US tariffs: Mexico calls Trump's 30% duties 'unfair'; EU warns of supply chain disruption
While the European Union has reiterated its commitment to negotiations, Mexico has rejected the move outright, calling it 'unfair' and unacceptable.
Trump made the announcement via his Truth Social platform, on Saturday, citing a trade imbalance with the EU and Mexico's alleged role in the flow of illicit drugs into the US.
EU 'ready to continue working'
European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen sharply criticised the proposed US tariffs, warning they would 'disrupt essential transatlantic supply chains, to the detriment of businesses, consumers and patients on both sides of the Atlantic.'
She reaffirmed the EU's preference for a negotiated settlement, saying, 'We remain ready to continue working towards an agreement by August 1.'
However, von der Leyen made it clear that the bloc would not back down if talks failed. 'We will take all necessary steps to safeguard EU interests, including the adoption of proportionate countermeasures if required,' she said, adding that the EU's trading practices remain among the most open and fair globally.
"The EU has consistently prioritized a negotiated solution with the US, reflecting our commitment to dialogue, stability, and a constructive transatlantic partnership," she said.
Brussels has already drawn up a retaliatory tariff package worth €21 billion, which remains suspended until July 14.
An EU spokeswoman confirmed that the bloc had been notified of the new tariff plan ahead of Trump's public announcement.
In response to the rising tension, EU diplomats have convened an emergency meeting in Brussels on Sunday to assess next steps.
Mexico 'did not agree'
Mexico, too, pushed back strongly against Trump's new tariff warning. In a joint statement from its economy and foreign ministries, the Mexican government labelled the move an 'unfair deal,' following discussions with US officials on Friday.
'We mentioned at the table that it was an unfair deal and that we did not agree,' the statement read.
Despite the rising tensions, both Mexico and the EU have indicated a willingness to keep the door open for further dialogue. However, with just weeks remaining until the August 1 deadline, the risk of a new global trade conflict is looming.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
18 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India inches closer to historic US trade deal, can Modi dodge Trump's 26% tariff threat?
Credit where credit is due. Indian trade negotiators have persevered and survived in a tough environment of tariff threats from Donald Trump and rapid-fire letters spitting out of the White strategy: stay calm and carry on. Bring a good ground game, prevent oversimplification of issues, and insist on fairness. An interim India-US trade deal appears tantalisingly close, which, when announced, should remove the sword of 26% tariffs hanging over India. It will be a subset of the 'first tranche' of a BTA that both agreed to complete by fall. Rajesh Agarwal, India's chief negotiator, is here to give the finishing touches but not to make an announcement. That right belongs to Trump. 'Many of us were expecting an announcement two weeks ago. It's impossible to assess what the president's going to do, what his calculus is,' Mark Linscott, a former US trade official, told me. Could the timing be related to trade talks with Pakistan and a desire to make a joint announcement? 'It would not be productive. The India agreement is historic,' said extended the July 9 deadline to August 1, possibly for two reasons - first, negotiations with some countries, including India, were at an advanced stage, and second, he needed to show results. A 'win' in a sea of threats would affirm that his mad strategy is with India have been substantive, with a focus on the long- term trade trajectory. Flexibility is the name of the game. If you are starting with a $45 bn trade surplus, some front-loading of benefits to the US can be digested. The main objective is to avoid the 26% tariffs Trump threatened and protect Indian being finalised would be an interim agreement, which will lead to more detailed discussions on a legal text, which, in turn, would lead to the 'first tranche' of an unprecedented deal and later to a possible second tranche. Neither side has travelled so far so quickly, or held as many meetings and video conferences negotiators are charged up. Sometimes, Delhi has had to wait for DC to respond, belying old beliefs that Indians move slowly, if at US wants more market access for industrial goods, apples, wines, alfalfa hay, soyabean, maize and dairy products. India is open to some, but GMO foods and dairy are red lines - one is banned under law, and the other could spark riots because American cows are fed a non-veg diet. Officials will likely set the most contentious issues for wants lower tariffs on its labour-intensive exports, from leather products to garments to textiles to gems and jewellery. Greater market access for pharma and electronics would be good, too, and while you are at it, don't forget to lower US tariffs on steel, aluminium and auto there are differences on 'standards' - whose standards are right, and should one country automatically accept another's? How do you position your objections? How do you simplify/harmonise the two regulatory structures? The word 'complex' doesn't do justice to the nature of discussions, the pushing and pulling, the stretching of limits, and making the right judgements while weighing the politics of it is on the cusp of something positive in a challenging landscape where every day springs a surprise, often a nasty one. US negotiators have kept everything close to their chest - even their companies don't know the direction of the all part of the strategy of unpredictability - now fully grown from its nascency in Trump 1.0. The letter bombs dropped on Japan, South Korea, Laos, Bangladesh and even Myanmar, are nothing but a pressure campaign to shock them into submission. A letter doesn't mean Trump won't do a trade deal - a Bangladeshi delegation is already here asking for for Senator Lindsey Graham's bill, which proposes 500% tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil, gas, uranium and petrochemical products, it does allow Trump to waive those tariffs for 180 days on national security grounds. A newer version - still secret - is expected to expand Trump's ability to grant the bill is pushed in the US Congress will depend on how talks with Russia progress, or don't. Both Dems and Rs are united in their desire to punish Moscow. India, as a major buyer of Russian oil, will have a problem on hand unless given a waiver. Diplomatic efforts are underway to sensitise Graham and his staff to India's need for energy If the bill becomes law, global oil prices will likely rise, which means higher prices for Americans at the gas pump. That won't be good news for Trump. But an interim trade agreement with India would be. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. The 10-second mystery: Did the Air India crash report hide more than what it revealed? Can Indian IT's 'pyramid' survive the GenAI shake-up? Zee promoters have a new challenge to navigate. And it's not about funding or Sebi probe. The deluge that's cooling oil prices despite the Iran conflict Stock Radar: Natco Pharma stock showing signs of momentum after falling over 30% from highs – what should investors do? In mid-caps, 'just hold' often creates wealth: 10 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential up to 44% F&O Talk | Foreign outflows, IT drag pull nifty lower; next support at 24,500: Rahul Ghose How to use dividend yield in volatile times: 6 stocks where this strategy has a high chance of giving much better returns
News18
29 minutes ago
- News18
Etihad, Other Airlines Order Inspection Of Boeing 787 Fuel Switch Locks: Report
Last Updated: The directive came just after an initial probe report of the plane crash involving an Air India flight AI-171, which resulted in 270 fatalities, was released. After preliminary findings from the investigation into the June 12 crash of Air India flight AI-171, major international airlines have started inspecting the fuel control switch locking mechanisms on their Boeing 787 aircraft, according to a report. The directive came just after an initial probe report of the plane crash involving an Air India flight AI-171, which resulted in 270 fatalities, was released. Etihad Airways issued an internal instruction on July 13 directing engineers to examine the locking mechanisms on its Boeing 787 aircraft, specifically referencing aircraft registered as A6-BLI, reported The Economic Times, citing exclusive documents. Sources revealed that Singapore Airlines has also begun similar inspections. India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) released its preliminary report on July 12, stating that the fuel control switches on the Air India aircraft had transitioned from 'RUN" to 'CUTOFF" just three seconds after takeoff. According to the AAIB, cockpit audio recorded a conversation between the pilots, with one asking, 'Why did you cut off (the fuel supply)?" The other responded that he had not done so. The Boeing 787's fuel control switches are designed with a locking system that prevents unintentional movement. The switch must be lifted before being moved into position—either forward to initiate fuel supply (RUN) or backwards to stop it (CUTOFF). The AAIB cited a 2018 safety notice from the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which warned of potential failures in this locking mechanism. The bulletin highlighted the risk that a faulty system could allow the switch to move without deliberate pilot input. However, Air India had not conducted the FAA-recommended inspection, as it was not classified as mandatory. As investigations continue, other airlines are now taking precautionary steps to examine their own Boeing 787 fleets for similar issues. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! view comments First Published: July 14, 2025, 12:46 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
India.com
29 minutes ago
- India.com
Bitcoin Hits Record High As US Enters ‘Crypto Week': Why Cryptocurrency Is Soaring And Washington Is Racing To Regulate
Washington D.C.: This week could become a turning point for crypto currency in the United States. Bitcoin has crossed $120,000 for the first time. At the same time, power, money and regulation are coming together in a way that may reshape how America deals with digital currency. Starting July 14, the US House of Representatives began what insiders have dubbed 'Crypto Week', a legislative showdown that could redraw the line between government control and financial freedom in the digital age. Three major bills are on the table. Their names sound technical, but their implications are seismic. At the top is the GENIUS Act, which aims to draw clear lines between securities and commodities in the crypto world – giving startups regulatory breathing room. It has already passed the Senate. Then there is the Clarity Act, which takes a swing at federal agencies like the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), trying to rein in their power and hand that authority back to the Congress. And finally, the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, which would ban the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency – a pushback against fears of state-run digital surveillance. In the eyes of many Republicans and of President Donald Trump in particular, this week is about liberation. No more lawsuits from the SEC. No more regulatory fog. Just 'innovation', 'freedom' and 'massive profits'. Trump has personally backed the industry's expansion, calling on lawmakers to ditch Biden-era restrictions and open the gates. 'Even if the bills stall, capital will flood back into the market,' said Bitfinex's head of derivatives Jag Kooner, speaking to Reuters. And so far, he has been right. Bitcoin surged 29% this year alone, peaking Monday (July 14) at a jaw-dropping $122,055. Ethereum touched $3,048, its highest level in five months. The crypto market's total value now hovers near $3.8 trillion. But the enthusiasm is hardly universal. Senator Elizabeth Warren is furious. She has accused Republicans, and Trump himself, of turning the U.S. government into a playground for crypto billionaires. 'This looks like another industry handout,' she said during a tense Senate hearing on July 9. She demanded a ban on public officials, including Trump, from issuing or profiting from crypto tokens – citing massive conflicts of interest. Her concerns are not baseless. The Trump family's ties to crypto run deep. From meme coins like $Trump and $Melania to the World Liberty Financial group, which earned the president over $57 million, the Trump orbit has been flooded with crypto ventures. And now, his team has filed with the SEC to launch a 'Crypto Blue-Chip ETF', further blurring the lines between public service and private fortune. Trump's crypto awakening has been swift. Once a skeptic, he now frames himself as the industry's champion. During his 2024 campaign, he welcomed crypto donations, courted blockchain entrepreneurs and promised to make the United States 'the crypto capital of the world'. That promise seems closer to reality than ever before. And it is paying off. Since Trump's re-election in November 2024, Bitcoin has skyrocketed 75%, vaulting from $69,539 on Election Day to record highs. At this point, Bitcoin's total value would place it among the world's ten largest economies, alongside Canada and Brazil. But volatility has not vanished. In February, Bitcoin briefly dropped below $90,000 after Trump stunned markets with sweeping tariffs on U.S. allies. Still, the coin rebounded, and then some, after Trump doubled down on crypto by announcing a federal 'crypto reserve' that would include five digital currencies, including Bitcoin. Amid global economic instability – trade wars, ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East and wild market swings – Bitcoin has emerged as both a financial escape hatch and a political weapon. More than any other U.S. president, Trump has embraced it as both. Supporters say this week marks the turning point for America's crypto industry. Critics say it is the beginning of its capture. Either way, Crypto Week is here, and the stakes have never been higher. Whether it ends in boom or bust, one thing is certain that the lines between finance, politics and technology are being redrawn live on the floor of the Congress. Washington D.C.: This week could become a turning point for crypto currency in the United States. Bitcoin has crossed $120,000 for the first time. At the same time, power, money and regulation are coming together in a way that may reshape how America deals with digital currency. Starting July 14, the US House of Representatives began what insiders have dubbed 'Crypto Week', a legislative showdown that could redraw the line between government control and financial freedom in the digital age. Three major bills are on the table. Their names sound technical, but their implications are seismic. At the top is the GENIUS Act, which aims to draw clear lines between securities and commodities in the crypto world – giving startups regulatory breathing room. It has already passed the Senate. Then there is the Clarity Act, which takes a swing at federal agencies like the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), trying to rein in their power and hand that authority back to the Congress. And finally, the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, which would ban the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency – a pushback against fears of state-run digital surveillance. In the eyes of many Republicans and of President Donald Trump in particular, this week is about liberation. No more lawsuits from the SEC. No more regulatory fog. Just 'innovation', 'freedom' and 'massive profits'. Trump has personally backed the industry's expansion, calling on lawmakers to ditch Biden-era restrictions and open the gates. 'Even if the bills stall, capital will flood back into the market,' said Bitfinex's head of derivatives Jag Kooner, speaking to Reuters. And so far, he has been right. Bitcoin surged 29% this year alone, peaking Monday (July 14) at a jaw-dropping $122,055. Ethereum touched $3,048, its highest level in five months. The crypto market's total value now hovers near $3.8 trillion. But the enthusiasm is hardly universal. Senator Elizabeth Warren is furious. She has accused Republicans, and Trump himself, of turning the U.S. government into a playground for crypto billionaires. 'This looks like another industry handout,' she said during a tense Senate hearing on July 9. She demanded a ban on public officials, including Trump, from issuing or profiting from crypto tokens – citing massive conflicts of interest. Her concerns are not baseless. The Trump family's ties to crypto run deep. From meme coins like $Trump and $Melania to the World Liberty Financial group, which earned the president over $57 million, the Trump orbit has been flooded with crypto ventures. And now, his team has filed with the SEC to launch a 'Crypto Blue-Chip ETF', further blurring the lines between public service and private fortune. Trump's crypto awakening has been swift. Once a skeptic, he now frames himself as the industry's champion. During his 2024 campaign, he welcomed crypto donations, courted blockchain entrepreneurs and promised to make the United States 'the crypto capital of the world'. That promise seems closer to reality than ever before. And it is paying off. Since Trump's re-election in November 2024, Bitcoin has skyrocketed 75%, vaulting from $69,539 on Election Day to record highs. At this point, Bitcoin's total value would place it among the world's ten largest economies, alongside Canada and Brazil. But volatility has not vanished. In February, Bitcoin briefly dropped below $90,000 after Trump stunned markets with sweeping tariffs on U.S. allies. Still, the coin rebounded, and then some, after Trump doubled down on crypto by announcing a federal 'crypto reserve' that would include five digital currencies, including Bitcoin. Amid global economic instability – trade wars, ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East and wild market swings – Bitcoin has emerged as both a financial escape hatch and a political weapon. More than any other U.S. president, Trump has embraced it as both. Supporters say this week marks the turning point for America's crypto industry. Critics say it is the beginning of its capture. Either way, Crypto Week is here, and the stakes have never been higher. Whether it ends in boom or bust, one thing is certain that the lines between finance, politics and technology are being redrawn live on the floor of the Congress.
