Donald Trump hits South Africa with 30% tariffs - the HIGHEST in Africa
The tariffs mark the highest imposed on any sub-Saharan African nation, and come amid increasingly strained diplomatic ties between Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.
The decision is a major blow to South Africa, whose exports to the United States – its second-largest trading partner – are vital for industries such as automobiles, agriculture, textiles, and wine.
Until now, these sectors had enjoyed duty-free access to the US under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA).
That arrangement, introduced in 2000 to boost African economic development through trade, now appears effectively terminated ahead of its scheduled review in September.
In a sweeping move, the US has also imposed tariffs on other African nations: 30% for South Africa, Algeria, Libya
for 25% for Tunisia
for 15% for Nigeria, Ghana, Lesotho, Zimbabwe , Angola, Botswana, Cameroon, Chad, Côte d`Ivoire, DR Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Uganda , Zambia
for , , 10% for Kenya, Ethiopia
Trump argues the tariffs are necessary to protect American jobs and industry, stating: 'African countries have had a free ride. It's time for fair trade.'
President Ramaphosa responded by confirming that negotiations are ongoing, with a framework trade deal already submitted to US officials.
That deal reportedly included: Purchasing US liquefied natural gas
Easing poultry import rules
$3.3 billion investment into US sectors like mining
Ramaphosa also announced that a domestic support package is being finalised to help South African firms most vulnerable to the new tariffs.
'We are deeply concerned about the implications of this decision on jobs and investment. Our priority is to protect South African industries and workers,' the president said.
Some exceptions have been made for strategic exports, including pharmaceuticals, copper, semiconductors, stainless steel scrap, and certain energy products.
US-South Africa relations have sharply deteriorated under the Trump administration.
The US president has cut all aid to the country and accused it of discriminating against its white minority – a claim South Africa has strongly denied.
Ramaphosa's attempt to mend ties at a May meeting with Trump appears to have failed.
This week, Trump hinted he might skip the G20 Summit in Johannesburg, saying: 'I've had a lot of problems with South Africa. They have some very bad policies.'
South Africa's wine industry – with the US its fourth-largest export market – warned that the 30% tariff puts it at a 'severe disadvantage' compared to countries still enjoying lower or no duties.
Industry body Wines of South Africa has urged both governments to resolve the issue swiftly, warning of long-term damage to trade, jobs, and investment.
With just days to go before implementation, pressure is mounting on Pretoria to either strike a deal or cushion the blow – as businesses brace for a sharp economic impact and possible job losses. Afghanistan – 15%
Algeria – 30%
Angola – 15%
Bangladesh – 20%
Bolivia – 15%
Bosnia and Herzegovina – 30%
Botswana – 15%
Brazil – 10%
Brunei – 25%
Cambodia – 19%
Cameroon – 15%
Chad – 15%
Costa Rica – 15%
Côte d`Ivoire – 15%
Democratic Republic of the Congo – 15%
Ecuador – 15%
Equatorial Guinea – 15%
Falkland Islands – 10%
Fiji – 15%
Ghana – 15%
Guyana – 15%
Iceland – 15%
India – 25%
Indonesia – 19%
Iraq – 35%
Israel – 15%
Japan – 15%
Jordan – 15%
Kazakhstan – 25%
Laos – 40%
Lesotho – 15%
Libya – 30%
Liechtenstein – 15%
Madagascar – 15%
Malawi – 15%
Malaysia – 19%
Mauritius – 15%
Moldova – 25%
Mozambique – 15%
Myanmar (Burma) – 40%
Namibia – 15%
Nauru – 15%
New Zealand – 15%
Nicaragua – 18%
Nigeria – 15%
North Macedonia – 15%
Norway – 15%
Pakistan – 19%
Papua New Guinea – 15%
Philippines – 19%
Serbia – 35%
South Africa – 30%
South Korea – 15%
Sri Lanka – 20%
Switzerland – 39%
Syria – 41%
Taiwan – 20%
Thailand – 19%
Trinidad and Tobago – 15%
Tunisia – 25%
Turkey – 15%
Uganda – 15%
United Kingdom – 10%
Vanuatu – 15%
Venezuela – 15%
Vietnam – 20%
Zambia – 15%
Zimbabwe – 15%
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
12 minutes ago
- IOL News
‘Women should not only be present in science – they must shape its direction'
This year marks 30 years since the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, a global agenda for advancing women's rights which includes their access to education, technology and leadership. Image: Supplied More than 30 years ago, South Africa took its bold first steps into democracy. It was a moment of unprecedented hope, not just for political freedom, but for the transformation of society in all its dimensions. As the country reflects on passing its three-decade milestone, it's an opportune time to assess the progress made by women in science, technology and innovation (STI). While the road has been uneven, the strides that have been made are undeniable. This year marks 30 years since the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, a global agenda for advancing women's rights which includes their access to education, technology and leadership. As we mark just over 30 years of freedom and reflect on 30 years of global gender advocacy since the Beijing resolution, we must shift our efforts from a focus on participation to a demand for leadership. Women should not only be present in science – they must shape its direction. That means ensuring that women lead laboratories, policy development, global scientific collaborations, and research and training institutions. It also means rethinking how we define innovation – more value needs to be placed on community-based knowledge, indigenous science and interdisciplinary approaches that centre on people, not just products. To understand how far we've come, we must begin with a pivotal moment in our country's history: the Women's March to the Union Buildings on 9 August 1956. On that day, more than 20 000 women of all races and backgrounds marched peacefully against apartheid's pass laws. They stood united in defiance of an oppressive system, carrying petitions and chanting, 'Wathint' Abafazi, Wathint' Imbokodo!' ('You strike a woman, you strike a rock'). That historic act of resistance was not just about civil liberties – it was a declaration of women's power to shape South Africa's future. Fast-forward to today, and that same spirit continues to drive South African women, not just in politics or activism, but in laboratories, tech hubs, industry and innovation spaces. In many ways, the progress of women in STI is one of the quiet revolutions of our democratic era, largely influenced by our policy frameworks that support women in this sector. The National Development Plan 2030, the Department of Science and Innovation's White Paper on Science, Technology and Innovation, and the more recent Decadal Plan all advocate for gender transformation and gender-responsive planning as national priorities. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Dr Rakeshnie Ramoutar-Prieschl, Head of Research Capacity Development at the University of Pretoria Image: Supplied Yet structural inequalities persist. Women – especially women of colour – remain under-represented in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) leadership roles, with a national representation of a mere 30% of the workforce. Barriers such as unequal access to quality education, limited mentorship opportunities, and gender bias in academia and industry continue to constrain progress. So, how can these systemic challenges be tackled? One of the most effective ways to empower women in STI is through mentorship. Access to mentors helps young women navigate the complex terrain of academia, research and industry, especially in male-dominated environments, such as mining- and engineering-related fields. It builds confidence, opens doors and fosters a sense of belonging. Science outreach efforts in rural and township schools, particularly those that bring in female scientists from similar backgrounds as role models, can have a transformative impact. When girls see someone who looks like them succeeding in science, it fundamentally shifts what they believe is possible. Embedding targeted programmes that focus on raising awareness of women's and girls' rights into school or university curricula can help address some of the societal ills that disproportionately affect girls and women. These include cyberbullying (especially on social media platforms), gender-based violence, exploitative relationships (such as those that involve 'sugar daddies'), and reproductive health and teenage pregnancies, among others. This calls for politicians, governments, higher education leaders, schools and communities to work together to co-create and co-develop inclusive innovation strategies for accelerated change. As we commemorate almost 70 years since the 1956 Women's March, we must remember and honour this defining act of resistance and unity. The women who marched to the Union Buildings were not just resisting oppression; they were demanding a future in which their daughters and granddaughters could be free to learn, lead and innovate. That dream is still being realised, in university labs, coding bootcamps, data science hubs and tech start-ups. But our work is far from done. We must shift from symbolic inclusion to structural transformation: more women in leadership, more equitable funding, more inclusive curricula and sustained support from childhood through to the career stage. The rocks that built this nation must now become the architects of its innovative future. Let us honour their legacy not just with words, but with policies, platforms and partnerships that ensure every girl, from the village to varsity, can rise, lead and transform the world. Dr Rakeshnie Ramoutar-Prieschl, Head of Research Capacity Development at the University of Pretoria
IOL News
42 minutes ago
- IOL News
30% Tariffs from the US government, 0% Leadership from the GNU government
Trade tensions between SA and the US, and represents a direct threat to thousands of South African jobs in key export sectors such as automotive manufacturing, agriculture, and mining. Image: Armand Hough /Independent Newspapers Build One South Africa (BOSA) expresses deep concern over the imposition of 30% tariffs on most South African imports to the United States, which will come into effect after a seven-day window. This marks a serious escalation in trade tensions between SA and the US, and represents a direct threat to thousands of South African jobs in key export sectors such as automotive manufacturing, agriculture, and mining. The outcome is not solely the result of an increasingly protectionist White House. It is a self-inflicted wound caused by years of incoherent and ideologically driven foreign policy from the South African government. What should have been a moment for skilled diplomacy and strategic engagement has instead become a textbook case in diplomatic failure. Key opportunities to repair and restore trust with US lawmakers and officials were squandered. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Even under the more diplomatic Biden administration, South Africa failed to rebuild trust. We did not use the opportunity to engage, negotiate, or reassure. And now, under a more transactional Trump presidency, patience has run out. What is clear is that South Africa urgently needs a foreign policy rooted in clear principles and strategic interests instead of nostalgia and ideology. Our diplomacy must be led by the state, above party politics, and laser-focused on three core objectives: expanding trade and economic growth, defending human rights, and advancing democracy on the continent and beyond. The current bipolar approach, with mixed signals from different actors, is unsustainable and deeply damaging. BOSA calls for five urgent steps to arrest this crisis and rebuild South Africa's credibility in Washington: Reassert official diplomatic leadership and prevent political freelancing that undermines national trade priorities. South Africa must speak with one credible, united voice. Engage directly with the US Congress, where AGOA's future will ultimately be decided. The case must be made for the mutual benefits of continued trade cooperation and use the over 500,000 US jobs linked to trade with South Africa as leverage. Present a credible trade and investment plan that highlights the potential of key export sectors and aligns with US strategic interests, especially in green energy and technology. Commission an urgent economic risk assessment to quantify the impact of these tariffs on jobs and industries, and guide responsive, sector-specific relief measures. Appoint a qualified ambassador to Washington who understands the intersection of economics and diplomacy and can lead the high-level engagements needed to restore trust and rebuild lost ground. South Africa cannot afford more indecision, ideological posturing, or diplomatic negligence. Our future economic growth depends on pragmatic, clear-headed leadership in foreign policy that puts South African jobs front and centre. Roger Solomons - BOSA Spokesperson
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Africa Needs Genuine Friends and Solidarity, Not Big Brother Mentality
Trump 2.0 has gone measures up, selectively and divisively putting African countries under the Orwellian gaze in ways that project, 'Big Brother mentality." Image: Brendan Smialowski/AFP The most challenging emotion for any African international relations observer and ordinary person today is processing the current US administration's stance against South Africa, in particular, and Africa in general. The legacy of the US in Africa may be problematic and mostly detrimental to the African population. But Trump 1.0 and 2.0 have demonstrated shocking derisive contempt for the continent and its people. Depending on which side of the debate one is on, the US could be the world's number one superpower or a rapidly declining one. The rise of a multipolar world and global pluralism, which recognises the emergence of other civilisations and nations, and their right to chart their foreign policies as long as they align and recognise the United Nations Charter, must be recognised. Gideon Chitanga, PhD, is an international relations and political analyst. Image: Supplied Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Although the African continent bled its most important asset, its human resources, through the slave trade, and was later subjected to close to a century of colonialism, its contribution to human civilisation through intellectual production and culture, abundant natural resources and trade, and the struggle for independence, self determination and national sovereignty should never be taken for granted. There is no doubt about the realisation and direction the continent needs to take, despite many national challenges. Africa is part of a fast-changing world order in which genuine friendships, partnerships and solidarity informed by empathetic historical understanding of its contradictions and choices could steer a robust path towards development. The rise of China, the second-largest economy in the world, and a nucleus around which the multipolar world is emerging into a reality, attests to changing times attuned to genuine multilateralism. Africa-China cooperation, and growing ties among countries of the global south are producing irrefutable evidence of progressive socio-economic transformation in infrastructure, energy, agriculture, and industrial partnerships, which are unfortunately rattling other powers, instead of supporting such initiatives. Increasingly, Africa and other countries in the global south are demanding an equal voice, responsible exercise of power and an equal share of economic prosperity in the interest of Africans and the whole human race. Despite resonant calls for commitment to multilateralism, a more participatory and equitable world order based on solidarity, international cooperation and mutually beneficial relations, respect for the national sovereignty and self-determination of other nations, the Trump Administration is rewriting history to the age of power is mighty, characterised by 'big brother mentality.' Trump 2.0 has gone measures up, selectively and divisively putting African countries under the Orwellian gaze in ways that project, 'Big Brother mentality." There is no denying the power of partnerships, including bilateral relations with the US, but Africa needs genuine friendship and solidarity that is informed by, and shares common concerns with, the structural legacy of poverty and inequality induced by close to a century of colonial hegemony. To the extent that some of the African leaders have failed their nations, and indeed Africa, friends of the continent and its people should work positively with Africans, who have a better, deeper understanding of their conditions to improve national institutions, governance, and equip the young generation of leaders with proper skills to lead during increasingly complex fluid global context. Furthermore, they must closely collaborate with African countries, and together with much of the global south, to advocate for more equitable international relations, fostering mutually beneficial win-win relations among all nations. While African countries and much of the global south are focused on improving socio-economic transformation at home, and multilateral relations that uplift many of us, Washington has chosen to go isolationist, seeking to 'Make America Great Again' (MAGA). Since the Trump Administration assumed power, it has imposed economic tariffs, including on some of the weakest economies in Africa, unilaterally cut aid, walked away from multilateral commitments such as the Paris Agreement on climate change, and recently from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). UNESCO is a specialised agency of the United Nations whose core mission is to build peace and security through international collaboration in education, science, culture, and communication. A statement attributed to Audrey Azoulay, the Director-General of UNESCO, says that the US withdrawal was anticipated, of course reflecting the general recognition that Washington is rolling back or out of major multilateral institutions. Azoulay profoundly noted that the decision to withdraw from UNESCO contradicts the fundamental principles of multilateralism. While withdrawing from multilateral institutions may be a legitimate choice of the current US Administration and American voters, it is its external behaviour that is not only concerning, but also boggles the mind. Let's take the example of South Africa, a major continental economic and political hub, which now finds itself as a major target of the US republican government. South Africa is a relatively stable multiracial democracy facing severe economic challenges, which, among many factors, largely accounts for its sluggish economic growth at an average of 1% in the past decade. A combination of growing violent crime, partly attributable to growing unemployment and a huge influx of economic and political migrants, has created major challenges for South Africa's Government of National Unity, under the African National Congress (ANC) and the Democratic Alliance (DA), a party dominated by the minority white population. US-South Africa relations are in jeopardy, but not because Pretoria has violated any of its domestic or international obligations. South Africa has consistently sought to exercise its foreign policy under its constitution and historical norms, in some cases to the consternation of US foreign policy, which tends to be oblivious of the human rights of its targets and the interests of the Global South. South Africa assumed its continental and global prominence after probably experiencing the harshest apartheid policy suffered by any nation. Secondly, like many post-colonial African states, the exercise of its national sovereignty and self-determination was realised out of a painful liberation struggle by its oppressed population. Yet, recently, the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee voted 34-16 to send the ''U.S.-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act'' to the full House of Representatives. The bill seeks a review of U.S.-South Africa relations over objections to the latter's foreign policy, and imposition of sanctions on South African government and business officials. The US is also snubbing the G20 under South Africa's Presidency, threatening the imposition of high tariffs, expelling Pretoria from AGOA, which, for all purposes, seems to have been overtaken by tariffs. The Trump Administration has also threatened to impose 100% tariffs on members of the BRICS, and to punish South Africa for its close relations with China, as well as its human rights advocacy on the Israeli war on Gaza. Sanctions will complicate South Africa's future economic prospects. Perhaps this US administration has ushered in a critical juncture for African countries to stand together in unity. The global south must reinforce national and international solidarity, intensify calls for robust multilateralism based on the United Nations Charter.
