
Japan braces for Trump's worst as yen takes trade war fire
Take Haruhiko Kuroda, arguably the most globally known governor the BOJ has had in its 143-year history. His notoriety stems from a 2013-2023 campaign to end deflation, one that supersized the BOJ's balance sheet to twice the size of Japan's US$4.7 trillion economy.
The resulting plunge in the yen propped up Japan Inc. But now it risks running afoul of the Donald Trump 2.0 presidency in ways complicating Tokyo's 2025. Already, Trump is sending rhetorical shots Japan's way.
That has Kuroda playing defense for his successor at BOJ, Kazuo Ueda. Japan, Kuroda says, must repair 'any misunderstanding' in Washington that it's intentionally weakening the yen to boost exports.
'In fact, the Japanese government has been making huge efforts to prevent the yen from weakening,' Kuroda told local media, pointing to moves to raise interest rates and even intervene in currency markets.
The BOJ, Kuroda stressed, 'is not intentionally guiding the yen lower with monetary policy. If there's any misunderstanding on that point, it needs to be addressed.'
What really must be addressed, though, is Tokyo's understanding of how its policies are going over globally.
Denial doesn't change the fact that the most consistent policy over the last 13 governments has been an undervalued yen. Or that a key reason the BOJ has been holding rates at, or near, zero since 1999 is to protect manufacturers facing increasing competition across Asia.
Spin doesn't change Japan's status as the globe's top creditor nation. Twenty-six years of zero rates gave rise to the so-called 'yen-carry trade.' Over time, investors got into the habit of borrowing cheaply in yen to fund bets on higher-yielding assets everywhere.
This strategy has kept aloft everything from Argentine debt to South African commodities to Indian real estate to the New Zealand dollar to derivatives on New York exchanges to cryptocurrencies.
That's why the yen's recent surge pulled the floor out from under markets around the globe. When the yen zigs sharply, markets have long tended to zag.
As such, the BOJ's move on July 31 last year to raise rates to the highest level since 2008 shook world markets. The same happened in January this year, when the BOJ hiked rates a second time to 0.50%.
Arif Husain, head of fixed income at T Rowe Price, speaks for many when he calls the yen-carry trade the 'San Andreas fault of finance.'
There's growing doubt, though, that the BOJ will keep tapping the monetary brakes as US President Trump layers on ever more tariffs, including threatening to tax Japan's all-important auto industry.
The worry is that higher borrowing costs would exacerbate headwinds caused by Trump's 20% tariffs on China, levies on steel and aluminum and 'reciprocal tariffs' to come.
Yet Japanese inflation is running a bit hotter than the BOJ would like. In January, Japanese inflation jumped 4% year on year, the highest in two years. That's double the BOJ's inflation target. It's also a rate that's exceeding average wage growth.
It's not the environment that Japan wants heading into an escalating trade war. Japan's fourth-quarter growth was weaker than expected. The government's second estimate of gross domestic product (GDP) showed output rose just 0.6% quarter over quarter, down from the initial 0.7%.
'The revisions broadly align with our expectations and confirm the picture of an economy struggling against weak domestic demand,' says Stefan Angrick, head of Japan Moody's Analytics.
It means 'Japan's economy is, at best, treading water,' Angrick says. Fourth-quarter data, he adds, 'masks an economy struggling to get out of first gear. Consumption is going sideways as pay gains have trailed inflation for the better part of three years. Sticky inflation and lackluster pay growth will push real wage gains further into the distance and, with it, an improvement in domestic consumption.'
What's more, Angrick says, 'the deteriorating trade outlook means Japan can't count on exports to save the day. Media reports released Tuesday confirm new US tariffs on steel and aluminum won't spare Japan.'
Takeshi Yamaguchi, chief Japan economist at Morgan Stanley MUFG, says that 'we expect the BoJ to stay on hold at the March 18-19 monetary policy meeting.'
Others were less put off by Japan's GDP showing. To Sonal Desai, chief investment officer at Franklin Templeton Fixed Income, recent data 'supports the view that rates will face heightened upward pressure as monetary policy tightens. The BOJ is likely to hike at least twice more this year, but we are tilting to three.' Desai expected short-term rates to top 1% this year.
There's also an argument that delaying rate hikes might enrage Trump as the yen remains weaker than it might otherwise be. Earlier this month, Trump claimed he warned the leaders of Japan and China they mustn't continue to weaken their currencies.
'You can't do it because it's unfair to us,' Trump complained. 'It's very hard for us to make tractors, Caterpillar here, when Japan, China and other places are killing their currency, meaning driving it down.'
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is no doubt alarmed to hear Trump lump Japan with China as currency manipulators. But his Liberal Democratic Party, and the BOJ under Kuroda's leadership, set the stage for the coming clash with the most mercantilist US leader in at least 125 years.
Kuroda, of course, was hired by then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to turbocharge the BOJ's quantitative easing policies. Abe's 2012-2020 premiership sought to end deflation via a sharply weaker exchange rate. Abe chose Kuroda in part because of his handiwork as a senior Ministry of Finance official in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
In 2013, Abe decided the BOJ should take the lead in revitalizing Asia's second-biggest economy. Hiring Kuroda was his big economic gamble _ an aggressive assault on the deflationary forces that had weakened Japan's financial foundations over the previous 15 years.
Kuroda didn't disappoint. He hoarded more than half of all outstanding government securities, a buying binge that all but halted regular bond trading. He gorged on stocks via exchange-traded funds, making the BOJ by far the biggest holder of Nikkei 225 and Topix index shares.
As part of its campaign to drive the yen down 30%, the Kuroda-led BOJ branched out into other asset markets, too. By late 2018, the BOJ's balance sheet surpassed Japan's GDP, a first for a Group of Seven nation.
This milestone is a reminder that for all the focus on the US Federal Reserve's ultraloose policies in Washington after the 2008 global financial crisis, the BOJ has been far more aggressive relative to GDP. And now, as even Kuroda admits, detrimental to Japan's economic development.
In his waning days as BOJ head, Kuroda signaled an about-face in his views on the link between exchange rates and healthy growth. He came to realize, at long last, that the costs of devaluation outweigh the benefits.
'The yen's depreciation might have an increasing negative impact on household income through price rises,' Kuroda told business leaders in late 2022.
Worse than that: the boost from weak exchange rates these last 26 years removed the urgency for disruptive structural reforms.
That's particularly true of Abe, who came to power pledging to loosen labor markets, catalyze innovation, reduce bureaucracy, increase productivity and empower women.
And now, an undervalued yen has Trump lumping Japan in with top American rival China. Tokyo got away with its beggar-thy-neighbor tactics during the Trump 1.0 era from 2017 to 2021 in part because Abe sucked up to Trump, and in part because Trump was linearly focused on China.
The Trump 2.0 White House, though, is targeting US allies even more assertively than supposed foes China, Russia or North Korea. That's been quite a surprise for Canada, France, Germany and other top economies. And it has Japan fearing the worst to come.
On Monday, Japanese Trade Minister Yoji Muto met in Washington with US officials seeking waivers on Trump's tariffs, particularly on autos and steel. To no avail, according to reports.
'The talk of tariffs is, in a lot of ways, worse than the implementation of them,' says David Bahnsen, chief investment officer at the Bahnsen Group. 'The tariff talk, reversal, speculation, and chaos only fosters uncertainty.'
Bahnsen adds that, 'I don't believe the administration knows how the tariff situation will play out, but if I were a betting man, I would say that it will persist long enough to do damage to economic activity for at least a quarter or two, and ultimately result in a deal with different countries that make everyone wonder why we went through all the fuss.'
Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at CFRA Research, notes that 'how long this period of investor caution persists depends on how quickly it will take the global trade clouds, and the resulting threat of recession, to dissipate.'
Look no further than Super Mario maker Nintendo, whose stock is plunging along with other Japanese video game stocks on worries that Trump's antics will boost prices in the US.
In fact, global investors broadly are 'reducing their positions in Japanese stocks,' including the 'most attractive stocks' that they have so far held on to.
If Kuroda, Ueda or Ishiba think Tokyo is going to escape Trump's wrath, then they're the ones 'misunderstanding' where Japan finds itself as 2025 unfolds.
Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


AllAfrica
3 hours ago
- AllAfrica
EU bluffing it will protect the Philippines from China
Europe will not defend the Philippines. Not in the first hour, not on day one, not at all. Malacanang can host foreign dignitaries, sign joint declarations and pose for photo-ops, but when pressure escalates in the South China Sea, Brussels will remain where it likes to be: on the margins of force. The reason is simple: the EU lacks means, mandate and will. Recent episodes confirm the reality. Trump pushed Europe into a 5% GDP outlay on American weapons, imposed humiliating tariffs and even instructed Europeans on managing a war at their own doorstep. Against this backdrop, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas went to Manila proclaiming solidarity and affinity with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr with the familiar homily on values. Yet the contrast was glaring: Europe accepts subordination in its own theater, while preaching resolve in Asia. The question thus arises: Could the actor Manila hopes will help to counter China in the West Philippine Sea ever be Brussels? Kallas used the visit to posture as a China hawk, without any leverage. Headlines proclaimed a new era of European commitment to Philippine security, inflated by 'concern' over China's 'illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive' behavior. But adjectives are not strategy. Partnerships rest on capability and intent, and Europe offers neither. If any message from the West carried weight lately, it came from France. President Emmanuel Macron, speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue, cut through the fog: Europe will not fight China. 'If the elephant in the room is the day China decides a big operation against a country, will you intervene day one? I would be very cautious today. Everybody would be very cautious today,' Macron said. France, the EU's only nuclear power, its most globally deployed force and the only member state with Indo-Pacific territories, confirmed Europe's hesitation. The implication is terminal: if France won't act, Europe can't. The evidence is not theoretical. The war in Ukraine remains Europe's test. While Kyiv still pleads for weapons and air cover, Brussels debates gas payments and packages of sanctions to the same regime shelling Ukrainian cities. After 1,300 days of war, Europe has sent billions but not a single combat brigade in a war that its leaders frame as 'existential.' Macron made the linkage explicit: 'If both the USA and the Europeans are unable to fix the Ukrainian situation, I think the credibility of both the US and the Europeans to pretend to fix any crisis in this [Southeast Asian] region will be very low.' Translation: Europe's relevance in Asia is bound to its performance in Europe. And now that performance is collapsing under reluctance, fragmentation, risk aversion and submission to Washington. Another way to put it: What has the Philippines contributed to Ukraine? Nothing. And rightly so. Kyiv is not Manila's fight, just as Palawan won't be Brussels's. Nations act where their interests are threatened and their capabilities count. However, the limits run deeper than military logistics. The EU is not a state. It is a bloc of 27 governments pursuing conflicting China strategies while leaders pretend to speak as one. France defends its own interests. Germany prioritizes export flows to Beijing. Eastern Europe chases Chinese infrastructure deals. Spain seeks Chinese factories. The EU has no collective security, and strategic autonomy remains a slogan. Amid these realities, what was Kallas really pursuing in the Philippines? Her tour through Southeast Asia, capped in Manila, was less about Philippine security than about self-projection—claiming global engagement without facing the only question that matters: would Europe ever fight in Asia? The answer had already come weeks earlier in Singapore, and it was no. The greater danger, accordingly, is miscalculation. Manila could mistake symbolic support for protection—and in a military contingency, that would be catastrophic. The gap between words and power was visible from Kallas's first steps as the EU's top diplomat: 'In my first visit since taking up office, my message is clear: the European Union wants Ukraine to win this war.' A war the EU refused to fight and cannot even negotiate to end became her stage for declarations. If Brussels cannot turn mantras into force there, how could it matter in the Philippines? The High Representative's role is not to set policy, still less to deliver victories, but to echo member-state consensus. Yet some Philippine commentators have excitedly portrayed Kallas's show as proof of security cooperation, as if it somehow promised definitive defense against China—still the EU's major trading partner. And full disclosure: the EU does not even have a trade agreement with the Philippines. Therefore, will it be values or trade? Interests or illusions of protecting 'like-minded allies?' Filipino aircrews over contested waters might not be comforted by Kallas's talk of 'democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.' They need combat integration, air cover and the certainty that escalation will be met with overwhelming force in nearby waters. Europe offers none of that. Currently, when it sends vessels to the region, routes are announced in advance to avoid confrontation—presence without purpose. Political affinities don't intercept warships or deter coercion. And the US no longer pretends these performances matter. In February 2025, Vice President J D Vance dismissed European irrelevance at the Munich Security Conference. Kallas answered with defiance, calling on Europe to lead the 'free world.' Weeks later in Washington, Secretary of State Marco Rubio refused to meet her—the very reason she had flown in. And when Ukraine is discussed, EU leaders are not decision-makers but invitees at the White House, where they are lectured on how to negotiate a war they never managed. For Manila, the ambiguity should be gone. The US, Japan and Australia remain their defense partners. Brussels is useful in trade, regulation and multilateral forums. But expecting military deterrence from Europe versus China is pure fantasy. Philippine policymakers should stop imagining battalions where there are only bureaucrats. At best, Brussels can fund radar stations or back maritime resolutions; but once combat begins, if it ever does, it will be reduced to its specialty—offering 'unwavering support' from afar. So beware when the pageantry resumes. The inaugural Philippines–EU Security Dialogue in late 2025 will spark the usual theatrical outrage from Beijing—just enough for some to feel important. But no one in Zhongnanhai will lose any sleep over a summit without soldiers. Because the South China Sea is not governed by grandiloquent declarations and gatherings. It is shaped by resolve, escalation thresholds and the capacity to act without asking. If and when the next crisis comes, Manila will already know Europe can be counted on for rhetoric but will ultimately do nothing. Sebastian Contin Trillo-Figueroa is a Hong Kong-based geopolitics strategist with a focus on Europe-Asia relations.


RTHK
9 hours ago
- RTHK
Privacy office raps retailers over data breaches
Privacy office raps retailers over data breaches Ada Chung said system breaches often result in the illegal sale of personal data for profit and the use of this information by fraudsters. Photo: RTHK The Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data has issued enforcement notices to three retail organisations following cybersecurity incidents that compromised the personal data of more than 130,000 customers and employees. The first breach involved Japanese fashion retailer Adastria, with the office reporting that a hacker used an employee's administrator credentials to access its platforms, which is provided by a third-party vendor, from an unknown overseas IP address, downloading order information and leaking the data of 59,205 Hong Kong customers. The compromised information included names, telephone numbers, and order details. During its investigation, Adastria discovered that the affected data had been disclosed on the Dark Web two months after the incident and was made available for download. Privacy Commissioner Ada Chung said the investigation found deficiencies within the organisation that contributed to the incident, including weak password management, failure to enable multi-factor authentication, insufficient awareness regarding personal data security and a lack of proper security reviews for the retailer's platforms. The other breach involved a server shared by My Jewelry and its parent company, Kwong's Art Jewellery, in which the data of 79,400 individuals were exposed. The compromised records belonged to customers and current and former employees and included highly sensitive information such as names, Hong Kong identity card numbers, dates of birth, telephone numbers, addresses, email addresses, membership numbers and employee commencement dates. Chung said the investigation revealed a hacker had performed a brute-force attack to obtain the credentials of an administrator account, which provided access to the two companies' information systems. Both breaches, she noted, involved retail organisations, which typically hold significant amounts of customer personal data. She noted that such incidents highlight the connection between data breaches and the illegal sale of personal data for profit, as well as the use of this information by fraudsters for various schemes. "In light of escalating cybersecurity threats, organisations should recognise that the personal data in their possession are valuable assets and they should allocate sufficient resources on cybersecurity and data security in order to safeguard the personal data in their possession," Chung said. She called on individuals affected by the data breaches to remain vigilant. "If they receive any unknown calls or unknown emails, they should be careful not to provide their personal data, including in particular, their banking account details, and they should also verify the identity of the caller if they are in doubt," she said. "If they receive any emails with suspicious attachments or links, they should not open the links or the attachments."


RTHK
10 hours ago
- RTHK
CS lauds opening of patriotic education base
CS lauds opening of patriotic education base Eric Chan expressed gratitude to the central government for supporting Hong Kong's national education efforts. Photo: RTHK Chief Secretary Eric Chan said on Thursday that the opening of a patriotic education base for Hong Kong and Macau students in Beijing marks an important milestone for the promotion of national education in the SAR. The facility is inside the Museum of the War of Chinese People's Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, which is located near Marco Polo, or Lugou, Bridge, where the second Sino-Japanese war broke out in 1937. Attending a ceremony to mark the opening of the base, Chan thanked the central government for its long-standing support for the SAR government's promotion of national education. He expressed belief the base would become an important platform in raising patriotic sentiments and the understanding of national history among young people from Hong Kong and Macau. "The history of the war of resistance is the most vivid kind of patriotic education material," Chan said in his speech. "I strongly believe and hope that everyone who visits the museum and the patriotic education base, especially students and teachers from Hong Kong, will experience first hand the awakening of patriotic sentiment." Chan added he hopes visitors can draw strength from the experience to strive for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. Chan went on to say that he looks forward to having more similar patriotic education facilities across the country, adding that would strengthen the national and ethnic identities of young people from Hong Kong and Macau.