Next Chernobyl? Experts warn Soviet-era nuclear plant at Armenia could explode at any moment
Experts Warn the Metsamor Nuclear Plant Could Become Another Chernobyl
Live Events
Earthquake Risk: Why Metsamor's Location Raises Red Flags
Experts Say Armenia's Nuclear Plant Is a Ticking Time Bomb
Calls Grow for EU and US Action to Prevent a Nuclear Disaster
FAQs
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
A Soviet-era nuclear power plant, which is located in one of the world's most earthquake-prone regions, is being called a "ticking time bomb" and a potential " Chernobyl in waiting" by experts, because they have raised concerns about its safety, as reported by the Daily Mail.The Armenian Nuclear Power Plant, which is located near the town of Metsamor and is 22 miles from Armenia's capital, Yerevan, at present supplies about 40% of the country's electricity, according to the Daily Mail report. Built in 1976 using Soviet-era technology, it has long been seen as controversial due to its location directly within a seismic zone, as per the Daily Mail report.Author Peter Marko Tase, who is an expert on the Southern Caucasus region, pointed out that "Chernobyl in waiting" "is a fact," as quoted in the report. He explained that, "Due to Armenia's lack of economic resources and the reactor's precarious structure, we can ascertain that such a nuclear reactor is an explosive that could go off at any moment," as quoted in the report. He emphasised that "it would have similar effects to the Chernobyl meltdown," as quoted by the Daily Mail.Tase also pointed out that, "Soil contamination, water quality degradation, and massive air pollution will be looming over the skies of Europe for at least a decade, in the tragic case of a meltdown," as quoted in the report.ALSO READ: Micheal Ward charged with rape and sexual assault: Top Boy actor denies allegations He highlighted that, "The plant is located in a region with high seismic activity. Its precarious operational activity represents a high risk of nuclear contamination. It is Europe's largest radioactive powerhouse in the event of an explosion," as quoted by the Daily Mail.The plant has a troubled history; after the deadly Spitak Earthquake in 1988, the facility was shut down for six years, only to resume operations in 1995, despite growing international concern, reported the Daily Mail.Tase pointed out that, "During the second half of 1980s, the Soviet Union regime decided to shut down this facility, but unfortunately this decision was never implemented. It represents an imminent danger for Europe and Southern Caucasus nations," as quoted in the report.ALSO READ: Love Island UK 2025: When is the final, how to Vote, and what can fans expect? Warnings came even before the plan reopened; as per an archived Washington Post article from 1995, Viktoria Ter-Nikogossian, an adviser to the Armenian parliament's environmental committee, had called the reopening "very, very scary," as per the Daily Mail report. She had pointed out at that time, "This nuclear plant can never be safe to run, and an accident would mean the end of Armenia," as quoted by the Daily Mail report.The Washington Post article also quoted Morris Rosen of the International Atomic Energy Agency, who had said at that time the plant's design was "clearly deficient," adding, "You would never build a plant in that area, that's for sure, with what's known now," as quoted by the Daily Mail.Meanwhile, Tase, who had authored hundreds of articles about the region and studied it for 15 years, has urged that it's time for the US and Europe to step in, as reported by The Daily Mail.He said, "The EU and the US must take immediate actions to secure the reactor's physical structure, and work diligently to shut down this ticking nuclear time bomb in a timely manner," adding, "Metsamor might be the most serious threat to global security and stability, and key players must act now," as quoted by the Daily Mail.Yes, but only one of its original two reactors is currently active, as per the Daily Mail report.Experts have pointed out that due to the reactor's precarious structure, the nuclear reactor is an explosive that could go off at any moment, similar in scale to Chernobyl, as per the Daily Mail report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
10 hours ago
- Mint
A Dutchmans Life Shows Russias Path Not Taken
Derk Sauer, a communist turned journalist, turned capitalist entrepreneur, died this week at 72 after a sailing accident. If you aren't Dutch or haven't been heavily involved with Russia over the last three decades, then you probably haven't heard of him. But he was a hugely important figure for independent Russian media and a man who shaped hundreds of lives if not more, including my own. His is a story that very sadly encapsulates the road that wasn't traveled in post-Soviet Moscow, either by the West in the 1990s, when it mattered most, or by President Vladimir Putin since. When the Soviet Union collapsed, shock therapy — a big bang approach to privatization and ending price controls and other constraints on the market — was prescribed. The idea was for the free market to build a new economy from the rubble of the old. Technology and knowledge transfer from the West would be key. McDonald's Corp. arrived early. Energy majors including ExxonMobil Corp. and BP Plc moved in, hoping to develop neglected and new oil and gas fields. Car manufacturers from General Motors Co. to Mercedes-Benz Group AG were lured by the prospect of selling modern vehicles to those used to having to repair a new Lada before they could drive it. But Moscow also became a kind of Klondike for small-time Western would-be entrepreneurs. Many were carpetbaggers in search of a quick buck. They had the ethics of the Russian oligarchs and criminals with whom they worked to set up anything from casinos to gyms. They came and went with the money. Even blue-chip names like the Harvard Institute for International Development became mired in corruption scandals and left in disgrace. In the end, too little of worth was built. What worked for Poland didn't for Russia, and the result, famously, was a massive transfer of wealth into the hands of a few Russian oligarchs. The economy shrank by almost 15% in 1992 alone. Life expectancy for men fell from to 59 years in 1993 from 64 just three years earlier. Yet this familiar horror show doesn't tell the whole story. Some value was built in the 1990s. When it came to fostering a professional, independent Russian media — a key component in any functioning market democracy — Sauer made a massive contribution. He showed what was possible and what it took to succeed. Sauer arrived before the Soviet collapse to launch a glossy English-language monthly for the Dutch publishing company VNU. As more became possible after 1991, he saw a market for a full-service daily Moscow newspaper, modeled on the Paris-based International Herald Tribune. When VNU didn't buy in, he found investors and started The Moscow Times. He didn't do the usual with such expatriate newspapers, hiring a few low-paid reporters to add some local color to a daily collection of wire stories. Instead, he invested in hiring a sizable team — including myself and older, more experienced hands, including from the IHT and The Washington Post. He used these to train and edit a larger group of young reporters from Russia and abroad. By the time I left after several years as editor in 1997, we had some 60 journalists and editors publishing 32 to 40 pages a day. But this expat-led publishing business soon became a sideshow. Sauer's holding company, Independent Media, expanded to publish Russian editions of a whole range of magazines, from Cosmopolitan and Vogue to Playboy. When an early effort at a Russian-language business newspaper fizzled, he pulled in the Financial Times and Wall Street Journal to create Vedomosti, which quickly became the country's most respected and genuinely independent daily. Nobody, of course, was immune from the wildness of a market that had been liberalized without regulations or institutions in place to create a level playing field. It was a jungle that served mainly the ruthless and the connected. As the money rolled in, Sauer also had to acquire a form of protection, selling a 10% stake in his company to an oligarch. But when either the Kremlin or Russian investors pressured him to shut down coverage that would embarrass them — including access for cash and transfer pricing scandals, respectively — he checked the reporting and let us print. Most important was that he and his family stayed, committing to what they were building. When the first opportunity came to cash out, some co-investors in Independent Media took the money and left. Sauer didn't. He remained even as the market became more difficult and the tolerance of a free press that allowed his stable of newspapers and magazines to thrive began to disappear. After eventually selling the company in 2005, Sauer went on to work with RBC, a Russian news outlet that sought the independence and quality he had come to represent. When The Moscow Times withered in 2017, he bought it back to keep it alive, albeit online and in a much-slimmed form. Increasingly under political pressure, he left RBC and then, in 2022, the country. He helped The Moscow Times and other exiled independent Russian outlets, such as the TV channel Dozhd , to relocate to the Baltic States and Netherlands, as they too had to flee. They continue to write and broadcast for Russians on issues such as the war in Ukraine in ways no domestically based media can. What might have been if more Western businesspeople had come to Russia not to join the pillaging that in many cases passed for investment, but to actually build something? Or had lived by the rules of a regulated free-market democracy, the way Sauer did for journalism? If Western governments had tried harder and risked more? Or if international financial institutions had offered something better suited to Russia than shock therapy? And what if Putin and his vertical power system hadn't made fact-based journalism impossible? If the Kremlin had focused on developing a strong, diversified domestic economy, instead of carving up the nation's resources among friends and looking for expansion and glory at the expense of Russia's neighbors? Those are unanswerable questions, and by now, academic. Perhaps there will be another chance, another Moscow opening, forced by a future, younger generation of Russians at a time when the West has grown wiser and less arrogant. All that's clear to me today, though, is that Russia would be a richer, freer, less aggressive and less paranoid nation had it remained open to people like Derk Sauer, rather than force him out with the ecosystem he did so much to foster. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Marc Champion is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe, Russia and the Middle East. He was previously Istanbul bureau chief for the Wall Street Journal.
Indian Express
12 hours ago
- Indian Express
Who is Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian President making headlines again?
Once hailed as a modernising reformer, Dmitry Medvedev, Russia's former president and current deputy head of the Security Council, has reemerged as one of the Kremlin's most provocative voices, escalating tensions with the West through increasingly aggressive statements. This week, Medvedev's threats prompted US President Donald Trump to take a dramatic step: repositioning two US nuclear submarines to unspecified regions. 'Based on the highly provocative statements,' Trump said on Friday, according to The Moscow Times, 'I have ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' In a Telegram post on Thursday, Medvedev made ominous references to Russia's Cold War-era 'Dead Hand' nuclear launch system, warning Trump to 'picture The Walking Dead,' a popular post-apocalyptic TV show. His latest remarks came after Trump threatened to impose new sanctions unless Russia agreed to a ceasefire in Ukraine , a demand the Kremlin has all but dismissed. Medvedev responded by accusing Washington of pushing the two nuclear-armed nations toward conflict. These are not isolated incidents. In June, following US airstrikes on nuclear-linked sites in Iran, Medvedev raised the idea that 'a number of countries' were ready to supply Tehran with nuclear warheads. Trump, angered by what he saw as casual nuclear bluffing, warned publicly against such escalations. Once seen as a technocrat open to global engagement, Medvedev, a trained lawyer with no KGB background, now operates as a loyal attack dog for the Kremlin. Medvedev's recent behaviour stands in stark contrast to the man who, as president from 2008 to 2012, once stood beside Barack Obama and spoke of joint global leadership, reported CNN. 'The solution of many world problems depends on the joint will of the United States and Russia,' he said at the time. According to CNN, Medvedev's presidency was widely viewed as a placeholder for Vladimir Putin, who returned to the post in 2012. Medvedev later admitted, 'They often tell me, 'You're a liberal.' I can tell you frankly: I have never had liberal convictions.' Following his demotion to prime minister and then deputy chair of the Security Council, Medvedev now regularly delivers hardline outbursts on social media. Medvedev's pivot has been especially sharp in the wake of Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. He has dismissed Ukrainian leaders as 'cockroaches breeding in a jar,' as per CNN, attacked Western officials as 'bastards and degenerates,' and mocked US politics. In a speech earlier this year, he showed a graphic depicting Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as Muppets, using the moment to call for the 'destruction of the Kyiv neo-Nazi regime.' However, not everyone is taking Medvedev's threats at face value. Commenting on this week's flare-up, Anatol Lieven of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft called both Medvedev's remarks and Trump's response 'pure theatrics.' 'Having refrained from the use of nuclear weapons over the past three years, Russia is obviously not going to launch them in response to a new round of US sanctions,' he said, as per CNN. (With inputs from The Moscow Times, CNN)
Time of India
13 hours ago
- Time of India
Wild history of jailed Kazakh ex-Premier's $3 mn mansion makes it a tough sell in a soft market
The bureaucrats at Kazakhstan 's state asset management company are facing a task that's as unusual as it's near impossible: selling a villa of the highest luxury. The 2,878-square-meter (30,980-square-foot) house in the swankiest corner of the capital, Astana , flaunts over-the-top features that have become a hallmark of luxury properties around the world: A pool with a unique water feature, a dance club and a theater in addition to 30 rooms that include sleeping quarters with a rare four-person bed. And it was once owned by Karim Massimov , the nation's longest-serving prime minister who is now doing jail time for an attempted coup. But even at $3 million, a 40% discount from its one-time valuation, the weight of recent Kazakh history is making it a very difficult sell. An auction was cancelled in May — the third attempt at a sale just this year — and the state asset company is now contemplating how to finally remove the property from its balance sheet. Attracting luxury buyers to a city that, despite Kazakhstan's vast resources wealth, hasn't yet developed a reputation as a playground for billionaires, was always going to be a challenge. The highest echelon of the wealth pyramid is small in the country of 20 million and the richest Kazakhs are reluctant to invest in a market that's stalled. The villa's lineage may be thinning the potential market even further. Live Events 'It will be very difficult to sell the house openly as everyone would know who bought it,' said Eldar Shamsutdinov, head of the Almaty-based think tank Kommentariy. It is also 'irrational to freeze so much money in property. The Astana residential property market is overheated, the investment attractiveness has dropped, the pace of prices growth has slowed. Demand for multimillion properties is almost fully satisfied.' Shining City on the Steppe How the mansion's story is affecting the sales process is a reflection of Astana's evolution as the capital of a newly independent nation, erected to flaunt its energy wealth and as an ode to its ruler. The second-largest former Soviet republic after Russia quickly raced ahead of its neighbors to build central Asia's richest economy, thanks to its energy exports. Nursultan Nazarbayev, who ruled the nation for almost 30 years after independence, envisioned a glimmering city rising dramatically from the Great Dala — the Kazakh steppe — in the middle of the country. In almost every way, it would serve as a contrast to the old capital, Almaty, nestled in the southern mountains near the borders with China and Kyrgyzstan. The location was chosen strategically to expand the central government's footprint in the country's north, where many of the Russian minority live and ties with Moscow are the strongest. Nazarbayev was intricately involved in the planning and in the early stages of development was known to sketch his dream skyline on napkins. The city is peppered with buildings designed by international architects, following the leader's concepts. Around the wide, wind-swept boulevards, the eclectic highlights include an entertainment complex shaped like a tent (credited to Norman Foster), a circus that looks like flying saucer and high rises that seek to bring in folklore aesthetic. The city was renamed Nur-Sultan to honor the former leader by Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, who followed Nazarbayev as president in 2019. That tribute soured after the coup attempt and the city returned to its previous name. 'Astana is the realization of Nazarbayev's personal ambition,' said Dosym Satpayev, the head of the consultancy Risk Assessment Group in Almaty. 'He wanted a larger place in history and considered it to be his brainchild.' A construction boom followed the 1997 move as a metropolis of more than 1.5 million people sprang up in place of what was once a town of about 300,000. By 2008, when the villa was built, the bubble had burst as the global financial crisis clobbered local banks and brought lending growth to an abrupt halt. Kazakhstan eventually needed to restructure billions of dollars worth of debt and spent at least $18 billion to bail out its financial industry. The country's prime minister during that turbulent time was Massimov, who was born in the future capital, then called Tselinograd. With an education that encompassed studies in Chinese, Arabic and economics, he taught at both Wuhan University and Columbia University in New York before a business career that included stints in Beijing and Hong Kong eventually took him to the highest levels of Kazakh banking. As prime minister, Massimov cut a larger-than-life figure. He was known as one of the first in Kazakhstan's political elite to embrace social media and cultivated a network of friendly bloggers. Like some other post-Soviet politicians, Massimov also liked to flaunt his athletic prowess, sometimes spotted swimming or riding a bike in town. And he was also a well-known fixture of the Astana nightlife: A 2008 diplomatic cable released by Wikileaks describes him entertaining a group and dancing on a stage at the upscale club Chocolat, after drinks at the Radisson Hotel's cigar bar. 'Bloody January' After two stints as prime minister, Massimov became the head of Kazakhstan's powerful national security apparatus. It was in that role that he got caught up in the 2022 unrest that became known as 'Bloody January.' The turmoil was the biggest threat to the country's stability since independence and was characterized as a coup attempt by the government. Massimov was arrested as an alleged instigator. In 2023, he was found guilty of high treason and sentenced to 18 years in prison and the confiscation of property. In the aftermath, the state seized Massimov's assets, including the mansion in Astana. According to official filings, ownership of the house was transferred in 2009. The national security committee described the property as a 'gift' from 'a business structure.' When authorities took control, they found $17.2 million in cash, 'elite watches, gold bullions, antiques and much more,' according to a National Security Committee statement at the time. To potential buyers, all that signaled not just a wealthy owner, but someone well connected with powerful allies across different strata of Kazakh society. And as political fortunes ebb and flow, it might be difficult to puzzle out just how a multimillion-dollar wager on such a high-profile property might play out now or in the future. 'People with big money are quite cautious,' said Satpayev at Risk Assessment Group. Without a clear succession plan for the current leadership, they may be 'fearing that there might be revanchism.' Property Roller Coaster For sure, it would be difficult to stay inconspicuous, even though the villa in the posh Karaotkel district remains hidden behind a wall more than two meters (6.6 feet) tall. The area, with its large park, swanky hotel and an upscale tennis center that once hosted Rafael Nadal, is also a symbol of Kazakhstan's growing wealth gap where bureaucrats and business people mingle with the new city's elite. In the end, the state might decide to keep the property and convert it to a different use, like an administrative building or a kindergarten, according to Shamsutdinov at Kommentariy. Through all the political upheaval, Astana's property market bounced back from the lows of the financial crisis, thanks to a series of government measures from mortgage subsidies to a program that redirected retirement savings to real estate. By 2021, the market was showing signs of force as country-wide purchases jumped 97%, according to Halyk Finance research. Geopolitics intervened again as the ripple effects of the Russia sanctions over the invasion of Ukraine sparked a steep decline, only to be followed by a sharp bounce in rental prices as Russians fleeing mobilization swelled the city's population. As of now, used-home prices are heading the other way again, dropping 1.9% this year through May, with nearly 12% inflation and a 16.5% benchmark interest rate cooling demand. Housing has become a particularly sore spot for many Kazakhs. After all the shocks of the past decade, wages are stagnant and unemployment remains stubborn, sapping the property market from much-needed impetus. That dynamic makes selling a lavish and notorious villa an even more daunting proposition.
