Exclusive: US sanctions on China refiners over Iran oil disrupt operations, sources say
The targeting of independent refiners, known as teapots, marked an escalation in Washington's efforts to cut off Tehran's export revenue as President Donald Trump seeks to pressure Iran into a deal over its nuclear programme.
Washington's sanctions against Shandong Shouguang Luqing Petrochemical in March and Shandong Shengxing Chemical in April have also begun to deter other, larger independent Chinese refiners from buying Iranian crude, three of the sources said.
About five plants in the refining hub of Shandong province have halted purchases of Iranian oil since last month, worried about being hit by sanctions, two trading executives said. That wariness is the main reason discounts for Iranian Light have widened to $2.30-$2.40 a barrel against ICE Brent from about $2 a month ago, the executives and another source said.
Among the inconveniences faced by the two sanctioned teapots, state-run Shandong Port Group, the main port operator in the province, has denied entry to vessels loaded with crude they have purchased, five trade sources said. That follows the port group's January ban on port calls by U.S.-sanctioned tankers.
Shandong Port Group and Shengxing did not respond to requests for comment. A Luqing executive declined to comment.
Large state banks have also stopped providing Luqing with operational capital for purchasing crude, forcing it to work with smaller banks, four of the sources said.
The sources declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter.
Beijing says it opposes unilateral sanctions and defends as legitimate its trade with Iran, which ships about 90% of its oil exports to China. However, Chinese customs data has not shown any oil shipped from Iran since July 2022, with Iranian crude imports instead labelled as originating from Malaysia or other countries.
The Shandong Port Group's banning of cargoes for the two refineries has forced them to discharge at other ports, according to three sources.
In one case, the tanker Bei Hai Ming Wang carrying oil for the Shengxing refinery was rejected when it sought to land at the Laizhou port, controlled by Shandong Port Group, around April 21, according to a source familiar with the matter.
It eventually unloaded on May 2 at the privately owned Wantong Crude Oil Terminal in neighbouring Dongying, data from analytics firm Vortexa showed.
In another sign of trading disruption from the sanctions, two Asia-based oil product traders who had previously dealt with Luqing said they stopped doing so after it was sanctioned.
In addition, no shipments of gasoline blendstock have been recorded since the end of March out of Laizhou port, used by Luqing for most of its blendstock exports, Kpler and LSEG shiptracking data showed.
That contrasts with the first three months of this year when 83,000 metric tons (701,000 barrels) of methyl tertiary butyl ether, a key gasoline blendstock export, were shipped from Laizhou, accounting for 15% of China's total outflow of the blendstock.
State giant CNOOC stopped supplying crude to Shandong Haihua Group's 40,000 barrel-per-day refinery, operated by Luqing, shortly after the U.S. sanctions were announced, three trade sources and a Shandong-based Chinese oil market consultant said.
CNOOC did not respond to a request for comment. Calls to Haihua went unanswered.
The two teapots have also begun selling product through new entities, according to seven trade sources, with Luqing using Shouguang Jiaqing Petroleum Sales and Shengxing selling via Shandong Xuxing Petrochemical. Calls to the two entities seeking comment went unanswered.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Israel is in talks to possibly resettle Palestinians from Gaza in South Sudan
Israel is in discussions with South Sudan about the possibility of resettling Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to the war-torn East African country, part of a wider effort by Israel to facilitate mass emigration from the territory left in ruins by its 22-month offensive against Hamas. Six people familiar with the matter confirmed the talks to The Associated Press. It's unclear how far the talks have advanced, but if implemented, the plans would amount to transferring people from one war-ravaged land at risk of famine to another, and raise human rights concerns. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he wants to realize U.S. President Donald Trump 's vision of relocating much of Gaza's population through what Netanyahu refers to as 'voluntary migration.' Israel has floated similar resettlement proposals with other African nations. Palestinians, rights groups, and much of the international community have rejected the proposals as a blueprint for forcible expulsion in violation of international law. For South Sudan, such a deal could help it build closer ties to Israel, now the almost unchallenged military power in the Middle East. It is also a potential inroad to Trump, who broached the idea of resettling Gaza's population in February but appears to have backed away in recent months. Israel's Foreign Ministry declined to comment and South Sudan's foreign minister did not respond to questions about the talks. A U.S. State Department spokesperson said it doesn't comment on private diplomatic conversations. Egypt opposes proposals to resettle Palestinians out of Gaza Joe Szlavik, the founder of a U.S. lobbying firm working with South Sudan, said he was briefed by South Sudanese officials on the talks. He said an Israeli delegation plans to visit the country to look into the possibility of setting up camps for Palestinians there. No known date has been set for the visit. Israel did not immediately respond to a request for confirmation of the visit. Szlavik said Israel would likely pay for makeshift camps. Edmund Yakani, who heads a South Sudanese civil society group, said he had also spoken to South Sudanese officials about the talks. Four additional officials with knowledge of the discussions confirmed talks were taking place on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss them publicly. Two of the officials, both from Egypt, told AP they've known for months about Israel's efforts to find a country to accept Palestinians, including its contact with South Sudan. They said they've been lobbying South Sudan against taking the Palestinians. Egypt is deeply opposed to plans to transfer Palestinians out of Gaza, with which it shares a border, fearing an influx of refugees into its own territory. The AP previously reported on similar talks initiated by Israel and the U.S. with Sudan and Somalia, countries that are also grappling with war and hunger, and the breakaway region of Somalia known as Somaliland. The status of those discussions is not known. 'Cash-strapped South Sudan needs any ally' Szlavik, who's been hired by South Sudan to improve its relations with the United States, said the U.S. is aware of the discussions with Israel but is not directly involved. South Sudan wants the Trump administration to lift a travel ban on the country and remove sanctions from some South Sudanese elites, said Szlavik. It has already accepted eight individuals swept up in the administration's mass deportations, in what may have been an effort to curry favor. The Trump administration has pressured a number of countries to help facilitate deportations. 'Cash-strapped South Sudan needs any ally, financial gain and diplomatic security it can get,' said Peter Martell, a journalist and author of a book about the country, 'First Raise a Flag.' Israel's Mossad spy agency provided aid to the South Sudanese during their decades-long civil war against the Arab-dominated government in Khartoum ahead of independence in 2011, according to the book. The State Department, asked if there was any quid pro quo with South Sudan, said decisions on the issuing of visas are made 'in a way that prioritizes upholding the highest standards for U.S. national security, public safety, and the enforcement of our immigration laws.' From one hunger-stricken conflict zone to another Many Palestinians might want to leave Gaza, at least temporarily, to escape the war and a hunger crisis bordering on famine. But they have roundly rejected any permanent resettlement from what they see as an integral part of their national homeland. They fear that Israel will never allow them to return, and that a mass departure would allow it to annex Gaza and reestablish Jewish settlements there, as called for by far-right ministers in the Israeli government. Still, even those Palestinians who want to leave are unlikely to take their chances in South Sudan, among the world's most unstable and conflict-ridden countries. South Sudan has struggled to recover from a civil war that broke out after independence, and which killed nearly 400,000 people and plunged pockets of the country into famine. The oil-rich country is plagued by corruption and relies on international aid to help feed its 11 million people – a challenge that has only grown since the Trump administration made sweeping cuts to foreign assistance. A peace deal reached seven years ago has been fragile and incomplete, and the threat of war returned when the main opposition leader was placed under house arrest this year. Palestinians in particular could find themselves unwelcome. The long war for independence from Sudan pitted the mostly Christian and animist south against the predominantly Arab and Muslim north. Yakani, of the civil society group, said South Sudanese would need to know who is coming and how long they plan to stay, or there could be hostilities due to the 'historical issues with Muslims and Arabs.' 'South Sudan should not become a dumping ground for people,' he said. 'And it should not accept to take people as negotiating chips to improve relations.' ___ ___
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump could expand role of national guard for ‘quick reaction' to unrest
Donald Trump could expand the use of national guard troops in US cities even further, if a plan from the Pentagon comes to fruition. The Washington Post, reporting on internal documents on Tuesday, says Pentagon officials are 'evaluating plans' to create a 'Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force' that would deploy to crack down on cities in events of unrest or during protests. The newly revealed plans come as Trump has used the national guard in ways beyond the norm. He deployed troops to Los Angeles against the state and city's wishes to tamp down protests against immigration enforcement, and sent troops to Washington DC and took over the local police under the guise of increased crime. The Department of Defense wouldn't weigh in directly on the idea of a 'reaction force'. 'The Department of Defense is a planning organization and routinely reviews how the department would respond to a variety of contingencies across the globe,' a defense official said in a statement to the Guardian. 'We will not discuss these plans through leaked documents, pre-decisional or otherwise.' In the documents, the Post reports, it calls for 600 troops to be placed at the ready at military bases in Alabama and Arizona, able to deploy quickly if called. This force could cost 'hundreds of millions of dollars'. The documents have timestamps from late July and early August, though they are marked as 'pre-decisional'. The plan, if implemented, would be an expansion of the use of troops in US cities and is legally questionable. National guard troops are frequently deployed in their states to respond to disasters and, particularly in 2020, to civil unrest, when many states called on their units to deploy amid protests over police brutality. In 2020, around the time of the election, the Associated Press reported then, the guard designated military police units in Alabama and Arizona to rapidly respond 'if requested by a governor in another state'. In that instance, reporting at the time said, governors would need to request the help – it wouldn't be deployed just by the administration, as has happened in recent months.
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Illinois governor likens Trump's D.C. power-grab to Nazis as other 2028 Democrats wrestle with a response
Democratic Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker compared President Donald Trump federalizing Washington, D.C.'s police department and sending in the National Guard to moves made by the Nazis. During Trump's announcement Monday morning, the Republican president signaled he could make similar moves in other cities, including Chicago, which set Pritzker off. Pritzker, 60, charged that Trump 'doesn't follow the law.' 'I have talked about the fact that the Nazis in Germany in the '30s tore down a constitutional republic in just 53 days,' Pritzker said. 'It does not take much, frankly, and we have a president who seems hell-bent on doing just that,' the Democrat added, according to the Chicago Tribune. The comments came a day after Pritzker signaled that he was open to a 2028 presidential bid - something that Trump mocked during his raucous briefing. 'And now I understand he wants to be president,' Trump said. 'But I noticed he lost a little weight, so maybe he has a chance, you know? You never know what happen,' the president teased before adding, 'But Pritzker's a gross incompetent guy.' In a social media post, Pritzker sarcastically wrote, 'Donald, thanks for the compliment!' 'Let's not lie to the public, you and I both know you have no authority to take over Chicago,' he continued. 'By the way, where are the Epstein files?' A handful of other possible 2028 Democratic hopefuls were quick to criticize Trump too - though they didn't take it quite as far. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who objected to Trump deploying U.S. Marines and the National Guard to Los Angeles earlier this year to quell anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement protests, noted that the president 'was just getting warmed up in Los Angeles.' 'He will gaslight his way into militarizing any city he wants in America,' Newsom said. 'This is what dictators do.' Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, whose state is adjacent to Washington, D.C., said in an official statement that Trump's announcement 'lacks seriousness and is deeply dangerous.' He claimed Trump was 'simply using honorable men and women as pawns to distract us from his policies.' New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, a failed 2020 White House candidate, took to X to claim that 'Trump doesn't care about the rule of law, and he doesn't care about D.C.' 'This insulting stunt and abuse of power is all a distraction from his corruption and incompetence,' the New Jersey Democrat said. Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who also ran an unsuccessful 2020 presidential bid, said the D.C. announcement amounted to a distraction and more. 'The president is doing this not in order to make the city safer - that's the job of local law enforcement - but to solve his own political problems,' Buttigieg said. 'I hesitate to use a word like "distraction," even though distraction is part of the goal, because it is legitimately important thing that he is taking power in this way.' Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro didn't chime in because he was distracted. On Monday a steel mill outside of Pittsburgh exploded killing two workers and hurting others. Other notable 2028 wannabes, including former Democratic nominee Kamala Harris and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer didn't immediately comment on the issue.
