&w=3840&q=100)
Donald Trump wanted 90 trade deals in 90 days. How many has he cracked?
US President Donald Trump delivering remarks on tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington. Reuters
US President Donald Trump shocked many in April when he announced the 'Liberation Day' tariffs on dozens of countries.
Trump surprised many again when he, a week later, announced a 90-day pause on the tariffs in order to allow countries to negotiate bilateral trade deals.
Trump had set a July 9 deadline for the nations to come to trade agreements with America.
Top Trump officials had vowed to 'achieve 90 deals in 90 days'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But how many deals have actually materialised?
Let's take a closer look:
Done but…
UK
Despite his bluster, Trump has only managed to close a handful of deals – which critics have decried as small potatoes.
The first is a pact with the United Kingdom signed last month.
While Trump has touted this as a 'major trade deal', that would be greatly stretching the truth.
This is in fact a 'mini-trade deal'.
Trump has only signed an executive order reducing tariffs on certain British goods.
This includes cutting a 25 per cent tariff on cars to 10 per cent for the first 100,000 vehicles.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and US President Donald Trump shake hands at the White House. File image/Reuters
The tariffs on British steel and aluminium are yet to be finalised.
Trump had also imposed tariffs on products made from steel and aluminium such as gym equipment, furniture and machinery.
The countries are also yet to reach an agreement on tariffs on pharma.
The UK has done away with a 20 per cent tariffs on US beef imports.
It also allowed 1.4 billion litres of ethanol to be imported tariff-free.
Ethanol shipments to the UK from the United States were earlier taxed at 19 per cent.
China
The second is a face-saving agreement with China.
China and the US have also reached a limited agreement – mostly to try to take a step back from the escalating trade war.
The two countries initially held talks in Geneva in May.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This came after China suspended exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets to the US in retaliation for Trump's tariffs.
This allowed both countries to pause tariffs for 90 days while they tried to work out a larger deal.
Trump in June claimed the United States had signed a deal with China but did not provide details.
'We just signed with China the other day,' Trump said at an event at the White House.
China and the US have also reached a limited agreement – mostly to try to take a step back from the escalating trade war.
A White House official claimed that the United States has reached an agreement with China on how to expedite rare earth shipments to the US during talks in London.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick too claimed the deal was 'signed and sealed'.
However, he too did not provide any specific information.
China merely said that the two countries have confirmed details on the framework of the Geneva trade talks.
It said China would approve exports of controlled items but made no mention of rare earths.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Following the London talks, the teams from both sides have maintained close communication,' a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce said.
'Recently, with approval, both sides further confirmed the details of the framework.'
China 'will review and approve applications for the export control items that meet the requirements in accordance with the law', the statement said.
Details about the deal remain scarce.
It remains to be seen if the world's largest economies can hammer out a larger trade deal.
Vietnam
Trump also announced a trade deal with Vietnam on Thursday.
Trump, taking to social media, claimed that under the 'Great Deal of Cooperation", the US would charge Vietnam 20 per cent on tariffs.
The US would also levy a 40 per cent tariff on goods that pass through Vietnam – a process known as 'trans-shipping'.
Vietnam, meanwhile, would have zero tariffs on US products.
Vietnam under the deal would have zero tariffs on US products.
Adam Sitkoff, executive director of the American Chamber of Commerce in Hanoi, told the BBC the deal puts Vietnam 'in a good position'.
'Companies that ship from [Vietnam] to the US are going to keep doing it', Siktoff added.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
However, he said 'trans-shipping' is a 'a vague and often politicised term in trade enforcement'
'It's unclear how much illegal re-routing Vietnamese officials will even be able to catch, or how much exists', Sitkoff said.
Work in progress
India
Trump and other top officials from both sides including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar have repeatedly expressed optimism that a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) with India is close.
Though the team from India led by chief negotiator Rajesh Aggarwal are huddled in intense discussions with US officials, key concerns remain.
India, for example, wants to protect its dairy and agriculture industry.
India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar. File image/PTI
For the unversed, India has never opened up its dairy industry to foreigners.
The US, on the other hand, is desperate to open up a new market for its goods.
Experts say that a UK-style limited trade deal is likely to be reached.
Canada
Negotiations between the US and Canada, which Trump has frequently dubbed the '51st state', temporarily broke down.
This came after Trump in a huff claimed Canada's Digital Services Tax (DST) is a " direct and blatant attack' on the United States.
'We are hereby terminating all discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately,' Trump wrote on social media. 'We will let Canada know the tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven-day period.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The talks are slated to be restarted after Canada announced it was scrapping the tax on US firms.
This revenue, which Canada generates from its digital users, would have impacted companies such as Google, Amazon, Meta and Apple.
The talks are slated to be restarted after Canada announced it was scrapping the tax on US firms.
'Rescinding the digital services tax will allow the negotiations of a new economic and security relationship with the United States to make vital progress and reinforce our work to create jobs and build prosperity for all Canadians,' Canadian Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said in a statement.
Canada says its expects to reach a deal with the US by July 21.
Japan
US officials including Trump had expressed optimism that a trade deal could be quickly and easily be reached with Japan.
Indeed, Japan, an ally of the United States was one of the first countries to open negotiations with Trump on a possible trade deal.
However, talks between the two countries seem to have hit a wall over automobiles – a key Japanese export on which the US has imposed a 25 per cent tariff.
Trump is now also threatening a tariff on Japanese rice.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Japan, an ally of the United States was one of the first countries to open negotiations with Trump on a possible trade deal.
'I have great respect for Japan, they won't take our rice, and yet they have a massive rice shortage,' Trump wrote on social media. 'We'll just be sending them a letter, and we love having them as a Trading Partner for many years to come.'
He also falsely claimed that Japan does not buy both products from the United States.
Japan, in fact, bought $298 million worth of rice and around 16,000 cars from the US.
However, no deal with Tokyo appears imminent.
Trump himself did not sound optimistic earlier this week.
'We've dealt with Japan. I'm not sure if we're gonna make a deal, I doubt it, with Japan,' Trump said. 'They and others are so spoiled from having ripped us off for 30, 40 years that it's really hard for them to make a deal.'
Japan earlier this week said talks are on.
Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Kazuhiko Aoki was quoted as saying, 'Japan will continue to engage vigorously in sincere and honest discussions toward the realization of an agreement that will benefit both Japan and the United States.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
How much will America have to pay for Trump's tariffs?
Analysis shows Trump's tariffs will cost US employers a healthy chunk of change.
The study by JPMorganChase Institute puts the price tag at $82.3 billion
This would impact companies whose annual revenue is between $10 million and $1 billion – which employ nearly a third of private sector US workers.
President Donald Trump talks to workers as he tours US teel Corporation's Mon Valley Works-Irvin plant. File image/AP
This is even worse if the original tariffs Trump had announced had remained in place.
In that instance, the companies would have faced an additional burden of $187.6 billion.
This would equate to shelling out around $2,000 extra per employee – or around three per cent of their payroll.
Employers won't be the only ones suffering.
Another study from Goldman Sachs said companies will pass on at least 60 per cent of their tariff costs to the consumer.
Trump's theatrics growing stale?
To many people, Trump's theatrics on tariffs are growing stale.
Some, in fact, say they had expected Trump to reach these broad frameworks with countries and then brand them as trade deals.
'I would expect the White House will announce some number of frameworks that it's going to call trade deals, but do not meet anyone's ordinary understanding of that term,' Tim Meyer, a professor at Duke University law school who specialises in international trade, told Bloomberg.
Others say countries are already beginning to look away from the United States.
Kristina Fong, an economic affairs researcher at ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, said China will be the first port of call for many nations.
'It's a very slow burn kind of momentum, but that's always been, I think, the underlying case,' Fong told Time Magazine
Meanwhile, Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is massively unpopular with the public.
Polls from multiple organisations show the bill receiving net disapproval ratings ranging from minus 19 per cent to minus 29 per cent.
Elon Musk and Donald Trump have been going at it over the 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. Reuters
CNN's senior data analyst Harry Enten said the public thingks the bill is 'awful and horrible'.
Enten said the more people learn about it, the more they hate it.
Meanwhile, Trump's poll numbers are said to be sinking.
A new poll shows Trump's approval and disapproval ratings are at 40 and 56 per cent respectively.
This comes as an expert from Harvard said that data shows that young men aged 18 to 29 are starting to turn on Trump.
These developments make sense given the fact that Trump, in fact, is hampered by one simple fact – he has no authority to sign off on major trade deals.
That power, along with the purse strings, lies in the hands of US Congress – which seems to have abandoned its authority completely in the era of Trump.
It remains to be seen if Trump can turn things around at this point.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
20 minutes ago
- India Today
Hamas seeks war-end promise as US-led Gaza ceasefire talks advance
As ceasefire negotiations intensify, Hamas is demanding clear guarantees that any new US-backed truce proposal for Gaza will not just pause the fighting, but lead to a permanent end to the war, a source close to the militant group insistence comes as Israeli airstrikes reportedly killed at least 59 people across Gaza on the same day, underscoring the high human cost of delays in diplomatic progress. Nearly 21 months into the war between Israel and Hamas, momentum appears to be building for a breakthrough — if both sides can agree on the is seeking clear guarantees that the ceasefire will eventually lead to the war's end,' the source told reporters, highlighting a major sticking point in talks mediated by Egypt, Qatar, and the United States. On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump announced that Israel had accepted the terms of a 60-day ceasefire, designed to allow space for negotiations toward a final resolution of the Hamas has not yet officially accepted the plan, the group said it was in consultation with other Palestinian factions and would issue a formal response to mediators OFFICIALS ARE CAUTIOUSLY OPTIMISTIC'If the Hamas response is positive, an Israeli delegation is ready to participate in indirect talks to finalise the deal,' said a senior official close to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. A second source familiar with the talks said Israel expected a reply from Hamas by proposal includes the staggered release of 10 living Israeli hostages and the return of the bodies of 18 more in exchange for Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails, an official familiar with the negotiations said on Thursday. Of the 50 remaining hostages in Gaza, 20 are believed to still be and Qatari negotiators have reportedly sought international assurances that the two-month ceasefire would serve as a stepping stone toward a broader end to hostilities — an element that Hamas views as non-negotiable.'Efforts for a Gaza truce gathered steam after the US secured a ceasefire to end the 12-day aerial conflict between Israel and Iran,' noted one Egyptian security source. 'Now the priority is getting both sides to commit to deeper talks.'But on the ground, Gaza continues to endure heavy bombardment. Medical officials reported dozens of civilian casualties from Israeli strikes on Thursday alone, as expectations mount for a breakthrough, but without guarantees, Hamas remains hesitant.- Ends(With inputs from Reuters)Tune InMust Watch


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not
Ogles Cites Trump's Achievements Interior Department Response to Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Live Events Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Technical and Cultural Challenges Can Mount Rushmore Have More Faces? Mount Rushmore Rock's Poor Quality Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Political Support and Resistance FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel has hogged the limelight again as a renewed political push has emerged to add a fifth face to Mount Rushmore, this time that of President Donald Trump. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has formally requested that Interior Secretary Doug Burgum study the feasibility of the addition. However, experts and park officials continue to emphasize the structural and philosophical Ogles wrote a letter to Secretary Burgum urging the Department of the Interior to consider expanding the Mount Rushmore National Memorial. He pointed to Trump's domestic policy bill, which passed Congress on Thursday, and the administration's ongoing border security also posted his proposal on social media, writing that the monument should evolve to include recent moments in US Department of the Interior did not directly comment on the expansion proposal. A spokesperson said the agency reviews all correspondence from Congress seriously and thoroughly. The National Park Service, which manages Mount Rushmore, did not issue a fresh statement in the past, NPS officials have stressed that the rock surrounding the current sculpture is unsuitable for new acknowledged the difficulties involved in modifying Mount Rushmore. He suggested a feasibility study involving the public and experts to address technical, legal, and cultural concerns. Mount Rushmore sits on sacred Lakota Sioux land, a source of ongoing dispute with Indigenous argued that recognizing Trump's accomplishments would increase the site's importance and visitor numbers, benefitting South Dakota and local officials and geologists have repeatedly warned that the monument cannot safely accommodate another face. Maureen McGee-Ballinger of the NPS stated in 2020 that no suitable rock remains near the sculpted area.A long-standing engineering partner, RESPEC, supports this view, saying any new carving could destabilize the existing engineer Paul Nelson said removing more material could harm the support of the monument, possibly risking structural Rushmore's original sculptor, Gutzon Borglum, made several changes to his design due to the rock's poor quality. Jefferson's first face had to be blasted away and moved. Roosevelt's face was carved in a narrow space near a crack, and Lincoln's face is held by the 1990s, scientists mapped over 140 fractures across the site, showing it is already fragile. Park rangers even angled Jefferson's gaze to avoid a Ogles, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) has introduced legislation to begin carving Trump's face on the mountain. The bill has not yet received a past interviews, Trump expressed interest in being added to the monument. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem once said Trump told her it was his sculptor Borglum's granddaughter said the monument was not intended to celebrate individuals but ideals. Past suggestions to include other presidents were never acted say the rock is unstable. Carving more faces risks damage to the existing sculpture and could make the entire structure Rep. Anna Paulina Luna introduced a bill in January to carve Trump's face, but it has not advanced in Congress.


Economic Times
27 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill could leave 12 million without healthcare and America drowning in debt
Republicans in the US Senate have narrowly passed Donald Trump's mega-bill on tax and spending after hours of stalemate and negotiation. But Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is likely to increase the debt of America, according to estimates from Congressional Budget Office. The megabill could also impact 12 million Americans as they might lose health coverage. Two Sharp with ET: HDB IPO stuns on debut, Trump bill triggers $3T debt alarm Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads 12 million Americans might lose health coverage Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads ( Originally published on Jul 01, 2025 ) Senate Republicans narrowly approved President Donald Trump's giant tax and spending cuts package today after a days-long grind. The vote was 50-50, and Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote. The bill will now go to the House of 'big, beautiful bill' must pass in the House before heading to the president's desk. GOP leaders are racing to try to get the bill to the White House by July 940-page proposal covers tax cuts, healthcare, food aid, clean energy, immigration enforcement, student loans, military spending, and more. According to a New York Times report, the bill could leave 12 million more Americans uninsured over the next bill could cut health insurance coverage for nearly 12 million Americans and add $3.3tn (£2.4tn) in debt, according to new estimates, reports BBC. The bill would result in deeper health care cuts and leave more people without insurance, according to a report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).New estimates from CBO also revealed that over the same period, federal spending on Medicaid, Medicare and Obamacare would be cut by $1.1 trillion. More than $1 trillion of the cuts would be made to Medicaid. The legislation would also cut federal spending on Medicaid, Medicare and ObamaCare by $1.1 trillion, with more than $1 trillion coming from a decade, the bill would add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt, according to the CBO. The version passed by the House would have added $2.4 trillion. The public debt currently stands at approximately $29 trillion, and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that the government will need to borrow an additional $21 trillion over the next decade. This outlook has fueled concerns that the proposed Republican legislation could significantly worsen an already bleak fiscal the bill is estimated to add $3.3 trillion to the national debt, that figure excludes increased borrowing costs. When those are factored in, the total impact could approach $4 trillion.'Our fiscal house is basically on fire,' Democratic Senator Gary Peters said in remarks on the Senate floor on Sunday. 'But if our Republican colleagues jam through this bill, it's not going to pour water on that fire. It's going to pour gasoline on those flames.'Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill would extend tax cuts passed by Republicans in 2017. The bill proposes cuts to certain programmes in order to pay for the tax healthcare, the spending bill proposes a work requirement on most adults in order to qualify for benefits. It also reduces the amount of taxes that states can charge medical providers, the funds from which are used heavily to finance Medicaid programs.