join the party. He said the unauthorised collection and processing of Aadhaar information by DMK constituted a violation of the fundamental right of citizens. The collection of Aadhaar details by private entities, including political parties, for purposes other than those explicitly permitted by law, constitutes a severe invasion of privacy, he said. The data collected by the DMK cadres from the public can be used to create detailed profiles of citizens, potentially influencing electoral outcomes through targeted messaging, micro-targeting, and manipulative propaganda. Hence, the petitioner sought a direction to restrain the DMK and its cadres from collecting Aadhaar details from the public for any purpose. The petitioner also sought a direction to the chief executive officer of Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) and secretary to the Union ministry of electronics and information technology to initiate a thorough investigation into the unauthorized collection of Aadhaar details by DMK.
