logo
Senate Republicans block attempt to roll back massive tax hike on professional gamblers

Senate Republicans block attempt to roll back massive tax hike on professional gamblers

Yahooa day ago
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked an attempt to reverse a little-noticed provision from their tax and spending cuts law that professional gamblers warn could be the end of their industry.
Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada sought unanimous passage of a bill that would roll back the change on gambling tax deductions, but Republican Sen. Todd Young of Indiana objected, stalling the proposal for now.
The emerging fight over the gambling provision is likely only the beginning of the fallout from the new tax law and its impact on the country. Spanning more than 900 pages, the bill signed into law by President Donald Trump last week contained a slew of provisions changing federal programs and the tax code, many of which lawmakers admit they are only now beginning to fully digest.
'My understanding is many Republicans, many Democrats did not even know it was part of that process,' Cortez Masto said of the gambling provision.
Under the new tax law, starting in 2026, individuals can only deduct 90% of their gambling losses up to the amount of their winnings. That's a change from the previous rule, which allowed gamblers to deduct 100% of their losses, up to the amount they won.
The change will only significantly impact those who gamble larger amounts and who take the extra steps to itemize and deduct their losses. But for those individuals, the impact could be steep.
In practice, for example, under the old rule, someone who wins $100,000 and loses $100,000 could deduct the full $100,000 in losses and owe nothing. Under the new rule, they would only be able to deduct $90,000 and would still owe taxes on the remaining $10,000, despite having lost all their winnings.
'This new amendment to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would end professional gambling in the U.S. and hurt casual gamblers, too,' Phil Galfond, a professional poker player, said on social media just days ahead of the bill's final passage.
The provision was included in the bill's text released on June 16 by Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo. Some senators have said they weren't aware of the provision, and it only publicly came to light days ahead of the bill's passage, with professional gamblers and media figures drawing attention to it.
'Now I see Republican senators walking all over the Capitol saying they didn't even know anything about this policy," said Sen. Ron Wyden, the top-ranking Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee.
'The fact is, when you rush a process like this, this way, and cram in all of these policies that you haven't really thought about, you risk consequences for people back home. That is what is going on here,' Wyden. said
The provision is estimated to generate over $1.1 billion in tax revenue over eight years. The entirety of the tax break and spending cuts bill will increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
Republicans say it was a necessary procedural change tied to the reconciliation process, which allowed them to pass the sweeping bill without Democratic support.
Young, the Indiana Republican who objected to Cortez Masto's bill, said he supports the policy but would only agree to undo it if Democrats accepted other provisions in return.
'I strongly support the underlying bill, but will have to object unless you can agree to my request,' Young said on the Senate floor.
Thursday's attempt by Cortez Masto won't be the last. On Wednesday, she introduced a bill that will first have to go through committee, but has bipartisan support, to restore the full gambling deduction. In the House, Nevada Democratic Rep. Dina Titus has also introduced a bill attempting to return to the previous standard.
___
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Dave Ramsey Follower Pushes Back On His 15-Year Mortgage Rule. With Today's Housing Prices, He Says It's Just Not Reasonable
A Dave Ramsey Follower Pushes Back On His 15-Year Mortgage Rule. With Today's Housing Prices, He Says It's Just Not Reasonable

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A Dave Ramsey Follower Pushes Back On His 15-Year Mortgage Rule. With Today's Housing Prices, He Says It's Just Not Reasonable

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. A longtime Dave Ramsey follower is questioning one of the personal finance personality's golden rules: the 15-year fixed mortgage. 'I know Dave is for 15-year fixed rate mortgages, but in this day in time I find that to be unreasonable with housing prices,' the original poster wrote in a Reddit thread recently. The poster, who lives in a small town in South Georgia, said homes are going for $250,000 or more, with even trailers pushing into the $200,000 range. On a $67,350 salary, he asked if it was more realistic to aim for 30% of take-home pay on a mortgage instead of Ramsey's recommended 25%. Don't Miss: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's , starting today. $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. That seemed to touch a nerve in some Redditors. 'The math is still the math,' one commenter responded. 'The rules he provides are to ensure that you waste the least amount of wealth-building potential on bank interest.' Others agreed that while the 25% rule is wise in theory, it doesn't always line up with reality in today's market. '25% is not a hard line but rather a guide,' one user shared. 'They just caution you the further you go above that line, the harder it becomes to reach your financial goals.' Many said they opted for 30-year loans but made extra principal payments to shorten the term. One wrote, 'I have a 30-year but add extra to the principal each month, which basically turns it into a 10-year.' Trending: It's no wonder Jeff Bezos holds over $250 million in art — Another said they refinanced from a 30-year to a 25-year, then to a 20-year, and are now on track to pay the house off in 13 years. "Not the optimal path, but it worked for us," they added. Some noted that financial flexibility is key. "I didn't really pay attention to the percentage of my income because I have a budget and knew what I could afford," one person commented. Plenty of Redditors expressed frustration with the idea that everyone can realistically follow Ramsey's guidelines. 'To get my payment under $1,000, I would need a down payment of $220,000, or 12 years of saving,' one person calculated. 'We are screwed in the new generation. I did what I was supposed to do... and yet I will be stuck renting my whole life with roommates.' Another said they make $68,000 a year in a lower-cost state and still couldn't find a house under $300,000. 'I have given up on ever affording a home and I am OK with my several roommates and renting.'Several people pushed back against the idea that renting is a waste. 'Rent equals the most you'll pay that year. Period. Something breaks, the landlord covers it,' one said. With a house, you're on the hook for everything—tax increases, repairs, insurance, closing costs. Despite the criticism, many commenters said Ramsey's overall philosophy of living below your means, avoiding debt, and planning for the future still holds up. 'You can do whatever you want,' one person wrote. 'But Dave's recommendations are based on decades of experience with thousands upon thousands of families.' But even some of Ramsey's loyalists admitted that times have changed. '$1,000 in 2025 doesn't cover a f***ing thing,' one said, referring to the starter emergency fund amount. "He got his bag in a different day and age." Read Next: Over the last five years, the price of gold has increased by approximately 83% — Investors like Bill O'Reilly and Rudy Giuliani are . This article A Dave Ramsey Follower Pushes Back On His 15-Year Mortgage Rule. With Today's Housing Prices, He Says It's Just Not Reasonable originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store