Colorado returns to national spotlight over LGBTQ+ rights
The U.S. Supreme Court is taking up a challenge to a Colorado law banning conversion therapy for minors in the latest instance of the state's pro-LGBTQ+ measures facing national scrutiny.
The big picture: The high court on Monday agreed to hear a challenge to a 2019 law aimed at protecting young people.
The measure was signed into law by Democratic Gov. Jared Polis, the first openly gay man elected governor in the U.S.
Why it matters: The high court's eventual decision could deal a major setback to the LGBTQ+ community, which the executive branch has already targeted with an executive order blitz that undermines protections and quality of life for transgender people.
State of play: This case represents a broader legal movement that's using First Amendment rights to reduce government oversight, University of Colorado Law School associate professor Scott Skinner-Thompson tells us.
The intrigue: Skinner-Thompson, who has filed an amicus brief in support of Colorado's law, says "weaponizing" the First Amendment has been used to target laws supporting LGBTQ+ rights.
"From my perspective ... this law is not targeted at speech, it's targeted at conduct," Skinner-Thompson says.
Flashback: Colorado has played a key role in cases involving LGTBQ+ rights decided by the Supreme Court over the past several years.
Two years ago, the high court said businesses can refuse to serve same-sex couples if doing so violates religious beliefs after a Colorado web designer declined to make a website for LGBTQ+ couples.
SCOTUS sided with a Christian baker from Lakewood in 2018 over his refusal to make a cake for a same-sex couple due to his beliefs.
Catch up quick: In the latest case, the high court agreed to take up a challenge from Kaley Chiles, a Christian counselor at Deeper Stories Counseling in Colorado Springs.
Chiles alleges Colorado's restriction against licensed mental health professionals engaging in conversion therapy for minors violates her free speech rights.
Between the lines: Conversion therapy attempts to change a person's sexual orientation or gender identity.
LGBTQ+ advocates and major medical organizations have condemned the practice as harmful, discriminatory and ineffective.
Zoom in: Chiles' attorneys argued that clients seek her "Christian-based counseling" on questions about their sexuality that conflict with their faith, noting she works only with "voluntary clients."
Conservative group Alliance Defending Freedom, which has argued other high-profile cases, said in the petition: "Colorado disagrees with Chiles's beliefs on gender and sexuality."
Chiles' lawyers pointed to a 5-4 decision from 2018 when the U.S. Supreme Court justices ruled that California could not force anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers to provide information about abortion.
The other side: Casey Pick, director of law and policy at The Trevor Project, in a statement to Axios said the challenge "has nothing to do with free speech, and everything to do with pushing dangerous, debunked practices."
What's next: The court will hear the latest case in its term beginning in October, meaning a decision likely won't come until summer 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Families file suit challenging Arkansas law that requires Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Seven Arkansas families filed a lawsuit Wednesday challenging an upcoming state requirement that public school classrooms have posted copies of the Ten Commandments, saying the new law will violate their constitutional rights. The federal lawsuit challenges a measure Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed into law earlier this year, similar to a requirement enacted by Louisiana and one that Texas' governor has said he'll sign. The Arkansas law takes effect in August and requires the Ten Commandments to be prominently displayed in public school classrooms and libraries. 'Permanently posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom and library — rendering them unavoidable — unconstitutionally pressures students into religious observance, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture,' the lawsuit said. The suit was filed on behalf of the families by the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and the Freedom from Religion Foundation. The lawsuit names four school districts in northwest Arkansas — Fayetteville, Bentonville, Siloam Springs and Springdale — as defendants. A spokesperson for Fayetteville schools said the district would not comment on pending litigation, while the other three districts did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A spokesperson for Attorney General Tim Griffin said his office was reviewing the lawsuit and considering options. Attorneys for the families, who are Jewish, Unitarian Universalist or nonreligious, said they planned to ask the federal judge in Fayetteville for a preliminary injunction blocking the law's enforcement. The attorneys say the law violates longstanding Supreme Court precedent and the families' First Amendment rights. 'By imposing a Christian-centric translation of the Ten Commandments on our children for nearly every hour of every day of their public-school education, this law will infringe on our rights as parents and create an unwelcoming and religiously coercive school environment for our children," Samantha Stinson, one of the plaintiffs, said in a news release. Louisiana was the first state to enact such a requirement, and a federal judge blocked the measure before it was to take effect Jan 1. Proponents of Louisiana's law say that ruling only applies to the five school boards listed in the suit, but The Associated Press is unaware of any posters being displayed in schools as the litigation continues.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judge blocks Trump admin from deporting Mahmoud Khalil using Rubio power
A federal judge in New Jersey blocked the Trump administration from deporting pro-Palestinian Columbia University protest organizer Mahmoud Khalil on foreign policy grounds. U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil under a provision of federal law that allows the deportation of any foreign citizen whose 'presence or activities' in the U.S. is determined to 'have serious adverse foreign policy consequences' and is chilling Khalil's First Amendment free speech rights. In a 14-page order, Farbiarz said the rarely used statute Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked against the former Columbia graduate student is likely unconstitutional. He also ruled that the activist and legal U.S. resident who has been in immigration custody in Louisiana since March can't be detained further on that basis. The judge said it was unlikely the Trump administration could justify detaining Khalil via another rationale it tacked on after his arrest in Manhattan: that when he applied for a green card, he failed to disclose all his past employment and membership in certain organizations. Immigrants are almost never detained for those sorts of omissions, the judge noted, finding it likelier that Rubio's determination was the basis for Khalil's ongoing detention. However, the judge's ruling did not foreclose Khalil's continued detention on alternative grounds, emphasizing that he had only definitively rejected Rubio's determination and that his decision had 'no impact' on other aspects of the effort to deport Khalil. Farbiarz, a Biden appointee, put his ruling on hold until Friday morning to allow the Trump administration to appeal. A lawyer for Khalil, Baher Azmy, said in an email that he believes Farbiarz's order means Khalil should be released from custody by Friday morning unless an appellate court intervenes. "We are relieved that the Court determined that both his detention and his removal based on the ridiculous, overbroad Rubio determination would be unconstitutional,' Azmy said, 'and that he is suffering severe ongoing harms [from] the government's grotesque, vindictive retaliation for his constitutionally protected expression in support of Palestine.' The departments of Justice, State and Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment. While Khalil has remained detained, others who have been similarly swept up as part of the Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian academics have been released. In early May, a Vermont federal judge ordered the release of Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish Tufts University Ph.D. student. A few days later, a federal judge in Virginia ordered the release of a Georgetown researcher, Badar Khan Suri. Like Khalil, both Ozturk and Suri had been detained in March.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Southern Baptist public policy arm survives challenge to its conservative credentials
DALLAS (AP) — Southern Baptist representatives on Wednesday fended off two efforts to move the staunchly conservative body even more sharply to the right, giving a vote of confidence to its public-policy agency and defeating a proposed constitutional ban on churches with women pastors. The votes came just before the adjournment of the two-day annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation's largest Protestant denomination. Church 'messengers' voted 3,744-2,819 to retain their public policy agency, rejecting calls for its abolition from those who allege the entity is tainted by liberal affiliations on immigration issues and who want it to be even more conservative than it already is. The bid to enshrine a ban on churches with women pastors in the SBC constitution received a 3,421-2,191 vote, but that 61% majority fell short of the two-thirds support needed to initiate a constitutional ban. The measures reflect debate only on the degree of conservatism in the SBC. It comes just a day after messengers overwhelmingly endorsed a call to overturn the Supreme Court's Obergefell v. Hodges decision legalizing same-sex marriage, and any other court and legislative actions with similar results. And it comes in a denomination that officially opposes women pastors, and where the debate is over whether that applies to women in subordinate pastoral roles. The action affirming the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission amounted to a vote of confidence in the public advocacy voice of the nation's largest evangelical body, coming at a time when Christian conservatives have unprecedented influence in Washington. Willy Rice, senior pastor of Calvary Baptist Church in Clearwater, Florida, said he filed the motion to abolish the ERLC with the aim of making it heed member criticisms. Had the measure passed, he argued, it would have given the agency time to enact changes by next year's annual meeting, when its fate would have come up for a final vote. 'But make no mistake, this motion is a wake-up call,' he said. But Richard Land, a former longtime president of the commission, said it would be 'tragic' to silence Baptists' voice in Washington. 'We have more opportunity right now to influence public policy in our nation's capital than we have had in my lifetime,' Land said. 'We have a president who is more sympathetic. … We have more congressmen and senators who are sympathetic to what we as Southern Baptists are trying to do, and to turn back the barbarians at the gate in our culture.' President Donald Trump has created at least three religion-focused entities with a strong evangelical Christian influence, reflecting the overwhelming support he's received from that demographic. Brent Leatherwood, president of the ERLC, presented a slideshow in defense of the organization. It included a photo of him with House Speaker Mike Johnson, a fellow Southern Baptist. A day before the vote, an ERLC event championed a Tennessee ban on certain medical treatments for transgender minors that faces a Supreme Court challenge. Abolishing the organization 'means the public square would be abandoned by the SBC, losing a powerful voice for the truth of the Gospel and in effect, rewarding secular efforts to push religion out,' Leatherwood said. What does the ERLC do? While not a lobbying organization, the ERLC has advocated against abortion and transgender rights. It has promoted a strongly pro-Israel stance, a longtime evangelical priority. The commission has also provided ultrasound machines for organizations that seek to dissuade women from having abortions. Leatherwood credited the ERLC with advocating for the repeal of Roe v. Wade, which was realized in a 2022 Supreme Court decision ending the nationwide right to an abortion. That was followed by abortion bans in several states. Leatherwood also touted ERLC advocacy for a pending congressional move to defund Planned Parenthood. But some criticism focused on the ERLC's opposition to criminal penalties for women who seek abortions. 'Time after time, they've opposed righteous pro-life legislation that seeks equal justice for the unborn, arguing that those who choose abortion should face no legal consequences,' Ethan Jago, pastor of Five Bridges Church in Panama City, Florida, said in calling for the vote to abolish the commission. Rice contended that 'outside progressive advocacy organizations have financially supported' the commission. But Leatherwood said more than 98% of commission funding comes from the SBC, with the remaining coming Baptist state conventions and individuals. While the ERLC has been criticized for its advocacy on immigration reform, the commission says it has promoted only stances in keeping with official SBC resolutions calling for both the rule of law and respect for human dignity. Women in pastoral roles debated The proposal on women pastors was a rerun of recent years' meetings. A similar proposal received two-thirds of votes in 2023, but fell just short of the necessary supermajority in 2024. Wednesday's vote sought to restart the process. The denomination's official statement of belief, the Baptist Faith and Message, reserves the role of pastor to men. Southern Baptist churches are self-governing. But the convention can kick them out if deemed not in 'friendly cooperation,' based in part on how closely they adhere to the Baptist Faith and Message on issues such as women pastors. But there remain disagreements over whether the faith statement applies only to women as a senior pastor or similar role, or whether it applies to ministry assistants with the title of pastor. In recent years, the convention began purging churches that either had women as lead pastors or asserted that they could serve that role. That included one of its largest congregations, California's Saddleback Church. But when an SBC committee this year retained a South Carolina megachurch with a woman on its pastoral staff, some argued this proved the need for a constitutional amendment. The church later quit the denomination of its own accord. Other ERLC-related controversies Criticism has long dogged the ERLC. After Leatherwood last year commended former President Joe Biden — who is deeply unpopular among religious conservatives — for withdrawing his reelection bid, the then-chairman of the commission announced his firing. However, the commission retracted that announcement and the chairman resigned when it became clear that its board's executive committee hadn't agreed to that. Instead, the board gave Leatherwood a strong vote of confidence along with a warning against stirring unnecessary controversy. A previous commission president drew fire for his harsh criticisms of pro-Trump pastors in 2016. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
