Adobe launches subscriptions for Firefly AI
Adobe is hoping to capitalize on the early success of its Firefly AI models by launching a new standalone subscription service that gives users access to the company's AI image, vector and video generating models.
This marks Adobe's boldest attempt yet to turn its Firefly AI models into a real product.
The company is also launching a redesigned webpage, firefly.adobe.com, where people can use Adobe's AI models. This includes the new Firefly AI video model, which is rolling out in public beta on the Firefly website and in the Premiere Pro Beta app.
Firefly's Standard plan costs $9.99 per month and provides unlimited access to Adobe's AI image and vector generating features, as well as Adobe's new AI video model. The Standard plan gives users 2,000 credits, which is enough to make 20 five-second AI videos.
Users can also connect Firefly plans to their Creative Cloud accounts to get unlimited AI image and vector generation in Photoshop, Express or other Adobe apps.
Meanwhile, the Pro plan will run users $29.99 a month, and offers enough credits to generate 70 five-second AI videos per month. The company is also working on a "Premium" tier (it hasn't announced pricing for this yet) that lets users create 500 AI videos per month, according to Adobe's VP of Generative AI, Alexandru Costin.
Previously, Adobe offered many of Firefly's AI tools within its existing Creative Cloud subscriptions, letting users try the new tools for no added cost. Users could upgrade to pricier plans if they wanted more access to Firefly, but they didn't have to. That system worked well for Adobe: Firefly's generative fill feature, added to Photoshop in 2023, has become one of the company's most popular new features of the last decade.
Now, Adobe wants to see if users will also pay up for its Firefly AI models.
The Firefly video model lets you turn text or images into a five-second, AI-generated video. There are controls on a side panel for changing the camera angles, camera movement, aspect ratio, and other features that creative professionals might want to customize.
The new Firefly offerings will compete directly with OpenAI's Sora, Runway's Gen-3 Alpha, and other AI video models that already have dedicated webpages and subscription plans. Google DeepMind's AI video model, Veo, seems to be a legitimate contender in the space as well, but it's still in private beta.
Part of Adobe's pitch to creative professionals is that Firefly was trained on a dataset of licensed videos, without any brand logos or NSFW content (something the company paid quite a bit to do). That means, according to Adobe, creatives should be able to use the Firefly AI models without worrying about legal troubles.
"We think the key differentiator for us is that we're the only IP-friendly, commercially-safe video model," Costin said in an interview with TechCrunch. "We want to differentiate with deep understanding of customer problems."
Adobe has also tried to ship AI tools that solve problems for creative professionals instead of just generating random AI videos.
For example, one of Firefly's AI video features, Generative Extend, lets users extend any clip's video and background noise by a few seconds. This is one of the more practical AI video tools on the market; other AI models just let you create new videos from scratch, or animate photos.
Costin says Adobe is working on another AI video tool to help with pre-production. The tool, which has yet to be announced, would help get creatives aligned on the same vision by creating a rough sketch of what a scene, or string of scenes, would look like.
However, Adobe needs to walk a fine line with generative AI. Many professionals who have used Adobe's apps for decades are upset about the rise of generative AI tools in their industries. The technology poses a threat to their livelihoods as they risk having their work automated away to an AI model — like the ones Adobe is building.
But Adobe is convinced this is where the puck is going in the creative world.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
2 Option Ideas to Consider this Wednesday for Bearish Traders
Today, we are using some moving average filters to find bullish stocks and then looking at a couple of different trade ideas. First the stock scanner: How to Use Barchart's Tools to Create My Favorite Low-Risk, High-Reward Options Trades Chewy Stock Is Off its Highs After Earnings - Time to Buy CHWY? Options Volume Surges for Molson Coors (TAP) as Statistical Sentiment Shifts Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. Which produces these results: Now that we have some bullish stock candidates, let's analyze three different option ideas. Adobe Bear Call Spread The first trade we will look at is a Bear Call Spread on Adobe (ADBE). First, let's run our Bear Call screener for Adobe: Let's evaluate the first ADBE bear call spread example. Selling the July 18 call with a strike price of $405 and buying the $415 call would create a Bear Call spread. This spread was trading for around $1.67 yesterday. That means a trader selling this spread would receive $167 in option premium and would have a maximum risk of $833. That represents a 20.05% return on risk between now and July 18 if ADBE stock remains below $405. If Adobe closes above $415 on the expiration date the trade loses the full $833. The breakeven point for the Bear Call spread is $406.67 which is calculated as $405 plus the $1.67 option premium per contract. Merck Bear Put Spread A bear put spread is a vertical spread that aims to profit from a stock declining in price. It has a bearish directional bias as hinted in the name. Unlike the bear call spread, it suffers from time decay so traders need to be correct on the direction of the underlying and also the timing. A bear put spread is created through buying an out-of-the-money put and selling a further out-of-the-money put. The maximum profit is equal to the distance between the strikes, less the premium paid. The loss is limited to the premium paid. Running the bear call spread screener shows these results for Merck (MRK): Let's use the first line item as an example. Using the August 15 expiry, this trade involves buying the $90 put and selling the $65 put. The price for the trade is $11.66 which means the trader would pay $1,166 to enter the trade. This is also the maximum loss. The maximum gain be calculated by taking the width between the strikes and subtracting the premium paid: 25 – 11.66 x 100 = $1,334. The breakeven price for the trade is equal to the long put strike, less the premium. In this case, that gives us a breakeven price of $78.34. The profit probability is 50.2%, although this is just an estimate. Conclusion There you have two different bearish trade ideas on two different stocks. Remember to always manage risk and have stop losses in place. Please remember that options are risky, and investors can lose 100% of their investment. This article is for education purposes only and not a trade recommendation. Remember to always do your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any investment decisions. On the date of publication, Gavin McMaster did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sam Altman Says Meta Offered OpenAI Staff $100M Signing Bonuses
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said Meta Platforms offered signing bonuses as high as $100 million to poach the ChatGPT maker's staffers. Speaking on his brother's "Uncapped with Jack Altman" podcast, Sam Altman added that the Facebook parent was offering even larger annual compensation packages. "I'm really happy that at least so far none of our best people have decided to take (Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg) up on that." The alleged attempts to poach OpenAI staffers come as Zuckerberg reportedly has been frustrated with Meta's level of AI CEO Sam Altman said Meta Platforms (META) offered signing bonuses as high as $100 million to poach the ChatGPT maker's staffers. Speaking on his brother's "Uncapped with Jack Altman" podcast, Sam Altman added that the Facebook parent was offering even larger annual compensation packages. "I'm really happy that at least so far none of our best people have decided to take (Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg) up on that." Altman added, "I've heard that Meta thinks of us as their biggest competitor," and that "their current AI efforts have not worked as well as they have hoped." Meta didn't immediately respond to an Investopedia request for comment. The alleged attempts to poach OpenAI staffers come as Zuckerberg reportedly has been frustrated with Meta's level of AI progress. The tech giant recently made a "significant new investment" in Scale AI that valued the startup at more than than $29 billion and hired CEO Alexandr Wang to boost its efforts in the technology. Read the original article on Investopedia
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Musk's xAI Holds Talks for Another Massive Fundraising Round
To catch up in the AI race, Elon Musk's xAI is going to have to burn some proverbial rubber — and lots and lots of literal cash. On Tuesday, Bloomberg reported that Musk's artificial intelligence startup is in talks to raise $4.3 billion in an equity investment — on top of the $5 billion it had already been trying to borrow from debt investors. According to a separate report from Bloomberg, the fundraising comes as the company continues to burn through a remarkable amount of cash every month. READ ALSO: Oil Prices Spike as Israel-Iran Conflict Threatens Production, Shipping and Proposed Crackdown on Pharma Ads Leaves Cable TV Fearing $10B Withdrawal Training and operating AI models is expensive. Like, very expensive. According to one estimate from tech pundit Ed Zitron, OpenAI's total costs may exceed $25 billion this year alone. Carlyle Group CEO Harvey Schwartz recently predicted in a shareholder letter that the industry as a whole will shell out some $1.8 trillion by 2030 to build out AI infrastructure. xAI is no different than its peers (and, in fact, may be burning through cash even faster than its peers in an attempt to catch up). Unlike OpenAI and industry frontrunners, the Grok chatbot operator has hardly established a revenue stream to offset its rapid burn rate: xAI has been burning through $1 billion per month to build its advanced AI models and expects to spend $13 billion this year alone. The company has raised $14 billion in equity fundraising since its launch in 2023, though as of March 31, it had only $4 billion left on its balance sheet, according to materials seen by Bloomberg. On the flip side, the company expects just $500 million in revenue this year. Comparatively, OpenAI recently claimed to have hit $10 billion in annual recurring revenue, driven in part by 3 million paying business users. X Marks The Spot: Still, xAI does expect the tables to turn eventually. That's based partly on the hope that its recent merger with fellow Musk venture X (formerly known as Twitter) could prove to be a fruitful partnership. The thinking is that access to X's content could offer a cheap (or free) alternative to paying for content elsewhere. Because nothing says 'quality training data' like an endless stream of memes, jabs and cat videos. This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive delivering razor sharp analysis and perspective on all things finance, economics, and markets, subscribe to our free The Daily Upside newsletter. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data