
CNBC Transcript: United States Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick Speaks with CNBC's Brian Sullivan on 'Halftime Report' Today
WHERE: CNBC's "Halftime Report"
Following is the unofficial transcript of a CNBC interview with United States Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC's "Halftime Report" (M-F, 12PM-1PM ET) today, Tuesday, July 15. Following is a link to video on CNBC.com: https://www.cnbc.com/video/2025/07/15/commerce-sec-howard-lutnick-on-indonesia-trade-deal-no-tariffs-there-they-pay-tariffs-here.html.
All references must be sourced to CNBC.
BRIAN SULLIVAN: Yes, we're here at the Senator David McCormick Innovation and Energy Summit at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. President Donald Trump is scheduled to be here later this afternoon to host a roundtable. You have got many companies here. You have got Amazon. You have got Alphabet. You have got BlackRock and many others. ExxonMobil is here as well, along with members of the Cabinet, including your next guest. That is the secretary of commerce, Howard Lutnick. Secretary Lutnick, thank you for making some time with us here. I mean, what a hell of an event that has been put together in a very short amount of time. We did interview the secretary of energy, speaking to the secretary of the interior. What is commerce's role in the energy and A.I. infrastructure build-out? What do you -- where do you direct the money and the knowledge base in this scheme?
U.S. COMMERCE SECRETARY HOWARD LUTNICK: So, the NIST is part of commerce, the National Institute of Standards and Technology. So the key is, we set the standards for A.I. So we have got the A.I. Standards and Innovation Institute as part of the Department of Commerce. So we're the driver of A.I. standards and also cryptography standards and also cyber standards. So those are the key pieces inside of Commerce.
SULLIVAN: So, Commerce, and you will forgive my lack of knowledge about the inner workings—
LUTNICK: Well, but you're with me now. So it's OK.
SULLIVAN: I literally have no idea. I should -- our D.C. team probably understands this a lot better than I do. So you're setting the rules of the road that will also shape investment.
LUTNICK: Correct.
SULLIVAN: So, all the stuff they talk about on "Halftime Report" every day, all the companies in A.I., they're going to have to follow rules that you and your team are ultimately going to mold.
LUTNICK: Correct. So we try to set the guardrails to make sure that the American standards are the standards the world uses, right? That's what we want. We want everyone to use our technology stack, our way of thinking about A.I. and let the world be balanced on ours. Now, really, it's a competition between the American standards and the Chinese standards. So we're out there working hard to make sure that our standards, our foundation, if you will, is what the world uses for A.I.
SULLIVAN: Well, I'm watching CNBC, as well as being on CNBC, and I'm looking at Nvidia getting a deal to be allowed to sell certain chips and do more business into China. That's coming from this administration. Is that a change of heart?
LUTNICK: Well, it's funny, because the Biden administration allowed China to buy these chips last year. So, then we held it up, and then, in the magnets deal with the Chinese, we told them that we would start to resell them. So, remember, these are an older chip. Biden had had them available, and we rethought it. But now that Nvidia came out with their newest chip -- you realize the newest chip is called the Blackwell. Then they have the H200 and H100. This is like the fourth one down. So the fourth one down, we want to keep China using it. We want to keep having the Chinese use the American technology stack because they still rely upon it. And that's key. So we try to play that balance. We don't sell them our best stuff, not our second best stuff, not even our third best. I think fourth best is where we have come out that we're cool.
SULLIVAN: Well, fourth best has given the stock a 4.5 percent pop today and an over—
LUTNICK: Well, they can sell a lot of those chips.
SULLIVAN: Well, you got an over $4 trillion market cap, right, which then, when Nvidia rises, it's kind of the tide that lifts a lot of different boats. You look at the Nasdaq. It's up today. But some would argue, why are we giving China any access to chips? How do we square that?
LUTNICK: So the idea is the Chinese are more than capable of building their own, right? So you want to keep one step ahead of what they can build so they keep buying our chips, because, remember, developers are the key to technology. You want the world's developers to use your tech. So Nvidia is driven to make sure all the developers of the world are still using their technology. So you want to sell the Chinese enough that their developers get addicted to the American technology stack. And that's the thinking. Donald Trump is on it. He thinks about it. And we have designed the platform model with Nvidia. Remember, we talk to our companies.
SULLIVAN: Yes.
LUTNICK: The Biden administration sort of hated American companies, and the Trump administration loves them.
SULLIVAN: You can't say that.
LUTNICK: Oh, come on. They tried to break them up and all this sort of stuff. The Trump administration—
SULLIVAN: There was lawsuits on Amazon -- Alphabet, but—
LUTNICK: The Trump administration embraces technology companies and we want to work with them and understand them and help them succeed.
SULLIVAN: Let's talk about permitting. We're going to hear from the secretary of the interior in "Power Lunch." I know that's not your purview. That's his. Permitting is everything, because you can get $20 billion invested in the data center here in Pennsylvania, but unless you have a power line to go from the power plant to the data center, it's worthless. So, when we look at permitting, we think, OK, we want to build power lines. That's steel, aluminum and copper. There's some new fears of tariffs on those exact things. Does that hurt or slow down our ability to invest in A.I. infrastructure if there are tariffs on the stuff we need to build that stuff?
LUTNICK: So let's think steel for a minute. We have all seen a steel blast furnace.
SULLIVAN: We are in Pittsburgh. I think it's fairly—
LUTNICK: You know what a blast furnace looks like, right?
SULLIVAN: Yes.
LUTNICK: It looks like pouring molten lava, right? That's what -- right? You have to use so much power to melt that iron ore, right? And the Chinese and the Japanese and the Koreans give that power for free or virtually for free to their steel companies. And then they dump steel on us and put our domestic steel companies out of business. And that's what's happened for years and decades, to the point where if all you do is import steel and all you do is import aluminum and all you do is import copper, how are you going to fight a war? We need steel to be made domestically. And so Donald Trump is saying, I'm going to take that government subsidy off the table. I'm going to put tariffs in to make it equal, so Americans build steel here so that if we want to fight a war, we can make our own ships, our own missiles. And that's the key to Donald Trump's thinking, national security here on our shores.
SULLIVAN: But it's not -- I mean, these are raw materials, right, and minerals. Like it's not just building it. It's about being able to mine it out and take out the iron ore, take out the stuff, the copper from the ground.
LUTNICK: Oh, yes. We don't charge tariffs on the raw material. We charge a tariff on the finished good.
SULLIVAN: Yes.
LUTNICK: The whole idea is, you can bring in the dirt, if you will, but when you try to melt that dirt in a refinery and make a blast furnace, that is the output that we want to make sure we protect American—
SULLIVAN: So, let's just -- let's role-play using like a fake example, because I don't want to talk about any specific companies. So let's say Sullivan Copper comes to Howard Lutnick and says, well, Mr. Secretary, I'd like to spend a billion dollars, open some new copper mines, but I got 10 years in the permitting line.
LUTNICK: Oh, we have got to break that.
SULLIVAN: I will spend the money. I will spend the money, but it's worthless. I can't -- you and I talked about this in Phoenix, Arizona, at TSMC a few months ago.
LUTNICK: We have got to break it. We broke it.
SULLIVAN: There is that logjam where it doesn't matter. We have $90 billion in commitments being made here at this thing, but none of that money will go anywhere if that last mile is not fixed. And that's all I hear from companies is that last mile is the problem. How do we solve that?
LUTNICK: Well, President Trump is on it. That's why he talks about the EPA. That's why we talk about permitting and regulation. We're going to make sure that the states that embrace production now, now, during this Trump administration, they're the ones who are going to get the investment. And if you're playing an old school, slow-rolling everybody, then other states are going to be successful. So the key is -- you're right. We have got to get those permits out the door. But the key is onshore.
SULLIVAN: Yes.
LUTNICK: Get that investment here. And then those states are going to want it to work and they're going to clear the path.
SULLIVAN: Let's talk about something, but I don't want you to tell anybody. It's just between you and I.
LUTNICK: OK, just between you and me.
SULLIVAN: All right, just between you and I. In the next hour, we're going to be speaking with the governor of Pennsylvania, Josh Shapiro, probably a front-runner for the 2028 nomination. Who knows? He's a Democrat. Don't tell anybody. But he's a Democrat. Is he on board? Is he playing? Are we able to cross party lines? Because energy and A.I., that should all be bipartisan, should it not? Shouldn't everybody want to win at A.I. for the United States, regardless of party affiliation?
LUTNICK: Look, the Democrats tried to close ANWR. They closed ANWR, right, the big oil in Alaska that's ours. They closed -- they closed coal plants, right? They close them, whereas President Trump calls it what, clean, beautiful coal, right? We need -- we need power. We need investments. And we think everyone should be on board. And if a governor is not on board, he's going to hurt his state. He's going to hurt his employees.
SULLIVAN: Is Pennsylvania on board? We're here. We're here at Carnegie Mellon. And it's a beautiful day. We're in Pittsburgh. Is -- steel, right?
LUTNICK: They have got the tools. Pennsylvania's got the tools to win.
SULLIVAN: Water? Power?
LUTNICK: Does the governor drive that permitting to make people successful who want to invest here? The government -- a state government has got to make sure that they embrace Donald Trump's vision of onshoring, reshoring and building America. And if they don't, those companies are going to find a nice red state to invest in.
SULLIVAN: Well, we are going to ask him in the next hour. That will be live. So Governor Shapiro will join us as well.
LUTNICK: Pennsylvania's a red state. Don't forget. It went for Donald Trump. It went for Donald Trump.
SULLIVAN: But it's a mix. It's got a Democratic governor and maybe the most important county in America, Erie, just north -- kind of go a little bit northwest-ish of here. We're going to hit that. Stock market, Mr. Secretary, keeps going up. It feels like the market's not believing that the worst of the tariffs is going to happen, something, again, you and I talked about in Phoenix and you have talked about on CNBC with others before. Is the market getting it right? Because a lot of investors are watching the market go up, up, up.
LUTNICK: President Trump is smashing down the barriers that have held American business back for 80 years. Tariffs were on America. So when we tried to sell elsewhere, there were tariffs. And when they tried to sell here, no tariffs. So our industries went overseas. President Trump is reversing that trend, zero tariffs away. Those are the deals he's made. Vietnam, he announced Indonesia just this morning, no tariffs there. They pay tariffs here, switching the asymmetry our way. Let's bring industry back. And that's going to unleash our farmers, our ranchers, our fishermen, and our industries are going to blow out. And that is what the stock market understands. Donald Trump understands business in America.
SULLIVAN: You said in Phoenix that we had -- you had a deal in your hand. You wouldn't tell us who. You wouldn't tell -- I tried, but you wouldn't tell me who the deal was with. Turns out it was with the U.K. Are you confident we can get these big, the big ones, the big deals done?
LUTNICK: I have them done. The question is, President Trump drives the strongest bargain. He's the dealmaker. He makes the deals. This morning, he was on with the president of Indonesia, and he makes the deals. That's how this administration works. We let the greatest dealmaker who's ever been in that office, he makes the deals.
SULLIVAN: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. "I have the deals done." I have a feeling that could move the -- I think that's going to move the market.
LUTNICK: I'm good with that.
SULLIVAN: We shall see. I know you have got a panel. The president's going to be here in a couple of hours. Still got a long way to go. Really appreciate your time today, sir.
LUTNICK: Pleasure.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump, European Union Commission prez give ‘50-50′ chance of striking trade deal after Scotland meeting: ‘Rebalancing'
President Trump and European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen both put the odds of reaching a trade deal at 50% ahead of their negotiations Sunday, but remained hopeful an agreement could be finalized. 'I think the President is right, we have a 50 to 50% chance to strike a deal. And indeed it is about rebalancing,' she told reporters in the DJT Ballroom at Trump Turnberry off the west coast of Scotland. Trump has given the EU an Aug. 1 deadline to ink a new trade deal with him or else face 30% tariffs. The EU is a block of 27 trade countries, which, taken together, traded about $1.68 trillion worth of goods with the US last year. Advertisement 3 President Donald Trump meets European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at the Trump Turnberry golf course in Turnberry, Scotland. AP 'This is the biggest deal. People don't realize this is bigger than any other deal,' Trump stressed ahead of his talks with the EU president. The president also noted that while a deal with the EU will address most outstanding trade-related issues, 'pharmaceuticals won't be part of it, because we have to have them made in the United States.' Advertisement Trump teased that he would know after about an hour whether or not a deal with the EU is possible before the Aug. 1 deadline and revealed that there are about 3 to 4 sticking points, but didn't detail specifics of what those issues are. He also aired his general grievances with European trade practices, particularly with automobiles and agriculture, though it wasn't clear if those were among the sticking points. 'We don't sell cars into Europe. We don't sell, essentially, agriculture of any great degree. They want to have their farmers do it, and they want to have their car companies do it,' he said. 'I'm not saying anything that nobody knows. We have a rough situation. If we want to sell cars in Europe, we're not allowed to. And as you know, they sell millions and millions of cars [into the US],' he added. 'What we want to do is make everybody happy.' Advertisement 3 The president also noted that while a deal with the EU will address most outstanding trade-related issues, 'pharmaceuticals won't be part of it, because we have to have them made in the United States.' Davide Bonaldo/SOPA Images/Shutterstock Von der Leyen, who flew to Scotland during Trump's four-day trip to the United Kingdom to meet with the American president, buttered him up 'as a tough negotiator and dealmaker.' 'And fair,' Trump interjected. Trump emphasized during his gaggle with reporters that he has no intention of delaying the Aug. 1 deadline before his customized 'Liberation Day' tariffs take effect. The president previously moved that deadline twice. Advertisement Rumors have swirled that Trump is eyeing a 15% baseline tariff on the EU, which would effectively cut his 'Liberation Day' proposal in half. Many Europeans have hoped he would drop that to the 10% baseline he has imposed on virtually all US imports — which is also the same rate he gave the United Kingdom during the tariff deal announced in May. 3 Trump emphasized during his gaggle with reporters that he has no intention of delaying the Aug. 1 deadline before his customized 'Liberation Day' tariffs take effect. Getty Images 'Better meaning lower?' Trump replied when a reporter asked him if he could do better than 15%. 'No.' So far, Trump has cut tariff deals with the UK, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines. The president teased that his team recently locked down another deal, but didn't specify which country. He also has a variety of tariffs in place now, such as a 25% rate on automobiles, aluminum, and steel, as well as 25% on imports from Canada and Mexico that don't comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. He's also recently mused about jacking up tariffs on Canada and Mexico. Trump has also reached a tariff truce with China and given Beijing an Aug. 12 deadline to cut a broader deal. Earlier this month, he gave Moscow an ultimatum to cut a peace deal with neighboring Ukraine within 50 days or else face 100% secondary tariffs on Russian energy — meaning levies imposed on countries that import from Russia.


Atlantic
16 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Zelensky Went Soft on Corruption Because the U.S. Did
Volodymyr Zelensky built a mythic reputation as a lonely bulwark against global tyranny. On Tuesday, the president of Ukraine signed that reputation away, enacting a law that gutted the independence of his country's anti-corruption agencies just as they closed in on his closest political allies, reportedly including one of his longtime business partners and a former deputy prime minister. To justify the decision, he cloaked it in an invented conspiracy, insinuating that Russian moles had implanted themselves in the machinery of justice. This is a scoundrel's playbook. Despite the ongoing war, Ukrainians swamped the streets of Kyiv in protest of their president's betrayal of democracy, forcing Zelensky to introduce new legislation reversing the bill he had just signed into law. It was a concession of error—and possibly an empty gesture, because the new bill is hardly a lock to pass the legislature. That Zelensky brazenly weakened Ukraine's anti-corruption guardrails in the first place shouldn't come as a shock. They were erected only under sustained pressure from the Obama administration as part of an explicit bargain: In exchange for military and financial support, Ukraine would rein in its oligarchs and reform its public institutions. Over time, the country drifted, however unevenly, toward a system that was more transparent, less captive to hidden hands. But in the Trump era, the United States has grown proudly tolerant of global corruption. In fact, it actively encourages its proliferation. Beyond the president's own venal example, this is deliberate policy. Brick by brick, Donald Trump has dismantled the apparatus that his predecessors built to constrain global kleptocracy, and leaders around the world have absorbed the fact that the pressure for open, democratic governance is off. Anne Applebaum: Kleptocracy, Inc. Three weeks into his current term, Trump paused enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act—loudly declaring that the United States wasn't going to police foreign bribery. Weeks later, America skipped a meeting of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's anti-bribery working group for the first time since its founding 30 years ago. As the head of the anti-corruption group Transparency International warned, Trump was sending 'a dangerous signal that bribery is back on the table.' For decades, the more than prosecute bribery cases; it tried to cultivate civil-society organizations that helped emerging democracies combat corruption themselves. But upon returning to the presidency, Trump destroyed USAID, the National Endowment for Democracy, and the U.S. Institute of Peace, dismantling the constellation of government agencies that had quietly tutored investigative journalists, trained judges, and funded watchdogs. These groups weren't incidental casualties in DOGE's seemingly scattershot demolition of the American state. Trump long loathed the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which he described as a 'horrible law,' an animus stoked by the fact that some of his closest associates have been accused of murky dealings abroad. Crushing programs and organizations that fight kleptocracy meshed with the 'America First' instincts of his base; the likes of Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon abhor the export of liberal values to the world. From the wreckage of these institutions, a Trump Doctrine has taken shape, one that uses American economic and political power to shield corrupt autocrats from accountability. Benjamin Netanyahu, on trial for bribery, fraud, and breach of trust, has been a prime beneficiary. Just as he was preparing to testify under oath, Trump denounced the prosecution as a 'political witch hunt' and threatened to withhold U.S. aid if the trial moved forward. Given Israel's reliance on American support, the threat had bite. Not long after Trump's outburst, the court postponed Netanyahu's testimony, citing national-security concerns. Trump acts as if justice for strongmen is a moral imperative. No retaliatory measure is apparently off limits. To defend his populist ally in Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro, who faces charges related to an attempted coup, Trump revoked the visa of Alexandre de Moraes, the Supreme Court justice overseeing the case. Last month, Trump threatened to impose 50 percent tariffs on Brazilian steel, aluminum, and agricultural exports to punish the country for Bolsonaro's prosecution. This is hard-nosed realism, not just ideological kinship. To protect himself, Trump must defend the rights of populist kleptocrats everywhere. He must discredit the sort of prosecution that he might someday face. That requires recasting malfeasance as perfectly acceptable statesmanship. Listen: The kleptocracy club By stripping anti-corruption from the moral vocabulary of American foreign policy, Trump is reengineering the global order. He's laying the foundation for a new world in which kleptocracy flourishes unfettered, because there's no longer a superpower that, even rhetorically, aspires to purge the world of corruption. Of course, the United States has never pushed as hard as it could, and ill-gotten gains have been smuggled into its bank accounts, cloaked in shell companies. Still, oligarchs were forced to disguise their thievery, because there was at least the threat of legal consequence. In the world that Trump is building, there's no need for disguise—corruption is a credential, not a liability. Zelensky is evidence of the new paradigm. Although his initial campaign for president in 2019 was backed by an oligarch, he could never be confused for Bolsonaro or Netanyahu. He didn't enrich himself by plundering the state. But now that Trump has given the world permission to turn away from the ideals of good governance, even the sainted Zelensky has seized the opportunity to protect the illicit profiteering of his friends and allies. Yet there's a legacy of the old system that Trump hasn't wholly eliminated: the institutions and civil societies that the United States spent a generation helping build. In Ukraine, those organizations and activists have refused to accept a retreat into oligarchy, and they might still preserve their governmental guardians against corruption. For now, they are all that remain between the world and a new golden age of impunity.

USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Mike Johnson says Ghislaine Maxwell should serve 'life sentence,' opposes potential pardon
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, said he believes Ghislaine Maxwell, a key associate of Jeffrey Epstein currently serving 20 years in prison for conspiring to sexually abuse minors, should face "a life sentence." "If you're asking my opinion, I think 20 years was a pittance," Johnson told NBC's Kristen Welker on "Meet the Press" July 27. "I think she should have a life sentence, at least." His remarks to NBC come as many, including supporters of President Donald Trump, clamor for testimony from Maxwell. Some followers of the case have proposed a pardon in exchange, but Trump told reporters on July 25 he hadn't considered the move. "I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I have not thought about," the president said. Epstein was charged with sexually trafficking minors and died by suicide while in detention in 2019. Maxwell, his longtime girlfriend, has been accused of recruiting minors for the disgraced financier's predation. Maxwell maintains her innocence and is appealing her 2021 sex-trafficking conviction. Johnson in his interview with NBC reiterated that pardons aren't up to him, telling the outlet, "obviously that's a decision of the president." "I won't get it in front of him," Johnson said. "That's not my lane." But, later in the interview he noted, "It's hard to put into words how evil this was, and that she orchestrated it and was a big part of it." "So, again, not my decision," he added, "but I have great pause about that, as any reasonable person would." The Trump administration for weeks has faced backlash over its handling of Epstein's case. Critics from Democratic lawmakers to prominent Republicans and slices of Trump's voter base accuse the president and other officials of not being transparent with the American people. The speaker has faced his own ongoing Epstein-related criticism, as some House Republicans have zeroed in on the Justice Department's recent review of Epstein's case and are calling for related documents to be released publicly. Democrats in Congress have piled on too. Reps. Ro Khanna, D-California, and Thomas Massie, R-Kentucky, introduced a bipartisan measure to force the Trump administration's hand in releasing the federal government's files. Also on "Meet The Press," the pair split on pardoning Maxwell. "That would be up to the president," Massie said. "But if she has information that could help us, then I think she should testify. Let's get that out there. And whatever they need to do to compel that testimony, as long as it's truthful, I would be in favor of." Khanna disagreed, saying Maxwell shouldn't receive a pardon. "Look, I agree with Congressman Massie that she should testify," the California Democrat said. "But she's been indicted twice on perjury. This is why we need the files. This is why we need independent evidence." Contributing: Bart Jansen and Aysha Bagchi, USA TODAY