Prime Day's most unexpected free gift comes with the Samsung Frame Pro TV
If you've been eyeing The Samsung Frame Pro — Samsung's souped-up version of its best-selling art-inspired game-changing Frame TV — this might be the most tempting Prime Day TV deal we've seen yet.
Right now, the 65-inch Samsung Frame Pro and the 75-inch Samsung Frame Pro are both on sale at Amazon during Prime Day for just $30 above it's lowest price ever.
Advertisement
But, right now, it comes with two premium freebies: the Samsung Music Frame and a customizable Frame bezel, all for the same price the TV alone was selling for last week.
That's nearly $600 you'd be buying after the fact in added value — no code, no extra steps, just because … Prime Day!
It has all the same art-displaying chops as the OG we reviewed a few months back, but steps it up with a brighter Neo QLED screen, über anti-glare matte finish, and more powerful 4K processor, and the latest and greatest tech from the tech juggernaut – Samsung Vision AI, allowing for a customized viewing experience.
Even better? The included Samsung Music Frame acts like a hidden Sonos in a photo frame. It can stand alone or pair wirelessly for immersive, invisible sound. (Trust me, it's easy to use and totally worth it.)
This isn't just a TV — it's a conversation starter. The Samsung Frame Pro transforms into a stunning smart-display when not in use and delivers ultra-clear 4K visuals with Quantum Dot technology and Samsung Vision AI when you're watching. Its anti-glare matte display and customizable bezels make it blend seamlessly into any space. It's the ultimate fusion of luxury, high design, and high performance.
This is a very limited-time Prime Day bundle, and based on how fast Frame deals typically go, it won't last long. Whether you're upgrading your own setup or finally investing in a living room centerpiece, this is the time to grab.
For over 200 years, the New York Post has been America's go-to source for bold news, engaging stories, in-depth reporting, and now, insightful shopping guidance. We're not just thorough reporters – we sift through mountains of information, test and compare products, and consult experts on any topics we aren't already schooled specialists in to deliver useful, realistic product recommendations based on our extensive and hands-on analysis. Here at The Post, we're known for being brutally honest – we clearly label partnership content, and whether we receive anything from affiliate links, so you always know where we stand. We routinely update content to reflect current research and expert advice, provide context (and wit) and ensure our links work. Please note that deals can expire, and all prices are subject to change.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
43 minutes ago
- CNET
These $130 Asus Gaming Headphones Get Almost Everything Right
CNET's expert staff reviews and rates dozens of new products and services each month, building on more than a quarter century of expertise. Asus ROG Pelta $130 at Amazon Pros Sound great Comfortable Customizable sound Affordable Three connection modes Cons No noise cancellation No Xbox support Minimal headband adjustment Asus ROG Pelta $130 at Amazon After reviewing the Turtle Beach Stealth 700 headset last year, I was impressed by just how much a good headset can improve the gaming experience. While headsets like the Stealth 700s are great, they're also expensive. The ROG Pelta headphones from Asus, on the other hand, nail the basics while being more affordable. I've been testing the Pelta's for several weeks now and I'm quite impressed. They get just about everything right and only cost $130. That's still a fair amount of money, but much of what you get with the Pelta is often only found on headsets that cost twice as much. What I like about the Asus ROG Pelta CNET/Jason Cockerham For starters, the 50mm titanium-plated drivers sound great. No matter what game I played, I heard everything clearly. Both music and movies sounded fantastic, almost as good as my $300 Sony XM3 headphones. The best part is that with the Asus Armory Crate app you can customize the sound profile in detail. Asus gives you lots of options for tuning the headphones precisely to your liking, which is a welcome touch at this price. There are some custom profiles as well for those who just want to pick one and leave it. To be honest, I never felt the need to switch from the default settings during my entire time with the Peltas. They're also comfortable to wear. The earcups fit well over my ears, and the cushions are comfortable -- more so than the Stealth 700s. They're made of soft mesh material that gives them greater breathability than others I've used. They're also very lightweight. There's no carrying case, which is disappointing. CNET/Jason Cockerham Microphone quality is also solid. I never had any teammates complain about not being able to hear me, and I even took a few video calls with them and didn't have any issues. The mic is also removable, which is convenient, so it doesn't get in the way when you're not using it. The 70-hour battery life (90 on Bluetooth) is quite decent, and you can get 3 hours of usage with 15 minutes of charging. The Pelta's can connect to PC, Mac, PlayStation, Switch and mobile devices via Bluetooth or a 2.4GHz USB-C dongle. There's also an included USB-C cable with an adapter if you want to go the wired route. The odd part is that there's no Xbox support. What I didn't like about the Asus ROG Pelta CNET/Jason Cockerham The only real downside is that the headband is not telescoping, which means there are only three predetermined positions for adjusting the headset. This may not be a problem for most, but I have a small, weirdly shaped head and the Pelta never quite fit as snugly as I would have liked. I always felt like they would slip off at any moment. They never did, but it always felt like they were about to. There's also no 3.5mm headphone jack. I get that this is becoming more common these days, but it's still annoying. There are still those of us who want a good analog connection from time to time. Noise cancellation also doesn't make an appearance, but that's not uncommon on gaming headphones, especially at this price. Should you buy the Asus ROG Pelta? Overall, for $130, there's really not much to dislike about the ROG Pelta headphones. They work with almost any device, sound great, have good battery life and are quite comfortable. If you're looking for a good gaming headset that won't have your wallet complaining, and you don't have an Xbox, the Pelta's should be high on the list.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Amazon UK to battle $5.4bn in lawsuits from retailers and consumers
The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal has authorised two lawsuits from retailers and consumers against online e-commerce giant Amazon for allegedly abusing its market dominance. Both lawsuits allege that Amazon violated Section 18 of the UK's Competition Act 1998 in actions before 31 December 2020, and Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The proposed class representatives are seeking potential collective damages totalling up to £4bn ($5.4bn) for affected parties, as reported by Reuters. The tribunal has given permission for these cases to proceed as opt-out collective actions. Andreas Stephan, a professor of competition law, is heading one lawsuit on behalf of more than 200,000 third-party sellers. This claim seeks damages of up to £2.7bn. Stephan's legal team accuses Amazon of rigging its "Buy Box" feature to preferentially highlight products that use Amazon's logistics and delivery services. The suit claims that the criteria used by Amazon to select which offers appear in the Buy Box are opaque and biased toward listings that employ Amazon's fulfilment by Amazon (FBA) service over those that use fulfilment by merchant (FBM). It also alleges discriminatory practices in how delivery promises are adjusted for FBM products. In a separate action, consumer advocate Robert Hammond is representing millions of Amazon customers in a lawsuit seeking up to £1.3bn. This case similarly accuses Amazon of anti-competitive behaviour. An Amazon spokesperson was quoted by the news agency: "These claims are without merit and we're confident that will become clear through the legal process. "Amazon has always focused on supporting the 100,000 businesses that sell their products on our UK store, and more than half of all physical product sales on our UK store are from independent selling partners." The legal challenges come amidst regulatory investigations and decisions by competition authorities concerning aspects of Amazon's operations and conduct within its national marketplaces. In January 2025, the retailer was accused of unlawful data tracking of its consumers in the US state of California. The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued Amazon in 2023 for using 'manipulative tactics and deceptive user-interface designs' to enrol consumers in Prime subscriptions. "Amazon UK to battle $5.4bn in lawsuits from retailers and consumers" was originally created and published by Retail Insight Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Jon Stewart warned comedians get 'sent away first.' Now it's happening.
'Go f--- yourself.' That was just one of the many 'witticisms' Stephen Colbert had for President Donald Trump and his "Late Show" audience on July 21, his first since breaking the news the show was coming to an end. Not in a year. Not after a farewell tour. Next May. No replacement. No streaming continuation. Yes, CBS made what it called an "agonizing" business decision to cancel the most-watched show at 11:30 p.m. ET/PT, just days after Colbert mocked the network's parent company for a $16 million payout to Trump. Colbert thanked CBS but also criticized its anonymous leak to the New York Post that the show loses between $40 million and $50 million a year amid falling ratings and advertising for late-night TV shows. On the one hand, you have those arguing this is simply a case of corporate cost cutting and media evolving. While others are raising the alarm this is a political decision disguised as a financial one. Both can be – and are – true at the same time. Before Colbert called his bosses' bosses' settlement with Trump a 'big fat bribe," his "Late Show" monologues have taken direct aim – nightly – at authoritarianism, misinformation, corporate cowardice and Trump for nearly a decade. One could even argue that he owes his success to Trump, because during his initial months at 'Late Show,' Colbert faltered in the ratings. In 2017, however, he began to see a surge of success as he got to mock Trump 1.0 in his monologues. Soon his show was No. 1 in late night, a ranking it held for nine straight TV seasons while simultaneously racking up 33 consecutive Emmy nominations. Colbert became a go-to voice for Trump-resistant Americans who enjoyed their political despair with a side of satire. In many ways, he took up the mantle left by his old boss, Jon Stewart, offering comedic catharsis in chaotic times. Despite this context, CBS claimed the decision to cancel was purely financial and 'not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount.' According to the company, the show had become too expensive to produce amid shrinking ad revenues and changing viewer habits. Opinion: Critics said Trump would ruin America. Six months in, he's proving them wrong. CBS is not wrong: Late-night advertising has by some estimates dropped by half since 2018. Anecdotally, I watch a lot of late-night viral clips on my phone, but I can't tell you the last time I watched any late-night television live on my television. But not everyone's buying the "it's just business" line. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, called for scrutiny while Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California, who taped the July 17 show when Colbert broke the news, echoed the concern. The Writers Guild of America issued a statement suggesting the move raises 'significant concerns' about political retribution. There are countless scathing opinion columns, letters to the editor and social media posts containing similar sentiments. Meanwhile, Trump gloated. He posted on Truth Social, "I absolutely love that Colbert' got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings. I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next." CBS is just one part of a massive merger between Paramount Global and Skydance. After Colbert's cancelation, the deal received approval from the Federal Communications Commission. The chairman of the FCC, Brendan Carr, was appointed by Trump. If you need a clue about whether his loyalties lie with the Constitution or the current occupant of the White House, Carr swapped out an American flag lapel pin for a gold medallion in the shape of Trump's profile just months ago. When corporations' incentives line up so conveniently with silencing dissent, we should be alarmed. Because both things can be true: The economics of late-night television, and the cultural influence of it, has been changing. And the timing of the settlement combined with the end of the "Late Show" is deeply concerning. Here is how it appears: The Trump administration made it clear that certain media deals wouldn't get approved unless certain broadcasting decisions were made. That would be the government using its power to punish dissent and influence private business decisions in order for political favor. In his 2022 Mark Twain Prize acceptance speech, Jon Stewart warned, 'When a society is under threat, comedians are the ones who get sent away first. It's just a reminder to people that democracy is under threat. Authoritarians are the threat to comedy, to art, to music, to thought, to poetry, to progress, to all those things.' That's the part that should concern us. The question isn't what happens to Colbert (he will be fine). It's what happens to us: the audience, the public, the people who depend on sharp, fearless voices to cut through the fog. Opinion: Public media funding cuts create fair competition for local news in Indiana The federal government defunded NPR and PBS. Now one of the most popular comedians on television is being nudged off the air. At what point do we stop calling this "just a business decision" and start calling it slow, strategic silencing? Because when cost cutting trims away the voices willing to laugh at power in real time, what's really being cut is dissent. And if that's not political, then what is?
