Ukrainians in Ireland succeeding in asylum applications at twice rate of other nationalities
Almost 1,000
Ukrainians
have applied for asylum in Ireland, with more than 80 per cent succeeding in their application – twice the rate of other nationalities –, data from the
Department of Justice
shows.
The figures, provided to The Irish Times, show since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 until May 26th this year, a total of 969 Ukrainian nationals have applied for international protection. Some 77 applications from Ukrainians have been made this year.
'Since 2022, 367 decisions regarding international protection applications from Ukrainian nationals have been made,' a department spokesman said.
He said 83 per cent of these 'resulted in the applicant being given a permission to remain in the State – generally refugee status'.
READ MORE
'In 2022-2024, 217 decisions regarding Ukrainian applications for international protection were made.
'In 2025 to May 28th, a further 149 decisions have been made.'
While the more than 100,000 Ukrainian nationals here have temporary refugee status, providing them with the right to work and to study, school places and childcare, as well as heavily State-subsidised accommodation, their status is not guaranteed into the future.
In contrast, international protection guarantees the right to live and work here permanently, as well as to bring immediate family to live here.
The EU Temporary Protection Directive, introduced in March 2022, has been renewed annually. It remains unclear whether it will be further extended in March 2026.
Brian Killoran, co-ordinator of Ukraine Civil Society Forum, says increasing numbers of Ukrainians are asking about applying for international protection as they look to solidify their legal position in the country.
'Last
year, a survey showed 53 per cent of people from Ukraine living here since 2022 wanted to stay,' he said. This represented an increase on the 41 per cent who expressed a wish to stay permanently the previous year.
'The longer they are here, they put down roots, children are in school, the more likely they are to want to remain here. They are increasingly asking about their options and one of those is international protection,' said Mr Killoran.
If a significant proportion were to apply in the coming year, 'that could put unbearable pressure on the international protection system', he warned.
'We need to know what will happen post-March 2026. Member states need to say what are the long-term plans.'
When people asked about applying for asylum, he said they were advised 'it is far from guaranteed'.
He also said there was a potential 'loss of rights' if the applicant was transferred out of the temporary protection system into the asylum application system.
These could include losing the right to work, to study and to live in their current accommodation, said Mr Killoran.
'They may find making an application for international protection disruptive to their life. We can't say to people, 'Don't do it' but we do advise people to get advice. An asylum application is not an easy route.
[
A Ukrainian in Dublin: 'People are less direct in Ireland. There are 50 shades of great'
Opens in new window
]
'Ultimately, the State needs to define post-temporary protection options. The priority is that they do that.
'Temporary protection was never meant to be a long-term measure, so bringing that to an end has to be done in a co-ordinated way,' said Mr Killoran.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
34 minutes ago
- The Journal
Children deported this week are 'victims for a state wanting to look tough', Dublin TD says
A DUBLIN TD has said that children should not face deportations from the state as outcry continues over the removal of a number of kids on a chartered flight to Nigeria by the Irish government this week. Social Democrats deputy Gary Gannon said that children were being made 'victims for a state wanting to look tough', adding that Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan has 'serious questions to answer' over this week's deportations. It comes after the principal of St James school in Dublin 8 that saw two of its pupils deported to Nigeria on Wednesday night criticised the decision to deport , saying that staff and pupils have been left 'devastated'. Five children and thirty adults were removed from Ireland on the chartered flight as part of the Department of Justice's new crackdown on immigration. School principal Ciarán Cronin had told The Journal that two of the children who were removed from the state had been pupils at his school for three years, and have in that time become an integral part of the community there. 'They've been part of our football team, part of our school fabric, part of our school lives,' he said yesterday. Defending the use of the flights yesterday, O'Callaghan said that deportations 'aren't a very pleasant part of the job,' but said the system becomes 'meaningless' if it won't make a difference whether people are granted asylum or not. Gannon told RTÉ Radio One's Today with Claire Byrne that there should be a regularisation scheme for children who have been in Ireland for a year, allowing them to stay here. 'If the system doesn't working at the moment we cannot punish the children that are over here,' he said, adding that a 'compassionate' approach was needed. Gannon also sought information on how many children are currently on deportation lists in Ireland. Advertisement He said the deportation of the children this week was 'devastating', especially for kids who were in Ireland for the past three and four years who have little 'The children on that flight, in the St James school in the Red Cow, they shouldn't be the victims for a state looking to look tough.' 'The consequences are not only for those on the deportation flight, it's for the other 20 odd children,' Gannon said, referring to St James School, describing it 'momentously painful' for the children involved. 'They have the right to come here, if the system is taking too long that is a failure of the state, not a failure of those parents,' Gannon said. Sinn Féin frontbench TD Eoin Ó Broin told reporters this morning that Ireland needs an international protection system that is compassionate, that is human rights based, that takes decisions in a timely manner. Asked whether he believes it's right to deport children who have residing in Ireland over recent years, he said that 'the real problem here is nobody should be waiting for three, four or five years for those decisions to be made'. 'I think if the government took the advice that ourselves and many others, including advocacy groups for people seeking international protection, to ensure decisions were made in a timely manner, then we wouldn't have the kind of challenges that we've seen this week,' the Dublin Mid-West TD said. 'But ultimately international protection has to do what it says. You're either granted international protection, you get your right to remain in the state, or if you're not granted international protection, you lose an appeal, and you lose the application to remain.' Asked about criticism that the government may be trying to appear more aggressive towards migration, he said the issue was that the government had 'made a complete mess' of the international protection system. 'Just like they've made a mess of housing, whether it's housing vacancy or housing more generally, they've made a mess of international protection, and therefore we will continue to raise the concerns that we have always raised with government until they get the system right.' With reporting from Mairead Maguire Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Agriland
an hour ago
- Agriland
French and Brazilian leaders disagree on Mercosur after meeting
The presidents of Brazil and France spoke of their differences on the EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement yesterday, during a visit of the Brazilian leader to the European Country. According to reporting by Reuters, French president Emmanuel Macron and Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva differed with each other on the issue, with Lula calling for Macron to 'open his heart' to the deal, and Macron pushing back, highlighting the negative impact to French and European farmers. Lula is set to shortly take up the rotating presidency of the Mercosur bloc – which also includes Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay – and indicated that he intends to use his six-month tenure to push the agreement over the final hurdles. 'I will not leave the Mercosur presidency without having concluded the trade deal,' he said. He also called on Macron to tell his fellow European leaders that Brazil was committed to fighting deforestation. According to the Reuters report, Macron said he was in favour of free and equitable trade, but that the deal, in its current form, would harm farmers as they would have to compete against South American farmers who are not subject to the same environmental regulations as European farmers. The French president said that the inclusion of so-called 'mirror clauses' may improve the deal. Reuters also reported that French farming organisations met with politicians this week and urged Macron to work with other EU countries to form a 'blocking minority' in the Council of the EU against the deal, (a blocking minority is four EU member states). Mercosur France and Ireland have been the two EU countries most steadfast against the EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement, with Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Simon Harris recently telling the Dáil that he is unconvinced that Ireland's concerns about the trade agreement have been 'adequately addressed'. According to Minister Harris, both he and his officials continue to engage at EU level at every opportunity, with both the European Commission directly and with counterparts in EU member states, including France, to 'voice our concerns with the agreement'. Harris said both he and his officials have sought to 'interrogate the outcome of negotiations to assess if our concerns have been adequately addressed'. However, he said: 'I am not convinced they have been.'
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
State should ease ‘financial burden' for people facing heavy legal costs at public inquiries, report finds
The 'personal financial burden' of appearing before a Commission of Investigation should be eased by the State, the final report of the National Asset Management Agency (Nama) commission has said. The Commission of Investigation into the controversial sale of Project Eagle has called on the Government to change the 'strict' guidelines for covering the legal costs of those who appear before high-profile public inquiries. It said witnesses who 'diligently' give evidence, submissions and documents can end up in the 'very unfortunate situation' of having to personally pay high legal fees for their participation in the process. At the moment, the guidelines for legal costs under the Commissions of Investigation Act 2004 says witnesses can recoup some but not all of their legal fees. The current guidelines do not cover instruction fees, brief fees and legal fees incurred while making submissions. READ MORE In the case of the Nama commission, over two-thirds of the legal bills of the so-called 'bad bank' could not be recovered. It is understood that Nama's total legal costs reached €7.5 million, but it only received €2.4 million of that back from the commission. Thirty-six witnesses on behalf of Nama, including past and present employees, offered evidence and submissions over the seven years of the inquiry. All of these witnesses made claims for the payments of their costs. After assessing the claims for costs from Nama with the help of the State Claims Agency , the commission said it believed the current guidelines on legal costs would 'benefit significantly from review and updating'. 'Engaging with a Commission of Investigation can be an onerous task for private individuals, many of whom understandably seek legal advice and assistance in relation to their interaction with a Commission,' the commission stated in its final report to Taoiseach Micheál Martin . 'Witnesses who diligently provide detailed statements, attend to give evidence, provide documents and make submissions may find themselves in the very unfortunate situation of having to discharge significant fees personally due to the strict confines of the guidelines for payment of legal costs.' The commission, whose sole member is Susan Gilvarry, said Nama had tried to recoup 'substantial legal costs', but the commission wasn't able to consider or direct the recovery of any costs not set out in the current guidelines. It pointed out that the recovery of costs was less important in the case of Nama, where a state agency's costs are 'sought to be recovered from a Government department'. But it said that these 'discrete set of circumstances' would not apply in every case, so it recommended that the 'guidelines are revised and clarified to reflect the personal financial burden that witnesses or third parties may be subjected to by virtue of being requested to engage with a Commission of Investigation'. [ Department of Finance to wind down special bank shareholdings unit Opens in new window ] The Department of the Taoiseach did not respond to requests for comment. The report from the Nama commission said that its final costs, from the point it was established in June 2017 to April 2025, were €10.3 million. This included €4.6 million in legal fees, a salary cost of €1.75 million and administrative costs of €1.4 million. Since the late 1990s, the State has spent more than €600 million on tribunals of inquiry and commissions of investigation, including the €143 million Mahon/Flood Tribunal, the €85 million Commission to inquire into Child Abuse and the €83 million Moriarty Tribunal. In April, the billionaire businessman Denis O'Brien was awarded €5.8 million by the State Claims Agency for the legal costs he faced while a witness for the Moriarty Tribunal between 2001 and 2010.
