Croatia's Game of Thrones filming sites face threat from Trump tariffs
By Antonio Bronic
DUBROVNIK (Reuters) -The fortresses and cobbled streets of the ancient Croatian town of Dubrovnik are often crowded with tourists eager to visit the locations from the Game of Thrones television series or the Star Wars: The Last Jedi film.
But comments by President Donald Trump this month that he will impose a 100% tariff on all movies produced outside the United States have alarmed the entertainment industry and some locals in Dubrovnik who fear directors may no longer film there.
"There have been huge disruptions because of the tariffs that Trump plans to introduce," said Croatian film producer Igor Aleksandar Nola, adding that budgets had already been hit by global economic upheaval.
"Part of the financing coming from banks and investment funds for audio-visual arts has been on standby because of the uncertainty," Nola told Reuters.
Central European countries and the Balkans have been used by Hollywood for years for their dramatic scenery, mix of architectural styles and cheaper filming costs. If a movie or series is a hit those locations can become hugely popular with visitors.
"The film and Game of Thrones have changed Dubrovnik for sure," said tourist guide Ivan Vukovic. About 1,000 tourists join a Game of Thrones tour every day, he said.
New souvenir shops were opened and jobs created for tourist guides and locals assisting in film productions out of season.
"All of this created a big economic boom," Vukovic said.
Trump did not provide details about the timing of tariffs, leaving executives wondering how they could be applied to the film industry.
Participants at the Cannes Film Festival, which opened on Tuesday, continued a cautious business-as-usual approach after the initial shock by the tariff announcement.
Mate Frankovic, the mayor of Dubrovnik, which receives about 1.4 million tourists a year, said he did not expect the crisis to last long or seriously affect film productions and tourism in Dubrovnik.
"I honestly cannot imagine a single serious U.S. film and large production without including a major European city," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump pardons drive a big, burgeoning business for lobbyists
Seeking a pardon from President Donald Trump has become big business for lobbying and consulting firms close to the administration, with wealthy hopefuls willing to spend millions of dollars for help getting their case in front of the right people. 'From a lobbying perspective, pardons have gotten profitable,' said one lobbyist whose firm has received such calls. There's no set rate for pardon help. But two people directly familiar with proposals to lobbying firms said they knew of a client's offer of $5 million to help get a case to Trump. These people, like others, were granted anonymity to speak candidly. And while such high numbers do not seem to be standard, they speak to a burgeoning pardon economy. A $5 million figure is higher than numbers The New York Times reported Trump allies receiving for pardon help in his first term. In 2021, the outlet reported that Brett Tolman, a former federal prosecutor who advised the White House on pardons, was receiving five-figure amounts for the work, according to filings and a client. The Times also reported that John Kiriakou, a former CIA officer convicted of disclosing classified information, was told that former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a Trump ally, could help secure him a pardon for $2 million; Giuliani disputed that account. Cozying up to a president's allies or hiring lobbyists to gain access to clemency isn't new. But along with the price spike, what's different now is that Trump is issuing pardons on a rolling basis — rather than most coming at the end of the administration. 'It's like the Wild West,' a Trump ally and lobbyist said. 'You can basically charge whatever you want.' The increased use of the pardon power has some familiar with the process concerned about the appearance of financial and political favoritism that can erode confidence in the clemency process. 'This is very destructive to our justice system. It delegitimizes the pardon power,' said Elizabeth Oyer, who served as pardon attorney for the Department of Justice during President Joe Biden's administration. 'It entrenches a two-tier system of justice in which wealth really can be a get-out-of-jail-free card.' 'All pardon and commutation decisions are solely made by President Trump, who is always willing to give well-deserving Americans a second chance — especially those who have been unfairly targeted by a corrupt justice system,' White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said. Since Trump took office in January, he has pardoned or granted executive clemency to more than 1,500 people, most related to the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. It's a significant uptick from a similar time frame during his first term in office. Even without the Jan. 6 defendants, Trump has pardoned 58 people; in his previous administration, Trump had pardoned just one person in his first year. In the past week alone, Trump has pardoned or commuted the sentences of 27 people. Many clemency recipients have been people with the means to elevate their case — allies, donors, celebrities and former politicians. There is a process for vetting pardon applications through the Justice Department's Office of the Pardon Attorney, but presidents have not always followed it. Some of the pardons Trump is granting, involving people currently incarcerated, would not be able to make it through the typical process. Unless the Justice Department grants a waiver, the regulations say that petitioners need to wait until five years after either the conviction or the end of their sentence, and they place a premium on acceptance of responsibility. As of this week, there are 6,394 applications for commutations and 1,529 applications for pardons. Not every Trump-aligned lobbyist is eager to take pardon work; some who have turned down offers said they have passed them along to a small handful of Trump supporters who then help the pardon-seeker get on the president's radar. In some cases, referral fees are paid to the lobbying firms even if they are not directly engaged to do the work, according to three people familiar with the process. 'There are others, like us, who have turned down a bunch of that work, but generally the way that works is that they get referred to others who are helping,' said a Washington-based lobbyist whose firm has been approached by people seeking a pardon. The person said that roughly half their client inquiries in recent months have been for pardon help. In the past, it was roughly 1 in 50 client solicitations. The Trump ally who is also a lobbyist said their firm is not taking pardon clients out of concern that they could face blowback when the political winds inevitably change. Another lobbyist said they turn down pardon work because it feels 'sketchy.' In a case that drew significant attention this week, Trump pardoned reality-TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley, who were convicted in 2022 on fraud and tax evasion-related charges. The two built a national following through their reality show 'Chrisley Knows Best.' The pardons came after a public pressure campaign led by their daughter Savannah, a prominent Trump supporter with nearly 3 million followers on Instagram. Key to reaching Trump is pushing a message that will appeal to the president, particularly one around a politicization of justice by Democrats or overzealous prosecutors. 'Weaponization is real,' said Tolman, who is now a Fox News contributor and the executive director of the conservative-leaning criminal justice reform group Right on Crime. 'If you are in power and you are willing to use the power of the prosecution to go after your political adversaries, how do we fix it?' His comments came during a 2024 panel at the Conservative Political Action Conference focused on the 'weaponization' of the justice system. The panel also included now-Attorney General Pam Bondi and Savannah Chrisley, who used the platform to talk about her parents' case. Tolman has become one of the go-tos for help when people are seeking Trump pardons. He helped the Chrisleys, as well as Charles Kushner, the father of Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner. At the end of Trump's first term, he also lobbied Trump to pardon Ross Ulbricht, who in 2015 was sentenced to life in prison on narcotics and money-laundering charges related to his dark web marketplace Silk Road. Getting Ulbricht out of prison became a cause célèbre to many on the political right who thought he was unjustly targeted by the justice system. During the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump promised to pardon Ulbricht, and he did so as one of his first acts after taking office. Tolman did not respond to a request seeking comment. Other Trump allies who have played influential roles in the pardon process over the past few weeks include Washington attorney Adam Katz, who previously represented Giuliani and helped secure a sentence commutation for a California businesswoman in Trump's first term. Katz did not return a request seeking comment, but lobbyists interviewed by NBC News named him, along with Tolman, as two of the people to whom they refer pardon work. Corcoran Partners, a Florida-based lobbying firm whose managing partner includes Matt Blair, the brother of Trump deputy chief of staff James Blair, has also registered to lobby on federal pardon issues for the first time. In March, Matt Blair's firm registered to lobby on 'pardon' issues for Juno Empire Inc., a Miami-based company that is identified in federal lobbying records as a 'medical billing advocate.' It's not clear what this company does or what its issue is, and there was no contact information available for Juno. Corcoran Partners did not return a request for comment. Longtime Trump confidant Roger Stone also registered in February to lobby for Roger Ver, who is nicknamed 'Bitcoin Jesus' and, if extradited from Spain, faces up to 109 years in prison for, among other things, allegations that he tried to evade nearly $50 million in tax payments. It's the first time Stone's firm, Drake Ventures, formally registered to lobby on pardon issues, records show. An attorney for Ver did not return a request for comment. Some lawyers also see new hope for their clients in Trump's willingness to issue pardons. Tim Parlatore, a former member of Trump's legal team, represented Adm. Robert Burke, who was convicted in May of bribery. Parlatore told NBC News that he had unsuccessfully attempted to get Justice Department leadership to reconsider the Burke case before it went to trial, and that he'd try to secure a pardon now that Burke has been convicted. 'I think I have a great appeal for Burke, but will I go and ask for a pardon? Absolutely! You'd be crazy not to,' he said. 'The way that that case was investigated and presented, I believe, was fundamentally unfair.' Parlatore said he wanted to 'pursue all possible remedies' for his client. 'I'll go to call people and try to figure this thing out, whether it's Ed Martin, Alice Johnson,' he said, referring to Trump's pardon attorney and his more informal 'pardon czar.' 'I just want to make sure that that gets in front of the right people to make a decision.' The president's pardon power, a vestige of the British monarchy, is largely unchecked. Trump isn't the first person to face criticism for controversial pardons. But the perception that Trump is leaning into rewarding supporters was boosted last week when Martin, Trump's current pardon attorney, openly signaled the political motivations for the pardon given to Scott Jenkins. The former Virginia sheriff was facing 10 years in prison after a federal jury found him guilty of taking $75,000 in return for doling out law enforcement authority to local businessmen, as well as two undercover FBI special agents. 'No MAGA left behind,' Martin posted on X after the pardon was announced. One staffer familiar with the pardon process said Martin and the administration were trying to 'undo the damage from weaponization,' often choosing to pardon people they felt were unfairly targeted. 'You have a president who's going to exercise his presidential powers that he has from the Constitution, whether or not there's some guidebook,' they said. 'He does it on trade, he does it on immigration, and he does it everywhere.' That staffer and other Trump allies argue that it was Biden's use of the power that has set the precedent under which they are currently operating. Biden pardoned or commuted the sentences of more than 8,000 people, including to his son Hunter, who was set to be sentenced on federal gun charges just weeks before the pardon was issued. On the way out of office, he also issued pre-emptive pardons for some members of his family, worried Trump would try to prosecute them. An administration official called Biden's pardon decisions an 'absolutely earth-shattering departure from presidential norms.' Trump supporters argue the potential hit to a president's reputation that previously existed for the perception of politicizing the clemency process is no longer there. 'It's become easier after Hunter's pardon. Long gone are the days of an eleventh-hour pardon. It has become more transactional,' the Trump ally and lobbyist said. Beyond increased payments to lobbying firms to help secure pardons, family members of those seeking pardons have also found it useful to amplify their platform by going on conservative media outlets that Trump is known to watch or appear in MAGA-friendly spaces. Savannah Chrisley, for example, spoke at the Republican National Convention and suggested her parents were targeted for being conservative. During a press conference Friday, she said it was a 'misconception' that she 'either paid for a pardon or slept for a pardon' for her parents. She said she simply went to Washington and made sure she was in 'the right room at the right time' and 'begged for meetings.' 'Many people have come on my OAN program to make their case for pardons,' former Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, who became a news anchor for One America News Network after Trump unsuccessfully tried to install him as attorney general, told NBC News. 'Some have not. Some might get granted in the future. I trust President Trump's judgment.' Gaetz says he himself has not officially focused on pardon work but said his show, like others, can help amplify a pardon-seeker's case. 'I've covered pardons as a journalist,' he said. 'One way people get on the pardon radar is coming on my show and making their case on other media President Trump is known to watch.' This article was originally published on
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump, not trans athletes, is the greatest threat to girls sports
Never mind what you hear from grandstanding Fresno County politicians or read in the right-wing media. The greatest threat to the future of girls sports is not transgender athletes, including the section champion who qualified in three jumping events at this weekend's CIF State Track and Field Championships in Clovis. The greatest threat to girls sports is Donald Trump. And by extension, anyone who supports Trump policies that disemboweled the Department of Education. How can that be, some of you are undoubtedly asking yourselves. Didn't President Trump, the man who once declared he would 'protect' women 'whether women like or not,' threaten to withhold funding for California because the CIF allows trans athletes to compete? Yes, he did. Moreover, Trump's Department of Justice launched an investigation into the state for supposed violations of Title IX, the landmark law that prohibits sex-based discrimination in education programs and activities that receive federal funding. Trump's use of Title IX to fuel his crusade against trans athletes — parroted by local politicians as they jousted for airtime on the local news — is darkly ironic and deeply hypocritical. Because while Trump virtue signals with Title IX in one hand, the other moves to dismantle the branch of federal government responsible for ensuring that the rights of millions of females are protected. Not just young women athletes but young women of many cross-sections: LBGTQ students, student survivors of sexual assault, minority students and disabled students. Trump's March executive order to gut the Department of Education (and with it the Office of Civil Rights) is already having a massive impact on how Title IX is regulated and enforced at public institutions across the country. By laying off half of the DOE staff, a move carried out by Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, Trump's order increased the caseloads of the remaining OCR case workers by 200% and shuttered seven of the 12 regional OCR offices (including the one in California), according to the National Women's Law Center. Enforcing Title IX rules that guarantee female athletes don't get short shift falls under the OCR's purview. Investigators ensure K-12 school districts, colleges and universities support men's and women's sports programs at the same level through equitable budgets, scholarships, coaching salaries, equipment and travel. And that's just athletics. The OCR investigates the claims of sexual assault and harassment victims while also probing complaints of discrimination against students based on their race, gender identity, religion and disability status. The early returns under Trump aren't good. According to a recent Pro Publica investigation, the number of civil rights cases being resolved on college campuses has plummeted since the executive order was issued while cases closed by the office that were dismissed without being investigated have jumped. 'OCR is the most useless it's ever been, and it's the most dangerous it's ever been. And by useless, I mean unavailable. Unable to do the work,' former OCR attorney Michael Pillera told the nonprofit news organization. If the true aim of Trump administration policies were to protect the rights of females and ensure girls and women's sports thrive, it would make little sense to gut the federal agency largely responsible for achieving that goal. Yet here we are. The hypocrisy of using Title IX as a weapon against the rights of transgender athletes while ignoring Trump policies that render Title IX toothless was lost on several Fresno County politicians Thursday as they took turns blasting the CIF, Gov. Gavin Newsom, the State Legislature. The only fresh idea on a complex and thorny issue came from first-term Republican Assemblymember David Tangipa, who proposed creating an 'open division' for transgender athletes to compete against boys or anyone else at the CIF level but separate from biological females. 'That way anybody who wants to compete can compete, but we also guarantee that there is a space for our young women and our young athletes to compete just like what Title IX has already settled,' Tangipa said. Already settled? If only. Under Trump 2.0, the federal statute protecting the civil rights of millions of young female athletes has been unambiguously weakened. Which constitutes a far greater danger to the future of girls' sports than a few transgender athletes.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Army estimates that Trump's military parade could cost $16 million in damage to Washington streets
The cost to repair Washington, D.C., streets after the upcoming military parade celebrating the Army's 250th anniversary could cost as much as $16 million, according to U.S. military officials. That's part of an estimated $45 million total cost for the June 14 military parade, which coincides with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. The cost estimates have fluctuated as planning continues. In an interview with NBC News' 'Meet the Press' earlier this month, the president defended the cost of the parade, calling it 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.' 'We have the greatest missiles in the world. We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we're going to celebrate it,' Trump added. The parade will be part of a massive celebration in downtown Washington that includes a number of events, historical displays and a demonstration by the Army's famous parachute team, the Golden Knights. The parade itself will include about 130 vehicles, including 28 M1A1 tanks, 28 Bradley Fighting Vehicles, 28 Stryker armored fighting vehicles and a number of vehicles towing artillery launchers. More than 50 helicopters will also participate in an 'extensive flyover' in the nation's capital. The event will also bring more than 9,000 soldiers from around the country to Washington, about 7,000 of whom will march in the parade itself. The event will also include at least eight Army bands, and some troops will ride on the nearly three dozen horses and two mules expected to march as part of a historical section of the parade. The soldiers visiting Washington for the parade will be housed in government buildings, including the Department of Agriculture building and a General Services Administration building. A few thousand others will bunk at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland. The troops are expected to eat military rations called meals ready to eat, or MREs, during their stay. Trump had long wanted a military parade during his first term. But it was canceled over concerns about cost and the optics of a military parade in the nation's capital that could be seen as akin to the kind commonly seen in Moscow, Beijing or Pyongyang, North Korea. The inclusion of tanks in a potential parade also drew concerns about what their tracks might do to the streets of Washington. The Army is preparing for the potential harm to Washington streets with several measures it hopes will avert damage. These include using 1-inch-thick steel plates, some as long as 20 feet, at places along the parade route where the tanks must turn and where those turns could cause the most damage to the streets. The addition of the steel plates is expected to cost the Army about $3 million, officials said. The tanks are also being outfitted with new track pads to create separation between the metal track and the ground, the officials said. Army officials said they believe these measures will keep the damage to a minimum and bring the cost of repairing any damage down significantly. 'We are targeting those areas that we have concerns, which primarily are areas where the tracked vehicles are going to have to turn sharply,' said Col. Jesse Curry, the executive officer for the Army Corps of Engineers. 'We are not particularly concerned that this staging area and the routes have been selected to really minimize the risk from weight and damage. But really, those areas where tanks have to turn, particularly the areas where the surface of the pavement, we typically receive an exaggerated level of stress.' The parade route itself will follow Constitution Avenue along the National Mall from 23rd Street to around 15th Street. The roughly 50 aircraft will include Black Hawk and Chinook helicopters, including several special operations variants. Also planned to fly are several historic aircraft, including World War II-era B-25s, P-51s and Vietnam-era helicopters. The parade is expected to last roughly 90 minutes and will be broken into eras: the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, World War I, WWII, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Global War on Terror, the modern Army and the future. The Army's Golden Knights will jump during the presentation about the Army's future and plan to deliver an American flag to Trump. In the early-May 'Meet the Press' interview, Trump defended himself against claims that the military parade was for his birthday, reiterating that the Army's 250th birthday and Flag Day are also on June 14. 'My birthday happens to be on Flag Day,' he said. 'I view it for Flag Day, not necessarily my birthday. Somebody put it together. But no, I think we're going to do something on June 14, maybe, or somewhere around there. But I think June 14. It's a very important day.' This article was originally published on
