Michael Steele: Lackluster GOP candidates open a 'battlefield' in fight for Senate control
Michael Steele, former Republican National Committee chair and co-host of 'The Weeknight,' said Brown's comeback bid shows how Democrats could sail to victory in next year's elections.
According to Steele, there are three types of candidates in each election cycle: the vulnerable, the secure and 'the unknown.' He called Brown an unknown — an 'individual who gets in a race that no one thought they would.' Steele said those candidates have a higher chance at an upset.
'That's the part that I think all of this works to the advantage of Democrats, because they have much more of those unknowns sort of falling into their favor,' he continued, pointing to North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper's decision to enter the Senate race in his state.
Steele also said there was another factor working in Democrats' favor ahead of the midterms: Many high-profile Republicans are sitting on the sidelines. Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp and former New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu both declined to run for Senate, despite pleas from their party.
Steele said their absences open up a 'battlefield' for Democrats and it's up to them to 'seize the moment, the momentum and the messaging.'
When Steele's co-host, Alicia Menendez, asked why he believed prominent Republicans like Kemp and Sununu were sitting out of the midterms, the former RNC chair said, 'It's not complicated.'
'They don't want Donald Trump anywhere near anything they're touching, because their ambitions go beyond 2026,' he said. 'So they don't want to have to run in a campaign in which Donald Trump could throw some smack their way, or they may have to smack him.'
You can watch Steele's full analysis in the clip at the top of the page.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
29 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Who is Tina Peters? Trump calls for her to be released from prison ‘RIGHT NOW'
President Donald Trump demanded the immediate release of Tina Peters, a former Colorado election official who is currently in prison. 'FREE TINA PETERS, a brave and innocent Patriot who has been tortured by Crooked Colorado politicians,' Trump wrote in an Aug. 21 Truth Social post. 'Let Tina Peters out of jail, RIGHT NOW,' he added. 'She did nothing wrong, except catching the Democrats cheat in the Election. She is an old woman, and very sick. If she is not released, I am going to take harsh measures!!!' The president previously called for Peters' release in May. Peters, 69, served as the county clerk of Mesa County, Colorado, from 2018 to 2023, where she oversaw elections. In 2021, state officials began investigating Peters after sensitive voting information from Mesa County surfaced online, according to Colorado Public Radio. It was alleged that she provided unauthorized access to voting equipment undergoing a software update to an individual connected to Mike Lindell, the MyPillow CEO, who has argued that the 2020 election was stolen. Peters, herself, was a prominent election denier. In Aug. 2024, a jury found Peters guilty of several criminal charges, including first degree official misconduct and failure to comply with secretary of state requirements. 'Today's verdict is a warning to others that they will face serious consequences if they attempt to illegally tamper with our voting processes or election systems,' Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser said at the time. Two months later, Peters was handed a 9-year prison sentence. During her sentencing hearing, Peters asked the judge for leniency, saying she 'never did anything with malice' and that she believed she was doing right by the people in her county, according to ABC News. 'I really am remorseful,' she added. Attorneys for Peters are currently appealing her conviction at the Colorado State Court of Appeals. In May, Trump also directed the Department of Justice to take action in order to secure the release of Peters, whom he said exposed fraud in the 2020 election. For years, Trump has claimed without evidence that the 2020 presidential election was stolen or 'rigged' due to voter fraud. Neither an attorney for Peters nor Colorado officials immediately responded to requests for comment from McClatchy News.
San Francisco Chronicle
29 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
How do you feel about Newsom's plan to go tit for tat with Texas on gerrymandering?
Gov. Gavin Newsom is ready to fight fire with fire. The governor's plan for a ballot measure to authorize the gerrymandering of California's congressional districts, if Texas and other red states do the same, is coming to fruition. 'These guys are playing by a different set of rules,' Newsom told the Chronicle in July. 'If we're gonna play fair in a world that is wholly unfair, we may have the higher moral ground, but the ground is shifting from underneath us.' On Thursday, California lawmakers will vote on whether to set a special election on Nov. 4 to ask voters if they want to temporarily replace congressional maps drawn by the independent California Citizens Redistricting Commission with gerrymandered districts that favor Democrats. All this is happening because President Donald Trump is pressuring Texas to redraw its congressional districts to squeeze out Democrats and strengthen the Republican majority in the House. The GOP-led Texas Legislature is complying with Trump and could vote on redistricting this week. We want to know how you feel about it. Questions about letters or the editorial board's process, shoot me an email at hmok@
San Francisco Chronicle
29 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump
NEW YORK (AP) — An appeals court has thrown out the massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump, ruling Thursday in New York state's lawsuit accusing him of exaggerating his wealth. The decision came seven months after the Republican returned to the White House. A panel of five judges in New York's mid-level Appellate Division said the verdict, which stood to cost Trump more than $515 million and rock his real estate empire, was 'excessive.' After finding that Trump engaged in fraud by flagrantly padding financial statements that went to lenders and insurers, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered him last year to pay $355 million in penalties. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million. The total — combined with penalties levied on some other Trump Organization executives, including Trump's sons Eric and Donald Jr. — now exceeds $527 million, with interest. 'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' Judges Dianne T. Renwick and Peter H. Moulton wrote in one of several opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling. Engoron also imposed other punishments, such as banning Trump and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Those provisions have been on pause during Trump's appeal, and he was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond. The court, which was split on the merits of the lawsuit and the lower court's fraud finding, dismissed the penalty Engoron imposed in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for further appeals to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. The appeals court, the Appellate Division of the state's trial court, took an unusually long time to rule, weighing Trump's appeal for nearly 11 months after oral arguments last fall. Normally, appeals are decided in a matter of weeks or a few months. New York Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the suit on the state's behalf, has said the businessman-turned-politician engaged in 'lying, cheating, and staggering fraud.' Trump and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. In a six-minute summation of sorts after a monthslong trial, Trump proclaimed in January 2024 that he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me.' He has repeatedly maintained that the case and verdict were political moves by James and Engoron, who are both Democrats. Trump's Justice Department has subpoenaed James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. James' personal attorney, Abbe D. Lowell, has said that investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren't deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren't audited. The defense also noted that bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, lowball estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing in September, Trump's lawyers argued that many of the case's allegations were too old, an assertion they made unsuccessfully before trial. The defense also contends that James misused a consumer-protection law to sue Trump and improperly policed private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. State attorneys said the law in question applies to fraudulent or illegal business conduct, whether it targets everyday consumers or big corporations. Though Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, the state contends that the numbers led lenders to make riskier loans than they knew, and that honest borrowers lose out when others game their net-worth numbers. The state has argued that the verdict rests on ample evidence and that the scale of the penalty comports with Trump's gains, including his profits on properties financed with the loans and the interest he saved by getting favorable terms offered to wealthy borrowers. The civil fraud case was just one of several legal obstacles for Trump as he campaigned, won and segued to a second term as president. On Jan. 10, he was sentenced in his criminal hush money case to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him jail, probation, a fine or other punishment. He is appealing the conviction. And in December, a federal appeals court upheld a jury's finding that Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her, affirming a $5 million judgment against him. The appeals court declined in June to reconsider; he still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. ___
