logo
No Alimony, No Maintenance: Man Divorces Wife On ‘Own Terms' Without Advocate Aid

No Alimony, No Maintenance: Man Divorces Wife On ‘Own Terms' Without Advocate Aid

News186 days ago
Last Updated:
Initially, the wife demanded a settlement of Rs 70 lakh, which was reduced to Rs 35 lakh within a year.
A man evaded paying alimony to his ex-wife and fought multiple legal cases filed by her successfully, that too without hiring a lawyer. If that sounds like a made-up story to you, then you would be shocked to know that it happened in reality. A Reddit post, documenting how the man got a divorce on his own terms, has grabbed the attention of social media users. The person's story was recounted by one of his friends on the platform.
As per the post, the man and his parents were falsely accused of charges under three legal sections. They were 498A (cruelty by husband or relatives), Domestic Violence, and CrPC 125 (maintenance claim). 'My guy jumped into the Legal Arena Party-In-Person, i.e., represented himself instead of hiring an advocate and got both DV and 125 dismissed without getting any maintenance order," read the statement from his friend.
Initially, the wife demanded a settlement of Rs 70 lakh, which was reduced to Rs 35 lakh within a year. 'My guy laughed so hard in mediation on hearing Rs 35 lakh that his wife instantly dropped to Rs 30 lakh. He still laughed hard and gave a counteroffer of 1 lakh," added the note. After three years, the lawyers of the man's former wife approached him 'for MCD (Mutual Consent Divorce) for zero alimony, which he graciously accepted."
The man also 'rejected all drafts of MoU (Memorandum of Understanding) from his wife's side and drafted his own MoU and MCD Petition", finally getting a divorce as per his terms and conditions. The post ended with the revelation that after the divorce was granted, he threw a party for his friends and co-workers.
Social Media Users React
Redditors had much to say about the viral post.
One user called the man 'Johnny Depp of India."
Another found the chain of events 'damn crazy."
One person urged the man to 'file a defamation case against the ex-wife."
'I am more surprised that the court allowed it," admitted an individual.
'That is a real flex," read an encouraging remark.
view comments
First Published:
July 30, 2025, 07:00 IST
News viral No Alimony, No Maintenance: Man Divorces Wife On 'Own Terms' Without Advocate Aid
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

5 more cases against Srushti Clinic head
5 more cases against Srushti Clinic head

Time of India

time42 minutes ago

  • Time of India

5 more cases against Srushti Clinic head

Hyderabad: Gopalapuram police have registered five new cases against the head of Srushti Fertility Clinic Dr Athaluri Namratha alias Pachipala Namratha, and others based on complaints lodged by five sets of victims. While in one case a couple alleged that the doctor handed them a baby whose DNA did not match theirs, three other couples accused the clinic of adopting dubious methods. They claimed that they had already paid the money — anywhere from Rs 12.5 lakh to Rs 19 lakh — and even deposited their biological samples when they grew suspicious about the operations of Dr Namratha and her clinic. The frauds occurred between 2019 and 2025. Cops are yet to ascertain details of the fifth case. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Case 1: DNA mismatch causes trauma A woman from Hyderabad, requesting anonymity, alleged that she and her husband had approached Universal Srushti Fertility & Research Centre in July 2024 for infertility treatment. Dr Namratha advised gestational surrogacy using the couple's own genetic material and assured them that all legal formalities would be handled by them. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The couple paid Rs 16.5 lakh for hormone therapy, laboratory work, and surrogate expenses. Their egg and sperm samples were collected at the clinic's Visakhapatnam branch on September 18, 2024. A baby girl was delivered via caesarean section on June 16, 2025, at a Visakhapatnam-based hospital. "Initially, we were told by the doctors that the baby was healthy, but they later shifted her to the NICU, terming her as late pre-term," the woman said. The couple's suspicions arose after Srushti staff refused to divulge the surrogate mother's details. Their fears deepened after they were unable to observe any facial resemblance with the baby, which prompted them to go for an independent DNA test. "The results, which came out on July 12, confirmed that neither of us was biologically related to the child," the complainant alleged. When confronted on July 22, Dr Namratha allegedly admitted that donor gametes were mistakenly used, and asked the couple to return the infant so the clinic could seek govt adoption clearance and repeat the procedure with their samples. The parents refused and approached the police, citing immense emotional trauma and legal uncertainty over the child's status. It is learnt that the child is still in the custody of the couple. The police have registered a case against Dr Namratha, Dr Vidyulatha, Kalyani, Sheshagiri, and Srinivasa Reddy under sections 61 (2), 316 (2), 318(4), 111, 335, 336, 340 BNS & Sections 38, 39, and 40 of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021. Case 2: Rs 12.5 lakh lost in fraudulent surrogacy deal Another couple from the city approached police alleging they were duped of Rs 12.5 lakh by Dr Namratha and others through a fraudulent surrogacy deal. The husband, a 34-year-old private employee from the city, alleged that he and his wife approached Dr Namratha in Nov 2024 for a surrogate baby. Between April and May 2025, the couple paid Rs 10 lakh for tests and collection of 'biological samples' at the Secunderabad branch. On June 26, Dr Namratha allegedly informed them that the "baby is ready," indicating successful initiation of surrogacy, and collected Rs 2.5 lakh more. Though Dr Namratha assured that the baby would be delivered on February 3, 2026, the couple became suspicious when the hospital repeatedly refused to reveal the surrogate's identity, produce consent forms, or show proof of court permission, and decided to approach the police. A case was registered against Dr Namratha, her associates, Chenna Rao, and Sureka under relevant sections of BNS & the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021. Case 3: NRI couple loses Rs 19 lakh A US-based NRI couple who approached Universal Srushti Fertility and Research Centre in December 2019 for infertility treatment allegedly lost Rs 19 lakh to the accused. The husband, a 49-year-old software professional, and his wife approached Dr Namratha who, quoting a high success rate, charged Rs 7 lakh in cash and collected the couple's biological samples. After an unsuccessful embryo transfer, the couple returned to the USA. In January 2020, Dr Namratha advised the couple to opt for a surrogacy procedure costing Rs 25 lakh. The complainant's brother paid Rs 12 lakh in cash as an initial instalment. "The clinic provided no documents about medical procedures or statutory clearances. Due to Covid-19, I could not personally meet the doctor, and when I reached the fertility centre on Sunday, I came to know about the recent case against Dr Namratha," the complainant alleged. A case was registered against Dr Namratha under relevant sections of the BNS. Case 4: Nalgonda couple alleges Rs 11 lakh fraud A couple from Nalgonda alleged that Dr Namratha and her associates duped them of Rs 11 lakh with a false assurance of providing them with a child through a surrogacy procedure. The 49-year-old man and his wife first approached Universal Srushti Fertility Centre in June 2024 after unsuccessful IVF treatment attempts. Dr Namratha suggested surrogacy, and the couple paid Rs 9 lakh through UPI and Rs 2 lakh in cash between May 20 and July 2, 2025, and their samples were collected at the Secunderabad facility. "Despite the payments, the hospital neither produced proof of necessary legal permissions. They collected samples from us but did not start the surrogacy procedure," the complaint alleged. On learning about the other complaints against the facility, the victim approached the police on Sunday, and a case was registered against Dr Namratha, her associates, Archana, Dr Sadanandam, Chenna Rao, and Sureka under relevant Sections of the BNS.

Fearing torture and arrest, migrants from NCR hire buses to return home
Fearing torture and arrest, migrants from NCR hire buses to return home

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Fearing torture and arrest, migrants from NCR hire buses to return home

1 2 Malda: Two buses with about 100 migrant workers from the National Capital Region returned to South Dinajpur's Buniadpur on Monday after traversing a distance of more than 1,500 km over two days. The passengers, who had arranged the private buses with their own money, said they had fled as they were afraid of being picked up by Delhi and Haryana cops on the suspicion of being Bangladeshis, tortured and forced to give up all their earnings to secure a release. Among them were several women who worked as domestic helps in Gurgaon.'s posh residential complexes. Not all who made the return journey had faced detention in NCR, but each one had a story to tell of how "people dressed as cops" were picking up Bengali-speaking migrants at night, refusing to accept their IDs and demanding Rs 5-6 lakh for their release. "We lived in Gurgaon for years with our families. We have all our documents to prove Indian citizenship. But we were still being being harassed by police and told to prove our identity. We were so scared that we hired a bus to return home," said Masud Karim, a resident of Rangapukur under Bangshihari police station You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata Jakir Mollah, who had found employment in Delhi four years ago, said, "The cops are picking up anyone at night. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like It's Genius for Learning Languages [See Why] Talkpal AI Undo They are not accepting any documents. Either one has to pay them money or be kicked, abused and then jailed. I did not want to end up in a police station and decided to return home with my family." Getting off the bus, Mojlesh Mollah said, "No document is a valid identity for the cops (in NCR). The more you keep showing, the more they keep asking. One cannot live in a place with the constant fear of being picked up by cops." Their fear of being harassed and thrown in a lockup is not misplaced. Junaid Alam of Gedrigach village under Goalpokhor police station of North Dinajpur was employed in a carpet factory in Panipat for the past two years. A few days back, he claimed, he was picked up by police and taken to Panipat police station. There, he was interrogated on his citizenship and pressed to confess that he was a Bangladeshi. When he refused, Alam alleged, he was brutally beaten up. His sustained a fracture in his leg in the police assault and was hospitalised. His family managed to bring him home last Thursday. Two other youths from Goalpokhor, Sabir Alam and Md Kabir, also met the same fate. A resident of Bijuvita village, Sabir returned home with a broken leg on Saturday night. He had been working in a carpet factory in Panipat for 15 years. On July 29, police came to the factory and checked his Aadhaar and EPIC. The next day, cops came again and picked him up. For three days, he was tortured in custody and suffered a fracture in his leg. "They kept insisting that I confess that I was a Bangladeshi," he claimed. Kabir from Solpara village, however, has still not been able to return home. A video in which he claims being tortured by Panipat police and appeals for help has reached his family. Both alleged that cops took away all their money. State minister Golam Rabbani visited their families and assured help. Trinamool Congress in a statement on Monday said, "They were beaten, abused and extorted by Delhi Police, which allegedly demanded bribes of ₹5–7 lakh for their release. These are Indian citizens, targeted solely for their language and identity. This is a hate-driven crackdown on the Bengali identity, enabled and emboldened by the Bangla Birodhi BJP regime. Delhi Police has turned into a tool of linguistic apartheid, criminalising Bangla, vilifying Bengalis, and extorting helpless workers. "

Delhi HC denies bail to DHFL promoter Kapil Wadhawan in bank fraud case
Delhi HC denies bail to DHFL promoter Kapil Wadhawan in bank fraud case

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Delhi HC denies bail to DHFL promoter Kapil Wadhawan in bank fraud case

New Delhi: The Delhi high court denied bail on Monday to DHFL promoter Kapil Wadhawan in an alleged Rs 34,926-crore bank fraud case, noting that his "conduct during custody was not beyond reproach". Justice Ravinder Dudeja rejected his bail plea, saying such economic offences were not only crimes against specific victims but against the financial system at large. The CBI alleged Wadhawan, as promoter and CMD of DHFL, was the principal architect of a massive financial fraud involving diversion and misappropriation of approximately Rs 34,926 crore from a consortium of 17 banks. "The allegations regarding manipulation of valuable assets and transactions carried out during judicial custody are grave and suggest that the applicant continues to exercise significant control and influence," the HC observed. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai It noted CBI's submission that Wadhawan was facing multiple investigations and cases across jurisdictions involving serious financial offences, which undermined his argument that he posed no risk if enlarged on bail. "The court cannot permit the release of a person who is prima facie the mastermind of a deep-rooted financial fraud, especially when the trial is at a nascent stage," it concluded, noting that if released on bail he might tamper with evidence or, worse, flee from justice. "Many of the witnesses in this case are stated to be either ex-employees or associates of DHFL and, as such, there is a high risk and possibility that the petitioner might try to influence witnesses," it said. Wadhawan is accused of creating and operating 87 shell companies in the names of associates, employees, and relatives to siphon off funds, falsely recorded as retail housing loans to over 2.6 lakh fictitious customers through a non-existent "Bandra Branch-001" in DHFL's internal systems. He was taken into custody in the case on July 19, 2022, and granted default statutory bail on Dec 3, 2022, but the Supreme Court cancelled his bail on Jan 24, 2024. The court observed his "effective custody" was two years, and not four years as claimed. "Having regard to the nature and seriousness of the allegations, the gravity of the offence, the applicant's central role in the conspiracy, the potential adverse impact of his release on the trial, and the huge magnitude of the funds siphoned off, this court finds no merit in the present application," the order held.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store