
Farmers' body warns against US deal, says protests will 'intensify' if concerns ignored
'If the Indian government moves forward with trade deals that overlook critical issues affecting our farmers, movements like ours will be compelled to intensify our protests against such anti-farmer policies. However, we are hopeful that the same sentiment which led India to wisely withdraw from the RCEP trade negotiations will prevail in this case as well,' the farmers' body said in a statement to the government amid ongoing negotiations.
In a letter to Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, the ICCFM warned that granting duty-free access to US agricultural products under a trade agreement could have serious consequences. It noted that the US has been engaged in a trade war with China, Mexico, and Canada since 2018, which has severely affected its agricultural exports.
'The US trade deficit in agriculture has nearly doubled, indicating a significant surplus they may seek to offload onto markets like India. For example, soybean exports from the US dropped from $34.4 billion in 2022 to $24.5 billion in 2024, while corn exports fell from $18.6 billion to $13.9 billion during the same period,' the letter stated.
The ICCFM further emphasised the risk to Indian farmers, stating that the US government is among the world's largest agricultural subsidisers. The 2024 Farm Bill has allocated a staggering $1.5 trillion towards farm subsidies. These substantial supports not only restrict agricultural imports into the US but also enable American products to enter export markets at artificially low prices. Allowing such heavily subsidised US imports into India, the ICCFM argued, would undermine India's longstanding position at the World Trade Organization (WTO) against these very subsidies.
Notably, a recent report by the State Bank of India (SBI) cautioned that opening India's dairy sector to US imports could result in an annual loss of Rs 1.03 lakh crore to Indian dairy farmers. The report highlighted that milk prices in India could drop by at least 15 per cent if the sector is opened up, significantly affecting the livelihoods of small dairy farmers due to the heavily subsidised US dairy industry.
The farmers' body also criticised the US for threatening Indian farmers' livelihoods at the WTO by challenging the modest support provided by the Indian government through public procurement schemes, citing alleged violations of WTO rules.
'This is despite the glaring lack of a level playing field. The US Farm Bill 2019 alone allocated $867 billion in subsidies for American farmers, whereas an OECD study indicates that the aggregate Producer Support Estimate for Indian farmers was a negative 14 per cent over 2000–2016,' the letter stated.
On the issue of edible oil, the ICCFM pointed out that the US is the world's third-largest exporter of soybean oil.
'India, once self-sufficient in edible oil, now imports nearly 70 per cent of its requirements due to anti-farmer trade policies. On 31 May, India halved the import duty on crude palm oil, soybean oil, and sunflower oil—from 20 per cent to 10 per cent—citing inflation. This duty cut, ostensibly made in the name of a Free Trade Agreement (FTA), primarily benefits large importers who dominate the import and processing of crude edible oil,' the letter stated.
While former US President Donald Trump supported large American agribusinesses, India's leadership must protect its small-scale producers who feed the nation, the farmers said, adding that India has the capacity to produce more edible oil, and lowering import duties only undermines domestic cultivation—benefiting corporations at the expense of Indian farmers.
Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
a minute ago
- Economic Times
After Ellen DeGeneres and Richard Gere, now Jimmy Kimmel could be next star to ditch US over Trump's administration
Many Hollywood celebrities, including Ellen DeGeneres, Richard Gere, and Jimmy Kimmel, have expressed their dissatisfaction with the political climate under President Donald Trump. Some have even hinted at leaving the United States due to their concerns. These reactions have sparked debates about the role of celebrities in politics and their responsibility as public figures during times of political division and unrest. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Celebrity Reactions to Trump's Presidency Jimmy Kimmel's Political Commentary Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Public and Media Reactions FAQs: In recent years, a number of Hollywood celebrities have reportedly considered leaving the United States due to dissatisfaction with the political scenario under President Donald Trump 's administration. After outspoken figures like Ellen DeGeneres and Richard Gere raised their concerns and hinted at leaving, talk show host Jimmy Kimmel has also been hinted at moving Trump's presidency, many well-known entertainers publicly criticized his policies. Ellen DeGeneres, known for her daytime talk show and advocacy for kindness, expressed frustration with the administration approach. Similarly, actor Richard Gere highlighted concerns about political tensions and its influence on American statements often gathered media attention and sparked conversations about the role of celebrities in politics. For some, considering a relocation outside the U.S. symbolized deep dissatisfaction with the direction of the Kimmel, host of the late-night show Jimmy Kimmel Live! , has been a critic of Trump and his administration over the years. His monologues frequently address political issues, often highlighting controversies and policies with sharp humor and pointed now suggest Kimmel has privately discussed the possibility of leaving the United States, joining other celebrities in expressing discomfort with the country's political environment of Trump's that some celebrities are contemplating leaving the country often sparks mixed reactions. Supporters argue that speaking out and even leaving is a legitimate response to political dissatisfaction. Critics sometimes accuse these figures of being out of touch or abandoning the country during challenging Kimmel's possible plans add to this ongoing discussion, highlighting the role of entertainers as both public figures and citizens of the country.A1. Jimmy Kimmel is a popular late-night talk show host known for Jimmy Kimmel Live!.A2. He hosts Jimmy Kimmel Live! on television.


India.com
3 minutes ago
- India.com
‘Even Toilet Paper Will Cost More': Late-Night Comedians Colbert, Fallon Roast Trump's India Tariffs With Brutal Punchlines
Washington: US President Donald Trump's trade policy has drawn fire not only from diplomats and economists, but from America's most popular late-night comedians. Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Fallon used their Thursday shows to take aim at his new 50 percent tariff on Indian goods. The penalty on India comes in two stages: a 25 percent hike that came into effect from August 7, followed by another 25 per cent due on August 27. Washington says the move is punishment for New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil. The tariffs apply to a long list of products, from medical supplies to everyday consumer items. On The Late Show, Colbert went straight for humour. He told viewers that the tariffs would push up the price of gauze, bandages and even wading. 'Perfect time to introduce my new product, Steve's wad. What is in them? What do you care? You are bleeding. It is a wad,' he joked. He kept the jabs coming. 'I hope you remembered to set your clocks back to 'more expensive',' Colbert said, referring to the scale of the global tariff rollout. He called the hikes 'huge' and emphasised that they raised import taxes to the highest level since the Great Depression of 1929. 'Never a great sign to be compared to the worst thing ever,' he quipped. Colbert pointed out that Brazil, like India, is also facing the full 50 percent tariff. 'Bad news for meat-based Americans,' he deadpanned. Jimmy Fallon, who hosts NBC's Tonight Show, joined in the mockery. 'Today more of President Trump's tariffs went into effect for more than 90 countries, including Canada, Brazil and India. The only places Trump did not charge are North Korea and Epstein Island,' he told his audience. The line landed in the wake of renewed scrutiny of the Trump's administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Fallon said that Brazil's tariff will hit tropical fruit prices hard. 'Fifty per cent on Brazil will dramatically raise the price of bananas, mangos and pineapples. Edible Arrangements was like, 'As long as you do not raise the price of cantaloupe and long toothpicks, we are good,'' he said. Even everyday staples, Fallon warned, would not be spared. 'Toilet paper will get more expensive. You know it is bad when people come out of the bathroom like, 'Hey, where is that long CVS receipt?'' he said. Covering over 90 nations, the latest round of tariffs has set the stage for a prolonged trade confrontation. In the meantime, Colbert and Fallon seem determined to keep turning the policy into late-night punchlines.


Economic Times
5 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Sri Lankan MP backs India amid tariff row
Synopsis Amid India-US trade issues, a Sri Lankan MP, Harsha de Silva, backs India. He highlighted India's support to Sri Lanka during its economic crisis. De Silva urged against mocking India's situation. He reminded everyone of India's generosity when Colombo faced difficulties. India provided significant financial assistance to Sri Lanka in 2022. The MP's statement occurred during a parliamentary debate. New Delhi: Amid the India-US tariff standoff, a Sri Lankan parliamentarian has come out in support of New Delhi and drawn attention to how the Indian government came to Colombo's aid when the island nation was facing a crisis. During a recent parliamentary debate on the growing India-US trade tension, Colombo district MP and former minister Harsha de Silva reminded critics of India's generosity during Sri Lanka's difficult days, according to people in the know. "Don't laugh at India. Don't mock them when they are down, because when we were down, they were the only ones to lend us a hand," a source quoted de Silva as saying. "It ain't over until the fat lady sings. We witnessed you laughing. Don't laugh. India expected the tariffs to come down to 15%, and so did we."India had provided close to $4 billion in assistance to Sri Lanka during the economic crisis in 2022.