Multiculturalism a strength for countries, but needs trust to flourish: experts
(From left) Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia Professor Farish Noor, Indonesian Minister for Religious Affairs Nasaruddin Umar, Victoria University of Wellington Professor of Psychology Colleen Ward, Edelman International president Ed Williams during a panel at the International Conference on Cohesive Societies on June 24. ST PHOTO: GIN TAY
SINGAPORE - When different communities interact with each other regularly and are supported by government policies that encourage such mixing, the outcome tends to be positive, resulting in reduced prejudice, deeper societal integration and more economic dynamism.
Yet while the evidence is clear on the strengths that multiculturalism can bring to a society, the erosion of trust around the world has made it more difficult for such plurality to flourish, experts said on June 24 at the first day of the International Conference on Cohesive Societies.
Speaking at the first plenary session of the three-day conference, Professor Colleen Ward from Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand said her research found that people who engage in multicultural contact tend to have a stronger sense of national belonging.
Meanwhile, minority and immigrant groups who live in countries with multicultural policies report higher trust levels and lower levels of perceived discrimination, added the professor of cross-cultural psychology.
Such strengths, however, rest on a foundation of mutual trust, which is in short supply today, said fellow speaker Mr Ed Williams, president of Edelman International.
He pointed to the results of the annual Edelman Trust Barometer, which since 1999 has been measuring the level of trust people in various countries have in societal institutions.
The latest study, published in January, found that a majority of respondents in 23 of the 26 countries surveyed felt moderate to high levels of grievance against business, government and the rich. Singapore was the country with the least amount of grievance reported, with fewer than 4 in 10 expressing such sentiments.
Mr William said it was worth thinking about why Singapore stood as an outlier compared to the rest of the world, where there was a 'collapse of the middle ground (and) the unraveling of shared understanding'.
'Could Singapore's deliberate approach to managing diversity, its longstanding emphasis on multi-racial harmony and integration, be one of the factors helping to sustain a deeper level of institutional trust?' he asked.
'No doubt there are other contributing factors, but in a global environment increasingly defined by division, there may well be lessons here that others would do well to study.'
Prof Ward said one reason why things are looking bleak for multiculturalism in many places is the number of 'existential threats' there are today, such as wars, pandemics, natural disasters and financial crises.
Her research found that countries become more 'culturally tight' when faced with such threats, which means there is lower tolerance for deviance from social norms and less openness to differences.
'Essentially, what we find is that 'tight' cultures are more prejudiced cultures,' she said, adding that these results were replicated across 25 countries and the 50 states of the United States.
Despite the pessimistic outlook for multiculturalism, the speakers emphasised that people and communities have the agency to make a difference.
Indonesia's Minister of Religious Affairs Nasaruddin Umar, the third speaker on the panel, noted that faith communities can play a role, including to identify kalimatun sawa, an Arabic phrase that translates to common ground.
For instance, the Istiqlal State Mosque in Jakarta conducts regular interfaith activities, and even has a Tunnel of Friendship that connects it with the nearby Church of Our Lady of the Assumption, said Dr Nasaruddin, who is also Grand Imam of the mosque.
He said that conflicts in the Middle East, such as in Gaza and involving Israel and Iran, also represent a failure of conventional diplomacy and highlights the need for faith-based diplomacy in international relations.
Involving faith leaders in peacemaking efforts would recognise the significance of religion in shaping global affairs and facilitate collaboration across religious divides, he added.
Prof Ward said building multiculturalism should not be seen as the sole responsibility of governments, and that citizens acting together can effect change.
She cited how New Zealanders came out and marched on their parliament in 2004 to protest acts of desecration that targeted Jewish graves in Wellington.
This prompted the Kiwi Government to develop the New Zealand Diversity Action Programme, which aimed to recognise the country's cultural diversity and to foster harmony among its peoples.
Agreeing, Mr Williams said no one organisation can solve a crisis of this magnitude alone, but only together with other partners.
'This is not a moment for institutional posturing, it's a moment for collective action - government with business and civil society, and a media sector that champions truthfulness are critical as we move forward,' he said.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
19 hours ago
- Straits Times
Indonesia still on alert despite Iran-Israel ceasefire
Despite no casualties from Iran's attack, airspace in the region was closed for a few hours on June 24 PHOTO: ARASH KHAMOOSHI/NYTIMES Follow our live coverage here. JAKARTA - Fears of an escalation in the conflict between Iran and Israel persist despite claims of a ceasefire between the two countries, with the Indonesian government expediting contingency planning as it finishes its first round of the evacuation of Indonesian nationals from the affected region. Hours before Iran and Israel agreed a ceasefire, Iran fired missiles at the Al Udeid air force base in Doha, Qatar on June 23 as a retaliation against the United States' bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities. The attack did not result in any casualties, as Iran had warned Qatar prior to the attack, as reported by Reuters. Despite no casualties from Iran's attack, airspace in the region was closed for a few hours on June 24, including that over Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, with a slew of airlines canceling their flights to the region, AFP reported. Among the flights affected was the one by Qatar Airways booked for at least 29 Indonesian nationals, the first batch of evacuees from Iran who fled the country through a 16-hour land trip to neighboring Azerbaijan. Indonesia's Foreign Ministry told reporters on June 24 that the evacuees would instead return to Jakarta on a Turkish Airlines flight, arriving more than two hours later than the initial schedule at Soekarno-Hatta International Airport in Tangerang, Banten. The ministry went on to say that it continued to 'monitor from a close range the escalation in the conflict between Israel, the US and Iran'. 'The ministry appeals to its citizens currently in the Middle East to increase their vigilance [and] avoid locations hosting assets of conflicting nations,' said the Indonesian ministry's citizen protection director Judha Nugraha in a statement. Prepare for the worst The renewed appeal for heightened alertness came despite US President Donald Trump's announcement that he had successfully negotiated a ceasefire between Iran and Israel. But less than 12 hours after the announcement, both countries threw accusations at each other that they had violated the deal and continued attacking each other beyond the agreed time the ceasefire was meant to start. All Indonesian representatives and embassies in Middle Eastern countries continue to be on high alert and on standby despite the ceasefire announcement in anticipation of any possible further escalation in the region, said Indonesia's Foreign Ministry director for Middle Eastern affairs Ahrul Tsani. 'Our representatives continue to monitor and remain responsive to any developments occurring, especially those in countries with US military bases,' Mr Ahrul told The Jakarta Post on June 24, listing countries such as Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and Iraq. Several Indonesian embassies in the listed high-alert countries have also begun circulating alert notices to citizens outlining responses to possible escalations, including calls to start packing important documents such as passports and employment contracts. Close call As officials call for calm amid the rising tensions, the Indonesian diaspora in the Middle East has been unnerved by the recent attacks. Mr Achmad, 42, was working in a restaurant in Doha when he suddenly felt the reverberation from an explosion at the Al Udeid base, located only about 30 minutes' drive from the Qatari capital. Panicking restaurant guests fled the restaurant after the explosion was felt. Qatari officials tried to calm down people by telling them not to panic or escalate things, said Mr Achmad. 'But I'm honestly worried. I saw with my own two eyes a missile being intercepted. I can't even describe the sound it created,' Mr Achmad told the Post on June 24. 'I'm just letting things be for now. I'm still breathing and standing. I just hope that there won't be any second wave of attacks. I won't know what to do in that case,' he said, explaining that he would lose his job in Doha if he were to be evacuated back to Indonesia. Indonesia's Foreign Ministry previously said that all evacuations of Indonesians from Iran and Israel would be voluntary rather than mandatory. The government has not issued any official diplomatic statement on the Iran-Israel conflict following Washington's decision to intervene on June 22, although its senior security ministry has called for all parties to return to the negotiating table. On June 22, Indonesia President Prabowo Subianto held a meeting with several ministers, including Jndonesia's Foreign Minister Sugiono, in his private residence in Hambalang, Bogor regency, West Java. The discussions revolved primarily around 'the dynamics of current global conditions and its effects on Indonesia's national interests', the State Secretariat wrote in a statement. The officials also discussed preparations for 'strategic steps' to protect national interests during the closed-door talks. THE JAKARTA POST/ ASIA NEWS NETWORK Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Multicultural societies must be woven together like batik, not a patchwork quilt: Tharman
President Tharman Shanmugaratnam giving his opening address at the International Conference on Cohesive Societies on June 24. ST PHOTO: GIN TAY Multicultural societies must be woven together like batik, not a patchwork quilt: Tharman SINGAPORE – The fabric of a multicultural society must be like a piece of batik – a single cloth woven by different hands to create a larger motif of many colours, said President Tharman Shanmugaratnam on June 24. In contrast, many societies see multiculturalism as a quilt of different patches stitched together, he said. But in times of stress, when economic insecurity or polarising forces intensify, the stitches weaken and the quilt is easily forced apart. Mr Tharman has often used the quilt analogy when speaking on multiculturalism. He added the batik twist in his opening address at the three-day International Conference on Cohesive Societies held at Raffles City Convention Centre, where batik was the preferred attire of many audience members. 'We have to weave threads of different colours, even different textures, into a single tapestry – or involve many artisans in making a single fabric... that creates a larger motif of a nation with many strands and many histories, but at one with itself,' he said. More than 1,000 people, including policymakers and young leaders from more than 50 countries, attended the conference organised by the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies and supported by the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth. The conference was first held in 2019 to provide an international platform for interfaith and multicultural dialogue, and for participants to exchange ideas and develop solutions to create cohesive and resilient multicultural societies. Mr Tharman's address focused on reasons for division across the world while highlighting areas that societies should work on to nurture multiculturalism. He first provided context, noting that enthusiasm for multiculturalism is waning and social cohesion is weakening worldwide. No political system can guarantee that a government or people will prioritise integration of different cultures, and recent evidence suggests the opposite – people are moving away from moderate tendencies towards more polarising behaviour, views and politics, he said. 'Shared values and belief in a common future do not come naturally, and there are always countervailing sentiments below the surface. Multicultural societies must therefore be actively woven,' he said. Advancing political polarisation is weakening the moderate middle ground and fuelling the rise of extremes, especially the radical right, said Mr Tharman. A startling trend observed in the last decade is the widening social and political divide between the better educated and the less, as well as those who live in the countryside and those who live in cities. 'What is most worrying is the way in which culture and identity is being injected into normal contentions over economic issues,' he said. Economic insecurity has converted identity and culture into a more virulent and more divisive political tool, he added. There are several deep forces behind the growing division, said Mr Tharman. First, the failure to control immigration and integrate immigrants, as seen in Europe. Second, the polarising effects of a fragmented media landscape and social media algorithms. While social media empowers many voices and frees access to information, much of it is now shaped by algorithms run by large technology companies, which have a polarising effect, said Mr Tharman. These algorithms offer a feed of stories that aligns with an individual's ideological preferences and strengthens them. Tech firms also have an incentive to maximise attention by propagating negative messages, he added. The third force contributing to division is the growing isolation in how people live their lives, especially in advanced countries. People are living more on their own and interacting less with neighbours who would have helped them to understand differences and accept disagreements. 'Societies can advance economically whilst regressing socially,' said Mr Tharman. Weaving a multicultural society requires sensible guard rails to prevent extremism and self-reinforcing polarisation, while allowing and encouraging differences in views, he said. This must begin from education, the most powerful tool available to integrate people, he added. Apart from allowing for social mixing, effective education can also uplift people of all backgrounds, said Mr Tharman. Without evidence that people can get ahead on their merits – with necessary support for those who start from behind – it will be difficult to sustain a sense of togetherness, he added. 'Education systems must be effective in uplifting every individual and every group. And I must say that's what we put great effort into, in Singapore,' he said. Another area is urban design to prevent ethnically or socially defined enclaves. He cited Singapore's public housing estates where more than 75 per cent of the population live, with a mix of ethnicities and income groups in every block. 'It's not just about housing. It's (also) about the facilities for recreation, for learning, for interaction, for morning qigong, a whole set of activities that bring people together,' he said. 'Common spaces in every neighbourhood, where you can develop your skills in a futsal court or watch others, or try out a new dance together. It's not just housing, it's an estate for social life.' While not every society can replicate what Singapore has done, it is still important to provide public spaces in societies with existing segregated neighbourhoods, he added. The third area to work on is that of media fragmentation and social media algorithms, which Mr Tharman characterised as 'one of the most complex'. He noted that the world is nowhere near agreement on the regulation of social media platforms, though advances have been made. 'It requires bold thinking. Both government and civil society have to actively work together, and with the tech companies that run the largest social media platforms, to make democracy safer and more sustainable,' he said. He cited the European Union's new Digital Services Act as a good example of how this can be done. The Act requires social media platforms to be accountable for content, such as the quick removal of hate speech. Singapore and Australia are also doing similarly. While some may say this is over-regulation – it is more regulation than big tech players are used to – an unregulated media landscape will only see democracy gradually unravel, Mr Tharman said. President Tharman Shanmugaratnam with the working committee of the Young Leaders Programme 2025 on June 24. ST PHOTO: GIN TAY Established news media will also have to show journalism that is built on accuracy and transparency, he said. They have to separate news from opinion, and when they publish opinion, they should provide different perspectives without it becoming a shouting match, he added. While he would not promote Singapore media as a model for the world, he pointed out that the mainstream media here is by far the largest chosen source of news among citizens, among many alternatives. That is critical, as it keeps that shared reality and common framework of facts for citizens, said Mr Tharman. Fourth, society must develop a culture of respect and solidarity that comes from everyday actions and not just governments and politicians. Civil society, educators, religious and community leaders and individuals also have to pitch in, he said. Each society must aim to build a community of respect, which goes to the heart of social cohesion and multiculturalism, said Mr Tharman. Respect is a source of upliftment as a society, he said. 'We need something more intrinsic to upliftment, we need the motivation that drives people to strive to overcome difficulties and to do their best. And the respect we lend each other is the most powerful source of motivation.' Goh Yan Han is political correspondent at The Straits Times. She writes Unpacked, a weekly newsletter on Singapore politics and policy. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Multiculturalism a strength for countries, but needs trust to flourish: experts
(From left) Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia Professor Farish Noor, Indonesian Minister for Religious Affairs Nasaruddin Umar, Victoria University of Wellington Professor of Psychology Colleen Ward, Edelman International president Ed Williams during a panel at the International Conference on Cohesive Societies on June 24. ST PHOTO: GIN TAY SINGAPORE - When different communities interact with each other regularly and are supported by government policies that encourage such mixing, the outcome tends to be positive, resulting in reduced prejudice, deeper societal integration and more economic dynamism. Yet while the evidence is clear on the strengths that multiculturalism can bring to a society, the erosion of trust around the world has made it more difficult for such plurality to flourish, experts said on June 24 at the first day of the International Conference on Cohesive Societies. Speaking at the first plenary session of the three-day conference, Professor Colleen Ward from Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand said her research found that people who engage in multicultural contact tend to have a stronger sense of national belonging. Meanwhile, minority and immigrant groups who live in countries with multicultural policies report higher trust levels and lower levels of perceived discrimination, added the professor of cross-cultural psychology. Such strengths, however, rest on a foundation of mutual trust, which is in short supply today, said fellow speaker Mr Ed Williams, president of Edelman International. He pointed to the results of the annual Edelman Trust Barometer, which since 1999 has been measuring the level of trust people in various countries have in societal institutions. The latest study, published in January, found that a majority of respondents in 23 of the 26 countries surveyed felt moderate to high levels of grievance against business, government and the rich. Singapore was the country with the least amount of grievance reported, with fewer than 4 in 10 expressing such sentiments. Mr William said it was worth thinking about why Singapore stood as an outlier compared to the rest of the world, where there was a 'collapse of the middle ground (and) the unraveling of shared understanding'. 'Could Singapore's deliberate approach to managing diversity, its longstanding emphasis on multi-racial harmony and integration, be one of the factors helping to sustain a deeper level of institutional trust?' he asked. 'No doubt there are other contributing factors, but in a global environment increasingly defined by division, there may well be lessons here that others would do well to study.' Prof Ward said one reason why things are looking bleak for multiculturalism in many places is the number of 'existential threats' there are today, such as wars, pandemics, natural disasters and financial crises. Her research found that countries become more 'culturally tight' when faced with such threats, which means there is lower tolerance for deviance from social norms and less openness to differences. 'Essentially, what we find is that 'tight' cultures are more prejudiced cultures,' she said, adding that these results were replicated across 25 countries and the 50 states of the United States. Despite the pessimistic outlook for multiculturalism, the speakers emphasised that people and communities have the agency to make a difference. Indonesia's Minister of Religious Affairs Nasaruddin Umar, the third speaker on the panel, noted that faith communities can play a role, including to identify kalimatun sawa, an Arabic phrase that translates to common ground. For instance, the Istiqlal State Mosque in Jakarta conducts regular interfaith activities, and even has a Tunnel of Friendship that connects it with the nearby Church of Our Lady of the Assumption, said Dr Nasaruddin, who is also Grand Imam of the mosque. He said that conflicts in the Middle East, such as in Gaza and involving Israel and Iran, also represent a failure of conventional diplomacy and highlights the need for faith-based diplomacy in international relations. Involving faith leaders in peacemaking efforts would recognise the significance of religion in shaping global affairs and facilitate collaboration across religious divides, he added. Prof Ward said building multiculturalism should not be seen as the sole responsibility of governments, and that citizens acting together can effect change. She cited how New Zealanders came out and marched on their parliament in 2004 to protest acts of desecration that targeted Jewish graves in Wellington. This prompted the Kiwi Government to develop the New Zealand Diversity Action Programme, which aimed to recognise the country's cultural diversity and to foster harmony among its peoples. Agreeing, Mr Williams said no one organisation can solve a crisis of this magnitude alone, but only together with other partners. 'This is not a moment for institutional posturing, it's a moment for collective action - government with business and civil society, and a media sector that champions truthfulness are critical as we move forward,' he said. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
