SC directs Centre for surveillance on highways to curb illegal encroachments
New Delhi [India], May 23 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed the Centre to constitute surveillance teams for regular highway patrols to inspect and collect data regarding unauthorised encroachments.
A bench led by Justice Abhay S. Oka issued a slew of directions to the Centre concerning illegally occupied highway lands. It directed the Highway Administration, under the National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 and the Highway Administration Rules, 2004, to formulate a detailed Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for constituting inspection teams tasked with monitoring National Highways and collecting data on unauthorised occupation of highway land.
Additionally, the Court directed the Union of India to establish surveillance teams comprising State Police or other forces to ensure regular and timely highway patrolling. The Court directed that compliance with both directives be reported within three months from the date of the order.
'The duty of the surveillance teams will be to do patrolling regularly and punctually. Even this compliance shall be reported within a period of three months from today', the bench stated in its judgement.
The Court was dealing with a PIL plea that flagged the issue of illegal encroachments on highway lands, the removal of which is pertinent for the safety of traffic on the highways.
The Court had earlier issued directions for removing such encroachments to the Central Ministry of Road Transport and Highways.
In its verdict pronounced on Wednesday, the Court noted that the Centre's Highway Administration has launched a mobile application 'Rajmargyatra' for the public to report incidents and hazards related to the Highways.
Thus, it directed the Centre to give wide publicity to the said mobile application on print, electronic, and social media.
'Information about the availability of this mobile application shall be displayed prominently at toll and food plazas on Highways', the court stated.
The Court also directed the Highway Administration to provide details of complaints received via the 'Rajmargyatra' app, particularly those about unauthorised highway land occupation, and the actions taken. It also directed the NHAI to report on creating a grievance redressal portal for such complaints.
The Court listed the matter seeking compliance of the said authorities on September 15, this year. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
MHA officials meet Kuki-Zo insurgent group members
The ministry of home affairs (MHA) officials on Monday held a meeting with representatives of the Kuki-Zo insurgent groups, which are currently under the Suspension of Operation (SoO) pact with the Centre, over the renewal of the SoO agreement. While the government is yet to comment on the details of the meeting, people aware of the matter, said MHA officials insisted on ensuring there is no hindrance from SoO groups on the free movement of people across the state and relocation of the camps from certain civilian areas, while the SoO groups insisted on new ground rules before the Centre renews the cessation of hostilities pact. Senior security force officers in Manipur maintained that the SoO groups wield influence over almost everything in the hill areas, where the Kuki-Zo people live, including their elected representatives. The meeting on Monday was significant because it was the first meeting held between government and SoO groups since the pact was put in abeyance last year. The MHA and the SoO group representatives have agreed to finalise a date within the next one week for the second meeting. 'There were five representatives from the two umbrella organisations KNO and UPF that are under SoO. The MHA side was represented by Northeast interlocutor AK Mishra and IB officials, including state's IB chief, a joint director rank officer. The ground rules need to be revisited and put on paper because a lot has changed since the SoO pact was signed in 2008. Before SoO is renewed, these rules must be formalised and put on paper. Both parties have to agree for its renewal. The second meeting will be held soon,' a person aware of the meeting said. The SoO agreement was signed by the Centre and the Manipur government with the insurgent groups in August 2008 and was being renewed every year until February 28, 2024 when the renewal process was kept in abeyance. The SoO was kept in abeyance by the Centre following allegations of SoO group cadres indulging in Manipur's ethnic clashes or providing training to the village defence volunteers, a charge that groups have denied vehemently. While former chief minister Biren Singh and other MLAs have demanded that the SoO pact be cancelled, Kuki-Zo groups and their legislators have requested Centre to renew the pact. There are around 1,500-2,000 insurgents from the SoO in different camps across the state. Their weapons are kept locked in a room within each camp under a double lock system - one key with them and the other with the government. Under the SoO Pact, the insurgent groups have agreed to stop any form of violence including attacks on security forces. The Centre and the state too signed that no force (army, paramilitary, state police) would launch operations against the signatories as long as they abide by the terms of the agreement. Meitei groups have accused SoO of being involved in the ethnic clashes, a charge that the representatives of the SoO groups deny.
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Speedy clearance expected in Sawalkote hydro project
The Union government is looking to give speedy clearance to a ₹22,700-crore hydropower project in Sawalkote on the Chenab so that work can commence by next year and the power ministry is on track to decide which agency should build it, two officials aware of the development said. The Sawalkote project, among four proposed hydroelectric projects in Jammu and Kashmir, has been granted the status of a nationally important project and is expected to generate 1,856 megawatts (MW) of electricity, one of the officials said. The four projects, which together can produce 3,119 MW of electricity, have been hobbled by long administrative delays as well as due to restrictions imposed by the Indus Waters Treaty, which India decided to put on hold a day after the deadly terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam on April 22 that claimed 26 lives. Apart from power, the Sawalkote dam, a so-called run-of-the-river project, will also bring irrigation potential to large agricultural tracts, a second official said, adding it will come up in the Ramban, Batote, Mahore and Udhampur forest divisions abutting the Raman, Reasi and Udhampur districts of the Union territory. The detailed project report or DPR for the dam has been prepared by the National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC) Ltd, the country's largest state-backed hydropower firm. The government is examining which agency should be tasked with the project. 'The Jammu and Kashmir government has expressed a desire to be involved in the construction of the project and build it either through one of its own power companies or through a joint venture. A decision will be taken soon,' the first official said. India has quickened processes to start work on proposed infrastructure on the Indus River system as well as speed up work on existing ones after pulling out of the 1960 water-sharing pact amid a freeze in ties following the Pahalgam terror attack. In 2021, the forest department of Jammu and Kashmir had recommended environmental clearance along with 'justifications', which had formally rolled out the process of preliminary work for the Sawalkote project, including recommendation of the catchment area plan. The Centre is likely to give a go-ahead soon for the stage I of the two-phased project after issues of picking the agency and reviewing Jammu and Kashmir's demand for a role through a joint venture are settled. The Union territory is keen on getting on board because the project will then create a revenue source for it, the second official said. 'Now that India has put the Indus treaty in abeyance, the country has no obligations under the treaty and it is free to create infrastructure in the Indus rivers on the Indian side,' said Shashi Shekhar, a former Union water resources secretary. Shekhar, as the top water resources bureaucrat then, had recommended the Centre suspend the treaty in 2016, when terrorists had attacked an Indian army base in Kashmir's Uri, killing 18 soldiers. Prior to keeping the water-sharing pact in abeyance following the Pahalgam terror attack, India had been pressing Pakistan to renegotiate the treaty, citing natural changes in the Indus river basin itself, which had diminished India's share amid a rising population. Under the treaty, the ratio of water shared by Pakistan and India stood at 80:20. India had sought a revision in the terms of the treaty bilaterally. According to the Indian side, Pakistan ignored pleas for bilateral renegotiation, and instead moved the World Bank for appointing a neutral expert to address the issues. India then accepted a neutral expert appointed by the World Bank, which had brokered the six-decade-old treaty by formulating its technical aspects, according to the Indian side. However, Pakistan then moved for international arbitration, a step India considers was a serious escalation by Islamabad, without exhausting all available options, according to Indian officials. Since India's decision to suspend the treaty, Pakistan has written four letters to Indian authorities, offering to discuss specific issues, HT had reported last week. India and Pakistan have fought four wars but the treaty had never been paused before. In letters sent to India, Pakistani authorities are learnt to have said that India didn't have powers to unilaterally suspend the treaty and called for resumption of negotiations. In an international conference on glaciers in Dushanbe on May 30, Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had raked up the treaty, accusing India of 'weaponising water'.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
HC drops four serious charges against Dalip Tahil's son Druv
MUMBAI: In a significant relief for actor Dalip Tahil's son Dhruv Tahil, 34, the Bombay High Court on Monday quashed four serious charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act that had been filed against him by the Mumbai Police's Anti-Narcotics Cell (ANC). Justice Milind Jadhav, presiding over a single-judge bench, held that the serious charges—relating to drug trafficking, conspiracy, and financing the illicit drug trade—were wrongly applied. The court noted that these charges stemmed from the ANC's decision to club together multiple alleged drug purchases made over 18 months, which was legally unsound. The case dates back to May 2021, when the ANC's Bandra unit arrested a man named Muzammil Shaikh near HDIL Tower in Bandra East. Police allegedly recovered 35 grams of mephedrone (MD) from him. Examination of Shaikh's mobile phone reportedly revealed that he had supplied small quantities of the drug to various individuals, including Dhruv Tahil. According to the police, between July 2019 and January 2021, Dhruv purchased a total of 44 grams of MD in 15 separate transactions, paying a total of ₹24,700. On this basis, the ANC booked him under stringent provisions of the NDPS Act, including Section 8(c) read with 22(b) (for possession of intermediate quantity), Section 27A (for financing illicit trafficking), and Section 29 (for conspiracy). While Section 8(c) carries a sentence of up to 10 years, Sections 27A and 29 prescribe imprisonment between 10 and 20 years. Dhruv had challenged the charges before the special NDPS court, which dismissed his plea on July 4, 2023. He then approached the High Court. His counsel, advocate Ayaz Khan, argued that the police had improperly aggregated multiple instances of small-quantity possession to frame charges applicable only to intermediate quantities. He contended that even if the allegations were accepted, they would, at most, attract Section 8(c) read with 22(a), which deals with small quantities and carries a maximum punishment of one year or fine, or both. Khan further relied on Section 218 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), which mandates a separate charge for each distinct offence. He argued that the prosecution could not legally merge 15 separate small purchases into one case to apply more serious provisions. Justice Jadhav agreed with the argument, observing that the prosecution had 'clearly erred' in clubbing multiple transactions into a single, more serious offence. 'This has led to the applicant being charged with an offence of a higher magnitude,' the judge noted. He pointed out that the NDPS charges under Sections 27A and 29, applied across an 18-month period, were 'prima facie bad in law.' He also emphasised that the procedural law—specifically Sections 218 and 219 of the CrPC—does not permit clubbing more than three offences into one trial if they span such a long period. 'Procurement of 1 or 2 grams of contraband at a time by the applicant over 18 months constitutes separate acts, and each would require a distinct charge,' Justice Jadhav said. With this reasoning, the court struck down the four serious NDPS charges against Dhruv Tahil, clearing the way for a more limited prosecution, if at all, under provisions dealing with small quantities.
