logo
Netflix resorted to AI use in Argentine sci-fi series

Netflix resorted to AI use in Argentine sci-fi series

Express Tribune20-07-2025
Netflix said on Thursday that it used generative artificial intelligence to produce visual effects that appeared for the first time on screen in one of its original series, employing a technology that has been a source of anxiety throughout Hollywood.
Co-CEO Ted Sarandos hailed AI as "an incredible opportunity to help creators make films and series better, not just cheaper."
Sarandos offered the example of Argentine science-fiction series El Eternauta (The Eternaut), where the creators wanted to show a building collapsing in Buenos Aires – a visual effect that would have been beyond the project's budget. The creative team partnered with Eyeline Studios, a production innovation group within Netflix, to make the dramatic scene with the aid of AI.
"That VFX sequence was completed 10 times faster than it could have been completed with visual traditional VFX tools and workflows," Sarandos said during the company's second-quarter investor call. "And also the cost of it would just wouldn't have been feasible for a show in that budget."
Sarandos said the sequence is the first GenAI final footage to appear on screen in a Netflix original series or film.
AI has become a flashpoint in Hollywood since the labour unrest of 2023, which resulted in new guidelines for the use of the technology. The main concern is that AI could replace the work of humans.
Co-CEO Greg Peters said Netflix may find other ways to leverage generative AI to improve the user experience – including offering viewers the ability to use spoken words to find something to watch.
"Saying 'I want to watch a film from the '80s that's a dark psychological thriller,' (and getting) some results back ... you just couldn't have done in our previous experiences," said Peters. "So that's super-exciting."
Advertising represents another opportunity for generative AI, Peters said, as brands and marketers seek to create compelling content.
"We think these generative techniques can decrease that hurdle iteratively over time and enable us to do that in more and more spots," said Peters. Reuters
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Where is Xavier in 'Wednesday' Season 2? Percy Hynes White's absence explained following scandal
Where is Xavier in 'Wednesday' Season 2? Percy Hynes White's absence explained following scandal

Express Tribune

time10 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Where is Xavier in 'Wednesday' Season 2? Percy Hynes White's absence explained following scandal

Wednesday season 2 has officially arrived on Netflix, and the show has addressed the absence of Xavier Thorpe, previously played by Percy Hynes White. Xavier, a key character in the first season and romantic interest of Wednesday Addams, is confirmed to have transferred to Reichenbach Academy in Switzerland. Principal Dort, played by Steve Buscemi, informs Wednesday of Xavier's move during the first episode. A letter from Xavier later reaches her, referencing one of his psychic visions connected to the mystery at Nevermore. It reads: 'Consider this my goodbye gift… Don't ask me how I know or what it means, but it's connected to you, I'm sure.' Percy Hynes White confirmed earlier this year that he would not return for season 2, writing, 'I had so much fun working on this show. I can't wait to watch season 2 :) Much love.' While no formal reason was shared by the production, his departure follows accusations of sexual assault made in 2023 on X. The post, now deleted, accused the actor of misconduct at a party. Hynes White denied the claims, calling them 'a campaign of misinformation' and stated that the rumours were false. Meanwhile Wednesday Season 2, Part 1 of which is now streaming on Netflix, also features cast additions, including Steve Buscemi, Joanna Lumley, and Billie Piper.

Musk vs. Modi: Inside the battle over India's internet censorship
Musk vs. Modi: Inside the battle over India's internet censorship

Business Recorder

time12 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Musk vs. Modi: Inside the battle over India's internet censorship

BENGALURU/NEW DELHI: In January, an old post on Elon Musk's social media platform, X, became a concern for police in the Indian city of Satara. Written in 2023, the short message from an account with a few hundred followers described a senior ruling-party politician as 'useless'. 'This post and content are likely to create serious communal tension,' inspector Jitendra Shahane wrote in a content-removal notice marked 'CONFIDENTIAL' and addressed to X. The post, which remains online, is among hundreds cited by X in a lawsuit it filed in March against India's government, challenging a sweeping crackdown on social media content by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration. Since 2023, India has ramped up efforts to police the internet by allowing many more officials to file takedown orders and to submit them directly to tech firms through a government website launched in October. X argues India's actions are illegal and unconstitutional, and that they trample free speech by empowering scores of government agencies and thousands of police to suppress legitimate criticism of public officials. India contends in court documents that its approach tackles a proliferation of unlawful content and ensures accountability online. It says many tech companies, including Meta and Alphabet's Google, support its actions. Both companies declined to comment for this story. Musk, who calls himself a free-speech absolutist, has clashed with authorities in the United States, Brazil, Australia and elsewhere over compliance and takedown demands. Musk says he will visit India after talk with Modi But as regulators globally weigh free-speech protections against concerns about harmful content, Musk's case against Modi's government in the Karnataka High Court targets the entire basis for tightened internet censorship in India, one of X's biggest user bases. Musk said in 2023 that the South Asian nation had 'more promise than any large country in the world' and that Modi had pushed him to invest there. This account of the behind-the-scenes battle between the world's richest person and authorities in the world's most populous country is based on a Reuters review of 2,500 pages of non-public legal filings and interviews with seven police officers involved in content-removal requests. It reveals the workings of a takedown system shrouded in secrecy, some Indian officials' ire over 'illegal' material on X, and the broad spectrum of content that police and other agencies have sought to censor. While the takedown orders include many that sought to counter misinformation, they also encompass directives by Modi's administration to remove news about a deadly stampede, and demands from state police to scrub cartoons that depicted the prime minister in an unfavourable light or mocked local politicians, the filings show. X didn't respond to Reuters questions about the case, while India's IT ministry declined to comment because the matter was before the court. Modi's office and his home ministry didn't respond to questions. There have been no immediate signs of souring personal relations between Musk and Modi, who have enjoyed a warm public rapport. But the showdown comes as the South African-born entrepreneur, whose business empire includes EV maker Tesla and satellite internet provider Starlink, gears up to expand both ventures in India. Even supporters of Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have faced scrutiny of their online musings from police officials newly empowered by the IT ministry to target social media activity. Koustav Bagchi, a lawyer and BJP member, posted an image on X in March that depicted a rival, West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, in an astronaut suit. State police issued a takedown notice, citing 'risks to public safety and national security'. India's Modi meets Trump, Musk as tariff pressure Bagchi told Reuters the post, which is still online, was 'light-hearted' and that he wasn't aware of the takedown order. The chief minister's office and state police didn't respond to Reuters queries. Of the earlier 2023 post, Shahane, the Satara police officer, told Reuters he couldn't recall the takedown order, but said police sometimes proactively ask platforms to block offensive viral content. 'Censorship portal' For years, only India's IT and Information & Broadcasting ministries could order content removal, and only for threats to sovereignty, defense, security, foreign relations, public order, or incitement. Some 99 officials across India could recommend takedowns, but the ministries had the final say. While that mechanism remains in place, Modi's IT ministry in 2023 empowered all federal and state agencies and police to issue takedown notices for 'any information which is prohibited under any law'. They could do so under existing legal provisions, the ministry said in a directive, citing the need for 'effective' content removal. Companies that fail to comply can lose immunity for user content, making them liable for the same penalties a user might face - which could vary greatly depending on the specific material posted. Modi's government went a step further in October 2024. It launched a website called Sahyog - Hindi for collaboration - to 'facilitate' the issuance of takedown notices, and asked Indian officials and social media firms to get on board, memos contained in court papers show. X didn't join Sahyog, which it has called a 'censorship portal', and sued the government earlier this year, challenging the legal basis for both the new website and the IT ministry's 2023 directive. In a June 24 filing, X said some of the blocking orders issued by officials 'target content involving satire or criticism of the ruling government, and show a pattern of abuse of authority to suppress free speech.' Some free-speech advocates have criticised the government's stricter takedown regime, saying it is designed to stifle dissent. 'Can a claim that some content is unlawful be termed as indeed unlawful merely because the government claims so?' said Subramaniam Vincent, director of journalism and media ethics at Santa Clara University's Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. 'The executive branch cannot be both the arbiter of legality of media content, and the issuer of takedown notices.' Red dinosaur Court filings reviewed by Reuters show federal and state agencies ordered X to remove around 1,400 posts or accounts between March 2024 and June 2025. More than 70% of these removal notices were issued by the Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre, which developed the Sahyog website. The agency is within the home ministry, which is headed by Modi aide Amit Shah, a powerful figure in the ruling BJP. To counter X in court, India's government filed a 92-page report drafted by the cybercrime unit to show X is 'hosting illegal content'. The unit analysed nearly 300 posts it deemed unlawful, including misinformation, hoaxes, and child sexual-abuse material. X serves as a vehicle for 'spreading hate and division' that threatens social harmony, while 'fake news' on the platform has sparked unspecified law-and-order issues, the agency said in the report. The government's response to X's lawsuit highlighted examples of misinformation. In January, the cybercrime unit asked X to remove three posts containing what officials said were fabricated images that portrayed Shah's son, International Cricket Council chairman Jay Shah, 'in a derogatory manner' alongside a bikini-clad woman. The posts 'dishonour prominent office bearers and VIPs', the notices said. Two of those posts remain online. Jay Shah didn't respond to Reuters queries. Other directives went beyond targeting fake news. X told the court India's railways ministry has been issuing orders to censor press reports about matters of public interest. These included February directives seeking the removal of posts by some media outlets, including two by Adani Group's NDTV, that contained news coverage of stampede at New Delhi's biggest railway station that left 18 dead. The NDTV posts are still online. NDTV didn't respond to Reuters queries and the railways ministry declined to comment. In April, police in Chennai asked X to remove many 'deeply offensive' and 'provocative' posts, including a now-inaccessible cartoon featuring a red dinosaur labelled 'inflation', which portrayed Modi and the chief minister of Tamil Nadu state as struggling to control prices. The same month, police demanded the removal of another cartoon that mocked the state government's lack of preparedness for floods by showing a boat with holes. X told the judge the cartoon was posted in November, and it could not 'incite political tensions' several months later, as the Chennai police asserted. The post remains online. The state government didn't respond to a request for comment. When Reuters visited the Chennai cybercrime police station that issued these directives, Deputy Commissioner B. Geetha criticised X for seldom acting on takedown requests. X does not 'fully grasp the cultural sensitivities', she said. 'What may be acceptable in some countries can be considered taboo in India.'

'Wednesday' Season 1 recap: Everything to know before Season 2 premieres on Netflix
'Wednesday' Season 1 recap: Everything to know before Season 2 premieres on Netflix

Express Tribune

time14 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

'Wednesday' Season 1 recap: Everything to know before Season 2 premieres on Netflix

As Wednesday Season 2 prepares to debut on August 8, audiences are eager to revisit the supernatural world of Nevermore Academy. Season 1 follows Wednesday Addams (Jenna Ortega) as she joins Nevermore, a school for outcasts, after being expelled for defending her brother. There, she uncovers dark secrets while investigating a series of murders in the nearby town of Jericho. Her psychic visions and connections to her ancestor Goody Addams reveal a prophecy that hints she may destroy Nevermore. Wednesday's strained relationships soon evolve into alliances. She befriends her werewolf roommate Enid, clashes with siren Bianca, and attracts the attention of Xavier. Her bond with normie Tyler grows, but her visions reveal he's the Hyde, a murderous creature controlled by Laurel Gates—posing as teacher Ms Thornhill. Together, they plan to resurrect Jericho's founder, Joseph Crackstone, using Wednesday's blood. In the season finale, Goody helps Wednesday survive a fatal wound, and she, alongside Bianca and Enid, defeats Crackstone, Tyler, and Laurel. Principal Weems is killed during the conflict. The season ends on a cliffhanger as Xavier gifts Wednesday a phone, and she immediately receives threatening texts from a stalker. With classes suspended and unresolved mysteries looming, the stage is set for Season 2. The new season will reportedly explore deeper threats and emotional stakes, including the fate of Enid. Wednesday Season 2 will be released in two parts on Netflix, with the first half dropping on August 6 at 12 am PT/ 3 am ET and the second on September 3.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store