
As Rahul Gandhi says Congress OBC outreach ‘fell short', a recall of the party's history with these communities
'I would like to say one thing. It is a personal thing… I do feel that when it came to OBCs, the Congress party's understanding of their issues, the challenges they were facing and the type of actions that the party should have and could have taken, we fell short,' Rahul said at a gathering of his party MPs and Telangana leadership.
'…This is a feeling I have that we allowed, we opened the space for the BJP because we were not responsive to the aspirations, to the desires of the OBCs,' he said.
In March-April 2023, the BJP had accused the Congress of insulting the 'entire OBC community' after Rahul was convicted of defamation over remarks that he made on the 'Modi' surname during an election rally in 2019.
The Congress had rejected the allegation at the time. However, the political history of India shows that the party has indeed missed several opportunities to reach out to these castes. Perhaps more importantly, it has failed to claim credit for policy changes with regard to OBCs that were, in fact, initiated by Congress governments.
Consider this short history.
The clamour for greater political representation for the backward classes, as well as demands for reservation for these communities on the lines of the quotas in government jobs for the Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs), began soon after Independence.
KAKA KALELKAR COMMISSION: In 1953, the government of Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru set up the first Backward Classes Commission (the expression 'OBC' was not in wide use at the time) under Article 340 of the Constitution, which empowers the President to 'appoint a Commission…to investigate the conditions of socially and educationally backward classes…and the difficulties under which they labour and to make recommendations as to the steps that should be taken by the Union or any State to remove such difficulties and to improve their condition…'.
The Gandhian social reformer Dattatreya Balkrishna Kalelkar, popularly known as Kaka Kalelkar, who was a member of Rajya Sabha at the time, was appointed chairman of the commission.
The Kalelkar Commission submitted its report to the government on March 30, 1955. It formulated a set of criteria for identifying socially and educationally backward classes, and made several recommendations for their uplift. According to a summary in the report of the Mandal Commission (see below), these included a caste census in 1961 (which will finally happen in the coming Census), treating all women as a class as 'backward', and reserving 70% seats in technical and professional institutions for qualified students from backward classes.
The recommendations were, however, not unanimous, and three of the members were opposed to the acceptance of caste as a criterion for social backwardness and reservation in government jobs. The Mandal report noted that Kalelkar himself wrote a long letter to the President expressing his disagreement on a number of issues.
Nehru's government considered the Kalelkar report and ultimately rejected it. Meanwhile, OBCs in the Hindi heartland had already begun to move away towards the socialist leader Ram Manohar Lohia. Until Lohia's untimely demise in 1967 at age 57, his anti-Congress politics was powered by these communities. After Lohia's death, Chaudhary Charan Singh, the Jat leader from Western UP, emerged as the leader of OBCs.
THE FIRST QUOTA FOR OBCs: In October 1975, Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna, who was the Congress Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh between November 1973 and November 1975, appointed the Most Backward Classes Commission under the chairmanship of Chhedi Lal Sathi. This was the first push for an OBC quota in Uttar Pradesh.
Subsequently, in April 1977, the government of another Congress titan, N D Tiwari, who succeeded Bahuguna after a phase of President's Rule, announced a 15 per cent quota in government jobs for OBCs in UP, perhaps the first such move anywhere in the country.
Within a week, however, Tiwari's government was dismissed by the Janata Party government led by Prime Minister Morarji Desai, which had come to power at the Centre following the post-Emergency elections of March 1977.
Consequently, it was the Janata government in UP led by Ram Naresh Yadav (1977-79) which implemented the quota — and also took the credit for it.
In August 1990, the central government led by Congress rebel V P Singh announced its intention to implement the report of the Socially and Educationally Backward Classes Commission, popularly known as the Mandal Commission.
The Mandal Commission had been constituted by the Morarji government in 1978, and its report — recommending 27% reservation for OBCs — had been submitted in 1980, but the governments of Indira and Rajiv Gandhi had chosen not to act on it.
The implementation of the report of the Mandal Commission unleashed a wave of OBC assertion and fundamentally altered the politics of North India. It catapulted leaders like Mulayam Singh Yadav, Lalu Prasad, Nitish Kumar, and Sharad Yadav to national prominence, and sealed the fate of the Congress in UP and Bihar.
BJP and Congress in the Mandal decades
In his 2006 biography of V P Singh, Manzil Se Zyada Safar, Ram Bahadur Rai quoted the former PM as having said: 'Congress leaders were obsessed with power equations. They were least concerned with the social equations and changes taking place… It was unable to read the Mandal phenomenon. It took a lot of time to understand the importance of coalition power… The BJP has shown more flexibility than the Congress on (striking alliances).'
Indeed, the BJP — at that time still considered a largely Brahmin-Bania party — showed the political flexibility to project OBC leaders such as Kalyan Singh, a Lodh Rajput, in UP, to counter Mulayam. As Mulayam's support base outside the Samajwadi Party's Yadav-Muslim core started to fragment, Kalyan rallied smaller OBC communities behind the BJP, eventually forging a non-Yadav OBC vote bank. After OBC leaders like Kalyan and Uma Bharti became rebels within the party, the BJP revamped its leadership at every level to accommodate these communities politically.
Kalyan's successor Ram Prakash Gupta (Nov 1999-Oct 2000) granted Jats OBC status in UP. In a bid to weaken both Mulayam and BSP chief Mayawati, the government of Chief Minister Rajnath Singh (Oct 2000-Mar 2002) devised a 'reservation within reservation' to divide OBCs and Dalits.
In 2006, Arjun Singh, the Union Human Resource Development Minister in the UPA-1 government, fought back pressures to push through 27% reservation for OBCs in admissions to central educational institutions, which had been pending since the implementation of the Mandal report.
It was one of the biggest decisions in favour of OBCs, and a defining moment in OBC politics — but hardly any political gains accrued to the Congress.
In 2010, the UPA-2 government initiated a move for a caste census. Then Law Minister Veerappa Moily wrote to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh about collecting caste/ community data in Census 2011. But on March 1, 2011, Home Minister P Chidambaram opposed the decision in Lok Sabha. Singh's government ultimately decided to conduct a full Socio Economic Caste Census (SECC) instead.
The SECC data was published by the Ministries of Rural Development and Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation, which conducted the census in rural and urban areas respectively, in 2016. However, the data remain unavailable. The Narendra Modi government has said it is 'not reliable'.
There is so far no precise estimate of India's OBC population. The National Commission for Backward Classes lists over 2,600 castes in the central list of OBCs for 27% reservation. The Mandal Commission said OBCs were 52% of the population. A report based on the National Sample Survey Organisation's 61st round, released in October 2006, put this figure at 41%.
All of this data will now be available after the delayed Census of 2021 announced by the Modi government.
This is a revised and updated version of an explainer that was first published on March 29, 2023.
Shyamlal Yadav is one of the pioneers of the effective use of RTI for investigative reporting. He is a member of the Investigative Team. His reporting on polluted rivers, foreign travel of public servants, MPs appointing relatives as assistants, fake journals, LIC's lapsed policies, Honorary doctorates conferred to politicians and officials, Bank officials putting their own money into Jan Dhan accounts and more has made a huge impact. He is member of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). He has been part of global investigations like Paradise Papers, Fincen Files, Pandora Papers, Uber Files and Hidden Treasures. After his investigation in March 2023 the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York returned 16 antiquities to India. Besides investigative work, he keeps writing on social and political issues. ... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
9 minutes ago
- India.com
Operation Sindoor Debate In Lok Sabha: PM Modi Slays Opposition
PM Modi's Reply On Operation Sindoor: Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched his counterattack against Opposition parties on Tuesday, following criticism from leaders such as Rahul Gandhi, Mallikarjun Kharge, and Akhilesh Yadav over intelligence failures and ceasefire claims. Addressing the Lok Sabha while replying to the opposition's charges on Operation Sindoor, PM Modi said that he stands in the house not only to present India's side but also to show a mirror to those who don't see the country's point of view. Prime Minister Modi also accused the opposition of playing at the hands of Pakistan by blowing up their narrative and claims. Prime Minister Modi also questioned Congress alleging that the grand old party has given a clean chit to Pakistan. PM Modi said that the Congress leaders are asking for proof that the terrorists were from Pakistan. Here are 10 key highlights from Prime Minister Modi's Lok Sabha speech: 1. I was abroad on 22nd April. I returned immediately. And immediately after coming back, I called a meeting and we gave clear instructions that a befitting reply has to be given to terrorism and this is our national resolve. The army was given a free hand to act. And it was also said that the army should decide when, where, how and in what manner. All these things were clearly said in that meeting. 2. Immediately following the Pahalgam attack, the Pakistani military anticipated that India would retaliate significantly. They even issued threats to use nuclear weapons. On May 6th and 7th, India executed its planned response, leaving Pakistan powerless to act. In just 22 minutes, our forces avenged the attack of April 22nd with clear objectives in mind. India took action as decided on the night of May 6, and Pakistan could do nothing about it. In 22 minutes, our army took revenge for April 22 with the designated target. 3. Armed Forces were given a free hand. They were told to decide the when, where and are proud that terrorists were punished, and it was such a punishment that the terrorist masterminds have sleepless nights even to this day. Terrorist bases were destroyed in Pakistan. No one can imagine that anyone can reach there. Bahawalpur, Muridke, has also been razed to the ground. Our forces destroyed the terrorist bases. 4. India successfully dispelled Pakistan's nuclear threat, demonstrating that nuclear blackmail is no longer an effective strategy. Pakistan's airbases and assets have suffered heavy damage. And to date, many of their airbases are in ICU. 5. India has shown its technical capability. It has struck Pakistan precisely on the chest. Pakistan's airbases and assets have suffered heavy damage. And to date, many of their airbases are in ICU. This is the era of technology-based war. If we had not made the preparations that we have done in the last 10 years, then we could imagine how much loss we could have suffered in this era of technology. 6. Through Operation Sindoor, for the first time, the world recognised the power of self-reliant India. Made in India drones, missiles exposed Pakistan's weapon system. 7. Through this operation, India has firmly conveyed three key messages: First, any assault on Indian soil by militants will be met with a decisive and fitting response on India's own terms. Second, nuclear threats will not deter India from taking necessary action. Third, there will be no distinction between a government that harbours terrorists and the masterminds behind such acts of terror. भारत ने सिद्ध कर दिया है कि न्यूक्लियर ब्लैकमेलिंग अब नहीं चलेगी, और न ही न्यूक्लियर ब्लैकमेलिंग के सामने भारत झुकेगा। -पीएम @narendramodi — BJP (@BJP4India) July 29, 2025 8. Here, many things were said (by opposition) regarding foreign policy as well. Many things were also said about global support. No country in the world has stopped India from taking action for its security. Out of 193 countries, only 3 countries made statements in support of Pakistan. Be it QUAD or BRICS... India received support from all over the world. 9. We said this on the first day in the press conference that our action is non-escalatory. We did Operation Sindoor by saying this. And that is why we stopped strike after targets were achieved. No leader of the world asked India to stop Operation Sindoor. During this time, on the night of May 9, the Vice President of the United States tried to talk to me. He kept trying for around an hour but I was busy in a meeting with our armed forces. So, I could not take his call. Later I called him back. The American Vice President informed me that Pakistan was planning a massive strike against India. My response was - if this is Pakistan's desire, then it will cost them dearly. If Pakistan will attack, we will carry out a bigger strike. 10. Operation Sindoor is going on. Pakistan ne 'dussahas ki kalpana ki toh, usse karara javab diya jayega' (if Pakistan dares any misadventure, they will get a befitting reply).


India.com
9 minutes ago
- India.com
No One Asked India To Stop Operation Sindoor: PM Modi Replies To Oppositions Trump Ceasefire Claims
Replying to the Opposition's charges on US President Donald Trump's India-Pakistan ceasefire claims, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday, while addressing the Lok Sabha, said that no leader of the world had asked India to stop Operation Sindoor. 'We said this on the first day in the press conference that our action is non-escalatory. We did Operation Sindoor by saying this. And that is why we stopped the strike after targets were achieved. No leader of the world asked India to stop Operation Sindoor,' the Prime Minister said. Operation Sindoor The Indian Armed Forces launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK). This came after the gruesome Pahalgam terror attack of April 22, in which 26 individuals were killed. According to Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, the Operation targeted key terrorist hubs and achieved complete operational success within just 22 minutes, eliminating over 100 terrorists and handlers. Pakistan retaliated by launching drone and missile attacks on Indian territory. After four days of military conflict between India and Pakistan, a ceasefire agreement was announced on May 10. Amit Shah In Lok Sabha Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Tuesday, during the ongoing debate in Parliament on Operation Sindoor, said that Pakistan is Congress's mistake and added that during Operation Sindoor those who sent the terrorists were killed, and in Operation Mahadev those who carried out the attack were gunned down. "Pakistan is Congress's mistake. If they had not accepted partition, there would have been no Pakistan today," Shah said. "Operation Sindoor killed those who sent the terrorists, and Operation Mahadev killed those who carried out the attack... I thought that after hearing this news, there would be a wave of happiness in the ruling and the Opposition parties, 'Magar Syaahi padd gayi inke chehre pe' (Their faces are smeared with ink)... What kind of politics is this?" Shah said during the debate on Operation Sindoor in the Lower House. Responding to the opposition's "why there was no war" charge, the Union Home Minister said that PoK exists only because of Jawaharlal Nehru. He claimed that the Nehru government gave 80 percent of Indus waters to Pakistan and forgot about PoK in 1971 during Indira Gandhi's tenure as Prime Minister.


India.com
9 minutes ago
- India.com
'From Sindoor to Sindhu, we have taken action against Pakistan on all fronts: PM Modi addresses Operation Sindoor in Parliament
'From Sindoor to Sindhu, we have taken action against Pakistan on all fronts: PM Modi on Operation Sindoor in Parliament | Key Highlights PM Modi on Operation Sindoor: Once again asserting that the Indian armed forces taught a good lesson to those behind the Pahalgam attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday said that 'masters of terrorism' are still losing their sleep over it. At the same time he launched a blistering attack on the Opposition for raising question on Operation Sindoor . Responding to the two-day debate on Pahalgam and Operation Sindoor in the Lok Sabha, the prime minister said the attack was aimed at instigating riots in India, and the country's unity has foiled the attempt. He also noted that Pakistan had some inkling of Indian action and had started issuing nuclear threats, but could do nothing when terror targets were hit. Key Highlights 'I stand here to make a case for India, and to show a mirror to those who do not understand this. I had said that we will teach the terrorists and their masters a befitting lesson which will be beyond their imagination. 'The armed forces taught them such a lesson that the masters of terrorism are still losing their sleep over it,' he said. 'It ( Pahalgam attack) was a conspiracy to instigate riots in India and the country's unity foiled that attempt. When I speak of this Parliament session being a Vijayotsav , it is of destroying the headquarters of terror,' he said. When Pakistan came out in support of terrorists, India's missiles, drones caused unimaginable loss; forced Pakistan to its knees Indian forces showed Pakistan that they had destroyed terror sites within minutes; we made our capabilities clear to them. On May 7, Indian armed forces stated publicly that they have struck terror sites inside Pakistan For Operation Sindoor , India had decided to attack the epicentre of terror that had supported Pahalgam terrorists Opposition can get headlines in media with their attacks on me, but this cannot earn them place in hearts of people of country Congress leaders targeted me for political gains, but their frivolous statements ended up discouraging our brave soldiers India got support of the entire world, but it is unfortunate that Congress did not support the valour of our soldiers.