
Trump withholds $7 billion in US school funding, leaving 1.4 million students at risk
The Trump administration has abruptly withheld nearly $7 billion in federal education funding, a move that threatens to disrupt critical services for millions of students across the United States.
The funding, previously approved by Congress and signed into law by President Trump in March, supports a range of programs including after-school care, summer enrichment, English language support, teacher training, and mental health services.
In a notification sent to state education agencies, the US Department of Education stated the funds would not be released as expected, citing a vague review process with no timeline for resolution.
As reported by The New York Times, the administration stated only that it was 'committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the president's priorities.' The decision has left school districts scrambling for contingency plans just weeks before the new academic year begins.
Programs supporting millions of students face immediate uncertainty
The sudden funding freeze affects multiple federally backed programs that have long supported vulnerable student populations.
Among them is the 21st Century Community Learning Centers initiative, which provides after-school and summer programs for low-income students. According to The New York Times, Jodi Grant, executive director of the Afterschool Alliance, estimated that this program alone supports 1.4 million students — about 20% of all children enrolled in after-school programs nationwide.
'These dollars are essential,' Grant said, adding that the freeze is 'catastrophic' for families who rely on consistent programming for childcare and academic support.
In low-income districts like Umatilla, Oregon, Superintendent Heidi Sipe said that without these funds, she has had to warn parents to prepare for canceled programs, even though 'there is no YMCA or similar alternative in our community,' as quoted by The New York Times.
Impact on non-English speakers and teacher support
The withheld funds also include money designated for supporting English learners and their families. Many school districts use this funding to train teachers, hire translators, and ensure access to school services.
Ana DeGenna, superintendent in Oxnard, California, told The New York Times that these programs are often the only link between immigrant families and the school system. 'Without this outreach, families who do not speak English could be cut off,' she said.
Another key affected program is the Student Support and Academic Enrichment grant, a bipartisan initiative in place for a decade. It funds school technology, mental health services, and staff training.
Potential legal challenges and political fallout
The decision has sparked sharp criticism from education advocates, Democratic lawmakers, and unions. Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, called the move 'lawless,' stating that the funding was appropriated by Congress and cannot be withheld without legal cause, as quoted by The New York Times.
Russell Vought, Director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, hinted at a potential rescission — a formal request to cancel funds — which, under federal law, could freeze the money until it expires, even without Congressional approval.
'No decision has been made,' Vought stated during a Senate hearing, according to The New York Times.
Senator Patty Murray, a leading Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, warned that each day of delay forces school districts to make painful decisions about staffing and services. 'They're forced to worry about layoffs instead of how to help kids succeed,' she said, as reported by The New York Times.
School districts brace for chaos as deadlines approach
In Omaha, Nebraska, Nicole Everingham, who helps coordinate after-school programming for 42 public schools, told The New York Times that staffing decisions must be made weeks before school starts.
A delay, even if temporary, could lead to chaos for working parents and students who rely on after-school supervision. 'It completely puts us in flux,' she said, adding that fewer staff means fewer available slots for students.
Unless reversed, the freeze could lead to broad service cuts, staffing reductions, and learning disruptions nationwide. With school budgets already under pressure, education leaders are calling for urgent action to release the funds before long-term damage is done.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk's father Errol Musk to Donald Trump: ‘Listen to Elon…he's not a fool'
Elon Musk 's father Errol Musk has shared an advice for his son. According to a report by Al-Arabiya English, Errol Musk advised his son Elon to 'stay silent' and concentrate on his businesses, especially Tesla. He acknowledged that politics can be complicated, with 'tempers flare' and 'human behavior is so complicated,' and suggested it's better for Elon to stay focused on what he does best—running his companies. Errol also expressed his surprise over the Tesla and SpaceX CEO's feud with US President Donald Trump . He said: 'As far as President Trump going against Elon, I can't really understand what is going on. It makes no sense to me at all.' Errol also expressed his optimism despite the rising tension between the two. He said: 'Something good will come out of this, I'm pretty sure.' Elon Musk's father supports Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill According to the report, Errol and Elon have different opinions about the Trump administration's One Big Beautiful Bill . While the tech billionaire has been a vocal critique of Trump's bill, Errol, on the other hand, supports it. Talking about the bill, Errol said 'United States needs a lot of rebuilding…they need to spend money'. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Walmart Photos Which Are Not For Everyone Old Money Style Undo The senior Musk also made a request to President Trump to 'Listen to Elon,' adding that 'He's not a fool'. At last, Musk's father advised both Trump and Elon to 'talk it out.' Trump-Musk feud The feud between Trump and Musk reignited after the tech billionaire criticized Trump's new federal spending bill. So much so that he threatened to create a new political group, calling it the 'America Party,' if the bill is passed by the Senate. Trump responded by questioning Musk's loyalty and criticizing electric vehicle mandates, which he called 'ridiculous.' Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly Endorsed [sic] me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate. It is ridiculous, and was always a major part of my campaign. Electric cars are fine, but not everyone should be forced to own one,' the president wrote on Truth Social. OnePlus Nord 5 and OnePlus Nord CE 5: Unboxing and first look AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ukraine arms freeze sparks GOP fury: Pentagon's pause catches Donald Trump allies off guard; target Colby
Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth (AP) The United States' latest decision to halt some weapon shipments to Ukraine came as a surprise even to people usually in the loop on such matters, including officials from the state department, members of Congress, and some key European allies, according to Politico. The halt was prompted by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby and a close group of advisers, who expressed concerns that some US weapons stockpiles were becoming depleted. The unexpected decision on Monday sparked concern and frustration, even among leading Republicans, over the apparent perception that a single senior Pentagon official had such influence on the outcome. Even President Donald Trump's allies expressed frustration over the decision, accusing officials like Colby, who conducted a review of US munitions stockpiles prior to the pause, of advancing the move without informing the rest of the administration or other stakeholders. They pointed out that the decision to suspend weapons shipments to Ukraine appeared to be made with minimal coordination across the administration, following major reductions to the national security council that had significantly weakened its influence. 'I think it's all made by the DOD policy director, this Colby guy. We essentially don't have a national security adviser,' said Republican representative for Texas Michael McCaul. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Искате да научите повече за новото BMW 2 Gran Coupe? BMW Научете повече Undo 'I'm not even sure (Secretary of State Marco) Rubio was consulted on this one … There's internal division in the White House.' The decision sparked confusion and a sense of shock in Ukraine, while also prompting concern in Europe over whether the US was beginning to retreat from its military backing of Kyiv, at a time when Trump seemed increasingly open to the idea of providing additional aid to help defend Ukraine against Russian attacks. Representative Brian Fitzpatrick, a member of the house intelligence committee, wrote a letter to Trump on Tuesday requesting an emergency briefing from the White House and the department of defense regarding the suspension of military aid, which had originally been approved under the Biden administration. One official said the Pentagon's move was uncoordinated and surprised the state department. According to two other officials, Pentagon leaders didn't consult the state department, the US embassy in Kyiv, or Ukraine envoy Keith Kellogg's team before halting a shipment of critical weapons already in Poland. Some members of the Joint Staff also opposed the decision, they added, reported Politico. The White House and the state department rejected claims that the munitions pause took officials by surprise. 'This is false,' said a White House official. 'The president and top officials expect the DOD to regularly review aid allocations to ensure they are in line with the America First agenda.'


Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Denied toilet access, made to kneel overnight: US deportee says he was tortured in El Salvador prison
Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was supposed to be safe. In 2019, a US immigration judge ruled that the 29-year-old Salvadoran could not be deported to his home country, citing credible fears that local gangs there would persecute him and his family. But in March 2025, the Trump administration deported him anyway. What followed has triggered a political and legal firestorm over the administration's immigration enforcement, reaching all the way to the US Supreme Court. The White House has repeatedly claimed that Abrego Garcia is a member of MS-13, the Salvadoran gang the US government has designated a foreign terrorist organisation. US President Donald Trump, speaking last month, declared that Abrego Garcia 'will never live' in the United States again. Yet multiple judges, including one on the Supreme Court, have ruled that he was deported in error and that the government is obliged to help 'facilitate' his return to Maryland, where he had lived since 2012. That court order came only after Abrego Garcia had already spent nearly three harrowing months inside El Salvador's notorious Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, where he was sent immediately after his wrongful deportation. 'Welcome to CECOT. Whoever enters here doesn't leave,' one official reportedly told him upon arrival, according to court documents filed by his lawyers. Held in an overcrowded, windowless cell with bright lights on 24 hours a day, Abrego Garcia says he was forced to sleep on a metal bunk with no mattress and was denied access to a bathroom, eventually soiling himself. He said he lost 14 kg in two weeks. In his testimony, he lists harrowing details. Upon arrival, he says he was kicked and hit repeatedly, leaving his body bruised and swollen. He and 20 others were made to kneel overnight, with guards striking anyone who collapsed, he claims. At times, he was told he would be transferred to cells with known gang members who would 'tear' him apart. He also said he heard screaming through the night. He saw prisoners assaulting each other in nearby cells. He was told by prison staff that his tattoos would mark him for death—until they later admitted they weren't gang-related at all. According to the new court filings, Salvadoran prison officials determined that Abrego Garcia was not affiliated with any gang. The Trump administration initially brushed aside the deportation as an 'administrative error.' But after weeks of legal pressure, it abruptly flew Abrego Garcia back to the US last month—not to release him, but to indict him. He is now in federal custody in Nashville, Tennessee, facing charges of participating in a conspiracy to smuggle undocumented immigrants, allegedly as a member of MS-13. His lawyers argue the evidence is flimsy and that the government is backpedalling on its previous mistake by doubling down on criminal accusations. Justice Department attorney Jonathan Guynn told a Maryland judge that the US intends to deport Abrego Garcia again, this time to an unnamed third country. There is no set timeline, but his attorneys say the threat is immediate and illegal. 'This was not a mistake,' one of his lawyers told reporters. 'It was a deliberate defiance of a court order.' The Justice Department has not commented publicly on whether it will comply with the Supreme Court's latest ruling or where it intends to send Abrego Garcia next.