Intel's 192-Core Diamond Rapids CPU Takes Aim at AMD's Server Dominance
Diamond Rapids represents Intel's most aggressive server CPU push yet, splitting 192 performance cores across four 48-core tiles using multi-die architecture. You're looking at 16-channel DDR5 memory support delivering up to 1.6 TB/s bandwidth—double what current systems handle. That's the kind of memory throughput your AI training workloads have been desperately craving.
To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter.
The platform upgrades tell the real story. A new 9324-pin LGA socket, PCIe Gen 6.0 support, and configurations scaling to 768 cores per system suggest Intel is betting big on density. But here's where reality bites: each socket consumes 500W, meaning a fully-loaded quad-socket server hits 2000W. Your facility's power and cooling infrastructure might need serious upgrades.
Intel's timing couldn't be more critical. AMD's Epyc Venice, also targeting 2026, promises 256 Zen 6 cores on TSMC's 2nm process—33% more cores than Diamond Rapids. That's like bringing a smartphone to a smartwatch fight; the size difference matters more than you'd expect.
Both processors target the same sweet spot: environments blending traditional server tasks with AI workloads. Diamond Rapids includes Advanced Performance Extensions (APX) and enhanced Advanced Matrix Extensions (AMX), plus native support for TF32 and FP8 floating-point formats. These aren't just spec sheet bragging rights—they're essential for modern AI inference that doesn't choke your general computing performance.
Your infrastructure decisions in 2026 will hinge on more than core counts. Power consumption, platform compatibility, and total cost of ownership matter more than raw specifications. Diamond Rapids' 500W requirement might seem excessive, but it's targeting workloads that currently require multiple lower-core processors.
The server CPU wars are entering their most intense phase since the original Opteron vs. Xeon battles. Your next hardware refresh cycle will determine whether you're riding the performance wave or drowning in outdated infrastructure, especially as Intel's comeback plan takes shape.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Intel Stock Is Falling Today: What Is Going On?
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Aug 20 - Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) shares swung sharply this week, surging 7% on Tuesday before tumbling by a similar margin on Wednesday. The volatility reflects growing uncertainty around the chipmaker's funding plans and turnaround strategy. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 10 Warning Signs with INTC. According to CNBC, Intel is in talks with several large investors about a discounted equity raise. The discussions come days after the company secured a $2 billion investment from Japan's SoftBank Group. At the same time, the U.S. government has signaled interest in taking a direct stake. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described domestic semiconductor production as vital to national security, while Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick suggested that Intel should provide equity in return for CHIPS Act support. Intel continues to face pressure despite leadership changes. Lip-Bu Tan stepped in as CEO in March to accelerate a turnaround effort aimed at addressing falling sales and shrinking market share. However, challenges remain, including public criticism from President Trump earlier this month, who later softened his stance after meeting Tan at the White House. The funding talks highlight how Intel's recovery is tied not just to markets, but also to political priorities in Washington. Sign in to access your portfolio
Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
Bernie Sanders Likes Trump's Plan for Government Taking Ownership in Tech Companies
There aren't many things that Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump agree on. But we may have found one idea where the two men see eye-to-eye. Sanders, an Independent Senator from Vermont who caucuses with the Democrats, told Reuters on Wednesday that he's in favor of the Trump administration's plan to convert federal grants for tech companies like Intel and TSMC into equity stakes in those companies. 'If microchip companies make a profit from the generous grants they receive from the federal government, the taxpayers of America have a right to a reasonable return on that investment,' Sanders reportedly told Reuters. The U.S. government is hoping to get a 10% equity stake in Intel in exchange for federal grants under the CHIPS Act, according to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who talked about the plan on Tuesday on CNBC. News broke of the idea last week, but Lutnick's appearance on CNBC was the first time anyone from the Trump regime had started talking about it publicly. 'The CHIPS Act was just a giveaway to rich companies,' Lutnick said on CNBC. 'I mean, why in the world is the United States of America taking money and giving it to companies like TSMC, which is worth a trillion dollars? I mean, why would we give them money to come to America?' U.S.-based Intel and Taiwan-based TSMC have both been incentivized by the CHIPS Act to invest more in manufacturing in the U.S., but it seems folks across the political spectrum have started to wonder whether it's smart to just hand out money to enormous companies without getting something more substantial in return. News broke Tuesday that Trump didn't just want an equity stake in Intel, but also chipmakers like Micron, TSMC, and Samsung. The idea behind grants for private companies is that they spur further investment in a given community and help create jobs. But the government taking an equity stake would theoretically come with a say in how that company does business, whether it's through employment decisions or any number of other choices. Lutnick insisted to CNBC that the government would not get any governance role at Intel along with its potential 10% stake, but it's hard to imagine that would be true. The government received a 'golden share' on the U.S. Steel deal when Japan-based Nippon Steel purchased the company in June. That allows Trump to appoint a board member in a very unusual arrangement. Under the CHIPS Act, TSMC received $6.6 billion in grants, while Intel has received about $7.9 billion, according to CNBC. Intel has slowed its expansion plans, which has left billions of dollars in funds on the table that haven't been allocated yet. And as the New York Times recently noted, converting $10.86 billion in government grants for Intel into equity would be one of the largest interventions into private industry since U.S. auto companies were bailed out during the Great Recession. Trump has also called for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to be fired over his alleged links to China, portrayed by the president as a potential national security concern. But Trump publicly changed his tune after meeting with Tan last week. It's not at all clear what kind of understanding the two men have come to. Needless to say, all of this potential government tinkering makes Wall Street very nervous. An editorial from the Wall Street Journal on Monday explained that details of the Intel deal were vague, 'but you can bet the feds wouldn't be passive investors.' Which brings us to the question of whether Bernie Sanders will actually like any potential arrangement Intel gets with Trump. Sanders may approve of an equity stake on paper, but President Trump's history of bending institutions to his will looks a lot different in practice. Trump has strong-armed universities, corporate media, and now has his sights set on museums and the way they present history. Lefties should be cautious when saying they support any idea from Trump without making it clear that any support comes with caveats. If the past six to eight months of Trumpism are any guide, an equity stake in Intel comes with plenty of strings attached.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why Taiwan Semiconductor Stock Tumbled Today
Key Points The U.S. government wants to take a 10% stake in Intel. It also wants to convert the free grant money that it already promised Intel into payment for Intel shares. The government may do the same thing to TSMC. 10 stocks we like better than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing › Contract semiconductor manufacturer Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM) stock slid 2.2% through 12:22 p.m. ET Wednesday. Why? As you may have heard by now, President Trump is planning to take an equity stake in Intel (NASDAQ: INTC). All the cool kids are doing it Following passage of the Biden administration's CHIPS Act supporting the U.S. semiconductor industry, Intel was awarded $10.9 billion in grants. But as Bloomberg reports, the Trump White House is now negotiating with Intel to convert those grants into a 10% stake in Intel stock. But Intel wasn't alone in winning CHIPS Act grants. As CNBC points out, Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) was awarded $6.6 billion in U.S. government semiconductor subsidies. And now it seems U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick may want to convert that grant into an equity stake as well. What does this mean for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing stock? That's the question investors are pondering today: What does this mean for TSMC? If Commerce converts its $6.6 billion grant into a $6.6 billion investment in TSMC stock, it will effectively remove $6.6 billion in "free money" from TSMC's balance sheet. But TSMC would still get to keep the $6.6 billion -- in exchange for handing shares over to the government. It might also be better positioned to win further government subsidies. But what if the rumors prove false? What if the government invests only in Intel, and not in TSMC? That would seem to give the government a big incentive to make sure Intel "wins" the semiconductor market, perhaps at TSMC's expense. This is bad news for TSMC. Should you invest $1,000 in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing right now? Before you buy stock in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $654,781!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,076,588!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,055% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Intel and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: short August 2025 $24 calls on Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Taiwan Semiconductor Stock Tumbled Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
