Rare deal stack drops 50% off Yeti tumbler making it £35 cheaper than Stanley rival
Rare deal stack drops 50% off Yeti tumbler making it £35 cheaper than Stanley rival
The Yeti Rambler is a great option for anyone who wants a durable, perfect for iced coffee mornings, smoothies, or water on the go
The Stanley rival, Yeti, keeps drinks cool for hours
With the arrival of balmy, sun-soaked days and a bank holiday on the horizon, it's crucial to have a dependable insulated bottle to keep your beverages refreshingly cool all day. Yeti's Rambler Bottle is the perfect portable companion. Typically retailing at £30, as opposed to the viral Stanley Quencher cup, which can cost upwards of £50, shoppers can now bag a bargain with a £20 saving on the 532ml insulated bottle, complete with a straw.
In a lesser-known deal stack, customers can slash the price of the Yeti tumbler to just £15 by combining it with TopCashback, a deals site that offers consumers a percentage of their money back when they shop via its links.
New members of TopCashback will be treated to a £15 sign-up bonus, plus an additional cashback amount for shopping with Go Outdoors, reducing the total cost of the tumbler to a mere £13.25 after cashback. Existing TopCashback members can also enjoy a modest discount, paying £28.25 after cashback.
New TopCashback members stand to save over £36 on the Yeti tumbler overall. Alternatively, the Thermos Thermocafe Tumbler from Argos, priced at £13 and featuring a lock lid to prevent accidental spills, is proving popular among shoppers. The Ninja's Sip Perfect Travel Mug, retailing for £34.99, has received glowing reviews. The Yeti Rambler is available in four vibrant colours: Firefly Yellow, Red, Big Sky Blue and Tropical Pink.
The Yeti tumbler helps keep drinks cool
While Stanley's quencher bottles have become a TikTok sensation due to their stylish hues and large capacities, YETI is renowned for its robust construction, superior insulation, and leak-proof lids.
The 18oz Rambler is an ideal choice for those seeking a compact, hard-wearing bottle equipped with a straw cap, making it perfect for enjoying iced coffees, smoothies, or simply water whilst on the move.
Moreover, with the prospect of summer heatwaves looming, possessing a reliable insulated bottle could spare you from shelling out on costly beverages when out and about.
Article continues below
How to get a Yeti Rambler for under £15
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Michelle Mone told it would be 'disappointing' if PPE firm made little profit
The Department for Health and Social Care is suing PPE Medpro for £130m after Baroness Mone acted as an introducer, saying the gowns were not sterile and unfit for use - the company denies the claims Conservative peer Baroness Michelle Mone was told by a boss of a PPE firm that it would be disappointing if the company made little or no profit, the High Court heard. Her husband Doug Barrowman was at the court yesterday for the second day of a £130million trial over PPE Medpro, a company he backed. The Department of Health and Social Care is seeking the return of £122m it spent on surgical gowns bought during the pandemic along with £8.6m in storage and transportation costs. The High Court heard that the gowns were not sterile and unusable in the NHS when delivered in 2020. PPE Medpro said it "categorically denies" breaching the contract, and its lawyers claimed it has been "singled out for unfair treatment". The company was backed by a consortium led by Mr Barrowman and the initial contact with the government's PPE team came from Baroness Mone. Written submissions in the case state that Baroness Mone was told by firm boss Anthony Page that it would be "extremely disappointing" if it made little or no profit. A few days before the contract was signed for 25 million gowns, fewer than the 50 million originally proposed, Mr Page wrote to her, saying: "Tomorrow we will submit our best price. As I said our margin will be tiny or possibly nothing at all as we have bought all the production capacity upfront. We really need to achieve a positive outcome to this extremely disappointing situation." Opening the trial on Wednesday, Paul Stanley KC, for the DHSC, said: "This case is simply about whether 25 million surgical gowns provided by PPE Medpro were faulty." Mr Stanley said 99.9999% of the gowns should have been sterile under the terms of the contract - equating to one in a million being unusable. 140 gowns were later tested for sterility, with 103 failing, and he added: "Whatever was done to sterilise the gowns had not achieved its purpose, because more than one in a million of them was contaminated when delivered. Mr Stanley said that the gowns were 'unusable in the NHS or any other setting', adding: 'Without the relevant assurances of conformity that the gowns met sterility requirements, the potential impact on safety was such that they could seriously harm or kill patients and so could not be released for use.' In his written submissions, Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said the "only plausible reason" for the gowns becoming contaminated was due to "the transport and storage conditions or events the gowns were subject", after they had been delivered. He added the testing did not happen until several months after the gowns were rejected, and the samples selected were not "representative of the whole population", meaning "no proper conclusions may be drawn". He said the DHSC's claim was "contrived and opportunistic" and PPE Medpro had been "made the 'fall guy' for a catalogue of failures and errors" by the department. He said: "It has perhaps been singled out because of the high profiles of those said to be associated with PPE Medpro, and/or because it is perceived to be a supplier with financial resources behind it. "In reality, an archetypal case of 'buyer's remorse', where DHSC simply seeks to get out of a bargain it wished it never entered into, left, as it is, with over £8 billion of purchased and unused PPE as a result of an untrammelled and uncontrolled buying spree with taxpayers' money." Bra tycoon Baroness Mone, 53, and Isle of Manbased entrepreneur Mr Barrowman, 60, who wed in 2020, both deny wrongdoing. They are facing a separate National Crime Agency investigation into PPE Medpro. A PPE Medpro spokesman said it "categorically denies breaching its obligations" and will "robustly defend" the claim. The trial is due to last five weeks, with a judgment expected at a later date.
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Shoppers can get a pair of Crocs slides for less than £5 in flash sale
Crocs' huge summer sale has some eye-catching deals and there's a simple way to make the most of one of the best The holiday season is fast approaching. Whether that involves sitting poolside, lazing on the beach or even just pottering in the garden, Crocs are a popular choice for low-maintenance, comfortable shoes and the brand's summer sale means they're cheaper than usual. Right now, Crocs has slashed the price of the Bayaband Slides by 40% to £20.99, down from its original price of £34.99. The Bayaband is one of Crocs' most popular unisex slider styles, ideal for easy wearing and that nostalgic Crocs look that has been given a revival. But there's a way shoppers can get them for less than a fiver by stacking deals using a money-saving website. New members of TopCashback, can claim a free £15 signup bonus plus extra cashback for shopping with thousands of different online retailers including Crocs. By joining the free site and then buying the Crocs as their first purchase, shoppers can effectively the iconic slides for £4.59. Existing TopCashback members can still benefit from a small discount and will pay £19.59 after cashback. Either way, it's a great opportunity to snap up a solid summer essential for less with the new member bonus meaning shoppers can save a huge £30 on the usual price of the popular sliders. Crocs isn't the only footwear brand trying to tempt shoppers with sales this weekend. If Dadcore is key to your footwear choices, head to Foot Locker to find retro styles like the Air Max trainers, which are ideal for festival season. Elsewhere, OFFICE has also added new lines to its summer sale; this includes popular sandal styles like the Birkenstock Arizona Two Strap Sandals. Meanwhile, 50% off Crocs sale encompasses dozens of popular styles from the brand including traditional and lined clogs as well as various sandals and slides. Many have a decent range of shades, with the Bayaband Slides available in colours including Black/White, White/Navy, Navy/Pepper, Cobblestone and Army Green at the bargain price. Crocs' Bayaband Slides are a reliable go-to for sunnier days, lightweight and water-friendly, they're ideal for beach days, holidays, poolside lounging, or just quick trips outside. Thanks to their simple slip-on design and comfort footbed, the cushioning and support allow shoppers to walk with ease with every step. They're made from the brand's signature Croslite foam, so they're durable, easy to clean, and won't weigh feet down. Sizes are selling fast, though, so for those with their eye on a particular colour, it's worth getting in there quickly. Online there are over 2,000 positive reviews from customers. One five-star comment read: "I wear my Crocs every day at home. Having painfully flat feet, I wear trainers during the day at work but slip straight into my Crocs once home. I just bought a second pair to wear as foot relief after a night out. These are beautiful, and I highly recommend them." Another shopper described them as 'so comfy,' adding: "Bought these for a recent holiday to Lanzarote and so glad I did. I was a little sceptical to whether or not they would be comfortable for walking any distance beyond round the pool but I wore them every day, round the pool walking to and from the beach, a good 2 miles each day and they were absolutely brilliant, super comfy and perfect for what I wanted. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend them and I would definitely buy them again. I don't like toe post flip flops so these sliders are spot on for me." Another shopper shared: "Wear them all the time, easy to walk in, comfortable, and just rinse to freshen them up." However, one shopper noted: "They are comfy, just wish the width was a bit bigger," with many shoppers suggesting to size down as the shoes ran larger than expected. How to get a pair of Crocs Bayaband Slides for under To claim the new member bonus, new members of TopCashback need to sign up via this link Search for Crocs and click 'Get Cashback Now' Shop and check out as usual Cashback will track and appear in your TopCashback account where it will become available for withdrawal
The Herald Scotland
2 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Court: Michelle Mone-linked firm must pay back £121m for ‘faulty' PPE
The company, a consortium led by Baroness Mone's husband, businessman Doug Barrowman, was awarded Government contracts by the former Conservative administration to supply PPE during the pandemic, after she recommended it to ministers. Both have denied wrongdoing. The Government is seeking to recover the costs of the contract, as well as the costs of transporting and storing the items, which amount to an additional £8,648,691. PPE Medpro said it 'categorically denies' breaching the contract, and its lawyers claimed the company has been 'singled out for unfair treatment'. Opening the trial on Wednesday, Paul Stanley KC, for the DHSC, said: 'This case is simply about whether 25 million surgical gowns provided by PPE Medpro were faulty. 'It is, in short, a technical case about detailed legal and industry standards that apply to sterile gowns.' The gowns were purchased at the height of the pandemic but have never been used (Image: PA) Mr Stanley said in written submissions the 'initial contact with Medpro came through Baroness Mone', with discussions about the contract then going through one of the company's directors, Anthony Page. Baroness Mone remained 'active throughout' the negotiations, Mr Stanley said, with the peer stating Mr Barrowman had 'years of experience in manufacturing, procurement and management of supply chains'. But he told the court Baroness Mone's communications were 'not part of this case', which was 'simply about compliance'. He said: 'The department does not allege anything improper happened, and we are not concerned with any profits made by anybody.' In court documents from May this year, the DHSC said the gowns were delivered to the UK in 72 lots between August and October 2020, with £121,999,219.20 paid to PPE Medpro between July and August that year. The department rejected the gowns in December 2020 and told the company it would have to repay the money, but this has not happened and the gowns remain in storage, unable to be used. In written submissions for trial, Mr Stanley said 99.9999% of the gowns should have been sterile under the terms of the contract, equating to one in a million being unusable. The DHSC claims the contract also specified PPE Medpro had to sterilise the gowns using a 'validated process', attested by CE marking, which indicates a product has met certain medical standards. He said 'none of those things happened', with no validated sterilisation process being followed, and the gowns supplied with invalid CE marking. He continued that 140 gowns were later tested for sterility, with 103 failing. He said: 'Whatever was done to sterilise the gowns had not achieved its purpose, because more than one in a million of them was contaminated when delivered. 'On that basis, DHSC was entitled to reject the gowns, or is entitled to damages, which amount to the full price and storage costs.' READ MORE: In his written submissions, Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said the 'only plausible reason' for the gowns becoming contaminated was due to 'the transport and storage conditions or events to which the gowns were subject', after they had been delivered to the DHSC. He added the testing did not happen until several months after the gowns were rejected, and the samples selected were not 'representative of the whole population', meaning 'no proper conclusions may be drawn'. He said the DHSC's claim was 'contrived and opportunistic' and PPE Medpro had been 'made the 'fall guy' for a catalogue of failures and errors' by the department. He said: 'It has perhaps been singled out because of the high profiles of those said to be associated with PPE Medpro, and/or because it is perceived to be a supplier with financial resources behind it. 'In reality, an archetypal case of 'buyer's remorse', where DHSC simply seeks to get out of a bargain it wished it never entered into, left, as it is, with over £8 billion of purchased and unused PPE as a result of an untrammelled and uncontrolled buying spree with taxpayers' money.' He also said there was a 'delicious irony' that Baroness Mone was mentioned in the DHSC's written submissions, when she had 'zero relevance to the contractual issues in this case'. Neither Baroness Mone nor Mr Barrowman is due to give evidence in the trial, and Baroness Mone did not attend the first day of the hearing on Wednesday. A PPE Medpro spokesperson said the company 'categorically denies breaching its obligations' and will 'robustly defend' the claim. The trial before Mrs Justice Cockerill is due to last five weeks, with a judgment expected in writing at a later date.
