Convicted for pointing gun at SDM, BJP MLA disqualified
Jaipur: The Assembly membership of Rajasthan BJP MLA, Kanwarlal Meena, has been terminated after he was found guilty in a case where he threatened an SDM with a pistol in 2005.
The Assembly has issued an official notification confirming the termination.
Rajasthan Assembly Speaker Vasudev Devnani announced on Friday that MLA from Anta constituency, Kanwarlal, has been disqualified from the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly following his conviction in a court of law. The disqualification is in accordance with Article 191(1)(e) of the Indian Constitution and Section 8(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Devnani stated that the disqualification took effect from the date of conviction, and consequently, the Anta (193) Assembly seat in District Baran has been declared vacant. The Speaker clarified that the decision was made after receiving legal advice from the Advocate General of Rajasthan.
'I do not work under any kind of pressure,' he emphasised. 'All decisions are made strictly in accordance with the law and only after a thorough examination of all aspects.' He further stated that precedent exists for such matters, noting that previous Speakers have also taken time to study and act on similar cases. Devnani cautioned against politicising the issue, underlining that the matter is purely legal in nature.
He explained that the Advocate General was asked to provide legal counsel on the day of the court's verdict regarding MLA Kanwarlal. According to established legal provisions, an MLA stands disqualified from the date of conviction, and the notification of the seat's vacancy is formally issued by the Legislative Assembly. He also referenced Article 177 of the Constitution, stating that the Advocate General has the constitutional authority to participate in the proceedings of the Legislative Assembly and offer legal opinions when required. Earlier, the Assembly Secretariat had issued a notice to Kanwarlal, requiring him to respond by May 7.
He was asked to clarify whether he had received any relief from the Supreme Court to stay his sentence. As the Supreme Court did not suspend the conviction or sentence, the Speaker was left with no option but to revoke his membership.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
37 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Daily subject-wise quiz: Polity and Governance MCQs on Lok Sabha, Justice Hema Committee and more (Week 114)
UPSC Essentials brings to you its initiative of daily subject-wise quizzes. These quizzes are designed to help you revise some of the most important topics from the static part of the syllabus. Attempt today's subject quiz on Polity and Governance to check your progress. 🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for May 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at Which of the following part/s of the Constitution of India offer scope for introducing affirmative action? 1. Part III (Article 15 and 16) 2. Part IV (Directive Principles of State Policy) 3. Part IV-A (Fundamental Duties) Select the correct answer using the codes given below: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 1 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 Explanation — Part III (Article 15 and 16) and Part IV (Directive Principles of State Policy) of the Constitution offer scope for introducing affirmative action. — Affirmative action is a policy that seeks to increase employment and educational possibilities for people who are under-represented in numerous aspects of our society. It is a series of policies designed to build a justified society for individuals who have previously faced discrimination by giving them priority access to education, employment, healthcare, social welfare, and other services. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer. Consider the following statements: Statement 1: In 1953, the government set up the First Backward Classes Commission under the chairmanship of Kaka Kalelkar. Statement 2: It was formed to identify the 'socially and educationally backward' communities. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are correct and Statement 2 is the correct explanation for Statement 1. (b) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are correct and Statement 2 is not the correct explanation for Statement 1. (c) Statement 1 is correct but Statement 2 is incorrect. (d) Statement 1 is incorrect but Statement 2 is correct. Explanation — While the Constitution ensured reservation for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST), the identification of backward classes was a post-Constituent Assembly phenomenon. — Responding to requests for quota for Other Backward Classes (OBCs), the Congress administration established the First Backward Classes Commission in 1953, chaired by Kaka Kalelkar, to identify 'socially and educationally backward' communities. Hence, statements 1 and 2 are correct. — The committee classified 2,399 castes as 'socially and educationally backward' based on their social status in the caste hierarchy, educational advancement, and representation in government services, trade, commerce, and industry. Because the panel believed caste to be the sole basis for determining backwardness, rather than economic position, the then-Congress government rejected the findings and allowed the states complete authority to determine the backward classes in their respective regions. Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are correct and Statement 2 is the correct explanation for Statement 1. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer. Initially, the Eighth Schedule listed 14 languages. Which of the following languages were not among the 14 languages? 1. English 2. Sindhi 3. Marathi 4. Punjabi Select the correct answer using the codes given below: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 3 and 4 only (d) 2 and 4 only Explanation — Every year, February 21 is observed as International Mother Tongue Day, a day with special significance in India, where hundreds of mother tongues are spoken across the subcontinent. — Initially, the Eighth Schedule listed 14 languages: Assamese, Bengali, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Kashmiri, Malayalam, Marathi, Oriya (renamed Odiya in 2011), Punjabi, Sanskrit, Tamil, Telugu, and Urdu. — English is not one of the 22 languages in the Eighth Schedule, however Sindhi was added to the Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution by the 21st Amendment Act of 1967. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer. The Justice Hema Committee was formed: (a) to draft a National Policy on Criminal Justice aimed at comprehensive reforms in the criminal justice system. (b) to examine the structure and functioning of police forces in India and recommend reforms to make them more accountable and professional. (c) to investigate sexual harassment and gender inequality in the industry. (d) to suggest reforms in the criminal justice system to make it more efficient and people-friendly. Explanation — The Kerala police withdrew 35 sexual assault complaints filed after the Kerala government announced the Justice Hema Committee report on August 19, 2024. — In July 2017, the Kerala government established the Justice Hema Committee to look into sexual harassment and gender discrimination in the industry. This was the first such committee established by any state in the country. — The report discovered a culture of sexual harassment in the Malayalam cinema industry. The Committee reported the existence of a casting couch (in which powerful men demand sexual favours from women in exchange for film roles), frequent suggestive and vulgar comments made by men at work, and drunk male co-actors forcing themselves into women's rooms, among other things. — The Committee also discovered that numerous women did not report cases of sexual assault for fear of retaliation. Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer. With reference to the rights of minorities, consider the following statements: 1. Article 30 of the Constitution of India provides for the rights of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions. 2. Only religion-based minorities shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. 3. The State can discriminate against any educational institution in awarding funding because it is managed by a minority, regardless of religion or language. How many of the statements given above are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Explanation — Article 30 of the Constitution of India provides for the rights of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions. Hence, statement 1 is correct. — All minorities, regardless of religion or language, have the right to create and run educational institutions of their choosing. Hence, statement 2 is not correct. — When enacting any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of an educational institution established and administered by a minority, the State must ensure that the amount fixed by or determined under such law for the acquisition of such property does not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed. — The State shall not discriminate against any educational institution in awarding funding because it is managed by a minority, regardless of religion or language. Hence, statement 3 is not correct. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer. (Source: Constitution of India) Why is the Lok Sabha called the popular chamber? (a) A joint session of Parliament is chaired by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. (b) The strength of Lok Sabha is and will always be greater than that of Rajya Sabha (c) It is composed of representatives of the people chosen by direct election on the basis of adult suffrage. (d) The Lok Sabha has greater authority in financial matters than the Rajya Sabha. Explanation According to FAQs at — 'The Lok Sabha is composed of representatives of the people chosen by direct election on the basis of adult suffrage. That is why it is called the popular chamber.' Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer. Consider the following key Acts: 1. The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) 2. The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) 3. The Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 (FEOA) 4. The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (COFEPOSA), 1974 Which of the above acts is the Enforcement Directorate empowered to enforce: (a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 1 and 4 only (c) 2, 3and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4 Explanation Mandate to enforce laws — While the ED has a broad mandate to investigate offences related to money laundering and foreign exchange violations, it's empowered to enforce the following key laws: — The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA): The ED traces assets from money laundering activities and is responsible for ensuring the prosecution of offenders and confiscation (permanent seizure of ownership, usually after conviction) of such assets. — The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA): The law enforcement agency is also responsible for imposing penalties on offenders of FEMA and in the cases pertaining to violations committed prior to the repeal of the FERA of 1973, which FEMA replaced, thus being responsible for the handling of legacy FERA cases. — The Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 (FEOA): The ED is mandated to attach (temporarily seizing of property without assuming ownership to prevent sale, usually during trial phase) and confiscate properties of economic offenders evading Indian law by fleeing abroad. — The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (COFEPOSA), 1974: The Directorate is the sponsor of cases under the law and can initiate preventive detention proceedings on FEMA violations based on COFEPOSA. (Refer to read more: As SC raps ED, a look at agency's powers, role and red lines) Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer. With reference to the office of Deputy Speaker, consider the following statements: 1. Like the Speaker, the Constitution states that the Deputy Speaker must be appointed in the first sitting of the newly elected Member of Parliaments of the House of People. 2. The Deputy Speaker has the same general powers as the Speaker when presiding over the House. 3. There was no Deputy Speaker for the entire duration of the 16th, 17th and 18th Lok Sabha. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 Explanation — There was no Deputy Speaker for the entire duration of the 17th Lok Sabha (2019-24). M Thambi Durai of the AIADMK, a BJP ally at the time, was Deputy Speaker of the 16th Lok Sabha (2014-19). The Opposition had the post of Deputy Speaker continuously from 1990 through 2014. Hence, statement 3 is not correct. — According to Article 95(1), the Deputy Speaker performs the duties of the Speaker if the post is vacant. The Deputy Speaker has the same general powers as the Speaker when presiding over the House. All references to the 'Speaker' in the Rules are deemed to be references to the Deputy Speaker as well for the times when he or she presides. Hence, statement 2 is correct. — Both the Speaker and Deputy Speaker must be appointed 'as soon as may be'. Article 93 states that 'The House of the People shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the House to be respectively Speaker and Deputy Speaker'. Hence, statement 1 is not correct. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer. Daily Subject-wise quiz — History, Culture, and Social Issues (Week 114) Daily subject-wise quiz — Polity and Governance (Week 113) Daily subject-wise quiz — Science and Technology (Week 113) Daily subject-wise quiz — Economy (Week 113) Daily subject-wise quiz — Environment and Geography (Week 113) Daily subject-wise quiz – International Relations (Week 113) Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X. Manas Srivastava is currently working as Senior Copy Editor with The Indian Express (digital) and leads a unique initiative of IE - UPSC Essentials. He majorly writes on UPSC, other competitive exams and education-related projects. In the past, Manas has represented India at the G-20 Youth Summit in Mexico. He is a former member of the Youth Council, GOI. A two-time topper/gold medallist in History (both in graduation and post-graduation) from Delhi University, he has mentored and taught UPSC aspirants for more than four years. His diverse role in The Indian Express consists of writing, editing, anchoring/ hosting, interviewing experts, and curating and simplifying news for the benefit of students. He hosts the YouTube talk show called 'Art and Culture with Devdutt Pattanaik' and a LIVE series on Instagram and YouTube called 'You Ask We Answer'.His talks on 'How to read a newspaper' focus on newspaper reading as an essential habit for students. His articles and videos aim at finding solutions to the general queries of students and hence he believes in being students' editor, preparing them not just for any exam but helping them to become informed citizens. This is where he makes his teaching profession meet journalism. He is also the editor of UPSC Essentials' monthly magazine for the aspirants. He is a recipient of the Dip Chand Memorial Award, the Lala Ram Mohan Prize and Prof. Papiya Ghosh Memorial Prize for academic excellence. He was also awarded the University's Post-Graduate Scholarship for pursuing M.A. in History where he chose to specialise in Ancient India due to his keen interest in Archaeology. He has also successfully completed a Certificate course on Women's Studies by the Women's Studies Development Centre, DU. As a part of N.S.S in the past, Manas has worked with national and international organisations and has shown keen interest and active participation in Social Service. He has led and been a part of projects involving areas such as gender sensitisation, persons with disability, helping slum dwellers, environment, adopting our heritage programme. He has also presented a case study on 'Psychological stress among students' at ICSQCC- Sri Lanka. As a compere for seminars and other events he likes to keep his orating hobby alive. His interests also lie in International Relations, Governance, Social issues, Essays and poetry. ... Read More
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Supreme Court Refuses To Reduce Lawyer's Sentence For Abusing Woman Judge, Says...
New Delhi: The Supreme Court today rejected a petition by a lawyer convicted of abusing a woman judicial officer in a court in Delhi. The top court refused to reduce the imprisonment sentence to 6 months and said, "Today, the majority of our officers in Delhi are women. They will not be able to function if somebody can get away like this. Think of their state," the bench commented orally. The bench of Justice PK Mishra and Justice Manmohan was hearing a plea against the order of the Delhi High Court, which upheld the conviction of a lawyer who used abusive language towards a woman judge in a challan matter inside the trial court. The lawyer used abusive, vulgar expletives after the judge had adjourned the matter. While hearing the plea, Justice Manmohan verbally remarked, "Just see the inspection report, the language used, we cannot even say in the open court". Justice Manmohan further said that if a stern view is not taken against such behaviour, women judicial officers would not be ensured a safe work environment. "Today, the majority of our officers in Delhi are women. They will not be able to function like this- if somebody can get away like this. Think of their state," the bench said. The lawyer, Sanjay Rathore, was convicted by the trial court and sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment for the offence under Section 509 (intending to outrage modesty of a woman) of the Indian Penal Code, 3 months under Section 189 (injury to public servant), and an additional three months under Section 353 (assault or criminal force against public servant to deter them from their duty). The trial court directed that the sentences would run consecutively, resulting in a total sentence of two years. Later, the High Court said that the sentence would run concurrently and not consecutively, reducing his sentence to 18 months from two years The counsel for the petitioner urged the Supreme Court bench to reduce his term of imprisonment to six months. He stressed several "mitigating factors" for this consideration, like his ageing parents and young children. He informed that the Bar Council has also acted against the lawyer.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Caste census will benefit NDA, delimitation is a Constitutional right: Kushwaha
The National Democratic Alliance will benefit from the Union government's decision to enumerate caste as part of the decadal Census exercise, said NDA ally and Rashtriya Lok Morcha chief Upendra Kushwaha on Tuesday (June 10, 2025), adding that delimitation was a constitutional right. Mr. Kushwaha, a Rajya Sabha MP, said this while addressing a press conference after members of the All India Kalwar Kalal Kalar Association joined the RLM. Also read | What is the significance of the Census? | Explained 'The Union government has already announced the caste census, the Centre will get the credit. Congress was in power for a long time. Why did they not conduct a caste census? [Rashtriya Janata Dal chief] Lalu Yadav was a powerful minister at the Centre, he could have pressured the government to undertake it,' he said. Population and delimitation He also reiterated his demand for delimitation, arguing that opposing it was equivalent to opposing the Constitution. Without naming anyone, he noted that some Chief Ministers from southern States are asking people to increase population, which is against the national policy. 'I saw that a southern Chief Minister has urged people to increase their population... The government of India wants to control the population, this is against the declared policy of the country,' he said. Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin and Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu are among those who have spoken about the disadvantage that southern States face because they followed family planning policies urged by the government over the years. They fear that Lok Sabha seats accruing to southern States will decrease if the delimitation exercise continues to use population as its major criteria. 'Delimitation is a right provided by the Constitution. The preamble says, 'We, the people of India', not 'We, the States of India',' Mr. Kushwaha said. NDA vote consolidation He reiterated that his loss in the 2024 Lok Sabha election from Karakat was because NDA votes had not been consolidated. 'If Upendra Kushwaha lost, NDA also lost. The area of Shahabad and Magadh, the results in Lok Sabha elections were not as per expectations for the NDA. The same situation was there in the 2020 Bihar assembly polls. The only reason is that the NDA vote in the region is not consolidated. When the votes get divided, the Mahagatbandhan (Bihar's Opposition alliance) benefits,' he said.
