Snap's revenue growth slowest in over a year as competition, ad platform glitch hurt
The Snapchat-parent said it had resolved the error that unintentionally allowed some ads to run at much lower prices.
Snap faces tough competition from the likes of TikTok and Meta-owned Facebook and Instagram, with advertisers preferring the larger platforms as they curtail marketing budgets amid economic uncertainty. Rivals Meta and Reddit (RDDT.N), opens new tab reported upbeat second quarter results last week.
"The digital ad tailwinds that propelled Meta and Reddit to blowout quarters turned into a light breeze for Snap," said eMarketer principal analyst Jasmine Enberg.
Under different circumstances, investors might have overlooked its ad platform misstep, but "there is little room for mistakes," she added.
Snap's quarterly revenue was also impacted by the timing of Ramadan, which influenced ad spending patterns. The end of the "de minimis" exemption - a U.S. duty-free import provision - also prompted some Chinese advertisers to reduce their marketing budgets.
In April, ad revenue declined about 1% before "largely recovering" through May, and triggering the company to roll out Sponsored Snaps - a new video ads format that appears in user inboxes - more broadly in June, said CFO Derek Andersen.
The company said its expanded roll-out of Sponsored Snaps across the U.S. and several other global regions is driving more user actions and deeper engagement with ad content.
The Santa Monica, California-based company reported second-quarter revenue of $1.34 billion, up around 8.7% from last year and largely in line with estimates, but lower than the double-digit growth it recorded in the last five quarters. Its net loss widened to $263 million from $249 million a year ago.
Small and medium-sized businesses were the largest contributors to ad revenue growth and its subscription service Snapchat+ remained a key driver for diversifying revenue beyond ads.
Snapchat+ subscribers rose 42% to nearly 16 million for the quarter ended June 30. Daily active users rose 9% to 469 million, compared with estimates of 467.9 million.
The company forecast third-quarter revenue between $1.48 billion and $1.51 billion, compared with analysts' average estimate of $1.48 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
17 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
BitChat Jack Dorsey's Offline Secure Messaging App : No Signal? No Problem!
What if you could send a message without ever needing Wi-Fi, cellular data, or even an internet connection? It sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie, but with BitChat, it's a reality. Created by Jack Dorsey, the mind behind Twitter and Square, this new app uses Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) to create a decentralized mesh network, allowing users to communicate even when traditional networks fail. Imagine being at a packed concert where your phone signal is nonexistent, or stuck in a remote area with no internet access—BitChat ensures you're never out of touch. But this innovation isn't just about convenience; it's also a bold step toward redefining how we think about privacy and connectivity in a hyper-connected world. In this overview, Better Stack explore how BitChat's peer-to-peer messaging works, the real-world scenarios it's built for, and the challenges it faces as it pushes the boundaries of offline communication. From its promise of secure, encrypted chats to its potential role in emergencies or protests, BitChat offers a glimpse into a future where staying connected doesn't depend on traditional infrastructure. But is it ready to deliver on its ambitious vision? As we unpack its features, limitations, and potential, you might find yourself questioning how much we truly rely on the internet—and whether BitChat could be the app to change that. BitChat: Offline Messaging App How BitChat Works BitChat's defining feature is its ability to assist peer-to-peer messaging without traditional internet infrastructure. Instead of using cellular towers or Wi-Fi, the app employs BLE to connect devices within a decentralized mesh network. Messages are relayed from one device to another until they reach their intended recipient. This system ensures that communication remains possible even in areas where cellular networks are unavailable, unreliable, or congested. For example, at large-scale events like concerts or sports matches, where cellular networks often become overwhelmed, BitChat can provide a dependable alternative. Similarly, in remote locations with no internet access, the app's offline functionality ensures users can stay connected. Its decentralized nature also makes it resilient in scenarios where traditional communication methods fail, such as during natural disasters or network outages. Privacy and Security Features Privacy is a cornerstone of BitChat's design. The app employs end-to-end encryption to protect messages from interception, making sure that only the sender and recipient can access the content. To establish secure communication channels, BitChat uses the Noise handshake protocol, a widely respected cryptographic framework. Additionally, the app incorporates ephemeral key rotation, which generates new encryption keys every 5 to 15 minutes. This feature minimizes the risk of long-term data exposure, further enhancing user privacy. Despite these robust measures, BitChat has faced criticism for early security vulnerabilities and the absence of comprehensive external audits. These concerns highlight the importance of ongoing development and rigorous testing to maintain user trust and safeguard sensitive information. As the app evolves, addressing these issues will be critical to its success. How BitChat Works Offline Watch this video on YouTube. Dive deeper into messaging apps with other articles and guides we have written below. Development Challenges and Platform Limitations BitChat originated as a weekend project by Jack Dorsey, with the assistance of an AI development tool named Goose, which accelerated the coding process. Its open source framework has attracted a growing community of contributors, allowing continuous improvements and regular security updates. This collaborative approach has been instrumental in refining the app and addressing user feedback. However, the app's performance has not been consistent across platforms. While the Android version has demonstrated greater reliability, the iOS version has encountered significant bugs that hinder the user experience. These technical inconsistencies underscore the need for further refinement to ensure seamless functionality across all devices. Additionally, the app's reliance on BLE technology limits its range to approximately 100 meters, which may restrict its utility in certain scenarios. Real-World Applications BitChat's unique features make it a versatile tool for a variety of real-world situations. Its ability to function without internet access and its emphasis on privacy position it as a practical solution for several use cases, including: Crowded Events: At concerts, festivals, or sports events where cellular networks are often overwhelmed, BitChat provides a reliable communication channel for attendees. At concerts, festivals, or sports events where cellular networks are often overwhelmed, BitChat provides a reliable communication channel for attendees. Confidential Meetings: The app's encryption features make it ideal for secure corporate discussions, journalist-source interactions, or other sensitive communications. The app's encryption features make it ideal for secure corporate discussions, journalist-source interactions, or other sensitive communications. Protests and Demonstrations: In situations where offline, secure communication is essential, BitChat offers a practical and discreet solution. In situations where offline, secure communication is essential, BitChat offers a practical and discreet solution. Remote Areas: For individuals in locations without internet access, such as rural communities or wilderness settings, BitChat ensures connectivity through its decentralized network. For individuals in locations without internet access, such as rural communities or wilderness settings, BitChat ensures connectivity through its decentralized network. Emergency Situations: During natural disasters or network outages, BitChat can serve as a critical tool for maintaining communication when traditional methods are unavailable. These applications highlight the app's potential to address a wide range of communication challenges, making it a valuable resource for both everyday users and those in specialized contexts. Looking Ahead: BitChat's Future The future of BitChat hinges on its ability to overcome current limitations and build trust among users. Addressing security vulnerabilities and improving platform stability will be essential to its long-term success. The app's open source nature provides significant opportunities for customization and innovation, allowing developers to tailor it to specific needs and explore new functionalities. If these efforts are successful, BitChat could play a pivotal role in redefining offline communication. Its decentralized architecture and focus on privacy make it particularly appealing to users who prioritize security or operate in environments with limited internet access. Furthermore, the app's development could inspire broader advancements in decentralized technologies, paving the way for a new generation of communication tools. BitChat's potential extends beyond individual users, offering solutions for businesses, humanitarian organizations, and communities in need of reliable, internet-free communication. As the app continues to evolve, it has the opportunity to establish itself as a cornerstone of decentralized messaging, addressing both practical and privacy-related concerns in an increasingly connected world. Media Credit: Better Stack Filed Under: Technology News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
Chinese state media says Nvidia H20 chips not safe for China
BEIJING, Aug 10 (Reuters) - Nvidia's (NVDA.O), opens new tab H20 chips pose security concerns for China, a social media account affiliated with China's state media said on Sunday, after Beijing raised concerns over backdoor access in those chips. The H20 chips are also not technologically advanced or environmentally friendly, the account, Yuyuan Tantian, which is affiliated with state broadcaster CCTV, said in an article published on WeChat. "When a type of chip is neither environmentally friendly, nor advanced, nor safe, as consumers, we certainly have the option not to buy it," the article concluded. Nvidia did not immediately respond to a request for comment. H20 artificial intelligence chips were developed by Nvidia for the Chinese market after the U.S. imposed export restrictions on advanced AI chips in late 2023. The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump banned their sales in April amid escalating trade tensions with China, but reversed the ban in July. China's cyberspace watchdog said on July 31 that it had summoned Nvidia to a meeting, asking the U.S. chipmaker to explain whether its H20 chips had any backdoor security risks - a hidden method of bypassing normal authentication or security controls. Nvidia later said its products had no "backdoors" that would allow remote access or control. In its article, Yuyuan Tantian said Nvidia chips could achieve functions including "remote shutdown" through a hardware "backdoor." Yuyuan Tantian's comment followed criticism against Nvidia by People's Daily, another Chinese state media outlet. In a commentary earlier this month, People's Daily said Nvidia must produce "convincing security proofs" to eliminate Chinese users' worries over security risks in its chips and regain market trust.
The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Digital resurrection: fascination and fear over the rise of the deathbot
Rod Stewart had a few surprise guests at a recent concert in Charlotte, North Carolina. His old friend Ozzy Osbourne, the lead singer of Black Sabbath who died last month, was apparently beamed in from some kind of rock heaven, where he was reunited with other departed stars including Michael Jackson, Tina Turner and Bob Marley. The AI-generated images divided Stewart's fans. Some denounced them as disrespectful and distasteful; others found the tribute beautiful. At about the same time, another AI controversy erupted when Jim Acosta, a former CNN White House correspondent, interviewed a digital recreation of Joaquin Oliver, who was killed at the age of 17 in a 2018 high school shooting in Florida. The avatar of the teenager was created by his parents, who said it was a blessing to hear his voice again. In June, Alexis Ohanian, a co-founder of Reddit, posted on X an animation of his late mother hugging him when he was a child, created from a photograph. 'Damn, I wasn't ready for how this would feel. We didn't have a camcorder, so there's no video of me with my mom … This is how she hugged me. I've rewatched it 50 times,' he wrote. These are just three illustrations of a growing phenomenon of 'digital resurrection' – creating images and bots of people who have died using photographs, videos, voice messages and other material. Companies offering to create 'griefbots' or 'deathbots' abound, and questions about exploitation, privacy and their impact on the grieving process are multiplying. 'It's vastly more technologically possible now because of large language models such as ChatGPT being easily available to the general public and very straightforward to use,' said Elaine Kasket, a London-based cyberpsychologist. 'And these large language models enable the creation of something that feels really plausible and realistic. When someone dies, if there are enough digital remains – texts, emails, voice notes, images – it's possible to create something that feels very recognisable.' Only a few years ago, the idea of 'virtual immortality' was futuristic, a techno-dream beyond the reach of ordinary people. Now, interactive avatars can be created relatively easily and cheaply, and demand looks set to grow. A poll commissioned by the Christian thinktank Theos and carried out by YouGov in 2023 found that 14% of respondents agreed they would find comfort in interacting with a digital version of a loved one who had died. The younger the respondent, the more likely they were to be open to the idea of a deathbot. The desire to preserve connections with dead loved ones is not new. In the past, bereaved people have retained precious personal items that help them feel close to the person they have lost. People pore over photos, watch videos, replay voice messages and listen to music that reminds them of the person. They often dream of the dead, or imagine they glimpse them across a room or in the street. A few even seek contact via seances. 'Human beings have been trying to relate to the dead ever since there were humans,' said Michael Cholbi, a professor of philosophy at the University of Edinburgh and the author of Grief: A Philosophical Guide. 'We have created monuments and memorials, preserved locks of hair, reread letters. Now the question is: does AI have anything to add?' Louise Richardson, of York university's philosophy department and a co-investigator on a four-year project on grief, said bereaved people often sought to 'maintain a sense of connection and closeness' with a dead loved one by visiting their grave, talking to them or touching items that belonged to them. 'Deathbots can serve the same purpose, but they can also be disruptive to the grieving process,' she said. 'They can get in the way of recognising and accommodating what has been lost, because you can interact with a deathbot in an ongoing way.' For example, people often wonder what a dead loved one might have done or said in a specific situation. 'Now it feels like you are able to ask them.' But deathbots may also provide 'sanitised, rosy' representations of a person, said Cholbi. For example, someone creating a deathbot of their late granny may choose not to include her casual racism or other unappealing aspects of her personality in material fed into an AI generator. There is also a risk of creating a dependency in the living person, said Nathan Mladin, the author of AI and the Afterlife, a Theos report published last year. 'Digital necromancy is a deceptive experience. You think you're talking to a person when you're actually talking to a machine. Bereaved people can become dependent on a bot, rather than accepting and healing.' The boom in digital clones of the dead began in the far east. In China, it can cost as little as 20 yuan (£2.20) to create a digital avatar of a loved one, but according to one estimate the market was worth 12bn yuan (£1.2bn) in 2022 and was expected to quadruple by 2025. More advanced, interactive avatars that move and converse with a client can cost thousands of pounds. Fu Shou Yuan International Group, a major funeral operator, has said it is 'possible for the dead to 'come back to life' in the virtual world'. According to the China Funeral Association, the cost is about 50,000 yuan per deceased person. The exploitation of grief for private profit is a risk, according to Cholbi, although he pointed to a long history of mis-selling and upselling in the funeral business. Kasket said another pitfall was privacy and rights to digital remains. 'A person who's dead has no opportunity to consent, no right of reply and no control.' The fraudulent use of digital material to create convincing avatars for financial gain was another concern, she added. Some people have already begun stipulating in their wills that they do not want their digital material to be used after their death. Interactive avatars are not just for the dead. Abba Voyage, a show that features digital versions of the four members of the Swedish pop group performing in their heyday, has been a runaway success, making about £1.6m each week. Audiences thrill – and sing along – to the exhilarating experience while the band's members, now aged between 75 and 80, put their feet up at home. More soberly, the UK's National Holocaust Centre and Museum launched a project in 2016 to capture the voices and images of Holocaust survivors to create interactive avatars capable of answering questions about their experiences in the Nazi death camps long into the future. According to Cholbi, there is an element of 'AI hype' around deathbots. 'I don't doubt that some people are interested in this, and I think it could have some interesting therapeutic applications. It could be something that people haul out periodically – I can imagine they bring out the posthumous avatar of a deceased relative at Christmas dinner or on their birthday. 'But I doubt that people will try to sustain their relationships with the dead through this technology for very long. At some point, I think most of us reconcile ourselves with the fact of death, the fact that the person is dead. 'This isn't to say that some people might really dive into this, but it does seem to be a case where maybe the prospects are not as promising as some of the commercial investors might hope.' For Mladin, the deathbot industry raises profound questions for ethicists and theologians. The interest in digital resurrection may be a consequence of 'traditional religious belief fading, but those deeper longings for transcendence, for life after death, for the permanence of love are redirected towards technological solutions,' he said. 'This is an expression of peak modernity, a belief that technology will conquer death and will give us life everlasting. It's symptomatic of the kind of culture we inhabit now.' Kasket said: 'There's no question in my mind that some people create these kinds of phenomena and utilise them in ways that they find helpful. But what I'm concerned about is the way various services selling these kinds of things are pathologising grief. 'If we lose the ability to cope with grief, or convince ourselves that we're unable to deal with it, we are rendered truly psychologically brittle. It is not a pathology or a disease or a problem for technology to solve. Grief and loss are part of normal human experience.'
