logo
Japan braces for Trump's worst as yen takes trade war fire

Japan braces for Trump's worst as yen takes trade war fire

Asia Times11-03-2025

Self-awareness isn't often a strong suit among top Bank of Japan officials.
Take Haruhiko Kuroda, arguably the most globally known governor the BOJ has had in its 143-year history. His notoriety stems from a 2013-2023 campaign to end deflation, one that supersized the BOJ's balance sheet to twice the size of Japan's US$4.7 trillion economy.
The resulting plunge in the yen propped up Japan Inc. But now it risks running afoul of the Donald Trump 2.0 presidency in ways complicating Tokyo's 2025. Already, Trump is sending rhetorical shots Japan's way.
That has Kuroda playing defense for his successor at BOJ, Kazuo Ueda. Japan, Kuroda says, must repair 'any misunderstanding' in Washington that it's intentionally weakening the yen to boost exports.
'In fact, the Japanese government has been making huge efforts to prevent the yen from weakening,' Kuroda told local media, pointing to moves to raise interest rates and even intervene in currency markets.
The BOJ, Kuroda stressed, 'is not intentionally guiding the yen lower with monetary policy. If there's any misunderstanding on that point, it needs to be addressed.'
What really must be addressed, though, is Tokyo's understanding of how its policies are going over globally.
Denial doesn't change the fact that the most consistent policy over the last 13 governments has been an undervalued yen. Or that a key reason the BOJ has been holding rates at, or near, zero since 1999 is to protect manufacturers facing increasing competition across Asia.
Spin doesn't change Japan's status as the globe's top creditor nation. Twenty-six years of zero rates gave rise to the so-called 'yen-carry trade.' Over time, investors got into the habit of borrowing cheaply in yen to fund bets on higher-yielding assets everywhere.
This strategy has kept aloft everything from Argentine debt to South African commodities to Indian real estate to the New Zealand dollar to derivatives on New York exchanges to cryptocurrencies.
That's why the yen's recent surge pulled the floor out from under markets around the globe. When the yen zigs sharply, markets have long tended to zag.
As such, the BOJ's move on July 31 last year to raise rates to the highest level since 2008 shook world markets. The same happened in January this year, when the BOJ hiked rates a second time to 0.50%.
Arif Husain, head of fixed income at T Rowe Price, speaks for many when he calls the yen-carry trade the 'San Andreas fault of finance.'
There's growing doubt, though, that the BOJ will keep tapping the monetary brakes as US President Trump layers on ever more tariffs, including threatening to tax Japan's all-important auto industry.
The worry is that higher borrowing costs would exacerbate headwinds caused by Trump's 20% tariffs on China, levies on steel and aluminum and 'reciprocal tariffs' to come.
Yet Japanese inflation is running a bit hotter than the BOJ would like. In January, Japanese inflation jumped 4% year on year, the highest in two years. That's double the BOJ's inflation target. It's also a rate that's exceeding average wage growth.
It's not the environment that Japan wants heading into an escalating trade war. Japan's fourth-quarter growth was weaker than expected. The government's second estimate of gross domestic product (GDP) showed output rose just 0.6% quarter over quarter, down from the initial 0.7%.
'The revisions broadly align with our expectations and confirm the picture of an economy struggling against weak domestic demand,' says Stefan Angrick, head of Japan Moody's Analytics.
It means 'Japan's economy is, at best, treading water,' Angrick says. Fourth-quarter data, he adds, 'masks an economy struggling to get out of first gear. Consumption is going sideways as pay gains have trailed inflation for the better part of three years. Sticky inflation and lackluster pay growth will push real wage gains further into the distance and, with it, an improvement in domestic consumption.'
What's more, Angrick says, 'the deteriorating trade outlook means Japan can't count on exports to save the day. Media reports released Tuesday confirm new US tariffs on steel and aluminum won't spare Japan.'
Takeshi Yamaguchi, chief Japan economist at Morgan Stanley MUFG, says that 'we expect the BoJ to stay on hold at the March 18-19 monetary policy meeting.'
Others were less put off by Japan's GDP showing. To Sonal Desai, chief investment officer at Franklin Templeton Fixed Income, recent data 'supports the view that rates will face heightened upward pressure as monetary policy tightens. The BOJ is likely to hike at least twice more this year, but we are tilting to three.' Desai expected short-term rates to top 1% this year.
There's also an argument that delaying rate hikes might enrage Trump as the yen remains weaker than it might otherwise be. Earlier this month, Trump claimed he warned the leaders of Japan and China they mustn't continue to weaken their currencies.
'You can't do it because it's unfair to us,' Trump complained. 'It's very hard for us to make tractors, Caterpillar here, when Japan, China and other places are killing their currency, meaning driving it down.'
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is no doubt alarmed to hear Trump lump Japan with China as currency manipulators. But his Liberal Democratic Party, and the BOJ under Kuroda's leadership, set the stage for the coming clash with the most mercantilist US leader in at least 125 years.
Kuroda, of course, was hired by then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to turbocharge the BOJ's quantitative easing policies. Abe's 2012-2020 premiership sought to end deflation via a sharply weaker exchange rate. Abe chose Kuroda in part because of his handiwork as a senior Ministry of Finance official in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
In 2013, Abe decided the BOJ should take the lead in revitalizing Asia's second-biggest economy. Hiring Kuroda was his big economic gamble _ an aggressive assault on the deflationary forces that had weakened Japan's financial foundations over the previous 15 years.
Kuroda didn't disappoint. He hoarded more than half of all outstanding government securities, a buying binge that all but halted regular bond trading. He gorged on stocks via exchange-traded funds, making the BOJ by far the biggest holder of Nikkei 225 and Topix index shares.
As part of its campaign to drive the yen down 30%, the Kuroda-led BOJ branched out into other asset markets, too. By late 2018, the BOJ's balance sheet surpassed Japan's GDP, a first for a Group of Seven nation.
This milestone is a reminder that for all the focus on the US Federal Reserve's ultraloose policies in Washington after the 2008 global financial crisis, the BOJ has been far more aggressive relative to GDP. And now, as even Kuroda admits, detrimental to Japan's economic development.
In his waning days as BOJ head, Kuroda signaled an about-face in his views on the link between exchange rates and healthy growth. He came to realize, at long last, that the costs of devaluation outweigh the benefits.
'The yen's depreciation might have an increasing negative impact on household income through price rises,' Kuroda told business leaders in late 2022.
Worse than that: the boost from weak exchange rates these last 26 years removed the urgency for disruptive structural reforms.
That's particularly true of Abe, who came to power pledging to loosen labor markets, catalyze innovation, reduce bureaucracy, increase productivity and empower women.
And now, an undervalued yen has Trump lumping Japan in with top American rival China. Tokyo got away with its beggar-thy-neighbor tactics during the Trump 1.0 era from 2017 to 2021 in part because Abe sucked up to Trump, and in part because Trump was linearly focused on China.
The Trump 2.0 White House, though, is targeting US allies even more assertively than supposed foes China, Russia or North Korea. That's been quite a surprise for Canada, France, Germany and other top economies. And it has Japan fearing the worst to come.
On Monday, Japanese Trade Minister Yoji Muto met in Washington with US officials seeking waivers on Trump's tariffs, particularly on autos and steel. To no avail, according to reports.
'The talk of tariffs is, in a lot of ways, worse than the implementation of them,' says David Bahnsen, chief investment officer at the Bahnsen Group. 'The tariff talk, reversal, speculation, and chaos only fosters uncertainty.'
Bahnsen adds that, 'I don't believe the administration knows how the tariff situation will play out, but if I were a betting man, I would say that it will persist long enough to do damage to economic activity for at least a quarter or two, and ultimately result in a deal with different countries that make everyone wonder why we went through all the fuss.'
Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at CFRA Research, notes that 'how long this period of investor caution persists depends on how quickly it will take the global trade clouds, and the resulting threat of recession, to dissipate.'
Look no further than Super Mario maker Nintendo, whose stock is plunging along with other Japanese video game stocks on worries that Trump's antics will boost prices in the US.
In fact, global investors broadly are 'reducing their positions in Japanese stocks,' including the 'most attractive stocks' that they have so far held on to.
If Kuroda, Ueda or Ishiba think Tokyo is going to escape Trump's wrath, then they're the ones 'misunderstanding' where Japan finds itself as 2025 unfolds.
Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

For once, Musk may be doing us all a service
For once, Musk may be doing us all a service

Asia Times

time2 hours ago

  • Asia Times

For once, Musk may be doing us all a service

A famous governor of New York State, Mario Cuomo, said that politicians should 'campaign in poetry, but govern in prose'. His son, Andrew, also a former governor, will surely follow this advice when running for election as mayor of New York in November. But Donald Trump has always thought differently. He campaigns with slogans and insults and then governs with theater, threats and tantrums. So it feels appropriate that the central contradiction of Trumpism was exposed last week in a theatrical, threat-filled clash between what we can call MAGA and MAPA: between Trump's 'Make America Great Again' and Elon Musk's accusation that Trump's policies will, in effect, 'Make America Poor Again.' As Trump is truly the comeback king, it would be foolish to underestimate his capacity for recovery and renewal. Nonetheless, what the clash with Musk has done is to expose Trump's vulnerability and to damage, perhaps permanently, his aura of power and impunity. The key test will now be whether more Republican senators and representatives feel willing to oppose Trump over his extravagant budget bill or his tariffs, now that one of their big fears may start to fade – namely, the fear of being attacked in their party's primary elections next year by the combination of Trump's words and Musk's billions. Until now, the only check against the White House has been the judiciary, but if Congress decides to wake up from the supine sleep it has been in since January, it too could start to act as a restraint on Trump's excesses. We knew this could change next year, once the campaign season begins ahead of the mid-term Congressional elections in November 2026. Now, assuming the Musk-Trump divorce persists, it could change much sooner. Those are the political and constitutional stakes. But the economic stakes are high, too. The cause of the bust-up is that Musk clearly fears that Trump's policies are leading America toward a recession and possibly economic disaster, outcomes that he does not want to be personally associated with. They are leading in this direction because the budget (which Trump calls his 'big, beautiful bill'), passed by the House of Representatives and now being examined by the Senate, will make America's already gigantic federal public debt – which stands at nearly 130% of GDP – even higher. It also includes provisions to give the Treasury the power to impose taxes on foreign investors, making that debt potentially harder to finance. At the same time, Trump's import tariffs are adding to inflation while discouraging both household consumption and business investment. Higher borrowing costs, as lenders worry about the size of the debt; a weaker, perhaps slumping economy, which makes it harder to pay the interest-burden on the debt – this is indeed a recipe for MAPA. Some comfort can be drawn from another slogan, one which Trump hates: TACO, which stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out' – in other words, the idea that this bully always retreats after making wild and aggressive threats. The President's two less theatrical encounters last week, his meeting in the Oval Office with Friedrich Merz, Germany's Chancellor, and his phone call with China's President Xi Jinping, both suggest that the outcome on tariffs may be better than we feared when he made his dramatic announcement on his 'Liberation Day' April 2. The negotiations with the European Union and China still lie ahead, as they also do with Japan, so we cannot be sure. But a pattern seems to be emerging of a less severe tariff regime being agreed if it is accompanied by some multi-billion dollar promises of investment in the United States and of purchases of US liquefied natural gas, defense equipment or soybeans. Those promises give Trump political wins, perhaps reducing the economic losses. What the EU can hope to achieve in its talks is a 10% import tariff, matching the tariff already agreed with the United Kingdom, while China is likelier to end up with something more like 40-50%, with higher figures for some sensitive products. China has flexed its muscles by showing its willingness to cut off supplies of critical minerals needed by US manufacturers, and its resilience by continuing to make progress on high-tech products despite US export controls, so it will probably be content with 40-50%. If this is the sort of outcome that emerges during negotiations this summer, it will not be a good one for the world economy, nor for America itself, but it will be less bad than it might have been. The most important hope is that whatever emerges will at least be stable, allowing businesses to make long-term plans based on predictable regulations and tariff levels. The trouble is that Trump always loves uncertainty and loves to use whatever instruments he can to display his power, so it is hard to be sure that even after the negotiations the tariff volatility will come to an end. That, however, is why Congress is so important. Tariffs, like all other federal taxes, are supposed to be set by Congressional legislation, not executive fiat. Trump has broken with that rule by claiming that there is a 'national emergency' under which he has the power to set tariffs, and that for specific products such as steel and aluminium he can do so on grounds of national security. On May 28, the US Court of International Trade, supported soon afterward by another federal court, ruled that Trump's claim of an 'emergency' is invalid, making his tariff decisions illegal too. The White House has lodged an appeal, but if it loses then the power to set most tariffs will revert to Congress. If so, this will be good news, both for avoiding MAPA and for restoring some rationality to trade policy and thus to international relations. Elon Musk is just as capricious and egotistical as Donald Trump, so we would also be foolish to depend on him being consistent either in his opinions or on his apparent divorce from Trump. He is always driven by the interests of his businesses and his billions, so let us not get starry-eyed about him. But let us nonetheless, for the time being, enjoy this moment by taking it at its face value. If Musk's schism with Trump encourages even a few senators to rediscover their spines, if it helps to restore Congress's role as the ultimate controller of spending, taxes and tariffs, and if it thereby hinders the White House's tendency to attack Europe and other allies on spurious grounds, it will have done America, and the world, a service. Other billionaire backers of Trump should take note: backing economically destructive policies that also lose global allies cannot be in their, or America's, interests. Formerly editor-in-chief of The Economist, Bill Emmott is currently chairman of the Japan Society of the UK, the International Institute for Strategic Studies and the International Trade Institute. First published on Bill Emmott's Global View, this is the English original of an article published on June 7 in Italian by La Stampa. It is republished here with kind permission.

Recommitting to Japan-South Korea cooperation amid uncertainty
Recommitting to Japan-South Korea cooperation amid uncertainty

Asia Times

time3 hours ago

  • Asia Times

Recommitting to Japan-South Korea cooperation amid uncertainty

This article, originally published by Pacific Forum, is republished with permission. As President Lee Jae-myung takes office in South Korea, his new government is poised to begin rebuilding domestic trust and setting forth a new foreign policy agenda. South Korea has been in political limbo for the past six months since former president Yoon Suk Yeol briefly declared martial law in December 2024 – and in the meantime the international arena has been thrown into chaos. As South Korea reemerges into this new global context, it faces some difficult decisions about how to manage its relationships with its key economic and security partners. Precisely because of this uncertain outlook, now is a critical time for the governments in South Korea and Japan to recommit to further strengthening their bilateral relations to deal with shared problems. Prior to the recent period of limbo, Japan-South Korea ties had improved markedly as part of a push by former President Yoon, former Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and former US President Joe Biden to strengthen trilateral relations among their countries. Since the trilateral Camp David Summit in August 2023, over 80 US-Korea-Japan dialogues have been convened to promote collaboration in areas ranging from economics to security to people-to-people exchange. However, with recent changes in political leadership, there are questions as to how Japan-South Korea relations will evolve in the coming months under the Shigeru Ishida and Lee administrations as the two leaders begin to engage. Why should the governments of Japan and South Korea recommit to cooperation now? To begin with, the two governments face worsening security threats. Both Japan and South Korea harbor long-standing concerns about China, as well as about North Korea's nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs. Concerns about North Korea have been compounded by deepening cooperation between Pyongyang and Moscow in the war in Ukraine and the likelihood that Russia is rewarding North Korea's support with the transfer of military technologies. In addition, Japan and South Korea depend heavily on an international economic order that is currently in crisis. For years, the World Trade Organization has been stalled by disagreements among developed and developing countries and challenged by the practices of China's state-led economic system. Now, the trade system is under immense strain as the United States imposes unilateral tariffs that undermine the 'most favored nation' principle, and escalating trade war looms as a possibility. Japan and South Korea share an interest in stabilizing the existing economic order, maintaining relatively free flow of goods and services and strengthening their own economic security and national resilience. Moreover, Japan and South Korea must deal with a mutual US ally that is increasingly a source of disruption rather than stability. Both countries run significant trade surpluses with the US, which has made them top targets for tariffs. Japan and South Korea currently face reciprocal tariffs of 24% and 25% respectively, as well as Section 232 tariffs on autos, auto parts, steel, and aluminum. Japanese and Korean companies are being asked to invest more in the US. The two governments are also facing US pressure to boost their defense spending and host nation support and to increase other kinds of alliance burden-sharing at the same time as the US is considering reducing its military presence. In general, the return of an 'America First' approach to US foreign policy throws traditional alliances and institutions into question, leaving Japan and South Korea in a more vulnerable position. How can Japan and South Korea work together to address these challenges? The first step is to maintain the positive progress that has been achieved over the last two mechanisms have been established, and plans have been set in motion to start addressing many of the common concerns mentioned previously. Some initiatives will need to be reexamined under new national leadership, but they constitute an important baseline that should not be lost. Although the Trump administration has reaffirmed support for trilateral US-Japan-South Korea cooperation so far, Tokyo and Soul may need to push forward bilaterally without Washington in some cases. Second, Japan and South Korea may benefit from consulting with one another regarding their respective bilateral negotiations with the US on trade and security issues. In some cases, they may even find creative ways to coordinate their efforts. For example, SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won recently proposed that South Korea and Japan could respond to US pressure by jointly purchasing liquefied natural gas from the US, 'to increase deal size and leverage greater buying power to secure lower prices.' This type of approach could be applied in other areas. Tokyo and Seoul could also quietly consult on their respective bottom lines, to avoid one government taking a 'bad' deal with the US that sets a negative precedent for the other. Third, Japan and South Korea can build upon the foundation of the last two years to cultivate more widespread support for improving bilateral ties among their domestic stakeholders including legislators, civil society organizations, scholars and the general public. There have already been modest improvements in the two countries' public sentiment toward each other, and now is the time to build on this momentum. The more stakeholders who see Japan-South Korea ties as valuable, the more resilient their relationship will be to negative episodes in the future. There are also likely to be opportunities to build ties in the trilateral context; for example, the US House of Representatives recently introduced bipartisan legislation to establish an inter-parliamentary dialogue among elected politicians in the US, Japan and South Korea. Fourth, Japan and South Korea will benefit from embedding their bilateral cooperation in broader regional and international coalitions. Most of the problems that these two countries face cannot be solved through bilateral cooperation alone; instead, Tokyo and Seoul must partner with other governments in the Indo-Pacific, Europe, and elsewhere to address transnational security and economic challenges. For example, Lee, the new president, has already announced that he will be attending the June summit of the G7, which is an important venue for South Korea to consult with other like-minded countries as a guest. Japan and South Korea can continue to strengthen their cooperation with NATO as part of the 'Indo-Pacific 4.' The two countries should also explore ways to shore up the international economic system through broader trade initiatives. For example, they could work together to revitalize discussions on the Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific at the APEC summit in Gyeongju in November, and South Korea could considering joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership as well as the WTO's Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement. Participation in such minilateral initiatives will help further reinforce and stabilize Japan-South Korea bilateral efforts. The path ahead will not be easy. Internal politics in both countries are complex, and leaders will have to balance competing domestic and foreign policy priorities moving forward. The grievances that haunt Japan-South Korea relations cannot simply be ignored, and it will require careful, sustained effort to find mutually acceptable resolutions. However, taking steps now to put Japan-South Korea relations on a more resilient footing will help to facilitate these difficult conversations – and the costs of not cooperating will increase if the international system becomes more unstable. Kristi Govella ( is an associate professor of Japanese politics and international relations at the University of Oxford and senior advisor and Japan chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

US-China trade talks, Qin Shi Huang's western expedition: SCMP daily highlights
US-China trade talks, Qin Shi Huang's western expedition: SCMP daily highlights

South China Morning Post

time12 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

US-China trade talks, Qin Shi Huang's western expedition: SCMP daily highlights

Catch up on some of SCMP's biggest China stories of the day. If you would like to see more of our reporting, please consider subscribing Top officials from China and the United States are expected to start a second day of negotiations in London on Tuesday morning local time, as the two sides strive to de-escalate a stand-off over trade and technology that has sent shock waves across the global economy. Chinese state media have sought to portray the escalating Los Angeles protests against President Donald Trump's immigration policies as proof of a broken government and the lack of social cohesion in the United States. Visitors look at depiction of human experiments at the Unit 731 museum in Harbin, in northeast China's Heilongjiang province. The facility was built to conduct research into germ warfare, weapons capabilities and the limits of the human body, rather than for mass extermination. Photo: AFP As thousands of students gather this week for the finals of the National History Day contest in the US state of Maryland, one research project may stand out – not only as a sobering reminder of an infamous, often forgotten Japanese military unit, but also for America's role in keeping its war crimes quiet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store