logo
Analysis-Ukraine's huge financing gap set to widen as war heats up and reforms stall

Analysis-Ukraine's huge financing gap set to widen as war heats up and reforms stall

The Star6 days ago
KYIV (Reuters) -Ukraine's financing gap will widen significantly next year if Russia keeps up its intense attacks across the country and the government fails to act on demands for reform from foreign lenders, analysts say.
The government spends most state revenues on the army and finances social and humanitarian spending with foreign aid, which state data shows has totalled $139 billion since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022.
Central Bank Governor Andriy Pyshnyi said that only about a third of the $65 billion needed for both 2026 and 2027 had been pledged, with talks underway on the rest.
A poll of eight economists by the Centre for Economic Studies, a Kyiv-based think-tank, showed Ukraine will need between $39 billion - this year's sum - and about $58 billion in external financing for next year alone. The task is urgent.
"A key challenge for the government now is to look for $10-15 billion in addition to that volume of aid which partners have already pledged for 2026," ICU, a Kyiv-based investment house, said in a research note.
Those negotiations may become more difficult after Ukraine missed key targets agreed with lenders - including the appointment of judges and other key officials - and the president tightened control over the two main agencies investigating corruption.
The move by President Volodymyr Zelenskiy sparked Ukraine's biggest wartime street protests and prompted strong criticism from Kyiv's European allies, who made it clear that strong anti-graft measures were key to the country's EU aspirations.
Zelenskiy backtracked and has submitted a new draft law to parliament, vowing to restore the independence of institutions set up to root out corruption, even at the highest level. The vote on the draft bill is set for later on Thursday.
But some damage has been done already, experts say.
"Although Europe is unlikely to walk away from Ukraine, future financial and military support will likely come under much more scrutiny, leading to delays that Ukraine can ill afford," said Evghenia Sleptsova, senior economist at Oxford Economics.
STALLED REFORMS
To unlock the next tranches of multi-year lending programs from the European Union and the International Monetary Fund, Ukraine needs to make various reform steps which include hiring more judges to the highest anti-corruption court, overhauling the agency tasked with managing nationalised assets and appointing a head of the bureau for economic security.
In the first quarter of this year, Ukraine failed to meet several funding targets under the four-year 50 billion-euro Ukraine Facility approved by the EU last year, two officials with knowledge of the matter said. In June, Ukraine requested 3 billion euros instead of the 4.5 billion euros it was meant to receive for the second quarter, they said.
The economy ministry, a coordinator for the facility, said Ukraine was meeting all its obligations despite wartime challenges and expected a tranche worth about 3 billion euros in August. The ministry said it hoped to receive a 1.45 billion euro tranche at a later stage.
Ukraine also has a $15.5 billion support program with the IMF and plans talks on a new lending program, officials say.
Danylo Hetmansev, a lawmaker from the ruling party and the head of parliament's committee for taxes and finances, said the delays in meeting key reform targets were baffling.
"I cannot say that among the uncompleted tasks there was anything extremely difficult or unmanageable," he said on the Telegram app.
Officials say that the government is working to implement all required reform steps but some more complicated tasks require more time.
Ukraine overhauled its government on July 17, appointing experienced technocrat Yulia Svyrydenko as the first new prime minister in five years to revitalise economic management.
The economy grew 2.9% last year but for this year, the central bank has cut its forecast to 2.1% as hopes for a quick end to the war as predicted by U.S. President Donald Trump have faded.
"While many of us have previously assumed that 2026 would be easier, we now anticipate that the war will continue into next year," said Oleksandra Betlyi, researcher from the Institute of Economic Studies in Ukraine.
She cited mining and agriculture among economic weak spots.
As Russian troops advance in the eastern Donetsk region, Ukraine has lost key assets, including the country's only coking coal mine near the besieged city of Pokrovsk. Russian strikes have also damaged Ukraine's gas production, Betlyi added.
Trump set a new deadline on Monday of 10 or 12 days for Russia to make progress toward ending the war in Ukraine, threatening to impose new sanctions if it failed to do so.
Analysts pointed out that Ukraine would be unable to cut its defence spending significantly next year, even if a ceasefire was agreed this year, given that its much larger neighbour Russia has hiked military spending to record levels.
Ukraine will spend a record 2.6 trillion hryvnias ($62 billion) or about 31% of GDP on defence this year.
($1 = 0.8725 euros)
(Reporting by Olena Harmash; Editing by Mike Collett-White and Philippa Fletcher)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil prices fall on Opec+ output hikes
Oil prices fall on Opec+ output hikes

The Star

time5 minutes ago

  • The Star

Oil prices fall on Opec+ output hikes

Brent crude futures settled US$1.12, or 1.63%, lower to US$67.64 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate crude slipped US$1.13, or 1.7%, to US$65.16. NEW YORK: Oil prices slipped on Tuesday as rising Opec+ supply and worries of weaker global demand countered concern about US President Donald Trump's threats to India over its Russian oil purchases. Brent crude futures settled US$1.12, or 1.63%, lower to US$67.64 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate crude slipped US$1.13, or 1.7%, to US$65.16. Both benchmarks settled to their lowest in five weeks. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, together known as Opec+, agreed on Sunday to raise oil production by 547,000 barrels per day for September, a move that will end its most recent output cut earlier than planned. "The significant increase in Opec supplies is weighing on the market," said Andrew Lipow, president of Lipow Oil Associates. Also weighing on prices, US services sector activity unexpectedly flatlined in July with little change in orders and a further weakening in employment even as input costs climbed by the most in nearly three years, underscoring the ongoing drag of uncertainty over the Trump administration's tariff policy on businesses. "The market now is going to see if India and China agree to substantially reduce the purchases of Russian crude oil, thereby looking for alternative supplies elsewhere," Lipow said. Trump on Tuesday again threatened higher tariffs on Indian goods over the country's Russian oil purchases over the next 24 hours. Trump also said declining energy prices could pressure Russian President Vladimir Putin to halt the war in Ukraine. New Delhi called Trump's threat "unjustified" and vowed to protect its economic interests, deepening a trade rift between the two countries. Oil's move since Trump's threat indicates that traders are sceptical of a supply disruption happening, John Evans of oil broker PVM said in a report. He questioned whether Trump would risk higher oil prices. "I'd call it a stable market for oil," said Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS. "Assume this likely continues until we figure out what the US president announces in respect to Russia later this week and how those buyers would react." India is the biggest buyer of seaborne crude from Russia, importing about 1.75 million bpd from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by trade sources. US crude inventories fell by 4.2 million barrels last week, sources citing American Petroleum Institute figures said on Tuesday. The US Energy Information Administration is due to release weekly U.S. inventory data on Wednesday, respectively. — Reuters

Brazil's Supreme Court caught off guard by order to arrest Bolsonaro, sources say
Brazil's Supreme Court caught off guard by order to arrest Bolsonaro, sources say

The Star

time5 minutes ago

  • The Star

Brazil's Supreme Court caught off guard by order to arrest Bolsonaro, sources say

Supporters of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro take part in a motorcade to protest, after Brazil's Supreme Court issued a house arrest order for him, in Brasilia, Brazil, August 4, 2025. REUTERS/Adriano Machado TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY SAO PAULO (Reuters) -Brazil's Supreme Court was caught off-guard by Justice Alexandre de Moraes' decision late on Monday to place former President Jair Bolsonaro under house arrest, two sources at the court told Reuters on Tuesday. The order underscores Moraes' readiness to act on his own despite both polarization among Brazilians on the issue and rising tensions with the White House. It came just days ahead of the introduction of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods entering the United States. U.S. President Donald Trump imposed the levies as a reaction to what he has characterized as a "witch hunt" led by Moraes against Bolsonaro, who is standing trial under charges of plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 electoral defeat. Bolsonaro has denied wrongdoing and described Moraes as a "dictator." Moraes' ruling has sparked concern within the Brazilian government that Trump could retaliate by inflicting further damage to Brazil's economy, two sources close to President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva's inner circle told Reuters. But Brazilian officials are not planning to push back against Moraes. The two court sources, one of whom is a justice, told Reuters that the other Supreme Court justices were supportive of Moraes, while those close to Lula said the president has neither the willingness nor the ability to influence the Supreme Court. "It doesn't change our approach in the slightest," said the justice, who asked not to be named to discuss the matter candidly. The Lula administration is instead planning policies to support those industries likely to be hardest hit by Trump's tariffs and to keep diplomatic channels open with Washington, said the political sources. But the Moraes move could create obstacles for the Brazilian negotiators, said Fabio Medina Osorio, Brazil's former attorney general. "This decision can certainly make things difficult," he said. A POLARIZED COUNTRY The Supreme Court is expected to hand down a verdict within weeks on the charges that Bolsonaro and his allies plotted to overthrow democracy. It is widely expected to convict the former president. Moraes' house arrest order cited a failure to comply with restraining orders he had imposed on Bolsonaro for allegedly courting Trump's interference in the case. While domestically Moraes has received praise by some for defending Brazil's judicial independence, others have accused him of overreach. The latest order drew mixed reactions, according to a Quaest poll based on social media posts, with 53% in favor and 47% against the arrest. Newspapers that had written scathing editorials about the alliance between Bolsonaro and Trump also questioned Moraes' decisions. "Moraes was wrong to order the arrest of the former president for communicating with supporters in a rally organized by the right," an editorial by Brazilian newspaper Folha de Sao Paulo said. "Brazil must acknowledge that Jair Bolsonaro has broad freedom to defend himself in court and to express himself wherever he chooses, including on social media." Former Supreme Court justices, too, offered differing views regarding the decision. "Alexandre de Moraes, in his ruling, not only upholds the country's sovereignty and independence but also the autonomy of Brazil's judiciary," said Carlos Ayres Britto, who left the Supreme Court bench in 2012. But former Justice Marco Aurelio Mello disagreed."My perspective would be different given the constitutional principle of presumed innocence," he said. (Reporting by Luciana Magalhaes in Sao Paulo, and Ricardo Brito and Lisandra Paraguassu in Brasilia, editing by Manuela Andreoni and Rosalba O'Brien)

Trump-led Texas redistricting gambit ignites national arms race to control Congress
Trump-led Texas redistricting gambit ignites national arms race to control Congress

The Star

time35 minutes ago

  • The Star

Trump-led Texas redistricting gambit ignites national arms race to control Congress

(Reuters) -The escalating political fight over the Texas congressional map is spreading across other states across the country, triggering an unprecedented mid-decade redistricting arms race with the balance of power in Washington at stake. At President Donald Trump's urging, Texas Republicans have proposed new congressional districts aimed at flipping five Democrat-held U.S. House seats in next year's midterm elections, further skewing what is already considered a deeply partisan map in that state. In response, Democratic governors elsewhere - most notably Gavin Newsom of California, the only state with more congressional districts than Texas - have threatened to retaliate by mounting their own redistricting efforts. "Donald Trump is a cheater, and so is Governor Greg Abbott," JB Pritzker, the Democratic governor of Illinois, told reporters on Tuesday. Standing alongside him were several of the Democratic lawmakers from Texas who fled their home state on Monday to deny Republicans a quorum and prevent a vote on the proposed new map. "As far as I'm concerned, everything is on the table," Pritzker said. Democrats need to flip only three Republican-held seats to retake the majority in the 435-seat House next year, so even modest gains for either party via redistricting could prove decisive. If Democrats win the House, they could stymie much of Trump's legislative agenda and pursue multiple investigations into his administration. The practice of partisan gerrymandering - manipulating district lines to benefit one party over another - has a long tradition in the United States, but the advent of powerful software and sophisticated voter data has allowed mapmakers to drill down to individual streets and neighborhoods. Redistricting typically occurs every 10 years to incorporate the U.S. Census count. Trump has broken with that convention by openly pushing Texas Republicans to pursue a rare mid-decade redistricting for partisan gain, even though the existing map, which Republicans drew just four years ago, resulted in the party winning 25 of the state's 38 seats. "I won Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know, and we are entitled to five more seats," Trump told CNBC on Tuesday, referring to the 2024 presidential election. Trump has encouraged other Republican states to follow suit. A senior White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters last week the administration believes as many as five states could redraw their maps, including Florida, where Governor Ron DeSantis has expressed a willingness to take such a step. DEMOCRATS VOW TO FIGHT BACK Ohio Republicans will draw a new map ahead of the November 2026 election that could flip at least two Democratic seats. In Missouri, where Democrats hold two of the state's seven seats, some Republican lawmakers have had preliminary conversations about a new map, according to a source familiar with the matter. Other Republican-controlled states that could in theory use redistricting to target Democrats include Kansas, Kentucky and New Hampshire. Democrats, meanwhile, face some legal hurdles in their biggest states. In California, where redistricting is overseen by an independent commission, voters would likely have to approve giving Democratic lawmakers the power to draw a new map. Newsom said on Monday he would put the issue before voters this autumn if Texas moves forward. Experts say a Democratic-drawn map could easily target five Republican incumbents, even though Democrats already hold 43 of the state's 52 seats. New York Governor Kathy Hochul said on Monday that she would not "fight with my hand tied behind my back." Even so, any new map in her state would require voters to approve a constitutional amendment, and that process cannot take place before 2026. In Illinois, where Pritzker and the Democratic-controlled legislature have no restraints, Democrats already hold 14 of the state's 17 U.S. House seats, leaving them without much room to maneuver. THREATS TO TEXAS DEMOCRATS Meanwhile, in Texas, the Republican attorney general, Ken Paxton, said on Tuesday he would seek court orders declaring that any Democratic lawmakers who failed to return by Friday will lose their seats. Democrats have dismissed that threat as empty. David Froomkin, a law professor at the University of Houston, said he did not believe judges would buy the argument that lawmakers had created vacancies by leaving the state in protest. "Courts have generally taken the view that a legislator has surrendered their seat when they have chosen to surrender their seat," he said. "Here, they're not intending to vacate their offices – they're exercising their offices by trying to prevent the passage of legislation they find troubling." Paxton's threat follows warrants issued by the Republican Speaker of the Texas House, Dustin Burrows, for authorities to bring the absent lawmakers back to the statehouse for a vote. Abbott has ordered state law enforcement to help find them. But the Democrats have all left the state, putting them beyond the reach of any state agency. Trump told reporters late on Tuesday that the FBI 'may have' to get involved in forcing Democrats back to Texas. (Reporting by Joseph Ax in New York; Additional reporting by Nandita Bose in Washington; Editing by Frank McGurty and Howard Goller)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store