"Lot of money is wasted, no long-term goals are set": Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan advocates for 'One Nation One Election'
Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India], June 8 (ANI): Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on Sunday participated in the One Nation One Election campaign in Bengaluru, Karnataka, emphasising the need for simultaneous elections in India.
Chouhan argued that the current system of frequent elections leads to a significant waste of resources and energy, highlighting that the constant election cycle diverts a major part of the nation's energy and resources, which could be better utilised for long-term development goals.
He stressed that holding Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha elections together would enable policymakers to focus on policy-driven decisions rather than being preoccupied with election preparations.
'In our nation, all parties are immersed in election preparations, and a major part of our energy goes into that. Due to this, a lot of money is wasted, and no long-term goals are set. It is time the nation thinks about this. At least Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha elections should now be conducted together, so there is no waste of time, and we can take policy-driven decisions. For this, the One Nation One Election campaign is going on across the country,' he said.
The One Nation One Election campaign aims to raise awareness and build consensus on simultaneous elections nationwide. The campaign's proponents argue that simultaneous elections would reduce the strain on the electoral machinery, minimise disruptions to governance, and promote more focused and sustained policy implementation.
The Constitution 129th Amendment Bill, 2024, and the Union Territories Laws Amendment Bill, 2024, were introduced in the Lok Sabha during the Winter Session of Parliament to achieve one nation, one election. They propose simultaneous elections to the Lok Sabha and state assemblies across the country.
The bill was referred to the JPC for scrutiny and discussion. Opposition members have been opposing the amendments and have argued that the proposed change could disproportionately benefit the ruling party, giving it undue influence over the electoral process in states and undermining the autonomy of regional parties. They have also argued that the bills proposing simultaneous elections are against the federal structure.
On Sunday, Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini said that the 'One Nation, One Election' initiative would help speed up India's development and reduce election-related expenses. Speaking at a marathon organised to support the proposal, CM Saini stated frequent elections stall growth and disrupt momentum.
On March 25, the JPC held an important meeting that lasted over five hours. Several MPs in the committee raised concerns about the practicality of holding Lok Sabha and state elections together.
The Constitution Amendment Bill empowers ECI to recommend to the President to postpone an election to a State Assembly. Currently, Article 356 of the Constitution allows for postponing an Assembly election only under specified conditions, which also involve approval by Parliament. The Bill does not have such requirements, and hence, it lowers the threshold for postponing elections.
The Constitution Amendment Bill does not specify a time limit on the postponement of an Assembly election. This opens the possibility of a state being left without an Assembly.
Legislatures in India have a term of five years. Elections to the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies were held together from 1951 to 1967.
However, this cycle was disrupted in 1968 and 1969 due to the premature dissolution of some State Assemblies. In 1970, the fourth Lok Sabha was also dissolved prematurely. Since then, elections for Lok Sabha and State Assemblies have been held with different schedules. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Today in Politics: Modi government completes first year in third term, 11th overall
The Narendra Modi-led NDA government at the Centre will mark its first anniversary in the third term and 11th overall on Monday. In its 11th year in power, the BJP went back to the drawing board to recraft its political and governance outreach and regained momentum by notching up surprisingly big wins in a string of Assembly polls as the burst of fresh optimism in the main Opposition Congress and other INDIA bloc parties following last year's Lok Sabha polls fizzled out. If the BJP turned the tide in Haryana and Maharashtra, two states where it suffered reverses in the Lok Sabha polls, on the back of its welfare measures and social engineering associated with regional leadership, it also finally wrested Delhi after 26 years, eclipsing its adversary Arvind Kejriwal of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on his home turf. The BJP now appears set to make a fresh political charge after recouping the ground lost in the national polls a year back while the Opposition is back to its disjointed self, with the Congress searching for an elusive and emphatic state poll win in a state. BJP rivals like West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee-led TMC and Kejriwal have drifted away from the Congress and the likes of Shiv Sena (UBT) and NCP (SP) stare at an uncertain future. Despite the reduced majority, the Modi government has gone about with pushing ahead with the contentious part of its agenda. The support it received from the TDP, JD(U) and Chirag Paswan-led LJP (RV) in the passage of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in Parliament, despite some voices of concern among them over its provisions, underscored the BJP's unchallenged dominance following its assembly poll wins. The government has also gone ahead with the push to its 'One Nation One Election' bills, which are being scrutinised by a Joint Committee of Parliament, despite lacking the two-thirds majority required for the approval of the constitutional amendment measure. Shivraj Singh Chouhan in Telangana Union Minister for Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Shivraj Singh Chouhan is scheduled to visit 'Viksit Krishi Sankalp Abhiyan' (VKSA) programme sites in Ranga Reddy district of Telangana on Monday. The visit intends to facilitate interaction with farmers and provide strategic guidance to enhance the campaign's impact, an official release said. During the visit, the minister will interact with the farmers in Mansanpally and Ramachandraguda villages of the district. About 1,500 farmers and farm women from across Telangana are expected to participate in the scientist-farmer interaction session to gain insights into sustainable practices, improved technologies, and integrated approaches to agriculture and aquaculture, it said. An exhibition will also be organised to showcase innovations and products by Telangana KVKs and ICAR institutes of Hyderabad. – With PTI inputs
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
2034 earliest for simultaneous polls under existing Bills: One Nation, One Election panel chief
P P Chaudhary, BJP MP and chairman of the Joint Committee of Parliament on Bills relating to 'One Nation, One Election', has told The Indian Express that the earliest that simultaneous elections can be held under the existing Bills is 2034, and the committee may go beyond the draft law to suggest ways to keep polls aligned, including recommending a provision for a constructive or positive vote of no-confidence. In an interview with The Indian Express, Chaudhary, responding to a question on how long it would take the committee to finalise its recommendations, said members had unanimously decided to visit all states and Union Territories – a process that would take about two to two-and-a-half years. So far, the committee has visited two states: Uttarakhand and Maharashtra. The Bills were introduced in Lok Sabha in December last year and were almost immediately referred to the Chaudhary-led committee which has been holding consultations with stakeholders for feedback. Although the draft legislation provides for a one-time measure to bring Lok Sabha and Assembly elections in sync, Chaudhary felt that the committee could make additional recommendations to address how synchronisation should be maintained. One such suggestion could be a constructive vote of no-confidence which, as is the case in Germany, requires members of a legislature who bring a no-confidence motion against a government to have the numbers to form the government instead. Asked when the first simultaneous elections would be held, he said: 'The committee will deliberate; Parliament will decide. We can't say when, but the Bill says the first session of Parliament, if it happens with the appointed date, then it would be from 2034.' The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Bill, 2024 and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment Bill), 2024 provide for simultaneous elections to the Lok Sabha and Assemblies. If passed, the Bills provide for the President notifying the appointed date on the first sitting of a newly-elected Lok Sabha and every state or UT Assembly elected after that appointed date would have its term curtailed to align with the Lok Sabha. This would provide for simultaneous elections to be held when the five-year term of the Lok Sabha ends. The Bills also provide for elections to be held for the remainder term in case a government falls before the five-year term. Asked what would happen if a Lok Sabha or Assembly election returns a hung verdict or if a Union or state government falls, Chaudhary said: 'The Constitution does not mention no-confidence motion even now; it is governed by Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha. We can bring in some provisions for stability. We can recommend new provisions in the Constitution.' He said the committee could deliberate on the issue and it was for Parliament to decide. 'If some impediments are there in the Constitution, those impediments may be redressed after discussion with all the members. Constructive no-confidence motion, like the German model, can be discussed. Once you bring a no-confidence motion, then at the same time, you should bring a confidence motion. In the rarest of rare situations, the Leader of the House can be elected on the floor of the House like the Speaker is. But, this situation will not arise. We have seen that the electorate does not support those who bring a no-confidence motion,' he said. 'All members will discuss and if there is a requirement to incorporate something or make additions to the Bill in the national interest, I believe the committee will recommend. If our end goal is to achieve 'One Nation, One Election', then definitely we will recommend amendments to enable that,' he said. The Bills had been introduced by Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal on December 17, 2024 and were based on the recommendations of the High-Level Committee chaired by former President Ram Nath Kovind. Responding to criticism from some in the Opposition that the move would be anti-democratic and against federalism, Chaudhary, who is BJP MP from Pali in Rajasthan, said simultaneous elections would further the cause of democracy. 'In our experience, the states where elections are held simultaneously, the voter turnout is 10-20% more. Is that in the interest of or against democracy? If there is only 40% polling and the PM or CM is elected with 21% of the votes, is that democracy? I believe polling will cross 80% if we have simultaneous elections. The expression of the will of the people will be more robust and it will strengthen democracy. Not holding simultaneous elections is anti-democratic,' he said. He maintained that the Bills only 'fixed the time schedule' of elections and did not affect the basic structure of the Constitution, federalism and free and fair elections. He said Article 327 of the Constitution gives Parliament the power to make provision with respect to elections to legislatures. When it comes to federalism, he said the Supreme Court, in the SR Bommai case in 1994, had reinforced that federalism is a basic feature and that the Bills before the committee do not infringe upon this as the powers of the Union and states remain the same. 'The first three elections were held simultaneously until 1967. Were those elections against federalism? Some Assembly elections are still held with Lok Sabha, is that against federalism? Has any regional party in those states demanded separate elections? Look at the example of TDP in Andhra Pradesh or BJD in Odisha. This argument is untenable. We welcome anyone who wants to come before the committee with such an argument, with foundations. We will deal with it. If there is no basis, we cannot deal with such an argument properly,' he said. The Bills, he said, did not alter the accountability of the government to Parliament and that holding frequent elections did not mean that the government would be more accountable. 'We have a parliamentary form of democracy. The executive is accountable 24×7 to Parliament,' he said. Asked about the concerns of regional parties that holding simultaneous elections would lead to regional issues being sidelined, he said voters were capable of electing different parties at the Centre and state. 'The voters today are very intelligent and politically educated. We can't underestimate the Indian voters. Underestimating them will tantamount to undermining them. The voters, particularly in rural areas like where I come from, know who to vote for in national elections based on national issues, and in local elections, based on local issues,' he said. Chaudhary said the cost of frequent elections was borne by the education system, particularly government schools where teachers are sent on election duty for months, and the economy. On how much it would cost to hold simultaneous elections, he said it would be 'maximum Rs15,000 crore'. But this, he said, would be a small amount when compared to the benefit to the economy in terms of fewer disruptions to governance, policy-making and investments. On the other hand, he said the practice of announcing freebies and caste-based politics around elections would also be reduced if all elections were held once in five years. As a part of the committee's hearings, he said all states and UTs had been asked to prepare reports on the impact of frequent elections to their economy and society. Stakeholders like the Indian Bank Association were also asked to study the impact of simultaneous elections. The Committee has so far met former Chief Justice of India U U Lalit and several former Supreme Court and High Court judges as a part of its consultations. He said the committee plans on meeting more legal luminaries, apart from political leaders and other stakeholders in states. Asked how the BJP would be able to have the Constitutional amendment passed as it required two-thirds majority, which the NDA does not have, he said he believed the parties who think of the national interest would support the Bills. 'It is not in the party's interest, it is in the national interest. It will not take time to be passed if they think in national interest. I have full faith that the parties that think of national interest will support. If Congress or any other party thinks of national interest first, then not just 2/3, but we will get 3/4 majority,' he said. The committee, comprising 39 members and two co-opted members, had been given an extension until the Monsoon session during the last session.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Explained: Lok Sabha blip is past, BJP back in business
The 2024 general elections saw the BJP fall short of a majority in Lok Sabha with its tally dropping from 303 to 240 seats. For the first time since 2014, the party of Prime Minister Narendra Modi had to rely on coalition partners to be in government. A year later, 2024's electoral setback appears to have been but a minor bump in the road for the Modi juggernaut. While continuing to bank on its nationalist credentials and image as a strong, uncompromising government, Modi 3.0 has taken policy stances that the opposition has struggled to counter. Here's a recap. A quick rebound In the past year, the BJP has secured clear majorities in state Assembly elections in Haryana, Maharashtra, and Delhi, cementing its status as the most dominant political force in the country, the 2024 blip notwithstanding. In Haryana, where it had won just five out of 10 Lok Sabha seats in June 2024, the BJP bounced back in October, winning 48 seats in the 90-seat Assembly. Then in November, the BJP on its own won 132 seats in the 288-seat Maharashtra Assembly, with its Mahayuti alliance winning a whopping 235 seats. In February this year, the BJP returned to power in the national capital for the first time in 27 years, winning 48 seats in the 70-seat Assembly and ending a decade of AAP rule in Delhi. While the BJP did not win the Assembly elections in Jammu & Kashmir, it was dominant in Jammu, winning 29 seats to Congress' six. The National Conference came to power after winning 42 seats. In fact the only significant Assembly polls setback for the BJP was in Jharkhand last October. The Jharkhand Mukti Morcha won 31 of the 81 seats, and returned to government in alliance with the Congress, which won 16 seats. The BJP secured 21 seats. Winning narrative war The BJP's successes over the past year come on the back of its ability to keep tight control of the political narrative, and repeatedly push the opposition into uncomfortable corners. The best example for this is Operation Sindoor, on whose back the BJP now rides a wave of nationalism across the country. Military successes aside, the Modi government has leveraged the operation to push the opposition, especially Congress, on the backfoot. Like in times past, the Congress has struggled to find an apt political idiom to counter the government on national security matters. Its recent attacks have focussed on the government allegedly capitulating to international pressure while agreeing to a ceasefire. But this flies in the face of the overwhelming national consensus, which views Op Sindoor as a resounding success that has established a new normal in India's response to terrorism. Several opposition leaders — including Shashi Tharoor and Salman Khurshid of the Congress, K Kanimozhi of the DMK, and Asaduddin Owaisi of AIMIM — too have echoed this position, and been a part of all-party delegations sent abroad to explain and defend the government's actions. That the Congress has repeatedly thrown jibes at Tharoor for his eloquent defence of Op Sindoor shows how confused the party is, a stark contrast to the BJP with its clear, resonant messaging. Strong but deft After 2024 elections, there was a perception that Modi 3.0 would be shakier than the previous two governments. The government's actions thus far prove that that is far from the case. Most notably, Modi 3.0 has continued to address its core ideological projects, much like it had done in its first and second term. In April, Parliament passed the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. Much like the 2019 law banning triple talaq, the Waqf Act is borne out of the BJP's long-stated desire to bring transparency and a sense of justice in matters pertaining to the Muslim community. The law is currently under challenge in the Supreme Court. The first year of Modi 3.0 also saw progress on the Prime Minister's pet idea of instituting simultaneous elections to the Lok Sabha and state Assemblies, with the introduction of two crucial Bills. Moreover, the government has been deft in its political manoeuvring. By unexpectedly deciding to enumerate caste in the next census, the government has turned the tables on the Congress and Rahul Gandhi who have invested a lot of political capital on the matter for close to two years. Effectively co-opting Congress' caste plank, the BJP has accused past Congress governments of not allowing a caste census, 'insulting' Dr B R Ambedkar, and putting the Mandal Commission report on OBC quotas on the backburner in the 1980s. As the Modi 3.0 turns one, there is every indication that the Prime Minister is well and truly in charge of a strong government, and like in his two previous terms, the Congress is yet to get its act together. Vikas Pathak is deputy associate editor with The Indian Express and writes on national politics. He has over 17 years of experience, and has worked earlier with The Hindustan Times and The Hindu, among other publications. He has covered the national BJP, some key central ministries and Parliament for years, and has covered the 2009 and 2019 Lok Sabha polls and many state assembly polls. He has interviewed many Union ministers and Chief Ministers. Vikas has taught as a full-time faculty member at Asian College of Journalism, Chennai; Symbiosis International University, Pune; Jio Institute, Navi Mumbai; and as a guest professor at Indian Institute of Mass Communication, New Delhi. Vikas has authored a book, Contesting Nationalisms: Hinduism, Secularism and Untouchability in Colonial Punjab (Primus, 2018), which has been widely reviewed by top academic journals and leading newspapers. He did his PhD, M Phil and MA from JNU, New Delhi, was Student of the Year (2005-06) at ACJ and gold medalist from University Rajasthan College in Jaipur in graduation. He has been invited to top academic institutions like JNU, St Stephen's College, Delhi, and IIT Delhi as a guest speaker/panellist. ... Read More
