Chicago man says squatters occupied his home before a showing and wouldn't leave — here's what he did
Steven Brill was excited to list his freshly renovated Tinley Park, Illinois home for sale. But shortly after posting the listing, his real estate agent called him to report a startling discovery — a family of four, complete with two dogs, had already moved into Brill's home without permission.
"I put the house on the market Monday evening, and then yesterday at 4 p.m., an agent went to go show the house for a showing," Brill explained to ABC 7 Chicago. "She said, 'Hey, we have a huge problem. We have squatters in the house.'"
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
Americans with upside-down car loans owe more money than ever before — and drivers can't keep up. Here are 3 ways to cut your monthly costs ASAP
Despite seeing the deed, police initially couldn't help Brill. The unwelcome occupants claimed they had a lease, even producing paperwork when confronted by police. But the police were unable to remove the squatters and told Brill he'd need to go through the eviction process.
In Illinois, that's a lengthy process that can take months. Here's what Brill did instead.
Squatters often take advantage of legal ambiguities and exploit the eviction process, which tends to favor occupants once a property is occupied. In Illinois, only the sheriff can perform evictions — and they need a court order to do so, which makes it challenging for landlords to remove squatters.
In Brill's case, the Tinley Park police initially deemed the provided lease credible enough not to intervene.
"Though the lease is most likely invalid, that is not the officers' responsibility to determine. Evictions are a civil matter," said a spokesperson for the Tinley Park Police Department.
Real estate attorney Mo Dadkhah explained why in a statement to ABC 7.
"Typically, when police or a sheriff shows up, they'll say, 'we have an agreement with the landlord.' And at that point, the police officer doesn't know if this document is real. They can't throw someone out who could potentially be a tenant. So, they'll tell the landlord, 'you have to go through the eviction process,' which unfortunately in the Chicagoland area, is lengthy. It's long and time-consuming," Dadkhah said.
Brill thought he would be forced to go through the eviction process, but a call to ABC 7 Chicago's I-Team finally provided relief. The I-Team reached out to the Tinley Park police, who agreed to do more investigating and found that the lease the family provided was invalid. The paperwork didn't have the correct address.
With that information, the police were able to force the family to leave, and Brill is now back in his home.
"I'm very glad I reached out to you guys. You were on it, jumped on it right away. I believe that calling you guys actually helped,' Brill told reporters. 'I feel like that lit a fire, and got everybody moving even faster.'
Read more: Are you rich enough to join the top 1%? Here's the net worth you need to rank among America's wealthiest — plus 2 ways to build that first-class portfolio
Squatters are a growing problem across the U.S., and several states are passing legislation to address the challenge. Situations like Brill's can quickly spiral into a costly burden from lost rental income, inability to sell, property damage and expensive legal fees.
Landlords and homeowners can take several steps to protect their property, starting with securing vacant properties with surveillance cameras and motion-sensor lights. If you know your neighbors, make sure they're aware the home is vacant and ask them to contact you if anyone appears to be living there. Regularly check locks and entry points for damage, too.
Sometimes, legitimate renters can turn into squatters. To limit your risk, implement a thorough screening process, including background and reference checks. Documenting your property's condition before listing or renting it can provide evidence for legal recourse if a squatter situation arises.
For properties that are often vacant, like vacation or rental homes, it may be worth investing in squatter insurance plans. These specialized plans can cover lost revenue, legal expenses, court costs and property damage.
Despite some experts saying it's a relatively rare occurrence, the cost of squatters can be high. Ultimately, awareness, vigilance and immediate action are critical to safeguarding your property and finances from the risk of squatting.
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Protect your retirement savings with these 5 essential money moves — most of which you can complete in just minutes
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
From a Russian prison, US schoolteacher tells lawyers he was grabbed by Moscow's soldiers
By Lucy Papachristou LONDON (Reuters) -A 73-year-old American jailed by Russia as a mercenary for Ukraine protested his innocence when his U.S.-based legal team and family finally tracked him down in April, months after he vanished into the vast Russian prison system, they said. Stephen Hubbard, a retired schoolteacher, was sentenced last October to almost seven years in a penal colony after a court found him guilty of serving in a Ukrainian territorial defence unit against Russian forces, tasked with manning a checkpoint. Russian state media reported that he had entered a guilty plea in the closed-door trial. The U.S. Embassy in Moscow has not been granted consular access to Hubbard, a State Department spokesperson said, adding that U.S. officials have requested his immediate release. Martin De Luca, his U.S.-based lawyer, told Reuters it was not until this April that his legal team learned Hubbard was being held in a facility in the Mordovia region, east of Moscow. "The first thing Hubbard wanted to talk about when he was able to make contact with the outside world was: 'It's not true,'" said De Luca, who made his first public comments on the case to the New York Times this week. "They (Russian soldiers) grabbed him from his house. He was not in any combat or military unit", De Luca recalled Hubbard saying. Joseph Coleman, a son from Hubbard's first marriage who lives in Cyprus, said he spoke to his father in prison by phone for less than five minutes on May 28. "He did sound a little down," Coleman told Reuters. "He said, 'I'm tired of being a slave.'" At least eight other Americans are currently imprisoned in Russia, which has stepped up arrests of alleged mercenaries for Ukraine since its 2022 invasion of its neighbour. But Hubbard is the only one designated by the U.S. as "wrongfully detained," making him a top candidate to be returned in any future prisoner exchange. The Kremlin said last month the two sides were discussing a possible swap involving nine people on each side. A document written on the letterhead of the IK-12 penal colony, signed by a prison official and seen by Reuters, says that Hubbard is incarcerated there. Russia's federal prison service did not respond to an emailed request for confirmation from Reuters. Other U.S. citizens previously jailed in Russia have been incarcerated in the same region. VIDEO CLUES Hubbard, a Michigan native who taught English abroad for decades, had moved to Izium in eastern Ukraine in 2014 to be with a Ukrainian girlfriend, but by 2022 he was living there alone, his family said. Russian forces captured Izium in April 2022. After his arrest, his family struggled to establish what had happened to him. They caught glimpses of him in videos posted online in pro-war Russian Telegram channels. One showed what appeared to be a staged interrogation. In another, Hubbard appeared with his hands zip-tied and whimpered as a man slapped him with a plastic sandal. His sister, Patricia Hubbard Fox, identified her brother in both videos in conversations with Reuters. The agency could not verify when and where the videos were taken. "He is so non-military," Hubbard Fox told Reuters last year, expressing doubt that her brother would have taken up arms for any state. "He never had a gun, owned a gun, done any of that... He's more of a pacifist." TRACKING HIM DOWN After Hubbard's trial, De Luca and his team at a U.S. law firm began working to secure his release. They picked up the case in late February. It wasn't easy to find him, De Luca said. "Russia is still a functioning country. There are laws, bureaucracies, processes that get followed," he said. The team located Hubbard at the penal colony in Molochnitsa, a very small town about a seven-hour drive from Moscow. De Luca said the team has been able to call Hubbard three times since April. He described him as weak after months living in a prisoner-of-war camp.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Coders are saving the Second Amendment: DIY guns and digital resistance
America has always defended itself and its freedoms with a gun in hand. But as technology evolves, code is starting to take its place. A new generation of Second Amendment supporters no longer visits shooting ranges or joins the NRA — instead, it circulates blueprints for 3D-printed weapons. Its members' mission is to protect their homes and their right to bear arms, no matter how the government feels about it. While Americans argue about bans, laws, and protests, an entire ecosystem of do-it-yourself gun culture has grown right under their noses. It's nothing like the old movies, where weapons were built from pipes and nails. Ghost guns — firearms without serial numbers or registration — are often made with parts printed on 3D printers and bought online. U.S. law allows individuals to make firearms for personal use, as long as they don't sell them. According to the ATF, this is legal in many cases. This culture has gone far beyond garages. Blueprints and guides are now spread through Tor, Telegram, and GitHub – anonymously and in ways that are nearly impossible to erase. The first famous design, 'The Liberator,' was posted back in 2013. To this day, anonymous communities keep sharing new versions. These self-styled digital patriots view the right to bear arms as a core freedom. Critics argue they undermine control, because weapons without serial numbers can't be traced. Laws can limit sales, but not ideas. While politicians try to close down stores, millions are downloading code. The Second Amendment has been digitized — it now lives in browsers. When the Supreme Court recently allowed new regulations on so-called 'ghost guns,' as detailed in this ruling, it only proved the paradox: Governments can chase physical parts, but the digital heartbeat of the Second Amendment grows stronger. For every law targeting the sale of hardware, a thousand computer files escape into the wild — untraceable, unstoppable, multiplying in the encrypted corners of the internet, where freedom now lives. Maybe we have reached the point where weapons are no longer just objects. They cannot be eradicated through any amount of banning, seizing, or burning so long as they can be downloaded. Yes, it's scary, but freedom isn't about comfort. It is about risk, discomfort, and chaos — and living with that to keep the right to defend yourself. I don't support putting guns in the hands of criminals. I also don't believe the answer is total control, or that such a thing is even possible. Today, the state is trying to catch up with the internet. But the internet will never stop. As Wired explains, this movement is spreading faster than any law can catch up. And maybe the real question isn't whether to ban weapons — it's how to live in a world where a weapon is now knowledge. This is Prometheus's curse for the digital age: We have stolen the fire of creation, and now we must live with its light, its heat and its burns. The more the government tries to play god by banning and seizing, the deeper into the cave the forge of innovation moves, hammering out new blueprints where Zeus's lightning cannot reach. Maybe this is the new era of the Second Amendment — and its files can't be taken away from Americans. Artem Kolisnichenko writes on crime, immigration, and border policy across the American South and Southwest. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
5 takeaways from the Alex Padilla furor
Chaotic scenes in which Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was pressed to the ground and handcuffed by federal agents set the political world aflame on Thursday. Padilla had come to a news conference being held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, raising his voice to ask questions. Agents, reportedly including at least one member of Noem's official security detail, swarmed Padilla, moving him to a corridor before pressing him to the ground and placing the handcuffs on him. The stunning moment played out against the political backdrop of disorder in California. President Trump's administration is seeking to crack down even harder on immigrants without legal status, and pro-immigrant activists are trying to block Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents from detaining people. Anti-ICE demonstrators have hurled debris at police and set cars ablaze. The strife — and the political debate — intensified after Trump ordered the deployment of the National Guard and the Marines. He did so in contravention of the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D). Here are the main takeaways from the Padilla episode. The sheer potency of the Padilla video is more powerful than anything else. The most widely circulated clip, which lasts less than a minute, begins with Padilla standing relatively close to where Noem is speaking, but not within arm's reach or making any sudden move toward her. Agents begin to push him further away. As they continue physically pressing in on him, the senator says, 'I am Sen. Alex Padilla, I have questions for the secretary.' Padilla begins to make remarks that he never gets to finish related to 'violent criminals,' and he is pushed into an adjacent corridor, briefly out of view of the camera. A voice — presumably Padilla's — says 'hands off.' Moments later, with three agents surrounding him, he is told to get 'on the ground' and to put his hands behind his back. At least two of the agents have their hands on Padilla holding him to the ground at this point, and cuffs are placed on him. A voice from an unidentified man then tells the person filming the events on their cellphone that no recording is allowed. The brief clip ends. But the shocking nature of seeing a sitting senator treated in such a way resonated immediately, taking over cable TV networks and social media and sparking a political firestorm. Democrats responded with fury to the treatment of Padilla, casting it as horrifying in itself — and as emblematic of the Trump administration's broader approach. Former Vice President Kamala Harris wrote on social media that the way Padilla was treated was a 'shameful and stunning abuse of power.' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said he was 'sickened to my stomach' by what he had seen. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) called it 'a horrifying moment in our nation's history.' Democrats, and millions of liberal Americans, were already outraged about Trump's deployment of the National Guard and the Marines, which they argue was an unnecessary and purposefully inflammatory move. Several media outlets reported that Padilla's attempt to question Noem took place after she had claimed federal agents were going 'to liberate this city' from its 'socialist' leaders. Soon after the incident on Thursday, Newsom called the treatment of Padilla 'outrageous, dictatorial and shameful,' and Bass said it was 'absolutely abhorrent.' But liberals also see the immigration question as part of a bigger picture, in which Trump has sought to exert his muscle against universities, the media, judges and law firms, as well as his political foes. To them, he is a president exceptional in all the wrong ways — in his intolerance of dissent, and his willingness to use the levers of government power to crush it. The images of Padilla being handcuffed crystallizes their case. The White House has vigorously defended the agents' treatment of Padilla. They are saying the senator is to blame. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement, 'Padilla stormed a press conference, without wearing his Senate pin or previously identifying himself to security, yelled, and lunged toward Secretary Noem.' The video of the incident does not appear to show Padilla wearing the pin that identifies senators, but it also does not include images of him lunging at Noem. Moreover, he clearly does inform the agents who swarm him that he is a senator. The White House's argument is that he did not do so early enough in the encounter. Jackson added, 'Padilla didn't want answers; he wanted attention.' The official X account of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) also contended that Padilla had 'interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself' and had 'lunged' at Noem. The DHS also alleged that Padilla was 'told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers' repeated commands.' Noem herself told Fox News soon after, 'He was never arrested. … Nobody knew who he was when he came into the room creating a scene. He was removed from the room. Yes, they started to put handcuffs on him — when he finally identified himself and then that was stopped.' Padilla says it's false to suggest nobody knew who he was, even before the melee erupted, because a member of the National Guard and an FBI agent escorted him into Noem's press conference from elsewhere in the building in the first place. Even so, members of the Trump administration plainly believe that adopting the president's 'never back down' approach will pay political dividends. The Padilla episode plainly helps Democrats make their case that the Trump administration is prone to repressive tactics. But the image of the senator on the ground also has to compete, in a political sense, with some of the equally compelling images of disorder in Los Angeles. Images of anti-ICE protesters using Molotov cocktails, carrying Mexican flags and setting fire to vehicles have been potent, especially with audiences that lean to the right. The latter images have been used to make the case that Democrats are soft on immigration — and on crime, especially if it relates to protests for causes they believe in. Those images, in turn, feed the belief that Trump is justified in mobilizing troops to restore order. Immigration was Trump's strongest issue in the general election campaign against Harris last year. He argued that former President Biden had been far too lax on the issue, in effect facilitating a massive influx at the southern border. Voters have mostly approved of Trump's efforts on border security while in office, as unauthorized crossings have fallen precipitously. But his poll ratings on immigration writ large are much more mixed. It's plausible that the apparent discrepancy stems from a public disquiet with some of the tactics used by immigration agents, and with Trump's often fractious attitude toward the courts when they rule against him. An Economist/YouGov poll this week highlighted the split. It found that 47 percent of surveyed Americans believe Trump's approach to immigration it too harsh, 40 percent believe it is about right, and 7 percent believe it is too soft. The same poll found 87 percent of surveyed Americans supporting the deportation of migrants without legal status who have committed violent crimes — but 61 percent opposed to deportations of those who had not committed violent crimes. In short, the politics of immigration is more nuanced and more changeable than hard-liners on either side make it appear. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
