Stocks Retreat on Weakness in Chip Makers
The S&P 500 Index ($SPX) (SPY) today is down -1.24%, the Dow Jones Industrials Index ($DOWI) (DIA) is down -0.64%, and the Nasdaq 100 Index ($IUXX) (QQQ) is down -1.98%. June E-mini S&P futures (ESM25) are down -1.25%, and June E-mini Nasdaq futures (NQM25) are down -2.01%.
Stock indexes today are trading lower, weighed down by losses in chip stocks. ASML Holding NV is down more than -6% after reporting that Q1 bookings were below consensus. Also, Nvidia is down more than -7% after the US government barred the sale of its H20 chips to China, with Nvidia saying the ban will cost it $5.5 billion in Q1 tied to inventory and commitments for the chip. Stock losses deepened today after the WTO cut its 2025 global trade estimates.
Today's US economic news was mostly better than expected and was a supportive factor for stocks. Stocks also found some support from a Bloomberg report that said China wants to see a number of steps from the Trump administration before it will agree to trade talks, including showing more respect by reining in disparaging remarks by members of his cabinet.
US MBA mortgage applications fell -8.5% in the week ended April 11, with the purchase mortgage sub-index down -4.8% and the refinancing mortgage sub-index down -12.4%. The average 30-year fixed rate mortgage rose +20 bp to 6.81% from 6.61% in the prior week.
US March retail sales rose +1.4% m/m, right on expectations and March retail sales ex-autos rose +0.5% m/m, stronger than expectations of +0.4% m/m.
US March manufacturing production rose +0.3% m/m, slightly stronger than expectations of +0.2% m/m.
The World Trade Organization (WTO) cut its 2025 global trade forecast to a -0.2% decline from a November forecast of up +3.0% and warned if the US pushes ahead with reciprocal tariffs, global trade will contract -1.5% this year.
Last Friday, President Trump said he would temporarily exempt consumer electronics from reciprocal tariffs and the baseline 10% global tariffs. However, a 20% tariff still applies to electronics shipped from China. Last Wednesday, President Trump announced a 90-day pause on higher reciprocal tariffs on 56 nations but left the new 10% baseline tariff on virtually all nations in place. Meanwhile, the EU last Thursday said it will delay for 90 days the implementation of 25% tariffs on 21 billion euros worth of US goods sent to Europe.
Stocks have been under pressure over the past five weeks due to fears that US tariffs will weaken economic growth and corporate earnings. On March 4, President Trump imposed 25% tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods and doubled the tariff on Chinese goods to 20% from 10%. On April 2, President Trump signed a proclamation to implement a 25% tariff on US auto imports. The tariffs will initially target vehicles fully assembled outside the US and, by May 3, will expand to include automobile parts made outside the US. On April 5, a 10% baseline tariff for virtually all nations took effect. Last Friday, China raised tariffs on all US goods to 125% from 84% in retaliation for the US raising tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%.
The US tariff turmoil has undercut the dollar and boosted gold. The dollar index last Friday sank to a 3-year low, and gold prices soared to an all-time high. The markets are concerned about the effects of US trade policies, which have caused consumer confidence to plummet and have prompted many companies to suspend their capital spending plans, a negative factor for GDP growth. Also, the dollar is facing a confidence crisis as the US weaponizes tariffs, diminishing the dollar's reserve-currency status and prompting some foreign investors to liquidate their dollar assets.
The markets will focus on US trade policy news during this holiday-shortened week. Later today, Fed Chair Powell will speak before the Economic Club of Chicago about the economic outlook. On Thursday, Mar housing starts are expected to fall -5.7% m/m to 1.416 million, and Mar building permits are expected -0.6% m/m to 1.450 million.
The markets are discounting the chances at 19% for a -25 bp rate cut after the May 6-7 FOMC meeting.
Q1 earnings reporting season began last Friday as big US banks reported their results. According to data compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence, the market consensus is for Q1 year-over-year earnings growth of +6.7% for the S&P 500 stocks, down from expectations of +11.1% in early November. Full-year 2025 corporate profits for the S&P 500 are seen rising +9.4%, down from the forecast of +12.5% in early January.
Overseas stock markets today are mixed. The Euro Stoxx 50 is down -0.48%. China's Shanghai Composite rose to a 1-1/2 week high and closed up +0.26%. Japan's Nikkei Stock 225 closed down -1.01%.
Interest Rates
June 10-year T-notes (ZNM2 5) today are up +3 ticks. The 10-year T-note yield is down -1.2 bp to 4.321%. June T-notes today are slightly higher, garnering carryover support from rallies in European government bonds after UK March consumer prices rose less than expected. T-notes also have support from Tuesday when US Deputy Treasury Secretary Faukender said a rule change was under consideration that could lower trading costs for banks, which could boost liquidity in the Treasury market. Gains in T-notes are limited today after US March retail sales rose as expected and March manufacturing production rose more than expected. Also, supply pressures are weighing on T-notes as the Treasury will auction $13 billion of 20-year T-bonds later today.
European bond yields today are moving lower. The 10-year German bund yield fell to a 1-week low of 2.479% and is down -3.3 bp to 2.502%. The 10-year UK gilt yield slid to a 1-week low of 4.571% and is down -4.2 bp to 4.606%.
UK Mar CPI rose 2.6% y/y, weaker than expectations of +2.7% y/y. Mar core CPI rose +3.4% y/y, right on expectations.
Swaps are discounting the chances at 99% for a -25 bp rate cut by the ECB at the April 17 policy meeting.
US Stock Movers
Chip stocks are falling today and are weighing on the broader market. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) is down more than -5% to lead losers in the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100. Nvidia (NVDA) is down more than -5% to lead losers in the Dow Jones Industrials after the US government banned it from selling its H20 chip to China. Also, ASML Holding NV (ASML) is down more than -5% after reporting weaker-than-expected Q1 bookings. Applied Materials (AMAT), Lam Research (LRCX), Marvell Technology (MRVL), and Broadcom (AVGO) are down more than -3%, and ARM Holdings Plc (ARM), KLA Corp (KLAC), Intel (INTC), GlobalFoundries (GFS), and Micron Technology (MU) are down more than -2%.
The Magnificent Seven stocks are falling today and are pressuring the broader market. Apple (AAPL), Meta Platforms (META), Alphabet (GOOGL), Tesla (TSLA), and Microsoft (MSFT) are down more than -2%.
Also, Amazon.com (AMZN) is down more than -1%.
Today's +1% gain in WTI crude oil is lifting energy producers. Marathon Petroleum (MPC) is up more than +3%, and Diamondback Energy (FANG) is up more than +2% to lead gainers in the Nasdaq 100. Also, Devon Energy (DVN), Occidental Petroleum (OXY), and Valero Energy (VLO) are up more than +2%. In addition, Exxon Mobil (XOM), Phillips 66 (PSX), Conoco Phillips (COP), Haliburton (HAL), and Schlumberger (SLB) are up more than +1%.
Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) is down more than -6% after reporting Q1 total net interest income of $770 million, below the consensus of $794.3 million.
JB Hunt Transport Services (JBHT) is down more than -4% after reporting Q1 Final Mile Services revenue of $200.7 million, weaker than the consensus of $220 million.
AGCO Corp (AGCO) is down more than -2% after Morgan Stanley downgraded the stock to underweight from equal weight with a price target of $75.
Omnicom Group (OMC) is down more than -2% after reporting a Q1 operating profit of $452.6 million, weaker than the consensus of $485.1 million.
Travelers Cos (TRV) is up more than 3% to lead gainers in the Dow Jones industrials after reporting Q1 core EPS of $1.91, well above the consensus of 74 cents.
Autoliv (ALV) is up more than +5% after reporting Q1 adjusted EPS of $2.15, well above the consensus of $1.65.
Newmont (NEM) is up more than +3% after BMO Capital Markets reinstated coverage on the stock with a recommendation of outperform with a price target of $63.
Lockheed Martin (LMT) is up more than +1% after Morgan Stanley upgraded the stock to overweight from equal weight with a price target of $575.
Earnings Reports (4/16/2025)
Abbott Laboratories (ABT), Alcoa Corp (AA), Bank OZK (OZK), Citizens Financial Group Inc (CFG), Commerce Bancshares Inc/MO (CBSH), CSX Corp (CSX), First Horizon Corp (FHN), First Industrial Realty Trust (FR), FNB Corp/PA (FNB), Kinder Morgan Inc (KMI), Progressive Corp/The (PGR), Prologis Inc (PLD), Rexford Industrial Realty Inc (REXR), Synovus Financial Corp (SNV), Travelers Cos Inc/The (TRV), US Bancorp (USB).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Should You Invest $1,000 in Taiwan Semiconductor Stock Today?
During the month of May, stocks started exhibiting some much-needed resilience. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite indexes rose by 5% and 8%, respectively. After bearing the brunt of precipitous sell-offs early this year, semiconductor stocks have started to stage a comeback. Last month, shares of Nvidia and Broadcom climbed by more than 20%, while Advanced Micro Devices surged by roughly 15%. Lagging behind the usual suspects, however, was Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM). While the stock's 12% gains beat the broader market, they still trail the chip industry's leading names. Below, I'll delve into why Taiwan Semi looks like a great buy right now. From there, I'll illustrate how a $1,000 investment could wind up being a multibagger for patient, disciplined investors. A hidden gem in a sea of semiconductor stocks Nvidia and AMD design chipsets known as graphics processing units (GPU). GPUs have the capability to run sophisticated calculations at fast speeds, which gives them an edge over traditional compute processes when it comes to developing generative AI applications. Cloud hyperscalers such as Microsoft, Alphabet, and Amazon, as well as big tech giants Meta Platforms and Oracle, have been buying GPUs in droves over the last few years in an effort to build out data centers and infrastructure services. While the robust demand for chips directly benefits Nvidia and AMD, Taiwan Semi has been an indirect beneficiary of these tailwinds. The reason? Because Taiwan Semi specializes in foundry services that actually manufacture the chip designs from Nvidia, AMD, and many others. In other words, the largest data center businesses in the world rely heavily on Taiwan Semi's fabrication business. Taiwan Semi is positioned for monster growth In the chart below, I've illustrated Taiwan Semi's revenue, gross profit, and net income over the last three years. As the slopes of the lines indicate, TSMC's sales and profitability profile are both steepening. TSM Revenue (TTM) data by YCharts To me, this signals two things. First, demand for chips is on the rise -- hence the revenue line is rising. However, the more lucrative trend is that gross margin and net income are accelerating in parallel with sales. This suggests that Taiwan Semi has achieved a fair degree of pricing power relative to competitors such as Intel. Considering AI infrastructure spend is expected to eclipse multiple trillions over the next five years, I don't see Taiwan Semi's growth prospects decelerating anytime soon. Should you invest $1,000 in TSMC stock? It's worth noting that technology investors Cathie Wood and Stanley Druckenmiller each recently added Taiwan Semi stock to their firms' respective portfolios. While blindly following institutional capital flows isn't necessarily a prudent strategy, I do think TSMC's long-term prospects earn some more credibility thanks to the recent buys by such prominent investors. In the chart below, I've illustrated how a $1,000 investment in Taiwan Semi stock 10 years ago is now worth approximately $8,500. Achieving almost a tenfold return in 10 years is impressive -- even for a growth stock. TSM data by YCharts There are a couple of important ideas to take away from the chart above. First, the trends clearly show that like many of its peers, TSMC stock has kicked into a new gear over the last couple of years thanks to a bullish AI narrative. Hence, the share price gains following the sell-off in 2022 appear overly pronounced. Here's the thing, though: Had you invested $1,000 in Taiwan Semi stock on Nov. 30, 2022 (the day ChatGPT was commercially launched), you would have doubled your money. This underscores the idea that holding on to a stock for long-term periods (i.e. 10 years or more) can lead to outsized gains compared to shorter-term, volatile periods. I think now is a great time to invest $1,000 in Taiwan Semi stock. The company's future growth prospects are arguably far more robust than they were 10 years ago, making now an interesting time to begin accumulating shares for a long-run position. Should you invest $1,000 in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing right now? Before you buy stock in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adam Spatacco has positions in Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, Oracle, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump's tariffs could pay for his tax cuts — but it likely wouldn't be much of a bargain
WASHINGTON (AP) — The tax cuts in President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act would likely gouge a hole in the federal budget. The president has a patch handy, though: his sweeping import taxes — tariffs. The Congressional Budget Office, the government's nonpartisan arbiter of tax and spending matters, says the One Big Beautiful Bill, passed by the House last month and now under consideration in the Senate, would increase federal budget deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. That is because its tax cuts would drain the government's coffers faster than its spending cuts would save money. By bringing in revenue for the Treasury, on the other hand, the tariffs that Trump announced through May 13 — including his so-called reciprocal levies of up to 50% on countries with which the United States has a trade deficit — would offset the budget impact of the tax-cut bill and reduce deficits over the next decade by $2.5 trillion. So it's basically a wash. That's the budget math anyway. The real answer is more complicated. Actually using tariffs to finance a big chunk of the federal government would be a painful and perilous undertaking, budget wonks say. 'It's a very dangerous way to try to raise revenue,' said Kent Smetters of the University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model, who served in President George W. Bush's Treasury Department. Trump has long advocated tariffs as an economic elixir. He says they can protect American industries, bring factories back to the United States, give him leverage to win concessions over foreign governments — and raise a lot of money. He's even suggested that they could replace the federal income tax, which now brings in about half of federal revenue. 'It's possible we'll do a complete tax cut,'' he told reporters in April. 'I think the tariffs will be enough to cut all of the income tax.'' Economists and budget analysts do not share the president's enthusiasm for using tariffs to finance the government or to replace other taxes. 'It's a really bad trade,'' said Erica York, the Tax Foundation's vice president of federal tax policy. 'It's perhaps the dumbest tax reform you could design.'' For one thing, Trump's tariffs are an unstable source of revenue. He bypassed Congress and imposed his biggest import tax hikes through executive orders. That means a future president could simply reverse them. 'Or political whims in Congress could change, and they could decide, 'Hey, we're going revoke this authority because we don't think it's a good thing that the president can just unilaterally impose a $2 trillion tax hike,' '' York said. Or the courts could kill his tariffs before Congress or future presidents do. A federal court in New York has already struck down the centerpiece of his tariff program — the reciprocal and other levies he announced on what he called 'Liberation Day'' April 2 — saying he'd overstepped his authority. An appeals court has allowed the government to keep collecting the levies while the legal challenge winds its way through the court system. Economists also say that tariffs damage the economy. They are a tax on foreign products, paid by importers in the United States and usually passed along to their customers via higher prices. They raise costs for U.S. manufacturers that rely on imported raw materials, components and equipment, making them less competitive than foreign rivals that don't have to pay Trump's tariffs. Tariffs also invite retaliatory taxes on U.S. exports by foreign countries. Indeed, the European Union this week threatened 'countermeasures'' against Trump's unexpected move to raise his tariff on foreign steel and aluminum to 50%. 'You're not just getting the effect of a tax on the U.S. economy,' York said. 'You're also getting the effect of foreign taxes on U.S. exports.'' She said the tariffs will basically wipe out all economic benefits from the One Big Beautiful Bill's tax cuts. Smetters at the Penn Wharton Budget Model said that tariffs also isolate the United States and discourage foreigners from investing in its economy. Foreigners see U.S. Treasurys as a super-safe investment and now own about 30% of the federal government's debt. If they cut back, the federal government would have to pay higher interest rates on Treasury debt to attract a smaller number of potential investors domestically. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Higher borrowing costs and reduced investment would wallop the economy, making tariffs the most economically destructive tax available, Smetters said — more than twice as costly in reduced economic growth and wages as what he sees as the next-most damaging: the tax on corporate earnings. Tariffs also hit the poor hardest. They end up being a tax on consumers, and the poor spend more of their income than wealthier people do. Even without the tariffs, the One Big Beautiful Bill slams the poorest because it makes deep cuts to federal food programs and to Medicaid, which provides health care to low-income Americans. After the bill's tax and spending cuts, an analysis by the Penn Wharton Budget Model found, the poorest fifth of American households earning less than $17,000 a year would see their incomes drop by $820 next year. The richest 0.1% earning more than $4.3 million a year would come out ahead by $390,070 in 2026. 'If you layer a regressive tax increase like tariffs on top of that, you make a lot of low- and middle-income households substantially worse off,'' said the Tax Foundation's York. Overall, she said, tariffs are 'a very unreliable source of revenue for the legal reasons, the political reasons as well as the economic reasons. They're a very, very inefficient way to raise revenue. If you raise a dollar of a revenue with tariffs, that's going to cause a lot more economic harm than raising revenue any other way.''
Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Bank of Canada's head says rate pause a result of ‘shock-prone' world
Tiff Macklem is wearing an Edmonton Oilers pin as he reflects on coming very close to beating big odds. It's a significant day for the governor of the Bank of Canada: he's just laid out his reasons to the entire country and a global audience for keeping the central bank's benchmark interest rate steady for a second straight time. That night is also Game 1 of the NHL's Stanley Cup finals; Macklem ends his press conference with a hearty 'Go Oilers!' It's a rematch from last year's heartbreak, when the Oilers came oh-so-close to mounting a seemingly impossible four-game comeback against the Florida Panthers, only to fall short by a single goal in Game 7. Macklem, too, was almost safe to declare victory last year. He had just about secured a coveted 'soft landing' for Canada's economy — a rare feat that sees restrictive monetary policy bring down surging levels of inflation without tipping the economy into a prolonged downturn. Story continues below advertisement 'We got inflation down. We didn't cause a recession,' Macklem said in an interview with The Canadian Press after the rate announcement Wednesday. 'And, to be frank, until President (Donald) Trump started threatening the economy with new tariffs, we were actually seeing growth pick up.' Fresh out of one crisis, the central bank now must contend with another in U.S. tariffs. 1:28 Doug Ford blames Trump, interest rates for Canada's stagnant housing market Five years into his tenure as head of the Bank of Canada, Macklem said he sees the central bank's role in stickhandling the economy — as well as Canada's role on the world stage — evolving. Many Canadians have become more familiar with the Bank of Canada in recent years. After the COVID-19 pandemic recovery ignited inflation, the central bank's rapid tightening cycle and subsequent rate cuts were top-line news for anxious Canadians stressed about rising prices and borrowing costs. Story continues below advertisement That was all in pursuit of meeting the central bank's inflation target of two per cent, part of a mandate from the federal government that's up for review next year. Get weekly money news Get expert insights, Q&A on markets, housing, inflation, and personal finance information delivered to you every Saturday. Sign up for weekly money newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Macklem said the past few years have led the Bank of Canada to scrutinize some of its metrics, like core inflation and how it responds to supply shocks in the economy. But he defends keeping the bank's inflation target, particularly at a time of global upheaval. 'Our flexible inflation targeting framework has just been through the biggest test it's ever had in the 30 years since we announced the inflation target,' he said. 'I'm not going to pretend it's been an easy few years for anybody. But I think the framework has performed well.' Macklem said, however, that he sees room to build out the mandate to address other areas of concern from Canadians, such as housing affordability. Whether it's the high cost of rent or a mortgage, or surging prices for groceries and vehicles, Macklem said the past few years have been eye-opening to Canadians who weren't around the last time inflation hit double digits in the 1980s. 'Unfortunately, a whole new generation of Canadians now know what inflation feels like, and they didn't like it one bit,' he said. Story continues below advertisement Monetary policy itself can't make homes more affordable, he noted — in a nutshell, high interest rates make mortgages more expensive while low rates can push up the price of housing itself because they stoke demand. But Macklem said one of the things he's reflecting on is that inflation can get worse when the economy isn't operating at its potential or when it's facing great disruption. 'There is a role for monetary policy to smooth out some of that adjustment — support the economy while ensuring that inflation is well-controlled.' He didn't offer suggestions on how the mandate might expand to address housing affordability specifically, but said 'the work is ongoing' and will be settled in meetings with the federal government next year. Right now, he's trying to make sure that the economic impacts from Canada's tariff dispute with the United States don't result in prolonged inflation. The Bank of Canada is not alone in debating how monetary policy ought to respond in what Macklem called a more 'shock-prone' world. The G7 Finance Ministers' Summit in Kananaskis, Alta., last month also featured roundtables with the bloc's central bankers. Conversations at the summit were 'candid,' Macklem said, and though the nations issued a joint statement at the close of the event, that doesn't mean they agreed on everything. Story continues below advertisement 'International co-operation, to be honest, has never been easy. It is particularly difficult right now, but that doesn't make it less important. That makes it more important,' he said. 'I do think Canada, as the chair of the G7, has a leadership role to play.' 2:56 Carney's government tables 'One Canadian Economy' bill to eliminate internal trade barriers The Bank of Canada is also changing the way it has conversations with Canadians and the kind of data it considers. A day after the June interest rate decision, deputy governor Sharon Kozicki told a Toronto business crowd how the central bank is using data more nimbly, relying heavily on surveys and more granular information to make monetary policy decisions in an uncertain time. These sources offer a faster way to see what's happening on the ground in the economy than traditional statistical models allow. Story continues below advertisement Macklem said the central bank would previously have dismissed most supply shocks as transitory — likely to pass without the need for central bank adjustments, such as rising and falling oil prices. But he said the Bank of Canada needs to be running a more 'nuanced playbook' now to respond to some increasingly common shocks: supply chain disruptions, trade conflicts and extreme weather to name a few. An overheating economy running up against a supply disruption is the kind of inflationary fire Macklem is trying to avoid in this latest crisis. 'The economy does not work well when inflation is high,' he said. 'And the primary role of the Bank of Canada is to ensure that Canadians maintain confidence in price stability. That's all we can do for the Canadian economy. That's what we can do for Canadians. And that's what we're focused on.' Later in the day on Wednesday, the Edmonton Oilers took Game 1 of the Stanley Cup finals. The Canadian team was down but roared back to win 4-3 in overtime. It's still early in the Bank of Canada's response to the latest global shock. But with any luck, Macklem's team might also get a leg up with lessons learned the last time they faced big odds.
