Merck to cut jobs and costs as demand for Gardasil in China remains weak
Merck
& Co on Tuesday announced job and cost cuts it said will save $3 billion a year as it posted lower second-quarter results due to continuing weak demand for its Gardasil vaccine in China.
The company said the cost cuts include $1.7 billion in annual savings from the elimination of certain administrative, sales and R&D positions. It also plans to reduce its global real estate footprint and optimize its manufacturing network.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Product Management
CXO
Public Policy
Design Thinking
Others
MBA
Management
Digital Marketing
Healthcare
others
Data Science
Leadership
Artificial Intelligence
MCA
PGDM
Data Science
Finance
healthcare
Degree
Technology
Cybersecurity
Operations Management
Project Management
Skills you'll gain:
Product Strategy & Roadmapping
User-Centric Product Design
Agile Product Development
Market Analysis & Product Launch
Duration:
24 Weeks
Indian School of Business
Professional Certificate in Product Management
Starts on
Jun 26, 2024
Get Details
Chief Executive Rob Davis said in a press release that the moves "will redirect investment and resources from more mature areas of our
business
to our burgeoning array of new growth drivers."
The company expects to achieve the full $3 billion in annual savings by the end of 2027.
Investors have been concerned about where Merck will replace
revenue
from its blockbuster cancer treatment Keytruda - the world's best-selling drug, which is set to lose patent protection toward the end of the decade. Gardasil's problems in China have also been a drag on the company's results.
Live Events
Merck said it earned $5.4 billion, or $2.13 a share, in the
quarter
, down from $5.8 billion, or $2.28 a share, a year earlier.
Analysts, on average, had forecast earnings of $2.01 a share. Merck's quarterly R&D costs were lower than expected.
Revenue in the quarter was $15.8 billion, down from $16.1 billion a year earlier. Analysts, on average, were expecting revenue of $15.9 billion.
Gardasil sales missed already weak Wall Street estimates. The company said it sold $1.1 billion of the vaccine, which prevents cancer caused by the human papillomavirus, down 55% from a year ago. Analysts had been expecting $1.3 billion of Gardasil sales in the quarter.
Merck paused shipments of Gardasil to China in January. It said the decline was primarily in China, but lower demand in Japan had hurt sales as well.
Sales of Keytruda rose 9% to just under $8 billion in the quarter, topping analyst forecasts of $7.9 billion.
The company, which announced a $10 billion takeover of UK-based Verona Pharma earlier in July, narrowed its full-year revenue forecast to a range of $64.3 billion to $65.3 billion. It had previously forecast revenue of $64.1 billion to $65.6 billion for the year.
It now expects to earn $8.87 to $8.97 a share in 2025. Analysts had forecast 2025 earnings to be $8.87.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
9 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Andhra Pradesh govt. unveils Electronics Component Manufacturing Policy 2024–29
The government on Friday notified the Andhra Pradesh Electronics Component Manufacturing Policy (4.0) 2024–29 (ECMP) aimed at boosting manufacturing capacities in the electronics sector and establishing a robust semiconductor and display fabrication ecosystem in the State. According to a G.O. issued by Katamneni Bhaskar, Secretary (IT, Electronics & Communications), the ECMP is aligned with the Government of India's Electronics Component Manufacturing Scheme and focuses on building an electronics component manufacturing ecosystem that contributes significantly to the State's economic development. The policy seeks to integrate State-based companies into the global electronics value chain, thereby enhancing their position within the supply network. The ECMP will remain in force for five years, during which the State government will extend incentives to eligible companies, as detailed in separate operational guidelines to be notified later. The policy emphasises the development of Component Manufacturing Clusters (CMCs) with shared facilities in strategic locations such as Tirupati, Anantapur, Visakhapatnam, Kopparthy, and Nellore. These CMCs will specialise in areas like printed circuit boards, display technologies, optoelectronics, and passive components. The policy also aims to enhance the Speed of Doing Business, reduce operational costs through infrastructure development, and provide ready-built factory shells and plug-and-play facilities. In addition, it targets the attraction of global anchor firms in key component segments by offering customised support packages and incentives for supply chain partners to participate in building the CMCs.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
World War III fears grow as Trump sends nuclear submarines toward Russia — fires back at Putin crony's bold threat
Donald Trump orders U.S. nuclear submarines near Russia after Medvedev's warning sparks global tension- In a dramatic turn of global events, President Donald Trump has ordered two U.S. nuclear submarines to be strategically deployed near Russian waters. This powerful move comes after Russia's Dmitry Medvedev, former president and current deputy chairman of the Security Council, made what Trump called 'foolish and inflammatory' threats, evoking Cold War-era nuclear rhetoric. The decision is not just a military maneuver—it is a strong geopolitical message amid rising global tensions and ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Donald Trump responds to Medvedev's nuclear threats with submarine deployment Tensions between the U.S. and Russia are reaching a boiling point after President Donald Trump ordered two nuclear submarines to reposition closer to Russian waters. This dramatic military maneuver was a direct response to former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev's alarming nuclear rhetoric, where he warned of retaliatory measures over Trump's Ukraine ceasefire deadline. Trump framed the move as a "precaution," yet it marks one of the boldest nuclear postures by a U.S. president since the Cold War. His administration is sending a clear signal: America won't tolerate escalatory threats from Moscow. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Project Management Artificial Intelligence Degree Data Science Others Product Management MBA Leadership Finance Healthcare CXO Public Policy Operations Management PGDM MCA Data Science Management Technology Cybersecurity Data Analytics healthcare others Design Thinking Digital Marketing Skills you'll gain: Project Planning & Governance Agile Software Development Practices Project Management Tools & Software Techniques Scrum Framework Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Certificate Programme in IT Project Management Starts on Jun 20, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Portfolio Management Project Planning & Risk Analysis Strategic Project/Portfolio Selection Adaptive & Agile Project Management Duration: 6 Months IIT Delhi Certificate Programme in Project Management Starts on May 30, 2024 Get Details But Trump's move isn't just about deterring Russia militarily—it's part of a broader pressure campaign that includes punishing economic measures. Alongside the submarine deployment, Trump is ramping up tariffs and trade restrictions, directly tying them to global alliances and behavior, especially countries with growing ties to Russia. This includes India, a key member of the BRICS alliance, which has continued importing discounted Russian oil and weapons. With NATO on edge and global markets rattled, Trump's military and economic posture is designed to reassert American dominance on multiple fronts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Things Women Should NEVER Wear! Undo Trump, reacting via his Truth Social account, stressed that the U.S. cannot afford to ignore such escalatory language. Calling Medvedev's rhetoric 'provocative,' Trump revealed that two nuclear-powered submarines have been moved to undisclosed locations near Russia 'as a precautionary measure.' His words echoed a deepening concern that the world is again walking a tightrope between diplomacy and destruction. US nuclear submarines positioned as warning signal to Russia The deployment of U.S. nuclear submarines near Russia serves a dual purpose—military deterrence and strategic signaling. While Trump emphasized that the move is defensive and meant to 'avoid unintended consequences,' analysts say this marks one of the most visible escalations between the U.S. and Russia in recent years. Live Events The submarines involved are part of the U.S. Navy's Ohio-class ballistic missile fleet, capable of carrying dozens of nuclear warheads. Their undetectable stealth and immense power make them one of the most formidable assets in America's strategic arsenal. This development is especially critical as it comes at a time when U.S.–Russia relations are already strained over the prolonged war in Ukraine, cyber threats, and economic sanctions. Trump's decisive move may shift the global chessboard and intensify calls for diplomatic engagement before the situation spirals further. Dmitry Medvedev revives Cold War-era nuclear warnings At the center of this high-stakes exchange is Dmitry Medvedev, who has increasingly taken on a more hawkish and aggressive tone in recent months. In his latest statement, Medvedev dismissed Trump's suggested Ukraine ceasefire plans and instead referenced Russia's massive nuclear arsenal. He also mentioned the 'Dead Hand' system —a Cold War legacy technology rumored to automatically launch Russia's nuclear weapons if national leadership is wiped out. This chilling detail sent shockwaves through Western governments and likely played a major role in Trump's rapid military response. Medvedev's public comments appear designed to demonstrate Russia's refusal to be bullied or coerced into surrendering geopolitical ground, especially in the ongoing conflict with Ukraine. Is Trump targeting India and BRICS with tariffs over Russia ties? Yes, and the message is loud and clear. President Trump has slapped a 25% tariff on Indian imports, followed by a penalty tied to India's continued trade with Russia. His administration is increasingly frustrated with BRICS nations—including India, Brazil, and China—who've maintained or deepened economic ties with Moscow despite the ongoing war in Ukraine. India's position is particularly sensitive: while it maintains strategic autonomy, its oil purchases from Russia and growing defense partnerships have drawn Trump's ire. U.S. officials even suggested India is being "made an example" to deter other nations from ignoring Washington's red lines. Trump's trade strategy is deeply intertwined with his foreign policy objectives. He's not only seeking better deals for the U.S. but also using tariffs as leverage to isolate Russia and disrupt emerging multipolar alliances like BRICS. Some U.S. lawmakers have gone as far as proposing 500% secondary tariffs on countries that continue to fund what they call "Putin's war machine." The timing is no coincidence—Trump's submarine deployment near Russia and economic pressure on India are part of the same high-stakes chess game. By linking military deterrence with aggressive trade tactics, Trump is reshaping the global order on his terms. Trump's decision sends global markets and foreign leaders on alert The announcement came as a shock to many international leaders, with NATO allies quickly convening emergency briefings to assess potential fallout. Several European nations have voiced concern about the dangerous path being carved by nuclear saber-rattling on both sides. Financial markets also reacted with caution. Global stocks dipped, oil prices surged, and defense stocks rallied as investors priced in the risk of growing military conflict. Analysts warned that such volatile moves could create long-term instability unless world leaders return to diplomatic channels. The United Nations issued a statement urging both the U.S. and Russia to exercise restraint and avoid inflammatory actions that could further escalate nuclear tensions. The Ukraine war continues to fuel global geopolitical instability The Ukraine–Russia war, now in its third year, remains a core source of global instability. President Trump has repeatedly insisted that Russia must agree to a ceasefire and begin peace talks, warning of strict deadlines and harsher consequences. However, Moscow has resisted U.S. pressure, and the Kremlin continues to frame the conflict as a defensive effort against NATO expansion. Trump's latest move underscores just how intertwined the nuclear issue has become with the broader Ukraine war. Experts fear that any misstep—verbal or strategic—could ignite a new, more dangerous chapter in this long-running conflict. Analysts warn of heightened nuclear risk and diplomatic breakdown Nuclear policy experts across the globe have raised alarms, cautioning that any military escalation involving nuclear assets, especially submarines, could be misinterpreted as a preparation for attack. 'This is a very delicate moment,' said Dr. Elena Petrov, a nuclear strategy analyst at the Atlantic Institute. 'By publicizing the submarine deployment, Trump is both deterring aggression and potentially increasing the likelihood of misunderstanding or miscalculation by the Russians.' She added that in a world where communication can be instantaneous but filtered through political rhetoric, leaders must be especially cautious. 'What's said online or in speeches can spark real-world consequences—especially when nuclear weapons are involved.' Trump defends the move as necessary caution, not aggression In the face of mounting criticism, President Trump defended his decision. He emphasized that the U.S. had no plans to initiate conflict but could not sit idle while a senior Russian official made what he termed 'reckless threats.' Trump insisted the move was not just about protecting American interests but also about showing strength in the face of intimidation. 'Words matter,' he wrote. 'When someone threatens nuclear retaliation, we must take it seriously.' This response plays into Trump's broader strategy of projecting American strength on the world stage, particularly in matters involving national security, energy dominance, and great power competition. Will nuclear brinkmanship replace diplomacy? The current climate raises difficult questions about the future of international diplomacy. With both Washington and Moscow hardening their stances, and with war still raging in Eastern Europe, the room for peaceful resolution appears to be narrowing. Analysts warn that mutual threats and weapons deployments only serve to erode what little trust remains between the superpowers. The absence of formal arms control talks, especially after the collapse of key nuclear treaties in recent years, makes these moments even more dangerous. Whether this incident becomes a turning point for reengagement—or the beginning of a new era of nuclear brinkmanship—remains to be seen. He world watches as nuclear tension rises between U.S. and Russia Trump's bold decision to deploy nuclear submarines close to Russian territory has transformed a war of words into a potential flashpoint. His warning to Medvedev—combined with the reality of submarine positioning—sends a clear message that the U.S. is ready to defend its interests and allies, even at great risk. At the same time, the move has rattled the international community, highlighting the urgent need for renewed diplomacy, strategic calm, and nuclear de-escalation. For now, all eyes are on what happens next—because in a world with nuclear weapons, miscommunication can become catastrophe in a matter of minutes. FAQs: Q1: Why did Donald Trump deploy nuclear submarines near Russia? To respond to Medvedev's nuclear threats and rising tensions over Ukraine. Q2: What did Dmitry Medvedev say that triggered Trump's decision? He warned of Russia's Cold War-era nuclear retaliation system, the 'Dead Hand.'
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Intel's manufacturing unit gets more ‘bad news' after company CEO Lip-Bu Tan's major restructuring announcement
Representative Image Intel's manufacturing unit faces more "bad news" as three senior executives in its operations are set to retire. This declaration from the company follows CEO Lip-Bu Tan 's announcement of major restructuring plans in its manufacturing unit. The latest announcement marks further change as Tan works to revitalise the struggling US-based chipmaker. According to a report by the news agency Reuters, Intel has confirmed that Kaizad Mistry and Ryan Russell, both corporate vice presidents in the technology development group, will retire. Additionally, Gary Patton, a corporate vice president at its Design Technology Platform organisation and a former IBM executive, is also retiring. The latest departures underscore the significant shifts occurring within Intel's manufacturing operations. Other changes may be coming for Intel's manufacturing process Intel has also discussed internal changes to its technology development group, which oversees the creation of manufacturing processes. The Reuters report also cited two individuals familiar with the matter to claim. The company is also reportedly planning to scale down its manufacturing capacity planning team and reduce part of its engineering workforce, the sources told Reuters. Manufacturing operations are currently led by Naga Chandrasekaran , a former Micron Technology executive, who joined Intel about a year ago under previous CEO Pat Gelsinger. In March, Chandrasekaran's role expanded to include both technology development and manufacturing. Since then, he has reorganised the teams under him, which provides for layoffs as part of broader global workforce reductions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Unsold 2021 Cars Now Almost Free - Prices May Surprise You Unsold Cars | Search Ads Learn More Undo What changes Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan has already announced Last week, during its quarterly earnings announcement, Intel's new CEO announced several significant changes for the company. Tan, who stepped into the role in March, outlined a plan to reduce the company's workforce to 75,000 by year-end, a cut of roughly 22%. The chipmaker also said it would adopt a more cautious approach to manufacturing investments. Intel added that the continuation of its next-generation 14A manufacturing process depends on landing a significant customer. Without one, the company may halt or abandon development. In a memo, Tan noted: 'We're developing Intel 14A ... from the ground up in close partnership with large external customers. Going forward, our investment in Intel 14A will be based on confirmed customer commitments.' Tan also informed investors that Intel's 18A process would likely deliver a reasonable return only if applied to the company's products. According to a previous report from Reuters, he has also considered discontinuing the offering of 18A technology to external clients to concentrate resources on the 14A process. Intel is reportedly planning to begin high-volume production of its Panther Lake PC chips later this year using the 18A process. 5 Tips to Get the Best Deals during sale on Amazon, Flipkart and other online websites
