What to know about Trump's plan to take 15% of AI chip sales to China
Here's what to know:
The administration will have to come up with a new structure for export licenses being approved by the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security, part of its bid to reshape exports of chips critical for training artificial-intelligence models.
They will need a creative approach because the Export Control Reform Act, which gives BIS authority to enact export controls, says no fee can be imposed in connection with license applications. And the Constitution prohibits the federal government from imposing taxes or duties on items exported from the U.S.
But many chips are manufactured overseas, so one option is for BIS to create new requirements for foreign-made items that need export licenses, industry experts said. Or U.S. officials could come up with a general purpose for the fee, such as helping U.S. leadership in science and technology.
'There isn't an existing mechanism to do this," said Aaron Bartnick, who worked in the Office of Science and Technology Policy during the Biden administration.
Neither side has released details of the agreements. People close to them say many of the details and the financial structure still need to be worked out.
Bernstein analysts estimate that Chinese demand for Nvidia's H20 AI chip in 2025 before an April export ban was roughly 1.5 million chips, or more than $20 billion in sales. That means the administration could bring in billions of dollars from the new agreement, depending on Nvidia's export volumes.
The administration could face opposition to the deal from national-security hawks who have worried that sending U.S. technology to China will boost the country's AI capabilities and military. Many have opposed the chip exports and worry that this type of activity as part of U.S.-China trade talks gives priority to business interests rather than security concerns as intended.
'Export controls exist to protect America, not to generate revenue," said Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, (D., Ill.), the top Democrat on the House Select Committee on China.
With the agreement, the administration is signaling that security priorities can take a backset for the right price, some experts said. 'A 15% fee won't buy back the national security we lose selling AI chips to China," said Jimmy Goodrich, a senior adviser to the think tank Rand who focuses on tech issues.
Trump defended the framework at a Monday news conference, saying that the H20 is obsolete and that he wants to let Nvidia Chief Executive Jensen Huang compete with Chinese technology companies. 'He's selling an old chip," Trump said.
The agreements illustrate how AI chips have become strategic commodities and taken center stage in trade talks between the U.S. and China.
The Trump administration has said it is comfortable exporting Nvidia's H20 because it isn't a top performing chip. The company specially designed it for the Chinese market to comply with export controls. Security hawks say it is still effective enough at certain tasks to boost China's AI industry.
Write to Amrith Ramkumar at amrith.ramkumar@wsj.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Confederation urges CM to form Cabinet sub-committee to review Nagamohan Das Commission report
Confederation of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes' Organisations on Thursday urged Chief Minister Siddaramaiah to form a sub-committee of the State Cabinet to review in detail the report submitted by the H.N. Nagamohan Das Commission, which was constituted to implement internal reservation among the State's 101 Scheduled Castes. Addressing press persons here, its president Lolaksha said that the confederation urges the Chief Minister to take a decision on forming the sub-committee in the special Cabinet meeting scheduled for Saturday. The sub-committee should be headed by a senior Minister who does not belong to a Scheduled Caste, but it should include all the Ministers belonging to the Scheduled Castes. 'The sub-committee should hear/receive the views and representations of the Scheduled Castes' people/organisations over the report, and review its merits and demerits,' he said. The proposed internal reservation policy should be designed with sincere concern to empower the most vulnerable among the oppressed and deprived Scheduled Castes through special priority, and ensure justice in every way without adopting any discriminatory policy on the basis of left or right leanings, Mr. Lolaksha said. Since any decision to be taken by the government on the report will have a significant impact on the lives and future of 1.07 crore people belonging to 27,24,768 Scheduled Caste families, the Chief Minister and Ministers should not take any hasty decisions in this regard, the confederation said. The confederation also demanded that, immediately after the current session of the Legislature ends, the sub-committee should either visit all districts or at least hold meetings in Kalaburgi, Belagavi, Mangaluru, Mysuru, and Bengaluru, to receive representations from Scheduled Caste people/organisations and then make appropriate recommendations to the government in accordance with the spirit of the Constitution. Mr. Lolaksha said: 'In our memorandum submitted to the Commission on January 31, we had demanded a fresh survey for internal reservation in the State. However, before the survey even began on May 5, the chairperson of the Commission said that those who have converted to Christianity but still hold an SC certificate would be allowed to participate in the survey. The chairperson also justified the participation of those registered under names such as Adi Dravida and Adi Karnataka, despite their caste names not being listed under the Scheduled Castes. The survey was conducted without including a 'religion' column, allowed 3,22,049 people registered as Beda Jangam and Budga Jangam to participate, but considered only 1,44,387 of them.' 'These actions, in data collection and analysis, go against the spirit and commitment of the Constitution, create hostility and division among castes, and classify communities in an unscientific manner, thereby making recommendations to the government. For these reasons, a thorough review of this report is absolutely necessary,' Mr. Lolaksha said.
Economic Times
3 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump is aiming for Pakistan-style compliance from India, but his plan is not working
Synopsis Amidst rising tensions, the US-India trade relationship faces turbulence as Trump's administration imposes tariffs, allegedly to pressure India on geopolitical issues like Russian oil imports. India views these actions as an infringement on its sovereignty, resisting demands to compromise on agriculture, patent laws and military sourcing. India's refusal to play a compliant role, unlike Pakistan, frustrates Trump. "Trump wants a vessel like Pakistan. India refuses to behave like one." That blunt assessment from Ajay Srivastava, founder of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), captures the essence of the US-India trade saga: it's less about economics than geopolitics. While headlines focus on tariffs and trade deficits, the underlying story is about power, leverage and sovereignty. Speaking to Economic Times, Srivastava explains, "Washington expects compliance, and India is not yielding." Trump, who is set to meet Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska, has long framed tariffs as a tool to 'fix trade deficits,' but India's case suggests a different motive. On August 7, the US announced it would raise tariffs on Indian goods from 25% to 50%, citing Delhi's purchase of Russian oil. India called the move 'unfair' and 'unjustified,' with the new rate set to take effect on August 27. The White House framed the tariffs as a way to cut Russia's energy revenues and pressure Vladimir Putin toward a ceasefire. With this increase, India becomes the most heavily taxed US trading partner in Asia, joining Brazil which faces similar steep tariffs amid tense bilateral relations. The economic stakes for India are high. In 2024, India exported $87 billion worth of goods to the US. According to US Census Bureau data for May 2025, imports from India stood at $9.43 billion, while US exports to India were $3.82 billion, resulting in a US goods trade deficit, or an Indian surplus, of roughly $5.6 billion. If the 50% tariffs remain in place, nearly all of India's annual exports to the US could become commercially unviable. Meanwhile, the US continues to run a $45.7 billion goods trade deficit with India, yet these tariffs disproportionately affect Indian exports compared with goods from other Srivastava, the message is clear: 'Trade deficit is just for the namesake. It's about forcing countries to fall in line with a geopolitical agenda.' India imports roughly 20% of its GDP in goods, spanning petroleum, machinery and electronics, yet Washington appears less concerned with trade imbalances than with pressuring India to compromise on and dairy have emerged as key sticking points in India-US trade talks, which collapsed earlier this month. On August 7, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declared, 'India will never compromise on the well-being of its farmers, dairy producers and fishermen.' New Delhi has consistently resisted US pressure to open these sectors, arguing that doing so would threaten millions of small farmers. Historically, India has kept agriculture largely off the table in trade agreements to safeguard domestic to Srivastava, US demands extend far beyond tariffs: opening government procurement, diluting patent laws that could make medicines costlier, limiting future digital taxes, and shifting military sourcing to the US. 'Even if we open agri and dairy, no trade deal will happen with this. Not a trade issue. They want you to open your government procurement, dilute patent laws, commit to never charge digital tax in future, buy military from the US, the list is endless,' he adds, 'Trump imposed 50% tariffs on Brazil partly over politics and partly because Brazil asked Twitter to remove anti-Brazil content. Records show India generates even more such requests, so he could use that as an excuse too. He can conjure unlimited reasons to impose tariffs if he's unhappy. My sense is he doesn't want a partner in India, he wants a vassal. India refuses to play that role; it insists on an equal partnership. That's the basic problem.'The US approach to Russian oil imports is uneven. China, Russia's largest crude buyer, faces no comparable tariff threats, while India is under heavy pressure. 'Even if the US demanded zero imports from Russia, India's imports would fall anyway due to economic circumstances,' notes Srivastava. European and US bans on petroleum products derived from Russian crude are already reducing India's imports, independent of Washington's selective approach reflects a broader pattern in US trade policy. Brazil, for example, faced a 50% tariff despite running a surplus with the US, largely over political disagreements including its stance on Venezuela and former President Bolsonaro. Venezuela itself is under secondary sanctions for buyers of its oil, though some firms, like Chevron, have received exemptions. These cases suggest that political alignment often outweighs economic between Russia and the US has dropped roughly 90% since the Kremlin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, though last year the US still imported $3 billion worth of Russian goods, according to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis and Census Bureau. Meanwhile, the European Union, a partner in sanctions against Russia, imported $41.9 billion (36 billion euros) of Russian goods in 2024, Eurostat data the US pressures India to cut Russian oil imports, market forces and global regulations are already reshaping trade flows. Europe and US bans on petroleum products ensure India's imports will decline regardless of Washington's actions. Srivastava cautions, however, that the US may find new reasons for tariffs, keeping India under continuous has built a buffer against such pressures. Exports constitute roughly 20% of GDP, compared with 90% for Vietnam, a country far more vulnerable to US-imposed shocks. 'Vietnam will suffer more. We will suffer, but we will absorb it properly. Country will bounce back. All we need to do is not to surrender,' Srivastava US consumers will also feel the impact of tariffs. About 90% of prescriptions in the US rely on generics imported from India. While the total trade value may be under $10 billion, disruption affects the majority of prescriptions, potentially raising prices significantly. Companies may eventually source alternatives over three to four months, but the immediate effect is inflationary.'Indian exports will suffer, but we need to consider whether it's better to endure this and use it to push delayed reforms, like diversifying exports, rather than falling into a bad deal. This isn't really about trade; it's about surrendering sovereignty,' Srivastava Srivastava, Trump's broader strategy is political theatre. 'Basically, he wanted to hit China. He couldn't, so he has to show his domestic voters that he is a big man, that a bully can show strength by hitting someone. He couldn't hit China, so let's hit India, that's the only thing.'With China, Trump launched a trade war over the large trade deficit, but Beijing hit back by restricting supplies of critical materials, he noted. 'India hasn't used those levers, which is why Washington expected Delhi to yield immediately.'India's refusal to play a compliant role, unlike Pakistan, frustrates Trump. At the same time, India maintains strategic autonomy, engaging with Russia on defence, limiting deep Chinese investment to marketing and distribution, and managing relations with the US on equal footing. 'We are a big country, big economy, and so we have to have workable, good relations with everyone, without being in anybody's camp,' Srivastava pre-Galwan, Chinese investment has been superficial. 'China doesn't invest in deep manufacturing. They will not supply any technology. They will invest in marketing of cars, garments, two, $5 billion here and there, but we don't want that. So we have to evaluate very carefully,' he says.'We can have targeted strategic relationships, like with Russia for defence, but moving closer to China is complicated. There's the border dispute and a $100 billion trade deficit,' he export-oriented economy, diversified supply chains and robust domestic market allow it to absorb short-term shocks while resisting long-term concessions. 'All we need to do is not enter into any relationship that costs us the medium or long term,' Srivastava takeaway is clear: Trump's tariffs are less about trade and more about leverage. Every tweet, every tariff threat, every demand is a political signal designed to demonstrate strength to domestic voters. 'Every day he abuses us on Twitter. That shows India has entered his mind,' Srivastava response emphasises sovereignty, resilience and strategic foresight. "Trade deal is not a trade deal. It's about bargaining for your sovereignty. And India is not bargaining."
Economic Times
3 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Modi heads to China — a delicate step in the dragon-elephant tango
Synopsis Amidst fragile relations and border tensions, Prime Minister Modi's upcoming visit to China signals a calculated step in geopolitics. Facilitated by a pact at the BRICS summit, the visit, tied to the SCO summit, aims to foster regional stability and address trade imbalances. India navigates complex relationships, balancing engagement with China and continued collaboration with the US. Just a year ago, the idea of Prime Minister Narendra Modi visiting China would have seemed far-fetched. Relations between the two nations were fragile. The border in eastern Ladakh was quiet but tense, with troop disengagement at key friction points still incomplete. Fast forward to 2025, and Modi's upcoming trip to Tianjin feels less like a gamble and more like a calculated step in a complex geopolitical dance. The foundation for this cautious reset was laid last October, when Modi and President Xi Jinping agreed at the BRICS summit that 'disputes and differences would not be allowed to disturb border peace.' That pact has held firm, setting the stage for Modi's visit, official confirmation aside. Meanwhile, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is scheduled to visit India next week to meet NSA Ajit Doval and External Affairs Minister S. visit is officially tied to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, a 10-member Eurasian security grouping led by China and Russia, often seen as a counterweight to NATO. Modi's last trip to China, in 2018, was also SCO-related. India's position in the SCO is unique, it refrains from endorsing projects like the Belt and Road Initiative and keeps its distance from China-centric economic roadmaps. Yet the SCO serves India's interests, from counterterrorism in Afghanistan to promoting connectivity that respects sovereignty and strengthening ties with Central Asia. Modi has used the SCO Heads of State Council meetings to spotlight cross-border terrorism, without directly naming Pakistan. The forum has also become a neutral space for India and China to engage after tensions spiked in 2020's Galwan clash. The so-called 'Moscow Consensus,' reached months after Galwan during an SCO foreign ministers' meeting, is a clear example. President Xi's participation in the 2023 SCO summit Modi hosted virtually further cemented the platform's hasn't attended every SCO summit. He skipped the Kazakhstan meeting last year. This trip signals recognition of the Tianjin summit's importance to China and the global stage. It's not just about bilateral ties, it's about maintaining a steady hand in regional geopolitics and securing support for India's upcoming BRICS policy has occasionally complicated India's external engagements, but the India-China thaw started long before trade tensions hit. Agreements to end the military standoff in eastern Ladakh were reached before the US elections. Modi's China visit conveys a clear message: India is ready for a functional relationship with Beijing, as long as border stability is preserved.'When NSA Doval visited China last December, both sides agreed to maintain peace on the ground so that 'issues on the border do not hold back the normal development of bilateral relations,'' the reports note. India has maintained this balance despite China's military ties with Pakistan or tensions in the South China Modi-Xi meeting could include announcements like resuming direct flights and rebuilding trust in trade, investment, and technology. India hopes China will ease trade restrictions and increase imports to reduce the $100 billion trade deficit. China, for its part, seeks a transparent, non-discriminatory environment for its companies.'The dragon-elephant tango may have just started, but in these circumstances, it will remain accident-prone,' analysts say, recalling highs and lows, from the early Modi years to Doklam, informal summits, and Galwan. Modi's recent remark, endorsed by Beijing, that 'competition should not be allowed to turn into conflict,' signals the cautious approach both sides are aiming visit doesn't mean India is abandoning the US. Modi has met Xi at previous SCO summits without affecting India's strategic autonomy. Today, attention is heightened because of US-India trade tensions, including tariffs on Indian oil imports from Russia. Yet India continues to pursue defence, technology, and energy collaboration with the China visit asserts India's position against unilateralism while keeping the door open with America. A potential resolution in Ukraine could also ease some tariff will closely monitor three issues: The US's continued commitment to the Indo-Pacific amid potential trade concessions with China, particularly as India hosts the upcoming Quad summit in November. Counterterrorism cooperation, which may be affected by the US recalibrating its Pakistan policy. The proposed H-1B visa overhaul, which could impact Indian professionals in IT and healthcare, potentially straining people-to-people and economic ties. These challenges will test India's diplomatic finesse and its ability to balance competing global priorities. With inputs from TOI
