
Rallies Held in US Cities to Commemorate 1999 Peaceful Appeal in China
Falun Gong practitioners held events in Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Seattle, Chicago, and New York to observe what is now known as the April 25 appeal, an event that took place in Beijing, China's capital.
On April 25, 1999, about 10,000 Falun Gong practitioners from various walks of life and across China gathered near Zhongnanhai, the compound of high-ranking officials of the Chinese Communist Party. They demanded the release of 45 fellow practitioners who had been arrested days earlier in Tianjin city and called for the protection of their rights to practice their faith freely.
During the April 25 appeal, then-Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji
The peaceful protest became one of the excuses for the Chinese regime to launch a brutal persecution to eradicate the group on July 20, 1999. CCP propaganda has portrayed the April 25 appeal as a 'siege' against the Party.
Los Angeles
On the evening of April 22, nearly 200 Falun Gong practitioners gathered outside the Chinese Consulate in Los Angeles to commemorate the April 25 appeal. Each of them held a candle to remember fellow practitioners who had been persecuted to death at the hands of the Chinese regime.
Zheng Cunzhu, chairman of the local committee of the China Democracy Party in Los Angeles, said at the event that overseas Chinese and governments in the West should be concerned about the ongoing persecution against Falun Gong.
Related Stories
4/25/2025
4/19/2025
'If we are not vigilant and allow the CCP's authoritarian force to expand around the world … in the end, it will spread worldwide like COVID-19,' Zheng said.
Hundreds of thousands of practitioners have been subjected to torture while incarcerated,
Philadelphia
Gong Qinhua, a traditional Chinese medicine doctor, spoke at a rally in Philadelphia's Chinatown on April 19. She recalled witnessing the events of April 25, 1999.
Gong said she traveled to Beijing with her family and arrived very early on that day.
'The practitioners were all extremely quiet without causing a disturbance. Some just stood there, while others did the Falun Gong exercises or read,' Gong said.
'In the evening, knowing that the CCP authorities had promised not to suppress Falun Gong and would release the Tianjin practitioners, the crowd dispersed quietly.'
Gong Qinhua speaks at a rally commemorating the 26th anniversary of the April 25 appeal, in Philadelphia, Pa., on April 19, 2025.
Yang Qian/The Epoch Times
Gong said the Chinese authorities arrested the 45 Falun Gong practitioners in Tianjin to lure practitioners from all over the country to come to Beijing and file their appeals.
When they arrived in the capital city on April 25, 1999, she said, the police also 'deliberately arranged' for the practitioners to gather on the sidewalks of two streets next to Zhongnanhai, creating the impression that they were carrying out a 'siege.'
Roughly 10,000 Falun Gong practitioners peacefully appeal outside Zhongnanhai, the central headquarters for the Chinese Communist Party, in Beijing on April 25, 1999.
Courtesy of Minghui.org
Thousands of Falun Gong practitioners line up on the street outside Zhongnanhai, the Chinese Communist Party headquarters, in a peaceful protest, in Beijing, China, on April 25, 1999.
Goh Chai Hin/AFP via Getty Images
'Some people think that if the April 25 event had not occurred, the suppression against Falun Gong could have been avoided. This view reflects a lack of understanding of the CCP's conspiratorial nature,' Gong said.
'The CCP often sets up traps, such as calling on intellectuals to speak up during the
Other Cities
On April 20, Falun Gong practitioners in Seattle held an event to commemorate the 26th anniversary of the April 25 appeal at downtown Westlake Park.
In Chicago, a group of local Falun Gong practitioners held their event in front of the Chinese Consulate on April 19.
Falun Gong practitioners in front of the Chinese Consulate commemorating the 26th anniversary of the April 25 appeal, in Chicago, Ill., on April 19, 2025.
The Epoch Times
In New York, thousands of Falun Gong practitioners took part in a
Sun, from northern Liaoning Province, said he didn't get the chance to participate in the appeal 26 years ago because he was just a high school student at the time.
Sun Ye and his wife, Yuan Jing, at a parade commemorating the 26th anniversary of the April 25 appeal, in Flushing, New York, on April 19, 2025.
Sarah Lu/The Epoch Times
'This is my first time taking part in an April 25 event. To be able to come to this free society and participate in such a grand event, I am very fortunate,' Sun said.
'I hope people can remember this part of history, understand the truth about Falun Gong, and work together to stop this persecution.'
Yang Qian, Ma Shanen, and Sarah Lu contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
12 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know
SAN FRANCISCO — President Donald Trump wants the U.S. government to own a piece of Intel, less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping chipmaker. If the goal is realized, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more U.S. companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas suppliers. The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the U.S. government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest economy. In his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogram the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15% commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export licenses. Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the U.S., which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the U.S. will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence. That's what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired him. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the U.S. in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story.' The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the U.S. government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of weakness. After enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 debut. Intel has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly $19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting spree. By the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last year. Although rare, it's not unprecedented for the U.S. government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in GM. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the company. But some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favor with the president to increase their orders for the company's chips. Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the program. The company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve U.S. taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.'

an hour ago
Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US
SAN FRANCISCO -- President Donald Trump wants the U.S. government to own a piece of Intel, less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping chipmaker. If the goal is realized, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more U.S. companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas suppliers. The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the U.S. government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest economy. In his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogram the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15% commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export licenses. Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the U.S., which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the U.S. will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence. That's what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired him. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the U.S. in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story.' The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the U.S. government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of weakness. After enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 debut. Intel has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly $19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting spree. By the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last year. Although rare, it's not unprecedented for the U.S. government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in GM. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the company. But some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favor with the president to increase their orders for the company's chips. Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the program. The company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve U.S. taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Volusia Schools' administrative costs rise, bucking a trend, while enrollment stagnates
Volusia County faced stagnant enrollment in 2024, but reported an increase in administrative costs, according to data required by the Educational Accountability Act and distributed by the Florida Department of Education. The administrative spending increase bucks a trend. Over a nine-year trend, costs peaked at 33% in 2020, the year that the COVID-19 epidemic hit, and dropped to 10% in 2023. The number for 2024 was 15%, according to the data. Over the long haul, from 2015 to 2024, the Volusia County School District has seen a $6.5 million increase in administrative costs, when adjusting for inflation, while the number of full-time students dropped by more than 1,800. Schools administrative costs slightly above state average The administrative cost increases were slightly above the state average over nine years, with Volusia ranking 23rd-highest out of 65 counties, compared to the rest of the state. (Gadsden and Jefferson counties were removed due to faulty data.) In the data released by the education department, the number of students enrolled is categorized as "unweighted full-time-equivalent students," which excludes students in charter schools or students who receive vouchers under the Family Empowerment Scholarship and/or McKay Scholarship. So, while Volusia's administrative costs have been growing and outpacing Florida's average, Volusia is only slightly above average in its administrative to instructional spending ratio (31st out of 65 counties), according to an analysis by The News-Journal. For reference, Polk County, which spends the lowest percent on administrative costs relative to instructional costs, spends only about 4.7% of its budget on administration. Franklin County spends the highest percentage on administrative costs relative to instructional costs, spending about 19.2%. Volusia is at about 8.27% Enrollment lagging at Volusia schools Stagnating enrollment isn't unique to Volusia. Statewide, the number of students in Florida's public education system has been static, thanks largely to the expansion of school choice initiatives. In 2001, the Florida Legislature established the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship Program (FTC) to give lower-income families more educational opportunities. Initially, the program required income verification, but Gov. Ron DeSantis removed the financial eligibility requirements in the 2023-2024 school year. Personalized Education Program (PEP) and Family Empowerment Scholarships also led to expanded options for parents. In essence, the programs and other incentives create incentives for parents to seek schooling options outside of public schools. 'Over the course of the years, the legislature has increased the amount of scholarships available to parents in the state, when at its inception it had income verifications,' John Cash, chief of staff for Volusia County Schools, said. 'But then those income verifications are no longer in place, and they have continued to increase the PEP scholarships every year." Cash said that means that as enrollment in the program increases, fewer parents will send their children to public schools, meaning less money will flow into the district's education system. And the census data backs it up. From 2015 to 2023, the school-age population (5 to 17-year-olds) has increased by about 4,500 or 9%, according to the American Community Survey five-year data. Meanwhile, the number of full-time students enrolled in the district decreased by 1.3%. The lower number of enrolled students has already affected the district's budget. 'When it materialized and there was a bigger growth in the scholarship program,' said Todd Seis, the chief financial officer for Volusia County Schools, in a June 24 workshop meeting with the school board. 'We planned for that reduction in we just gave it back to the Department of Education.' So why have costs been increasing when enrollment hasn't? Federal and state laws have forced districts to evolve and, as a result, spend more money. For example, Alyssa's law, which was named after a 14-year-old who died during the Parkland school shooting, forced districts to have panic alert systems. Drills and training for staff also increased costs, according to Seis. Another example is having an internal auditor for districts with over $500 million in annual revenues. Volusia outsources the job to an external firm, but it also led to increased costs. 'The additional requirements established in 2018 have created the need for coordinated support across multiple departments,' Seis wrote in an email to The News-Journal, "including fiscal services, to ensure that internal auditors receive the information they need to complete their reports." This article originally appeared on The Daytona Beach News-Journal: Volusia schools' admin costs rise despite stagnant enrollment Solve the daily Crossword